[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] It has been almost 50 years since Thomas Kuhn, in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, posited that science does not progress by steady accumulation of knowledge, but rather by a system of competition among paradigms. They vie for supremacy through greater parsimony, explanatory power, and popularity among community of scientists (Kuhn, 1962). The current controversy concerning identity of (PrPs) (proteins devoid of nucleic acid) as infectious agents of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE) elucidates all issues involved in just such a debate. While modern biology high school and university textbooks cover many scientific controversies that have been resolved decades and even centuries ago, they fail to cover current scientific disputes. This article is intended to address such an omission by introducing prion controversy in biology classes in high schools and colleges. In 1982, biochemist and neurologist Stanley Prusiner proposed a hypothesis concerning infectious proteins. He identified them as abnormal prions, proteinaceous infectious particles capable of converting normal (naturally present proteins in mammals) into an abnormal form causing a fatal disease of central nervous system (CNS) in both animals and humans. Heretofore, it had been accepted that infections could be caused only by protozoans, fungi, bacteria, rickettsia, viruses, or viroids. Only nucleic acids, informational polymers, were known to be able to duplicate themselves, not proteins. For discovery of which Prusiner posited can cause TSE, he received a Nobel Prize in 1997. Were Prusiner's hypothesis correct, our understanding of organic world would be changed forever. However, Laura Manuelidis (2007), one of most dedicated scientists in this field and head of neuropathology at Yale School of Medicine, contends that prions thereby became canonized, although careful review of data revealed many discrepancies. Indeed, even Nobel Prize winners can err (Allchin, 2008), including Prusiner, and thus remain in realm of a hypothesis (Manuelidis, 2007). Despite overwhelming opposing data published in The Lancet, Science, Virology, The Journal of Virology, Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, Viral Immunology, Journal of NeuroVirology, Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, and many other scientificpublications, most, if not all, biology textbooks in U.S. present asthe primary cause of TSE. While there are scientists convinced of ability of abnormal to cause infections, there are other scientists who, based on their observations and experimental data, do not think that could become infectious. Manuelidis suggests that may simply be part of late stage of a disease, not part of cause (Mihailova, 2007), and PrP infectivity is questionable, and perhaps non-existent (Manuelidis, 2007). * Cannibalism & Rise of TSE Since students seem more engaged when instructors incorporate examples from popular culture into classroom discussions (Pryor, 2008), one might start a consideration of with mention of Kurt Vonnegut's science fiction novel, Cat's Cradle (1963), before introducing Deadly Feasts (1997), a shocking nonfiction case history of discovery and epidemiology of fatal disease TSE. Certainly, truth is stranger than fiction if one were to contrast Richard Rhodes' documented study and any of Vonnegut's science fiction novels. Cat's Cradle, concluding in an apocalyptic climax, concerns ability of a nucleant that can turn water into ice, just as an abnormal prion can allegedly turn its host into abnormal forms, resulting in this fatal brain pathology. Deadly Feasts begins with a description of a burial ceremony that women of Fore tribe used to practice in New Guinea, the last wild place on earth. Sixty or more native women with their babies and small children, family of a deceased woman, would gather to bury her in their stomachs rather than abandon her to rot in ground. …
Read full abstract