Abiraterone Research Articles

Survival outcome and prognostic factors in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with abiraterone acetate – real-world experience in Vietnam

Introduction and aim. In real life, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients (mCRPC) had more complex clinical presentation than patients in the COU-AA-302 trial. This study primarily aimed to describe the overall survival of chemotherapy-naive mCRPC treated with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP). Other relevant outcomes and baseline characteristics of these patients were also evaluated. Material and methods. This retrospective, observational study collected data from chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients treated with AAP in Vietnam. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate time to treatment failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS). The impact of baseline characteristics on OS was explored using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Results. Data from 65 eligible patients were analyzed. The rate of PSA response was 73.8%, median PSA PFS was 10.5 months (95% CI: 7.4–13.6), median TTF was 15 months (95% CI: 11.1–18.9), and median OS was 24.9 months (95% CI: 18.9–30.9). Shorter OS was significantly associated with a higher Gleason score (≥8), shorter time from ADT start to mCRPC (<12 months), visceral metastases, and <50% PSA decline (p<0.05). Conclusion. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone is well tolerated and effective for chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients in clinical practice. Moreover, Gleason score, visceral metastasis, time from ADT start to mCRPC, and PSA response are the independent indicators for predicting the OS of mCRPC patientsin both univariate and multivariate analyses.

Efficient Process Development of Abiraterone Acetate by Employing Design of Experiments.

This article describes an efficient process for the synthesis of abiraterone acetate by employing Quality by Design (QbD) principles and statistical design of experiments (DoE). It focuses on the identification of critical quality attributes (CQAs), the relationship between CQAs and material attributes (MAs), and critical process parameters (CPPs) for the synthesis of hydrazone, vinyl iodide intermediates, and final product. Risk assessment is employed to identify the probable critical factors involved in each chemical transformation. The design of experiments approach aided in controlling the formation of critical impurities in all three reactions, namely, deacylated impurity in the hydrazone intermediate, 17-methyl impurity in the vinyl iodide intermediate, and hydroxy and diene impurities in the final API. The process was developed such that we achieved 95, 85, and 82% selectivity and 99, 96, and 99% purity in hydrazone, vinyl iodide intermediate, and final API, respectively. This reflects improved throughput from 25 to 57% as a result of the subtle interplay of critical process parameters identified by DoE studies.

Adjustment for imbalances in baseline characteristics in the MAGNITUDE phase 3 study confirms the clinical benefit of niraparib in combination with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer

BackgroundMAGNITUDE (NCT03748641) demonstrated favourable outcomes with niraparib plus abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (+AAP) versus placebo+AAP in patients with BRCA1/2-altered metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Imbalances in prognostic variables were reported between arms, which impacts estimation of both the clinical benefit and cost‑effectiveness of niraparib+AAP for healthcare systems. A pre-specified multivariable analysis (MVA) demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) with niraparib+AAP. Here, we used an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) model to adjust for covariate imbalances and assess time-to-event outcomes. MethodsIPTW analysis of time-to-event outcomes was conducted using data from patients with BRCA1/2-altered mCRPC (N = 225) in MAGNITUDE. Patients received niraparib+AAP or placebo+AAP. OS, radiographic progression-free survival, time to symptomatic progression, time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy and time to prostate-specific antigen progression were assessed. Weighted Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for each endpoint, and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were obtained from a weighted Cox model. ResultsImprovements in survival outcomes were estimated for niraparib+AAP versus placebo+AAP: unadjusted median OS was 30.4 months versus 28.6 months, respectively (HR: 0.79; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.55, 1.12; p = 0.183). Following IPTW, median OS increased to 34.1 months with niraparib+AAP versus a decrease to 27.4 with placebo (HR: 0.65; 95 % CI: 0.46, 0.93; p = 0.017). Similar improvements were observed for other time-to-event endpoints. ConclusionsIPTW adjustment provided a more precise estimate of the clinical benefit of niraparib+AAP versus placebo+AAP in patients with BRCA1/2-altered mCRPC. Results were consistent with the pre-specified MVA, and further demonstrated the value of adjusting for baseline imbalances, particularly in smaller studies. Trial registrationNCT03748641 (MAGNITUDE)

EE29 Cost-Effectiveness of Niraparib Plus Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

EE29 Cost-Effectiveness of Niraparib Plus Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Clinical Outcomes and Risk Stratification in Patients With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated With New-Generation Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors

BackgroundOptimal drug selection for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) remains unclear. We therefore assessed the clinical outcomes of mHSPC treated with new-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARSIs) and identified risk factors associated with the prognosis of mHSPC. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 324 patients with mHSPC who were treated with ARSIs, including abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, and apalutamide, between January 2018 and December 2022. In addition to assessing the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and overall survival (OS) during ARSI treatment, we investigated several potential risk factors for a poor OS in patients with mHSPC. ResultsPatients with a ≥ 90% PSA reduction (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.58; P = .002) and those whose PSA declined to ≤ 0.2 ng/mL (HR: 0.22, 95% CI, 0.08-0.63; P = .005) showed significantly better OS than other patients. Gleason grade group 5 (GG5), presence of liver metastasis, and an LDH ≥ 250 U/L were identified as prognostic factors significantly associated with a poor OS, with HRs of 2.31 (95% CI, 1.02-5.20; P = .044), 7.87 (95% CI, 2.61-23.8; P < .001) and 3.21 (95% CI, 1.43-7.23; P = .005). ConclusionWe identified GG5, the presence of liver metastasis, and elevated LDH at the diagnosis as significant factors predicting the OS of mHSPC, but the choice of ARSIs did not affect the prognosis. The potential prognostic impact of these markers requires further investigation.

Independent association between prostate-specific antigen nadir and PSA progression-free survival in first-line abiraterone acetate treatment in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: a pilot study.

There is limited evidence regarding the correlation between prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics and clinical outcomes. Therefore, after regulating other covariates, we studied patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who received abiraterone acetate as the first-line treatment. In this study, we investigated whether time to PSA nadir was independently associated with PSA progression-free survival (PFS). As a retrospective cohort study, this study contained a total of 77 castration-resistant prostate cancer patients who received abiraterone acetate from October 2015 to April 2021 in a Chinese hospital. The dependent variable was PSA-PFS. The objective independent variable was time to PSA nadir (TTPN). Covariates involved in this study included age, duration of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), PSA level at baseline, time of 50% PSA decline, time of PSA decline to nadir, Gleason score, bone metastasis, previous treatment, PSA decline <50% in 3 months, PSA to nadir in 3 months, PSA decline <90%, PSA decline <0.2 ng/mL, and PSA flare. For the 77 subjects, their mean age was 72.70 ± 8.08 years. Fully calibrated linear regression findings indicated that PSA decline and kinetics were positively associated with PFS (months) after adjusting confounders (β = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.11-1.44). A non-linear relationship was not detected between PSA decline or PSA kinetics and progression-free survival. According to the data of this study, there was a correlation between early PSA changes and patients treated with abiraterone acetate.

Sequential ADT and abiraterone acetate plus prednisone versus combined ADT with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: A propensity score-matched study.

Sequential ADT and abiraterone acetate plus prednisone versus combined ADT with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: A propensity score-matched study.

CYCLONE 2: A phase 3 study of abemaciclib with abiraterone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

5001 Background: Oncogenic addiction to androgen receptor (AR) signaling drives mCRPC progression, highlighting the unmet need for novel treatment strategies to maximize AR-directed therapy. Preclinical evidence suggests a key role for CDK4/6 in sustained AR signaling, uncontrolled proliferation, and hormonal resistance in prostate cancer. Abemaciclib (ABEMA) is a potent CDK4/6 oral inhibitor that significantly augments the efficacy of endocrine therapy in hormonally driven (ER+) high-risk early-stage and metastatic breast cancer. ABEMA also showed single-agent activity in heavily pretreated mCRPC. Here, we report the primary results of CYCLONE 2, a Phase 3 study of ABEMA plus abiraterone (ABI) in pts with 1L mCRPC. Methods: CYCLONE 2 was a seamless Phase 2/3 adaptive trial with a dose-finding safety lead-in. Randomization to the ABEMA or placebo (PBO) plus ABI and predniso(lo)ne was stratified by prior docetaxel receipt for mHSPC, measurable disease, and radiographic progression at study entry. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) per RECIST v1.1 and PCWG3. The study was powered at ~90%, assuming a HR of 0.55 for rPFS, at a cumulative 2-sided alpha level of 0.05. Results: Between Nov 2018 and Jul 2022, 393 pts were randomized. Baseline characteristics were balanced across arms. Primary endpoint of rPFS was not met (HR 0.829; 95% CI, 0.619–1.111; p=0.2123), medians were 21.96 months for the ABEMA plus ABI group vs 20.28 months for the PBO plus ABI group. rPFS by blinded independent central review was consistent with investigator assessment (HR 0.842; 95% CI, 0.611–1.160). OS was a gated secondary endpoint and not inferentially tested (HR 0.927; 95% CI, 0.669–1.285; 38.9% maturity). Other secondary endpoints included time to PSA progression (HR 0.637; 95% CI, 0.474–0.856), time to symptomatic progression (HR 0.768; 95% CI, 0.522–1.131), and time to worst pain progression (HR 0.935; 95% CI 0.665–1.314). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) reported in the ABEMA plus ABI group were anemia (13.6% vs 4.3% in the PBO plus ABI group), neutropenia (12.6% vs 0.5%) and ALT increased (8.7% vs 6.5%). Discontinuations of all study treatments due to AEs were 13.1% vs 4.3% in ABEMA plus ABI vs PBO plus ABI groups, while discontinuations of ABEMA or PBO alone due to AEs were 5.8% vs 1.6%, respectively. Conclusions: In patients with mCRPC, adding abemaciclib to abiraterone did not significantly increase rPFS. While no OS detriment was observed, secondary endpoints were not meaningfully improved. Overall, the combination was well tolerated, and safety was consistent with the known profiles of the individual medicines. Clinical trial information: NCT03706365 Clinical trial information: NCT03706365 .

Comparison of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response in patients with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) treated with apalutamide (APA) vs abiraterone acetate (ABI): A real-world (RW) causal analysis.

Comparison of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response in patients with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) treated with apalutamide (APA) vs abiraterone acetate (ABI): A real-world (RW) causal analysis.

Overall survival from PANTHER: A multicenter trial of apalutamide, abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in Black and White patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

Overall survival from PANTHER: A multicenter trial of apalutamide, abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in Black and White patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

A systematic literature review and indirect treatment comparison of PARP inhibitors in combination with next-generation hormonal agents in BRCA-mutated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

e17029 Background: In the USA, several poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are approved in combination with next-generation hormonal agents (NHAs) for metastatic castration resistant-prostate cancer (mCRPC), including olaparib plus abiraterone acetate with prednisone/prednisolone (OLA+AA/P) and niraparib plus AA/P (NIRA+AA/P) for mCRPC with BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutations (BRCAm), and talazoparib plus enzalutamide (TALA+ENZ) for mCRPC with homologous recombination repair mutations, including BRCAm. All approvals were based on placebo (PBO)-controlled Phase III trials. To support clinical decision-making, we performed a systematic literature review and indirect treatment comparison (ITC) to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of regimens. Methods: Published clinical trials were identified by searching Embase, MEDLINE, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews database, conferences and registries up to September 2023. Studies reporting radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), and/or safety outcomes for mCRPC were included. The feasibility of performing anchored or unanchored ITCs using BRCAm subgroup data was assessed. Where feasible, Bayesian ITCs were performed using BRCAm subgroup hazard ratios (HRs) for investigator-assessed rPFS, blinded independent central review (BICR) rPFS, and OS. Safety ITCs were performed using overall study data and reported as risk differences (RD) for adverse events (AEs). Results: Thirty-nine studies were identified, of which three reported BRCAm-specific data, including PBO-controlled studies for OLA+AA/P, NIRA+AA/P, and TALA+ENZ. An anchored ITC was feasible for OLA+AA/P and NIRA+AA/P using PBO+AA/P as a common comparator. ITC results showed a significant improvement in rPFS and OS, and a numerical reduction in AE risk for OLA+AA/P vs NIRA+AA/P (Table). TALA+ENZ was excluded from the ITC as it was not possible to form a network with OLA+AA/P or NIRA+AA/P due to differences in NHA use (ENZ vs AA/P) in PBO-control arms, whilst data limitations prevented unanchored ITCs. Conclusions: In BRCAm mCRPC, ITC results suggest that OLA+AA/P has improved efficacy and a favorable safety profile vs NIRA+AA/P. Current evidence does not allow for a robust comparison of OLA+AA/P or NIRA+AA/P with TALA+ENZ in BRCAm mCRPC. [Table: see text]

Efficacy of Enzalutamide Rechallenge for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

There have been several reports on rechallenge with docetaxel, cabazitaxel, abiraterone acetate, or ethinylestradiol for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, the efficacy of enzalutamide rechallenge for mCRPC has not been evaluated. We retrospectively reviewed 63 consecutive patients who received enzalutamide for mCRPC at our institution between 2014 and 2022. Eight of these patients underwent rechallenge with enzalutamide after disease progression on prior enzalutamide and other therapy and were the focus of this study. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (PSA decrease >50%), PSA progression-free survival, treatment duration, overall survival (OS) after CRPC, and treatment-related adverse events were evaluated. PSA decline to enzalutamide rechallenge was observed in 6 patients (75%), of which 2 patients had a PSA response. The median treatment duration was 4 months (range 1-12) and median PSA progression-free survival was 3 months (range 1-7). Median OS after CRPC was 41 months. OS after CRPC was not increased in patients with a PSA response. No toxicities were worse than grade ≥3. Enzalutamide rechallenge achieved a PSA response in a quarter of our patients with mCRPC after disease progression on prior enzalutamide. However, no improvement of OS was identified in these patients.

Pembrolizumab plus Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone in Patients with Chemotherapy-naïve Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Results from KEYNOTE-365 Cohort D

Background and objectiveAbiraterone acetate (abiraterone) plus prednisone is approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus abiraterone in mCRPC. MethodsIn cohort D of the phase 1b/2 KEYNOTE-365 study (NCT02861573), patients were chemotherapy-naïve, had disease progression ≤6 mo before screening, and had either not received prior next-generation hormonal agents for mCRPC or had received prior enzalutamide for mCRPC and had disease progression or became intolerant to enzalutamide. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 wk plus abiraterone 1000 mg orally once daily and prednisone 5 mg orally twice daily. The primary endpoints were safety, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate, and objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) according to Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3–modified RECIST v1.1 by BICR and overall survival (OS). Key findings and limitationsFor the 103 patients who were treated, median follow-up was 28 mo (interquartile range 26–31). The confirmed PSA response rate was 56% (58/103 patients). The ORR for patients with RECIST v1.1–measurable disease was 16% (6/37 patients). Median rPFS was 15 mo (95% confidence interval 9.2–22) and median OS was 30 mo (95% confidence interval 23–not reached); the estimated 24-mo OS rate was 58%. In total, 91% of patients experienced treatment-related adverse events, and 39% experienced grade 3–5 events. Grade 3/4 elevation of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) was observed in 12% and 6.8% of patients, respectively. One patient died due to treatment-related myasthenic syndrome. Study limitations include the single-arm design. ConclusionsPembrolizumab plus abiraterone and prednisone demonstrated antitumor activity and acceptable safety in patients with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC. Higher incidence of grade 3/4 elevated ALT/AST occurred than was reported for the individual agents. Patient summaryFor patients with metastatic castratation-resistant prostate cancer, the drug combination of pembrolizumab plus abiraterone and prednisone showed antitumor activity and acceptable safety.

Long-Term Pharmacokinetic Follow-Up of Abiraterone Acetate in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

This ABIGENE pharmacokinetic (PK) study sought mainly to characterize the unchanged drug PK during long-term abiraterone acetate (AA) administration in advanced prostate cancer patients (81 patients). It was observed that individual AA concentrations remained constant over treatment time, with no noticeable changes during repeated long-term drug administration for up to 120 days. There was no correlation between AA concentrations and survival outcomes. However, a significant association between higher AA concentrations and better clinical benefit was observed (p = 0.041). The safety data did not correlate with the AA PK data. A significant positive correlation (r = 0.40, p < 0.001) was observed between mean AA concentration and patient age: the older the patient, the higher the AA concentration. Patient age was found to impact steady-state AA concentration: the older the patient, the higher the mean AA concentration. Altogether, these data may help to guide future research and clinical trials in order to maximize the benefits of AA metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.

Impact of Comorbidities and Drug Interactions in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Receiving Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors.

Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) are widely prescribed in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Real-world frequencies and potential impacts of comorbidities and concomitant medication (conmed) interactions with ARPIs are not well described. Patients receiving ARPIs for mCRPC were identified from the electronic Prostate Cancer Australian Database (ePAD). Demographics, clinicopathologic characteristics, and outcome data were extracted. Conmeds and comorbidities were collected from medical records. Potential interacting comorbidities were defined from trial and post-trial data. Clinically significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) were identified using UpToDate Lexicomp and Stockley's databases. Patient characteristics, comorbidity interactions, DDIs, and outcomes were analyzed. Two hundred thirty-five patients received first- or second-line ARPIs for mCRPC from 2012 to 2021, with a median follow-up of 27 months. One hundred sixteen received abiraterone acetate (AAP) and 135 received enzalutamide (ENZ). The median age was 74 years, and the median number of conmeds was 4. Clinically significant DDIs occurred in 55 (47%) AAP patients and 90 (67%) ENZ patients. Only 5% of DDIs were predicted to affect ARPI pharmacokinetics (PK) or pharmacodynamics, whereas 95% were predicted to impact conmed PK or increase toxicity risk. In patients receiving ENZ, DDIs were associated with lower PSA50 (50% v 74%, P = .04) and poorer overall survival (28 v 45 months, P = .04), although statistical significance was not maintained on multivariate analysis. No significant survival differences were seen with DDIs in patients receiving AAP. Potential interactions between comorbidities and ARPI were present in 72% on AAP and 14% on ENZ with no significant associated survival differences. DDIs and drug-comorbidity interactions in real-world patients receiving ARPIs for mCRPC are common and may affect outcomes. Ongoing clinician education regarding DDIs is necessary to optimize patient outcomes.

Plasma microRNA Signature as Companion Diagnostic for Abiraterone Acetate Treatment in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Study.

Abiraterone acetate (AA) serves as a medication for managing persistent testosterone production in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, its efficacy varies among individuals; thus, the identification of biomarkers to predict and follow treatment response is required. In this pilot study, we explored the potential of circulating microRNAs (c-miRNAs) to stratify patients based on their responsiveness to AA. We conducted an analysis of plasma samples obtained from a cohort of 33 mCRPC patients before and after three, six, and nine months of AA treatment. Using miRNA RT-qPCR panels for candidate discovery and TaqMan RT-qPCR for validation, we identified promising miRNA signatures. Our investigation indicated that a signature based on miR-103a-3p and miR-378a-5p effectively discriminates between non-responder and responder patients, while also following the drug's efficacy over time. Additionally, through in silico analysis, we identified target genes and transcription factors of the two miRNAs, including PTEN and HOXB13, which are known to play roles in AA resistance in mCRPC. In summary, our study highlights two c-miRNAs as potential companion diagnostics of AA in mCRPC patients, offering novel insights for informed decision-making in the treatment of mCRPC.

Impact of a pharmacist-led oral chemotherapy monitoring clinic at the South Texas Veterans Health Care System.

As cancer treatments shift from traditional intravenous chemotherapy to inclusion of oral oncolytics, there is a critical need for structured oral chemotherapy monitoring and follow-up programs. To provide continuous care and minimize clinical gaps to Veterans receiving oral chemotherapy, the hematology/oncology clinical pharmacy practitioners designed and initiated a pilot, pharmacist-driven, Oral Chemotherapy Monitoring Clinic at the South Texas Veterans Health Care System supported by an oral chemotherapy certified pharmacy technician. A retrospective evaluation of patients receiving oral chemotherapy at the South Texas Veterans Health Care System was performed before (Phase I) and after (Phase II) pilot implementation to assess the impact of an Oral Chemotherapy Monitoring Clinic on compliance with drug-specific lab and symptom monitoring. Complete monitoring was defined as 100% of recommended labs and symptoms assessed per cycle, partial monitoring was <100%, but >0%, and incomplete monitoring was defined as 0%. The primary outcome assessed the proportion of patients receiving complete monitoring in Phase II compared to Phase I. Most patients were male (94%), with a median age of 72 years. The most common oncolytic was abiraterone acetate. Overall, drug-specific baseline and follow-up laboratory and symptom monitoring was complete at a statistically significantly higher rate in Phase II compared with Phase I (p-value < 0.01). A significantly higher portion of patients in the Phase II cohort had a clinical pharmacy practitioner intervention (44% vs. 90%; p < 0.01). Monitoring for Veterans receiving oral chemotherapy was optimized with clinical pharmacy practitioner and certified pharmacy technician involvement while simultaneously alleviating Oncologist and nurse oral chemotherapy workload.

Prognostic outcomes in Japanese patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: Comparative assessments between conventional androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and ADT with novel androgen receptor signal inhibitor.

The objective of this study was to compare the prognostic outcomes between metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) patients receiving conventional androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and those receiving ADT plus a novel androgen-receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) in routine clinical practice in Japan. This was conducted as a retrospective multicenter study including 581 mCSPC patients, consisting of 305 receiving ADT alone or in combination with bicalutamide (group 1) and 276 receiving ADT plus one of the following ARSIs: abiraterone acetate, apalutamide, or enzalutamide (group 2). Prognostic outcomes between these 2 groups were comprehensively compared. In the entire cohort, prostate-specific antigen-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) in group 2 was significantly longer than that in group 1, while no significant difference was noted in overall survival (OS) between the two groups. In patients corresponding to the LATITUDE high-risk group, however, both PSA-PFS and OS in group 2 were significantly longer than those in group 1. Of several factors examined, the following were identified as independent predictors of poor PSA-PFS in the entire cohort as well as the LATITUDE high-risk group: high C-reactive protein, high lactate dehydrogenase, high alkaline phosphatase, high Gleason score, and group 1. Furthermore, it was possible to precisely classify both the entire cohort and LATITUDE high-risk group into 3 risk groups regarding PSA-PFS according to the positive numbers of independent factors: positive for ≤1 factor, favorable; 2 factors, intermediate; and ≥3 factors, poor. Combined use of ARSIs with ADT could improve the prognostic outcomes of mCSPC patients, particularly those in the LATITUDE high-risk group, in real-world clinical practice in Japan.

Comparative effectiveness of first-line systemic treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

No head-to-head trials had been performed to estimate the relative effectiveness of poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) and androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSi) in the first-line treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We aimed to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of various systemic treatment agents for patients with mCRPC. A comprehensive literature search was conducted for abstracts and full-text articles from the database's inception through April 27, 2023. The study concentrated on assessing radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) for both overall and homologous recombination repair mutation (HRRm) population, with overall survival (OS) as the secondary measure. Under the Bayesian framework, the overall effect was pooled using the fixed-effects model in base case analysis. Scenario analysis using restricted mean survival time (RMST) methods was performed to test the robustness of the results. Nine studies with 6,830 patients and 8 unique treatment options were included. Network meta-analysis demonstrated that talazoparib in combination with enzalutamide (TALA + ENZA; overall population, hazard ratio [HR], 0.20; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.16-0.26; RMST, 3.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.46-4.60; HRRm population, HR, 0.15; 95% CrI: 0.09-0.23; RMST, 4.14; 95% CI 2.84-5.39) was superior to other treatments in the first-line setting in terms of rPFS. The results of Bayesian framework and RMST models showed consistent efficacy ranks. When extrapolated to overall survival benefit, within the Bayesian framework, olaparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone (OLAP + AAP) achieved the highest OS benefit for the overall population, which was not statistically significant when compared to TALA + ENZA. However, TALA + ENZA achieved the highest OS benefit at 3years by applying RMST. We suggest that talazoparib in combination with enzalutamide is probably a preferred treatment agent for the overall population and HRRm patients with mCRPC. Given the limitations of network framework and the modeling assumptions undertaken to finalize the analyses, results should be cautiously interpreted.

Exploring optimal drug targets through subtractive proteomics analysis and pangenomic insights for tailored drug design in tuberculosis

Tuberculosis (TB), caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, ranks among the top causes of global human mortality, as reported by the World Health Organization’s 2022 TB report. The prevalence of M. tuberculosis strains that are multiple and extensive-drug resistant represents a significant barrier to TB eradication. Fortunately, having many completely sequenced M. tuberculosis genomes available has made it possible to investigate the species pangenome, conduct a pan-phylogenetic investigation, and find potential new drug targets. The 442 complete genome dataset was used to estimate the pangenome of M. tuberculosis. This study involved phylogenomic classification and in-depth analyses. Sequential filters were applied to the conserved core genome containing 2754 proteins. These filters assessed non-human homology, virulence, essentiality, physiochemical properties, and pathway analysis. Through these intensive filtering approaches, promising broad-spectrum therapeutic targets were identified. These targets were docked with FDA-approved compounds readily available on the ZINC database. Selected highly ranked ligands with inhibitory potential include dihydroergotamine and abiraterone acetate. The effectiveness of the ligands has been supported by molecular dynamics simulation of the ligand–protein complexes, instilling optimism that the identified lead compounds may serve as a robust basis for the development of safe and efficient drugs for TB treatment, subject to further lead optimization and subsequent experimental validation.