Abdominal Trauma Index Research Articles

Penetrating Colon Injuries

Eighty-five patients with penetrating colon injuries, treated either by exteriorized repair (39) or loop colostomy (46), were analyzed. Missile wounds accounted for 75.3% of the injuries. The Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (PATI) was the scoring method employed to assess quantitatively the severity of injuries in each patient. Of 21 patients with right colon injuries, eight were treated by exteriorized repair and the remainder by loop colostomy. PATI and other variables were comparable in both groups. Suture line leaks occurred in two patients (25%) with exteriorized repair. The morbidity was similar in both groups. In left colon trauma, exteriorized repair was employed in 31 patients and 33 underwent loop colostomy. The injury severity indices, clinical status, and time lapse to laparotomy were similar in both groups. Colostomy was avoided in 67.7% (21 of 31) patients with exteriorized repair. The incidence of abscesses was significantly higher in the colostomy group compared to the group treated by exteriorized repair (24.2% and 6.4%, respectively; p less than 0.05). The length of hospital stay was shorter after exteriorized repair (17.2 days vs. 23.2 days; p less than 0.05). All three mortalities (3.5%) were related to associated injuries. We conclude that exteriorized repair is a safe and superior alternative to loop colostomy in penetrating colon trauma.

Penetrating cardiac trauma. Quantifying the severity of anatomic and physiologic injury.

A method of quantifying the anatomic extent of injury to the heart, Penetrating Cardiac Trauma Index, (PCTI) and other thoracic organs has been proposed. The total extent of thoracic injury, Penetrating Thoracic Trauma Index (PTTI), was measured. When associated abdominal injury was present, it was assessed by the Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (PATI) of Moore et al. The severity of total injury sustained by the patient, represented by the Penetrating Trauma Index (PTI), was determined by the sum total of these scores. The extent of physiologic abnormality induced by cardiac penetration, (Physiologic Index or PI), was graded on a scale of increasing severity from 5-20 based on the vital signs of patients on admission. Analysis of 112 patients with penetrating cardiac injuries (1973-1983) revealed that the indices, PCTI and PI, showed an excellent correlation with survival (R2 = 0.827 and 0.928, respectively) as did the total extent of trauma (PTI). A composite prognostic score of the sum of PI and PTI demonstrated a significant separation of survivors from nonsurvivors (p less than 0.001). It is concluded that these anatomic (PCTI and PTI) and physiologic (PI) indices are valid and, with additional confirmation, may provide an objective method of evaluating penetrating cardiac injuries.

Penetrating duodenal injuries. Analysis of 100 consecutive cases.

One hundred consecutive patients with penetrating duodenal injuries were reviewed retrospectively to analyze the results of various methods of treatment. The severity of the abdominal injury was quantified by the Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (PATI). The overall mortality was 25%. Sixteen per cent of the deaths were related to extensive associated organ injury, eight per cent to sepsis, and one per cent to concurrent head trauma. Duodenal fistulas occurred in four per cent and were associated with mortality in two per cent. The complications of duodenal fistula, abdominal sepsis, and mortality from sepsis were significantly higher in those patients treated by repair and decompressive enterostomy with or without a serosal patch than in those with repair or resection. The severity of duodenal and associated organ injuries, as well as the clinical status, were similar in both groups. It is concluded that the majority of duodenal injuries from penetrating trauma may be treated effectively by primary repair, and that the use of decompressive enterostomy or serosal patch appears to contribute to an increased morbidity rate.

Aggressive definitive management of penetrating colon injuries: 136 cases with 3.7 per cent mortality.

One hundred thirty six patients with penetrating colon injuries (gunshot wounds, 95; stab wounds, 41) were retrospectively analyzed. A scoring system, the Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (P.A.T.I.), was employed to quantitatively assess the severity of injuries in each patient. Of 67 patients with right colon injuries, 48 (72%) were treated definitively by primary repair (32) and by resection and ileocolic anastomosis (16), with minimal morbidity. In 69 patients with left colon injuries, 47 (68%) were treated by colostomy (28) and by exteriorized repair (19). Overall, exteriorized repair was successful in 74% of patients. All five mortalities (3.7%) were related to associated injuries. It is concluded that the majority of the right colon injuries can be treated definitively. Exteriorized repair should be the preferred method whenever colostomy is considered, except in severe left colon injuries requiring resection.

Risk of infection following laparotomy for penetrating abdominal injury.

We analyzed the occurrence of putative risk factors for postoperative infection in 338 patients who underwent emergency laparotomy for penetrating abdominal injury. Mortality was 3%, with nine of ten deaths directly related to infectious complications. Gunshot wounds and colon injuries occurred more frequently in the patients who died than in survivors. Stepwise discriminant analysis revealed that transfusion requirement, length of operation, age, and the penetrating abdominal trauma index were the most significant risk factors for any infection. Other risk factors examined (shock, number of organs injured, mode of injury, and chest injury) did not contribute any additional information. Colon injury was more prevalent in patients with trauma-related infections than in those with nosocomial infections.

Preoperative antibiotics for abdominal gunshot wounds: A prospective, randomized study

In an effort to define the optimal preventive antibiotics for gunshot wounds to the abdomen, 100 consecutive patients were randomized while in the emergency department to receive either combination ampicillin, amikacin, and clindamycin, combination doxycycline and penicillin, or carbenicillin (Groups I, II, and III, respectively). Antibiotics were continued for 5 days in the presence of distal ileal or colonic injury. The study groups were comparable in age, sex, incidence of shock, degree of peritoneal contamination, and abdominal trauma index. The incidence of infection was not statistically different among the groups. Enterobacteriacea were the predominant offenders, although anaerobes were identified in all groups. The critical risk factor was distal ileal or colon injury. This study indicates that a regimen employing a single agent whose spectrum includes both aerobes and anaerobes is as effective as more expensive and potentially toxic multiagent regimens.

Factors influencing nutritional assessment in abdominal trauma patients.

Previous work has shown that an abdominal trauma index (ATI) based on anatomic severity of injury reliably predicts complications following abdominal trauma, whereas the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) does not. This study was undertaken to reconcile the disparity between the PNI and ATI as predictors of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Twenty-four patients undergoing immediate laparotomy following acute abdominal trauma were evaluated. Their mean age was 32.8 years (range 18-59 years); 18 were men. All patients underwent nutritional assessment within 12 hours of surgery. A statistical comparison of blood replacement, operating time, ATI, and PNI was performed. The mean PNI was 51 and mean blood replacement was 12.5 units. Using linear regression the PNI and amount of blood replacement correlated significantly (r = 0..44, p less than 0.05). Operating time and ATI did not correlate with PNI. In conclusion, the PNI was more strongly influenced by blood loss than severity of intraperitoneal injury. For this reason it is relatively ineffective in predicting complications following trauma.