Abdominal Surgery Group Research Articles

Does Prior Lower Abdominal Surgery Prevent Laparoscopic Hernia Repair (Totally Extraperitoneal or Transabdominal Preperitoneal)? A Prospective Observational Study.

Objective: Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) surgeries were considered contraindicated in patients who underwent lower abdominal surgery until recently. However, in recent surgeries, it has been reported that they can be performed safely in those cases. Our aim in this study is to investigate the effectiveness of laparoscopic hernia repair methods in patients who have and have not had lower abdominal surgery before. Patients and Method: This study was a prospective observational study between May 2018 and May 2023. Two hundred eighty-eight patients were included in the study. The operation was started with the TEP technique in all patients. Patients, classified in two groups who had not previously undergone abdominal surgery (n = 216) (Group I) and who had surgery (n = 72) (Group II). Demographic characteristics of patients, intraoperative and postoperative complications were determined. In addition to descriptive statistical methods (mean, standard deviation), Shapiro-Wilk normality test, independent t test, and chi-square test were used to evaluate the data. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the factors affecting the presence of Previous Surgery and Peritoneal Tear. Results were evaluated at the significance level of P < .05. Results: Two hundred fifty-nine patients were operated with TEP method. TEP method was converted to transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) in 9 patients from Group I and 20 patients from Group II. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Conclusion: With increasing experience in laparoscopic hernia surgery, it is now possible to perform hernia surgeries with preperitoneal (TEP) and abdominal approaches (TAPP) in patients who have previously undergone lower abdominal surgery.

Risk of neurodevelopmental impairment in Swedish preterm children treated for necrotizing enterocolitis: retrospective cohort study.

As the survival of preterm infants has increased, the management of long-term complications, especially neurodevelopmental impairment, becomes increasingly important. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in preterm babies receiving medical or surgical treatment for necrotizing enterocolitis, compared with other preterm babies and preterm babies who received abdominal surgery for other indications. In this nationwide Swedish cohort study, including all liveborn preterm babies born between 1998 and 2019, the risk of attention deficit (and hyperactivity) disorder, autism spectrum disorders, cerebral palsy and intellectual disability was assessed by multivariable Cox regression, expressed as hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (c.i.). Of the surgically (n = 384) and medically (n = 709) treated preterm infants with necrotizing enterocolitis, neurodevelopmental disorders were present in 32% (HR 2.24, 95% c.i. 1.86 to 2.69) and 22% respectively (HR 1.40, 95% c.i. 1.19 to 1.65), compared with 21% (HR 1.63, 95% c.i. 1.40 to 1.91) in the abdominal surgery group (n = 844) and 13% (reference) among other preterm infants (n = 78 972). The highest relative increases were for intellectual disability (HR 3.60, 95% c.i. 2.65 to 4.89) in the surgical necrotizing enterocolitis group and abdominal surgery group (HR 2.84, 95% c.i. 2.12 to 3.80) compared with the control preterm group, and for cerebral palsy (respectively HR 2.74, 95% c.i. 2.04 to 3.68 and HR 2.54, 95% c.i. 1.87 to 3.44). Medically treated necrotizing enterocolitis was associated with autism (HR 1.67, 95% c.i. 1.34 to 2.08), without significant increases for the other specific outcomes. Both surgically treated groups were also strongly associated with both attention deficit (and hyperactivity) disorder and autism. Surgically treated necrotizing enterocolitis, medically treated necrotizing enterocolitis and abdominal surgery for other indications in preterm infants were all associated with an increased risk of impaired neurodevelopmental outcomes, compared with other preterm infants.

Feasibility of a novel unassisted single-channel transcolonic endoscopic appendectomy for the treatment of appendiceal lesions (with video).

Transcolonic endoscopic appendectomy (TEA) is rapidly evolving and has been reported as a minimally invasive alternative to appendectomy. We aimed to characterize the feasibility and safety of a novel unassisted single-channel TEA. We retrospectively investigated 23 patients with appendicitis or appendiceal lesions who underwent TEA from February 2016 to December 2022. We collected clinicopathological characteristics, procedure‑related parameters, and follow‑up data and analyzed the impact of previous abdominal surgery and traction technique. The mean age was 56.0years. Of the 23 patients with appendiceal lesions, fourteen patients underwent TEA and nine underwent traction-assisted TEA (T-TEA). Eight patients (34.8%) had previous abdominal surgery. The En bloc resection rate was 95.7%. The mean procedure duration was 91.1 ± 45.5min, and the mean wound closure time was 29.4 ± 18.6min. The wounds after endoscopic appendectomy were closed with clips (21.7%) or a combination of clip closure and endoloop reinforcement (78.3%), and the median number of clips was 7 (range, 3-15). Three patients (13.0%) experienced major adverse events, including two delayed perforations (laparoscopic surgery) and one infection (salvage endoscopic suture). During a median follow-up of 23months, no residual or recurrent lesions were observed, and no recurrence of abdominal pain occurred. There were no significant differences between TEA and T-TEA groups and between patients with and without abdominal surgery groups in each factor. Unassisted single-channel TEA for patients with appendiceal lesions has favorable short- and long-term outcomes. TEA can safely and effectively treat appendiceal disease in appropriately selected cases.

Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block for Non-cardiac Thoracic and Upper Abdominal Surgery: A Single Institute Comparative Retrospective Case Series.

Introduction Erector spinae plane (ESP) block was first introduced for the management of thoracic pain but has become increasingly popular for the treatment of abdominal surgical pain. Previous studies have shown the ESP block can be easily adapted to abdominal procedures at the corresponding dermatome level and provide postoperative analgesia. Though the versatility, simplicity, and safety of the ESP block have been demonstrated, there is a gap in the literature regarding its comparison between thoracic and abdominal surgeries. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the ESP block in treating acute postoperative pain in patients undergoing thoracic and abdominal surgeries. Methods This retrospective study included 50 patients in the non-cardiac thoracic surgery group (bilateral breast mastectomy with reconstruction) and 50 patients in the abdominal surgery group (robotic or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy). Data was obtained via the acute pain service records at a tertiary care center from 2018 to 2022.All patients received bilateral ESP blocks, performed under ultrasound guidance. Various parameters were evaluated including oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores during post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), 6, 12, and 24 hours postop. The use of abortive antiemetic medications within 24 hours was also measured to evaluate the incidence of nausea and vomiting. The results were analyzed and compared. No control group is included, as all patients at our institution receive a peripheral nerve block as a part of the institution's enhanced recovery pathway (ERP). Results This retrospective study included 50 patients in the non-cardiac thoracic surgery group (bilateral breast mastectomy with reconstruction) and 50 patients in the abdominal surgery group (robotic or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy). Compared to the thoracic group, the abdominal group had a statistically higher VAS score in PACU with mean difference (MD)1.3 VAS, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03-2.56, p-value 0.0443, statistically higher OME consumption in the PACU (difference 13.35 OME, 95% CI 4.97-21.73, p-value 0.0003), and requiredsignificantly more antiemetic pharmacotherapy (mean 1.4 antiemeticsadministered, 95% CI 0.84-2.04, p-value <0.0001). Despite the abdominal group having more OME utilization in the PACU, there was no difference in cumulative OME use in the first 24hours (95% CI-9.745-24.10, p-value 0.4021). Conclusion In this study, we demonstrated that ESP blocks are an effective regional anesthesia technique to reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption. The ESP block can serve as a useful and safe alternative to either thoracic epidural or paravertebral blocktechniques in thoracic and upper abdominal surgeries for perioperative pain management.

Preliminary investigation of the effect of non-cardiac surgery on intraoperative islet and renal function: a single-center prospective cohort study.

The effect of different non-cardiac surgical methods on islet and renal function remains unclear. We conducted a preliminary investigation to determine whether different surgical methods affect islet function or cause further damage to renal function. In this prospective cohort study, the clinical data of 63 adult patients who underwent non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia were evaluated from February 2019 to January 2020. Patients were divided into the abdominal surgery group, the laparoscopic surgery group, and the breast cancer surgery group. The primary outcome was the difference between the effects of different surgical methods on renal function. Islet and renal function were not significantly different between the groups. The correlation analysis showed that hematocrit (HCT) and hemoglobin (HB) were negatively correlated with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (p < 0.05), MAP was positively correlated with C-peptide (p < 0.05), and HCT and Hb were positively correlated with serum creatinine (SCr) (p < 0.05). Fasting insulin (FINS) and C-peptide were negatively correlated with SCr (p < 0.05), and the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was positively correlated with SCr (p < 0.05). FINS, C-peptide, HOMA-IR, and the homeostatic model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-β) were positively correlated with cystatin C (Cys C) (p < 0.05). FINS, C-peptide, and HOMA-IR had positive effects on beta-2-microglobulin (β2-MG). FINS, C-peptide, and HOMA-IR were positively correlated with Cys C and β2-Mg. While FINS and C-peptide were negatively correlated with SCr, HOMA-IR was positively correlated with SCr.

SUCCOR morbidity: complications in minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the incidence of intra-operative and post-operative complications in open and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.MethodsData were collected...

Safe thoracoscopic repair of recurrent congenital diaphragmatic hernia after initial open abdominal repair.

The optimal surgical approach for recurrent congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) remains controversial. We compared the surgical outcomes of a thoracoscopic approach versus an open abdominal approach for recurrent CDH after initial abdominal open repair. The subjects of this comparative study were patients who underwent open abdominal or thoracoscopic surgery for recurrent CDH following an initial open abdominal repair. Among 166 patients with Bochdalek-type CDH, 15 underwent reoperation for recurrent CDH following an open abdominal repair. Seven patients underwent open abdominal surgery (group O) and eight underwent thoracoscopic surgery (group T). The operative duration was similar for the two groups, with less blood loss (17.2ml/kg vs. 1ml/kg, P = 0.001) and fewer intraoperative complications in the T group (n = 6 vs. n = 0 cases, P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the number of postoperative complications (n = 1 vs. n = 1, P = 1.0) or in the number of patients with a second CDH recurrence (n = 2 vs. n = 1, P = 0.569) between the two groups. Thoracoscopic surgery is preferable to the open surgical approach for recurrent CDH following an initial abdominal open repair.

Elective Recurrent Inguinal Hernia Repair: Value of an Abdominal Wall Surgery Unit

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to analyze the impact of an abdominal wall surgery unit on postoperative complications (within 90 days postoperatively), hernia recurrence and chronic postoperative inguinal pain after elective recurrent inguinal hernia repair.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of all adult patients who underwent elective recurrent inguinal hernia repair between January 2010 and October 2021. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the group of patients operated on in the abdominal wall surgery unit and the group of patients operated on by other units not specialized in abdominal wall surgery. A logistic regression model was performed for hernia recurrence.ResultsA total of 250 patients underwent elective surgery for recurrent inguinal hernia during the study period. The patients in the abdominal wall surgery group were younger (P ≤ 0.001) and had fewer comorbidities (P ≤ 0.001). There were no differences between the groups in terms of complications. The patients in the abdominal wall surgery group presented fewer recurrences (15% vs. 3%; P = 0.001). Surgery performed by the abdominal wall surgery unit was related to fewer recurrences in the multivariate analysis (HR = 0.123; 95% CI = 0.21–0.725; P = 0.021).ConclusionsSpecialization in abdominal wall surgery seems to have a positive impact in terms of recurrence in recurrent inguinal hernia repair. The influence of comorbidities or type of surgery (i.e., outpatient surgery) require further study.

The Effect of Upper Abdominal Surgery on Complication Profile in Ovarian Cancer.

Introduction: Due to the superficial peritoneal spread of ovarian cancer, upper abdominal surgical procedures are often required to achieve optimal surgical cytoreduction. This study compares the mortality and morbidity rates of patients undergoing upper and lower abdominal cytoreductive surgery in our institution. Material and Methods: Patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery for ovarian malignancies from 2014 to 2020 were retrospectively identified from an institutional database. Upper abdominal cytoreduction was defined anatomically as debulking of disease proximal to the ligament of Treitz. Perioperative and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: A total of 148 operations were performed. A single gynecologic oncologist performed all procedures. When all cytoreductive procedures were evaluated, diaphragm injury, blood transfusion, hospital stay, atelectasis, pneumonia, effusion, wound infection and need for intensive care were found to be statistically significantly higher in patients who underwent upper abdominal surgery compared to patients in the lower abdominal surgery group (p=0.001, p=0.017, p=0.002, p=0.045, p=0.006, p=0.005, respectively). Conclusion: In patients scheduled for cytoreductive surgery with the diagnosis of ovarian cancer, upper abdominal surgery is a viable procedure, although it carries a higher risk of complications compared to lower abdominal surgery alone. Upper abdominal surgery in advanced ovarian cancer can be applied to patients with an acceptable complication profile when the possible survival advantage is considered.

OC-018 Elective recurrent inguinal hernia repair. Value of an Abdominal Wall Surgery Unit

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study is to analyze the influence of an abdominal wall surgery unit in postoperative complications (within postoperative 90 days), hernia recurrence and chronic postoperative inguinal pain after elective recurrent inguinal hernia repair. Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent elective recurrent inguinal hernia repair between January 2010 and October 2021. The short- and long-term outcomes between the groups of patients operated on by the Abdominal Wall Surgery Unit and groups operated on by surgeons outside of the specialized abdominal wall group were compared. A logistic regression model was performed for hernia recurrence. Results A total of 250 patients underwent elective surgery for recurrent inguinal hernia during the study period. Patients in the abdominal wall surgery group were younger (P= &amp;lt;0.001) and had less comorbidities (P= &amp;lt;0.001). Complications were similar in both groups. Patients in the abdominal wall surgery group presented fewer recurrences (15% vs 3%; P= 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, surgery performed by the abdominal wall surgery unit was related to fewer recurrences (HR= 0.164; 95% CI= 0.44–0.613; P=0.007). Conclusions Recurrent inguinal hernia repair is associated with better results in terms of recurrence when it is performed by a specialized abdominal wall unit.

Safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic appendectomy in patients undergoing abdominal surgery

Abstract Background Although laparoscopic appendectomy is the criterion-standard treatment method for acute appendicitis, the decision on laparoscopic or conventional technique is usually made according to individual perspectives. The reasons affecting this individual point of view include whether the disease is complicated, the infrastructure of the hospital, the patient's comorbid factors, and previous intra-abdominal operations. This cross-sectional retrospective study aimed to evaluate the safety of laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with a possible diagnosis of “appendicitis” in patients who had undergone previous abdominal surgery. Methods Patients who were operated on with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in our clinic between March 2021 and March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were grouped as those with a history of abdominal surgery (group 1) and without (group 2). In addition, demographic data of the patients (age, sex), body mass index, presence of comorbid disease, history of abdominal surgery, operation time, rate of conversion to open surgery, postoperative hospital stay, complications, and radiological and pathological appendix size were recorded. Results A total of 181 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 32.51 ± 15.89 years. Seventy (38.7%) of the patients were female, and 111 (61.3%) were male. Thirty-four patients (18.8%) were in group 1, and 111 patients (81.2%) were in group 2. The mean age, body mass index, and operation time in group 1 were statistically higher than in group 2 (P &lt; 0.001). However, there was no difference between the groups regarding postoperative hospital stay, radiological and pathological appendix size, conversion to open surgery, and presence and severity of complications (P &gt; 0.05). Conclusion In line with the data the authors have shown in their study, a laparoscopic appendectomy can be performed safely in patients who have undergone abdominal surgery. Therefore, surgeons should not stray from a laparoscopic appendectomy when they see an abdominal incision.

Postoperative Discomfort Among Laparotomy Patients from a Selected Hospital at Mangaluru: An Observational Study

Abstract Background Factors causing postoperative discomfort after laparotomy are numerous and must be explored in depth. The postoperative distress may significantly affect the patient's state of well-being. Hence, the present study aims to assess the factors contributing to discomfort after laparotomy. Aim The aim was to assess and compare the discomfort between open and laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Objectives of the Study 1. To analyze the causes of patient's discomfort after abdominal surgery.2. To compare the discomfort between open and laparoscopic abdominal surgery.3. To determine the association between pain and selected variables among open and laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Materials and Methods An exploratory approach with a prospective observational design was adopted for this study. Using the purposive sampling technique, 100 patients were selected to open and 100 to laparoscopic abdominal surgery groups. Data were collected using demographic and clinical proforma and standardized postoperative discomfort inventory 6 and 24 hours after the surgery. The assessment focused on the study variables such as symptoms after the surgery and the factors contributing to the postoperative discomfort. Statistical Analysis The collected data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics using the SPSS software version 20. Results Among 200 participants, most of the open (68%) and laparoscopic abdominal surgeries (42%) belong to 25 to 35 years of age. Also, 54% and 13% were diabetic in open and laparoscopic abdominal surgery groups, respectively. Most samples (56% in open and 68% in laparoscopic surgery) stayed 5 and 10 hours in postoperative ICU. In open and laparoscopic abdominal surgeries, pain is the primary (100%) cause of postoperative discomfort after 6 hours of surgery. Movement restriction is also the reason for significant discomfort both in open (98%) and laparoscopic (100%) abdominal surgeries.In contrast, pain (99% and 100%), movement restriction (92% and 95%), and abdominal distention (61% and 34%) were the major problems contributing to the patient's discomfort after 24 hours of both open and laparoscopic surgeries too. There was a significant difference in causes of patient discomfort between open and laparoscopic abdominal surgery after 6 hours (P &lt; 0.05), except for discomfort related to IV drip (P = 0.852), constipation (P = 0.2), and chills (P = 0.6). Conclusion Even though pain is the major distressing factor both in open and laparoscopic surgeries, the current study highlights a few other factors that affect postoperative recovery. Nurses' attention to such distressing factors will fasten patients' recovery and quality of life after abdominal surgery.

Appropriateness of choice and duration of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis and the incidence of surgical site infections: A prospective study

ObjectivesSurgical site infections (SSIs) develop within 30–90 days postoperatively. Antibiotic prophylaxis helps reduce SSI incidence, with cefazolin being the most used agent. Current guidelines recommend against postoperative antibiotic administration or a very short course. This study evaluated the appropriateness of prophylactic antibiotics by surgery type, as well as duration and their impact on SSI incidence. MethodsThis was an observational prospective study of adults admitted between June and October 2019 for abdominal or orthopedic surgery who received prophylactic antibiotics. The primary endpoint was compliance of postoperative prophylactic antibiotic duration with the guidelines. Secondary endpoints included appropriateness of antibiotic choice and SSI rates. ResultsOf the 98 patients, 59, 23, and 16 had orthopedic, upper abdominal, and lower abdominal surgery, respectively. Median postoperative antibiotic durations were longer in the abdominal surgery group than in the orthopedic surgery group (7 vs. 5 days; P = 0.03). Hence, overall compliance with the guidelines in terms of postoperative antibiotic duration was 11.2% (13.6%, 13%, and 0% in each surgery group, respectively; P = 0.3). Conversely, antibiotic choice was highly compliant with the guidelines at 71.4% (72.9%, 65.2%, and 75% in each surgery group, respectively; P = 0.74). This was significantly associated with a lower risk of SSIs (odds ratio 0.24, 95% confidence 0.09–0.63). ConclusionWhile there was a lack of guidelines compliance in terms of duration, appropriateness of antibiotic choice was high and was associated with a lower likelihood for SSIs. Clinicians are encouraged to follow the guidelines to improve patients' quality of care by preventing SSIs and reducing the risk of antimicrobial resistance development.

Analysis of early relaparotomy in recipients of adult living donor liver transplantation

Background: While early relaparotomy following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an important event and its outcomes are still unclear, the aim of this retrospective study is to investigate the causes and outcomes of early relaparotomy in recipients of adult living donor liver transplantations. Materials and methods: Between April 2015 and April 2020 at Medipol University Medical Faculty Hospital Organ Transplantation Department, Istanbul, Turkey, 15 patients (9.3%) who underwent early relaparotomy were studied retrospectively. Results: Eight patients (53.3%) had a history of upper abdominal surgery in the early laparotomy group. The most common cause of early relaparotomy had postoperative bleeding in 9 patients (60%). The overall survival rate was 66.7%. Mortality was higher in the group over 60 years old and with a history of upper abdominal surgery. Conclusions: The history of upper abdominal surgery appears to be a risk factor for early relaparotomy. Also, previous upper abdominal surgery group and elderly patients group present with more mortality. We should be very careful in these groups.

Assessment of the effect of hemostatic materials on blood calcium concentration

Purpose of the study. Assessment of the effect of hemostatic materials on concentration of calcium of blood.Materials and methods. The following groups of local hemostatic materials were studied: collagen plate (No. 2), hemostatic sponge from medical gelatin (No. 3), oxidized cellulose material (No. 4), experimental samples of hemostatic sponge developed by the team of authors, based on the sodium salt of carboxymethylcellulose with various modifications (groups No. 5-8). In the control group (No. 1), only blood of volunteer donors was used, without introducing the test materials. Evaluation of the effect of hemostatic materials on blood calcium concentration was carried out according to the described method: «Method for comparative investigation of the effectiveness of local hemostatic agents in an in vitro experiment» Russian patent No. 2709 517. According to the results of the study, median, 25 and 75 percentiles were calculated. The validity of differences between groups was determined using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test (p&lt;0.05).Results. In groups using various materials, such as group No. 2 (Tachocomb) by 0.24 mmol/L and group № 4 (Surgicel Fibrillar) by 0.7 mmol/L, the serum calcium level was statistically significantly lower than the control group. Significant differences of calcium level values after blood immersion of volunteer donor samples based on cellulose derivatives were revealed, namely in group No. 5 (Na-CMC + Tranexamic acid pressed) value exceeds that in group No. 4 by 0.58 mmol/l. In other cases, comparisons of calcium concentration values in groups using experimental samples (not introduced into clinical practice) with material widely used in abdominal surgery (group No. 4) were found to be greater: in group No. 6 (Na-CMC + Tranexamic acid unsaturated) by 0.61 mmol/l, in group No. 7 (Na-CMC pressed) by 0.75 mmol/l, in group No. 8 (Na-CMC unsaturated) by 0.5 mmol/l.Conclusion. It should be noted that although there are no significant differences in the groups using experimental samples of local hemostatic agents and the control group, the calcium levels in groups No. 5-6 are close to those in the groups using widely known materials such as Tachocomb (No. 2) and Gelita-Spon Standart (No. 3). Also, among the samples developed by the authors, the greatest effectiveness was identified in group No. 8 (Na-CMC, unpressed), in which the serum calcium levels (2.14 mmol/L) are lower than in groups No. 5-7.

Comparison of analgesic requirements in robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic abdominal surgeries.

Background and Aims:Robot-assisted surgery is advantageous in the precision of tissue handling and shorter postoperative recovery. We compared postoperative analgesic requirements in laparoscopic versus robot-assisted surgery in the first 24 h as our primary objective. The secondary outcomes were extubation on table, time to ambulation, and length of ICU stay.Material and Methods:After approval from the ethics committee 48 patients undergoing either laparoscopic (group L [n = 24]) or robotic abdominal surgery (group R [n = 24]) were evaluated for analgesic requirements postoperative targeting a numerical rating scale ≤3 in a prospective comparative study. Postoperative patients were allotted to a three-tier pain management, level 1 comprising paracetamol 1 g intravenously every 8 h, level 2, 1.5 mg/kg tramadol every 8 h, and level 3 fentanyl 0.5 μg/kg. The total analgesic consumption in the first 24 h was calculated for each group. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test.Results:Age, weight, and types of surgery were comparable between the groups. The intraoperative opioid use was comparable between both groups but the duration of surgery was longer in group R. Postoperative analgesic requirements were significantly less in group R (P = 0.024) and the length of ICU stay was shorter (P < 0.05). The time to ambulation was significantly shorter in group R patients (P < 0.001).Conclusion:Analgesic requirements were significantly less in robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the first 24 h. The time to ambulation and length of ICU stay were shorter in the robot-assisted group in comparison to the laparoscopic group.

The Influence of Prior Abdominal Surgery on Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy.

We evaluated the influence of prior abdominal surgery on perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in initial Japanese series. We reviewed patients with small renal tumors who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy from October 2011 to September 2020 at our institution. Patients with prior abdominal surgery were compared with those without prior surgery based on perioperative outcomes. The chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical analyses of variables. Of 156 patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, 90 (58%) had no prior abdominal surgery, whereas 66 patients (42%) underwent prior abdominal surgery. No significant differences in perioperative outcomes were observed between with and without prior abdominal surgery groups. In transperitoneal approach robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, 31 patients (80.4%) had prior abdominal surgery. Trocar insertion time in the with prior abdominal surgery group took longer than the without prior abdominal surgery group (32 vs. 28.5 min, P = 0.031). No significant difference was observed in the conversion rate between the two groups (P = 0.556). Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy appears to be a safe approach for patients with prior abdominal surgery. In transperitoneal approach robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with prior abdominal surgery, trocar insertion time was longer, but no significant differences were found in other outcomes. Transperitoneal approach robot-assisted partial nephrectomy is thus considered a safe procedure for patients with prior abdominal surgery.

Effect of Carbon Nanoparticle Tracer Combined with Laparoscopy in the Treatment of Colon Cancer.

In this study, our aim was to compare the clinical effects of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for the treatment of colon cancer. From January 2018 to December 2018, a random sample of 398 colon cancer patients was collected. The open abdominal surgery group underwent open surgery, while the laparoscopic surgery group underwent laparoscopic surgery. The success rate of the two groups, total intraoperative blood loss, length of incision, postoperative bedtime, times of lymph node dissection, and incidence of postoperative complications were compared. Both groups were provided carbon nanotracers for staining. The intraoperative blood loss of the laparoscopic group was significantly lower than that of the open abdominal group (this difference was statistically significant, P < 0.01). However, the operation time and lymph node dissection were similar for the laparoscopic group and the open abdominal group (the difference was not statistically significant, P > 0.05). The gastrointestinal function recovery time, hospital stay, and lung infection rate of patients in the laparoscopic group were significantly lower than those of patients in the open abdominal group. Postoperative bleeding, anastomotic leakage, and wound infection were also observed, but differences between the groups were not statistically significant. The incidence of postoperative complications in the laparoscopic surgery group was lower than that in the open surgery group (statistically significantly, P < 0.05). Laparoscopic surgery in patients with colon cancer is effective and offers patients improved health, shortened recovery time, and better quality of life. Carbon nanotracers can be used to stain lymph nodes and to make distinguishing between diseased and normal tissue easier.

Safety and efficacy of transperitoneal laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery in patients with previous abdominal surgery.

The aim of this study is to assess the safety and feasibility of the transperitoneal laparoscopic approach during nephron sparing surgery in patients with previous abdominal surgery. We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal masses. All patients had received a diagnosis of cT1a renal exophytic mass (⩽5 cm). Patients were divided into two groups, those with and without previous abdominal surgery. Patients with solitary kidney or major previous abdominal surgery were excluded in this study. The operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, surgical complications, and positive surgical margins were recorded to compare outcomes among two groups. Of the 157 patients who were included in our study, 71 (45.3%) had a history of abdominal surgery (Group 1), while the remaining 86 (54.7%) had not (Group 2). Cholecystectomy was the most common previous surgery performed near the renal fossa. Patients with previous abdominal surgery experienced increased operative time (111.5 vs 83.2 min; p = 0.001). However, no statistically significant difference was found in estimated blood loss (122.1 vs 114.4 mL; p = 0.363), length of stay (4.1 vs 3.8 days; p = 0.465), rate of conversion to open surgery (2.8% vs 2.3%; p = 0.234), and rate of complications (p = 0.121). However, operative time (p = 0.003) and length of stay (p < 0.001) were greater in patients with versus those without previous open cholecystectomy. Our results suggest that laparoscopic partial nephrectomy after minor previous abdominal surgery is safe and feasible in selected patients affected by renal masses with low nephrometry score. However, previous cholecystectomy results in an increased risk of conversion to open surgery and longer hospital stay in patients undergoing right laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Mo1638 ENDOSCOPIC RESECTION FOLLOWED BY SURGERY IN T1 COLORECTAL CANCER WITH HIGH RISK HISTOLOGICAL FEATURES DOES NOT AFFECT CANCER-RELATED LONG-TERM OUTCOMES

We aimed to identify if endoscopic resection of T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) before surgical resection (secondary surgery) unfavorably affects cancer-related long-term outcomes compared to surgery without prior endoscopic resection (primary surgery). We included patients who underwent surgery for T1 CRC with at least one high-risk histological features (poor differentiation, deep submucosal invasion, lympho-vascular invasion, and/or positive/indeterminate resection margins) at our institution between 2011-2016. Medical records, histology reports and results of endoscopic and radiologic examinations were reviewed retrospectively. Radical abdominal surgery was performed in 852 patients (388 primary and 464 secondary surgeries). Surgical trans-anal excision was performed in 21 patients (9 primary and 12 secondary surgeries). During follow-up periods of 51.4±18.3 months, cancer recurrence occurred in 20 patients. Five-year survival rates did not differ between primary and secondary abdominal surgery groups (97.3% vs. 98.5%, p = 0.294). Analyses stratified by nodal stages and number of high-risk histological features did not show any difference in cumulative survival rates. However, patients with secondary abdominal surgery showed higher 5-year survival rates compared to secondary trans-anal surgery (98.6% vs. 90.9%, p < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, preoperative serum CEA level was an independent risk factor for cancer recurrence. Prior endoscopic resection was not an independent risk factor for cancer recurrence. Endoscopic resection of T1 CRC with high-risk histological features did not affect cancer-related long-term outcomes. Therefore, endoscopic resection of suspected T1 CRC can be performed without fear for worsening the oncological prognosis.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)