Abdominal Solid Organ Research Articles

Continuous erector spinae plane block: a simple, safe and effective technique for pain control in patients with rib fractures

Ribs are frequently affected after a blunt or penetrating thoracic trauma. Acute key complications associated with rib fractures include pain, hemo-pneumothorax, extrapleural hematoma, pulmonary contusion and laceration, and vascular injury. In high energy traumas, injuries to abdominal solid organs may also coexist. A later complication that can limit the weaning of patients from sedation and ventilation is neuropathic pain, which is frequently associated with rib fractures and that is often poorly responsive to oral and topical medications. The benefit of interventional nerve block procedures is still controversial. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a relatively new technique for thoracic analgesia that can be both a simpler and safer alternative to more complex and invasive neural blocking techniques, especially in intensive care unit patients whereas major contraindications (i.e. coagulation alteration, infection etc.) might limit the feasibility of more invasive methods, such as central blocks.

Predictive Factors Associated with Mortality and Disposition Following Abdominal Solid Organ Injuries

Treffalls, Rebecca; Luu, Jennie H MBS; Parikh, Raina; Treffalls, John A BS; Etlinger, John E MD, FACS Author Information

Liver Transplantation in Recipients With a Positive Crossmatch: A Retrospective Single-Center Match-Pair Analysis.

A positive crossmatch (XM+) is considered a contraindication to solid abdominal organ transplantation except liver transplantation (LT). Conflicting reports exist regarding the effects of XM+ on post-transplant outcomes. The goal of this retrospective single-center analysis is to evaluate the influence of XM+ on relevant outcome parameters such as survival, graft rejection, biliary and arterial complications. Forty-nine adult patients undergoing LT with a XM+ between 2002 and 2017 were included. XM+ LT recipients were matched 1:2 with crossmatch negative (XM-) LT recipients based on the balance of risk (BAR) score. Patient and graft survival were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test. Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes in XM+ and XM- groups were conducted. Patient and graft survival were similar in XM+ and XM- patients. Rejection episodes did not differ either. Recipients with a strong XM+ were more likely to develop a PCR+ CMV infection. A XM+ was not associated with a higher incidence of biliary or arterial complications. Donor age, cold ischemia time, PCR+ CMV infection and a rejection episode were associated with the occurrence of ischemic type biliary lesions. A XM+ has no effects on patient and graft survival or other relevant outcome parameters following LT.

Improving the Visualization of the Adrenal Veins Using Virtual Monoenergetic Images from Dual-Energy Computed Tomography before Adrenal Venous Sampling

(1) Background: This study explored the optimal energy level in advanced virtual monoenergetic images (VMI+) from dual-energy computed tomography angiography (DE-CTA) for adrenal veins visualization before adrenal venous sampling (AVS). (2) Methods: Thirty-nine patients were included in this prospective single-center study. The CT value, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured in both adrenal veins and abdominal solid organs and were then compared between VMI+ within the range of 40-80 kiloelectron volt (keV). The visualization rate of the adrenal veins and the overall image quality of solid organs were subjectively compared among different keV VMI+. The AVS success rate was recorded for 20 patients. (3) Results: For the adrenal veins, 40 keV VMI+ had the peak CT value, noise and CNR (p < 0.05). Subjectively, the visualization rate was the highest at 40 keV (100% for the right adrenal vein, and 97.4% for the left adrenal vein) (p < 0.05). For solid organs, the CT value, noise and CNR at 50 keV were lower than those at 40 keV (p < 0.05), but the SNR was similar between 40 keV and 50 keV. The overall subjective image quality of solid organs at 50 keV was the best (p < 0.05). The AVS success rate was 95%. (4) Conclusions: For VMI+, 40 keV was the preferential energy level to obtain a high visualization rate of the adrenal veins and a high success rate of AVS, while 50 keV was the favorable energy level for the depiction of abdominal organs.

Detection of post-traumatic abdominal pseudoaneurysms by CEUS and CT: A prospective comparative global study (the PseAn study)-study protocol.

The success of non-operative management in trauma increased with the availability of new-generation CT scan machines, endoscopy, and angiography, becoming the standard of care in hemodynamically stable trauma patients with abdominal solid organ injuries, with a success rate of 78% to 98%. Post-traumatic pseudoaneurysms (PAs) can develop at any region of an injured artery and they may cause delayed bleeding in splenic or hepatic trauma, with an incidence in patients treated with NOM of 2%-27% and 1.2%-6.1% respectively. Diagnosis is made by angiography, contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CT), or Doppler Ultrasound (US) while the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), has increased in recent years although few data are available about CEUS feasibility in the follow-up setting. The PseaAn study has been designed to assess the role of CEUS in the follow-up of abdominal trauma by defining its sensitivity, specificity and predictive values compared with abdominal CT scan. The PseAn study is a multi-centric international diagnostic cross-sectional study initiated by the Level I Trauma Center of the Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital in Milan, Italy. To study the role of CEUS in detecting post-traumatic splenic, hepatic, and renal PAs compared with the gold standard of CT with intravenous contrast at different follow-up time points, and whether it can replace CT scan in the follow-up of solid organ injuries, patients with OIS III and above will undergo a follow-up with both a CEUS and CT scan to detect post-traumatic parenchymal pseudoaneurysm within two to five days from injury. The use of CEUS in the follow-up of abdominal trauma follow-up (particularly blunt trauma) has increased, to minimise the use of ionizing radiation and contrast media and encouraging results have been published during the last decade showing that CEUS is an accurate technique for evaluating traumatic lesions of solid abdominal organs. Conclusions We think that CEUS, which is underused worldwide, is a useful and safe tool that may replace CT scan in follow-up with the major advantage of reduced radiation. Our current study may give stronger evidence to support this view.

The Effect of Language on Access to Timely COVID-19 Vaccination of Solid Abdominal Organ Transplant Recipients.

In dynamic healthcare environments including the COVID-19 pandemic, it is paramount to communicate health recommendations expediently and clearly. Research has shown social determinants of health affect the impact of COVID-19 on abdominal transplant recipients, but there has been less research on the effect of language proficiency. This is a cohort study of time to first COVID-19 vaccination among abdominal organ transplant recipients in an academic medical center in Boston, MA between 18 December 2020, and 15 February 2021. Cox proportional hazards analysis of time to vaccination by preferred language were adjusted for race, age group, insurance, and transplanted organ. Among 3001 patients, 53% were vaccinated during the study period. Language preference other than English was independently associated with delay to vaccination (0.64, p = 0.001), on adjusted analysis. In addition, Black, Hispanic and other race patients were less likely to be vaccinated than white patients (0.58, 0.67, 0.68 vs. reference, all p < 0.03). Language preference other than English is an independent barrier to solid abdominal organ transplant recipients' access to timely COVID-19 vaccination. Equity in care should be improved by providing targeted services to minority language speakers.

Impact of COVID-19 on abdominal organ transplantation: A bibliometric analysis.

Abdominal solid organ transplant (SOT) programs have been hit hard by the COVID-19 pandemic, which was officially declared as such on March 11, 2020. Over two years, the tightening and softening of limitations in response to the "waves" of infection and COVID-19 fluctuations have provided distinct issues for waitlisted patients, transplant recipients, and transplant organizations. We searched Scopus using the terms "transplant" and "transplantation," and organ-related phrases like "intestin*," "liver," "kidney," "hepatic," "renal," and "pancrea*," as well as COVID-19 terms such as "COVID-19," "coronavirus," and "SARS-CoV-2." We included articles, reviews, conference papers, letters, notes, editorials, brief surveys, book chapters, and errata and studied nations, institutions, authors, journals, keywords, and articles. VOSviewer 1.6.18 and Excel were used to create tables and figures. We included 1,251 of 1,256 studies. Among them, 289 (23.1%), 489 (39.1%), and 473 (37.8%) papers were published in 2020, 2021, and 2022, with mean (SD) citations of 30.3 (53.3), 14.3 (26.8), and 4.79 (6.38), respectively. Compared to other abdominal organs, the field of kidney transplants had the highest number of articles describing the impact of COVID-19. The United States contributed the most articles, and the American Journal of Transplantation published the most articles. To our knowledge, this is the first bibliometric investigation of the impact of COVID-19 on SOT. This report provides an overview of the research conducted on SOT and COVID-19. There is potential for this bibliometric analysis to serve as a beneficial and practical resource for ongoing and future research.

Analysis of Blunt Abdominal Solid Organ Injury in Children: A Single Centre Study

Aim: To determine the management of solid organ injuries in blunt trauma abdomen (BTA) in children whether to conserve or operate. Study design: Descriptive case series. Place and duration of study: Department of Paediatric Surgery Sahiwal Teaching Hospital and Sahiwal Medical College Sahiwal from 1st January 2020 to 31st March 2022. Methodology: Fifty eight patients with blunt abdominal trauma due to any cause, the medical records of all patients with trauma of any kind age upto 13 years were carefully reviewed. Initial resuscitation was done according to ATLS protocol. Ultimate management decision was based on stability of patients after resuscitation. Results: The mean age was 5.34 years. Most of the patients suffered from road traffic accident, 50(86.2%). Fifty two (89.65%) patients showed free fluid in the abdomen. Organ injury in 27(46.55%) patients. CT abdomen with intravenous contrast confirmed findings of ultra sonography. Despite resuscitation, 17(43.9%) patients remained unstable and were operated. Forty one patients were kept on conservative treatment. Hospital stay ranged from 1-19 days. Conclusion: Although non-operative management is the treatment of choice in blunt trauma abdomen with solid organ injury but stability of the injured child is the central pivot around which the whole management revolves. Delay in presentation and failure of timely resuscitation results into high operative intervention. Keywords: Blunt trauma, solid, Liver, Spleen, children

Is it time to re-think FAST? A systematic review and meta-analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) and conventional ultrasound for initial assessment of abdominal trauma

BackgroundThe Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) examination using conventional ultrasound has limited utility for detecting solid organ injury. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis compares the performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to conventional ultrasound when used as the initial assessment for abdominal trauma prior to computed tomography (CT) imaging.MethodsA systematic literature search of major databases was conducted of human studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of conventional ultrasound and CEUS occurring prior to CT imaging for abdominal trauma. The study followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. The quality of studies was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2) tool. Paired pooled sensitivity and specificity between conventional ultrasound and CEUS were compared using data extracted from the eligible studies. Diagnostic odds ratio, number needed to diagnose values, and likelihood ratios were also determined.ResultsTen studies were included. More than half of the included studies demonstrated low risk of bias. Using McNemar’s test to assess for paired binary observations, we found that CEUS had statistically higher sensitivity (0.933 vs. 0.559; two-tailed, P < 0.001) and specificity (0.995 vs. 0.979; two-tailed, P < 0.001) than conventional ultrasound in the setting of abdominal trauma, respectively. When divided into particular findings of clinical interest, CEUS had statistically higher sensitivity than conventional ultrasound in screening for active bleeding and injuries to all abdominal solid organs. CEUS also had superior diagnostic odds ratios, number needed to diagnose values, and likelihood ratios than conventional ultrasound.ConclusionThe diagnostic value of CEUS was higher than that of conventional ultrasound for differentiating traumatic abdominal injuries when used as the initial assessment in the emergency department.

Clinical Role of Interventional Radiology in Abdominal Solid Organ Trauma

Interventional management is commonly used for traumatic injuries to the abdominal solid organs. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) and the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) recently published guidelines for the management and treatment of liver, spleen, and kidney injuries, emphasizing the importance of interventions. Here, we discuss the characteristics of each organ and the procedure method for each organ that interventional radiologists need to know when treating trauma patients.

Recent advances in anaesthesia for abdominal solid organ transplantation.

Organ transplantation has undergone remarkable revolution in the last two decades and offers a scope for survival amongst patients with end-stage organ failure. Along with availability of advanced surgical equipment and haemodynamic monitors, minimally invasive surgical techniques have emerged as options for surgery both amongst the donors and recipients. Newer trends in haemodynamic monitoring and expertise in ultrasound guided fascial plane blocks have changed the management in both donors and recipients. The availability of factor concentrates and point-of-care tests for coagulation have allowed optimal and restrictive fluid management of patients. Newer immunosuppressive agents are useful in minimising rejection following transplantation. Concepts on enhanced recovery after surgery have allowed early extubation, feeding and shorter hospital stay. This review gives an overview of the recent progress in anaesthesia for organ transplantation.

Can whole blood viscosity predict the development of acute mesenteric arterial thrombosis?

Acute mesenteric ischemia is a serious condition with high mortality rate, resulting internal organ damage and intestinal necrosis due to sudden occlusion in the arteries feeding the abdominal solid organs and intestines. The most common causes of acute mesenteric artery ischemia are embolic processes and thrombosis that develops on the basis of primary mesenteric artery atherosclerosis. Whole blood viscosity (WBV) was defined by De Simon and could be calculated with a formula that consists of total plasma protein and hematocrit (HCT). In our study, we aimed to investigate the predictive value of WBV for acute mesenteric ischemia caused by primary mesenteric artery occlusion. Between January 2015 and February 2021, a total of 55 patients with a retrospective diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) and 50 healthy volunteers as a control group were included in the study. WBV was calculated with the De Simon for-mula using the HCT and plasma protein levels from the blood tests of healthy volunteers and patients at the time of admission with acute abdomen. No significant differences between the two groups in terms of baseline demographic characteristics except the preva-lence of age (72.1±12.4 vs. 65.7±6.4; p<0.001) and hypertension (40% vs. 23% p=0.002). AMI patients had significantly higher WBV values both at low shear rate (LSR) ([46.3±21.7 vs. 33.4±±13.1, p<0.001] and high shear rate [HSR] [16.5±11 vs. 15.8±0.7, p<0.001]). The univariate analysis identified several variables for predicting AMI including age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.066 confidence interval [CI]: 1.023-1.111, p=0.003), hypertension (OR: 3.612 CI: 1.564-8.343, p=0.003), WBV at HSR (OR: 2.074 CI: 1.193-3.278, p=0.002), and WBV at LSR (OR: 2.156 CI: 1.331-3.492, p=0.002). However, after multivariate analysis, only hypertension (OR: 3.537 CI: 1.298-9.639, p=0.014) and age (OR: 1.085 CI: 1.026-1.147, p=0.004) showed significance. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, a cut-off value of 43.5 WBV for LSR had a 72% sensitivity and a 70% specificity for prediction of mesenteric ischemia patients (area under curve [AUC]: 0.743, p<0.001) and a cut-off value of 16.29 WBV for HSR had a 78% sensitivity and 76% specificity for prediction of mesen-teric ischemia patients (AUC: 0.773, p<0.001). In our study, we determined that the WBV value obtained with the De Simon formula is a valuable parameter in predicting the development of acute mesenteric artery ischemia caused by primary mesenteric artery occlusion.

2107. Epidemiology and Outcomes Associated with Enterococcal Blood Stream Infection among Abdominal Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Abstract Background Bloodstream infections (BSIs) account for 18% of bacterial infections in the first year after solid organ transplantation (SOT). Enterococcus is an important cause of nosocomial BSI, accounting for up to 20% of BSIs in this population, with Vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) posing a particular risk. This study aims to characterize the epidemiology and outcomes of enterococcal BSIs in abdominal SOTs. Methods A retrospective, single-center, case-control study of adult abdominal organ transplant (kidney transplant (KT), liver transplant (LT), simultaneous liver-kidney transplant (SLK), pancreas transplant, or simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant) recipients between 01/01/2016 - 07/30/2021 was conducted at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Subjects were identified and reviewed using the Organ Transplant Tracking Record, their online medical record, and Vigilanz. Subjects with an enterococcal BSI within the first 6 months post-transplant were compared to those with non-enterococcal BSIs in the same period. Results We identified 26 subjects with enterococcal BSIs and 28 controls with non-enterococcal BSIs (n = 54; 10.2%). Cases were mostly LT recipients (n = 20; 77%) with a median MELD at transplant of 33 (range 14 - 43). Controls included 8 LT recipients (29%), 14 KT recipients (50%), and 6 SLK recipients (21.4%). Groups differed significantly (all p&amp;lt; 0.05) by factors including perioperative transfusion requirements, need for reoperation, and number of interventions post-transplant. Most cases (n = 16; 62%) and 11 controls (39%) had received antibiotics within the month prior to transplant. Cases had a median time of 25.5 days to infection and controls 100.5 days (p &amp;lt; 0.0001) (Figure 1). There were no differences in 1-year mortality (Figure 2) between the groups. E. faecium was the predominant species of Enterococcus (n = 23; 88.5%), with a majority (91.3%) of the isolates being VRE. The VRE rate was 80.8% among cases, 38.9% among all BSIs, and 4.0% among all transplants. Table 1:Demographic, Surgical, Hospitalization, and Antimicrobial Data. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of enterococcal BSI cases and non-enterococcal BSI controls are compared, along with transplant characteristics, transfusion requirements, surgical risk factors, hospitalization data, outcomes, and antibiotic exposures. Microbiological and resistance data are also presented. Enterococcal BSIs had lower odds of being a kidney transplant and having CKD or CKD on RRT; they had higher odds of being a liver transplant and having prior immunosuppression, steroid induction alone, reoperations, and macrolide exposure. Enterococcal BSIs had lower KDPIs, higher transfusion requirements, lower cold ischemia times, more procedures, and a shorter time to BSI (Chi-square and Fischer exact tests for categorical variables; Mann-Whitney tests for continuous variables). **Liver and simultaneous liver-kidney transplants; ***Kidney and simultaneous liver-kidney transplants; ****Reoperation within two weeks of primary closure; *****Biopsy proven acute antibody or cellular rejection within 6 months of transplant; ******ERCP stenting compared to IR stenting, among those with biliary complication. BSI – bloodstream infection; CKD – chronic kidney disease; HIV – human immunodeficiency virus; MELD – model of end stage liver disease; KDPI – kidney donor profile index; CMV – cytomegalovirus; pRBC – packed red blood cells; ERCP – endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; RRT – renal replacement therapy. Figure 1:Time to Bloodstream InfectionProbability of BSI-free survival illustrated, with enterococcal BSIs occurring significantly earlier than non-enterococcal BSIs post-transplantation (Kaplan-Meier survival analysis). BSI – bloodstream infection.Figure 2:MortalityProbability of survival, without significant difference between enterococcal and non-enterococcal BSIs. Data censored at one year of follow-up. BSI – bloodstream infection. Conclusion In our abdominal organ SOTs, enterococcal BSIs occurred early among LT recipients. The high incidence of VRE among E. faecium isolates in this population warrants further investigation into the optimal approach to empiric antimicrobials for bacteremia in the early post-transplant period. Disclosures Carolyn D. Alonso, MD, Cidara Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant.

Timing of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis initiation after injury: Findings from the consensus conference to implement optimal VTE prophylaxis in trauma.

Optimizing prophylaxis against venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) is a critical issue in the care of injured patients. Although these patients are at significant risk of developing VTE, they also present competing concerns related to exacerbation of bleeding from existing injuries. Especially after high-risk trauma, including injuries to the abdominal solid organs, brain, and spine, trauma providers must delineate the time period in which VTE prophylaxis successfully reduces VTE rates without encouraging bleeding. Although existing data are primarily retrospective in nature and further study is required, literature supports early VTE chemoprophylaxis initiation even for severely injured patients. Early initiation is most frequently defined as <48 hours from admission but varies from <24 hours to 72 hours and occasionally refers to time from initial trauma. Prior to chemical VTE prophylaxis initiation in patients at risk for bleeding, an observation period is necessary during which injuries must show themselves to be hemostatic, either clinically or radiographically. In the future, prospective examination of optimal timing of VTE prophylaxis is necessary. Further study of specific subsets of trauma patients will allow for development of effective VTE mitigation strategies based upon collective risks of VTE and hemorrhage progression.

The Predictive Role of Systemic Inflammatory Markers in the Development of Acute Kidney Failure and Mortality in Patients with Abdominal Trauma.

Background: Abdominal trauma is defined as a variety of injuries to the abdominal wall, solid or hollow intra-abdominal organs, and various intra-abdominal vessels. Recently, there has been a significant amount of interest in the establishment of a reliable biomarker that can predict the outcome in patients with an abdominal injury. The purpose of this study is to confirm the predictive role of inflammatory biomarkers and underlying risk factors and the risk of acute kidney insufficiency (AKI) developing and mortality in abdominal trauma patients; Materials and methods: The current study was intended as an observational, analytical, retrospective cohort study and included all patients over 18 years of age with a diagnosis of abdominal trauma confirmed through a CT scan admitted to the County Emergency Clinical Hospital of Targu-Mureș, Romania between January 2017, and December 2021; Results: Non-survivor patients had a greater age (p = 0.02), as well as a higher prevalence of ischemic heart disease (IHD) (p = 0.007), history of myocardial infarction (MI) (p = 0.002), peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (p = 0.01), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (p = 0.01), and all risk factors (p = 0.0004 and p < 0.0001). In terms of injured organs, we have in the second group a higher incidence of kidney injury (p = 0.003) and hemoperitoneum (p = 0.008). Multivariate analysis showed a high baseline value for all inflammatory biomarkers that are independent predictors of adverse outcomes for all recruited patients. Furthermore, for all hospitalized patients, the history of MI (p = 0.03; p = 0.001; and p = 0.003), PAD (p = 0.01; p = 0.01; and p = 0.002), obesity (for all p < 0.0001), CKD (p < 0.001; p = 0.01; and p = 0.001), and kidney injury (p = 0.02; p = 0.004; and p = 0.01) were independent predictors of all outcomes. Moreover, IHD (p = 0.008 and p = 0.02), tobacco (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.02), and hemoperitoneum (p = 0.009 and p = 0.01) were predictors of mortality and composite endpoint, but not for AKI risk, as well as atrial fibrillation [AF] (p = 0.04) as predictors of the composite endpoint Conclusions: Higher monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelets to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic inflammatory index (SII), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratios (NLR), aggregate inflammatory systemic index (AISI), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) levels at admission, according to our data, highly predict AKI risk and death.

Large Colonic Lipoma: An Unusual Presentation and Colonoscopic Resection

Lipomas are a very common benign neoplasm, the most common soft-tissue tumor, consisting of mature fat cells enclosed by a capsule. They are mostly superficial and located at the subcutaneous tissue of any part of the body [1]. However, they can be found at other sites, such as the central nervous system, abdominal solid organs and also in a subepithelial presentation in any part of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract [2-4].

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus outbreak in a pre- and post-cardiothoracic transplant population: Impact of discontinuing multidrug-resistant organism surveillance during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Many institutions suspended surveillance and contact precautions for multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) at the outset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic due to a lack of resources. Once our institution reinstated surveillance in September 2020, a vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) faecium outbreak was detected in the cardiothoracic transplant units, a population in which we had not previously detected outbreaks. An outbreak investigation was conducted using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for strain typing and electronic medical record review to determine the clinical characteristics of involved patients. The infection prevention (IP) team convened a multidisciplinary process improvement team comprised of IP, cardiothoracic transplant nursing and medical leadership, environmental services, and the microbiology laboratory. Between December 2020 and March 2021, the outbreak involved thirteen patients in the cardiothoracic transplant units, four index cases, and nine transmissions. Of the 13, seven (54%) were on the transplant service, including heart and lung transplant recipients, patients with ventricular assist devices, and a patient on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation. Four of 13 (31%) developed a clinical infection. Cardiothoracic surgery/transplant patients may have a similar risk for VRE-associated morbidity as abdominal solid organ transplant and stem cell transplant patients, highlighting the need for aggressive outbreak management when VRE transmission is detected. Our experience demonstrates an unintended consequence of discontinuing MDRO surveillance in this population and highlights a need for education, monitoring, and reinforcement of foundational infection prevention measures to ensure optimal outcomes.

Thromboprophylaxis Timing After Blunt Solid Organ Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IntroductionTrauma patients with blunt abdominal solid organ injuries are at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), but the optimal time to safely administer chemical thromboprophylaxis is controversial, especially for patients who are managed nonoperatively due to increased risk of hemorrhage. We sought to compare failure of nonoperative management (NOM) and VTE events based on timing of chemical thromboprophylaxis initiation. MethodsA systematic review was conducted in PubMed and Embase databases. Studies were included if they evaluated timing of initiation of chemical thromboprophylaxis in trauma patients who underwent NOM of blunt solid organ injuries. Outcomes included failure of NOM and incidence of VTE. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed comparing patients who received late (>48 h) versus early thromboprophylaxis initiation. ResultsTwelve retrospective cohort studies, comprising 21,909 patients, were included. Three studies, including 6375 patients, provided data on adjusted outcomes. Pooled adjusted analysis demonstrated no difference in failure of NOM in patients receiving late versus early thromboprophylaxis (odds ratio [OR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]:0.4-2.14). When including all unadjusted studies, even those at high risk of bias, there remained no difference in failure of NOM (OR 1.16, 95% CI:0.72-1.86). In the adjusted analysis for VTE events, which had 6259 patients between two studies, patients receiving late chemical thromboprophylaxis had a higher risk of VTE compared with those who received early thromboprophylaxis (OR 1.89, 95% CI:1.15-3.12). ConclusionsBased on current observational evidence, initiation of prophylaxis before 48 h is associated with lower VTE rates without higher risk of failure of NOM.

Abdominal Imaging Findings in Patients with COVID-19 Part 2: Solid Organs.

Since severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) first appeared in China in December 2019, the globe has been dealing with an ever-increasing incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In addition to respiratory disorders, 40% of patients present with gastrointestinal (GI) involvement. Abdominal pain is the most common indication for computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography. After GI tract involvement, solid visceral organ infarction is the most prevalent abdominal abnormality in COVID-19. This review aims to gather the available data in the literature about imaging features of solid abdominal organs in patients with COVID-19. Gallbladder wall thickening and distension, cholelithiasis, hyperdense biliary sludge, acalculous cholecystitis, periportal edema, heterogeneous liver enhancement, and liver hypodensity and infarction are among hepatobiliary imaging findings in CT, particularly in patients admitted to ICU. Pancreatic involvement can develop as a result of direct SARS-CoV2 invasion with signs of acute pancreatitis in abdominal CT, such as edema and inflammation of the pancreas. Infarction was the most prevalent renal and splenic involvement in patients with COVID-19 who underwent abdominal CT presenting with areas of parenchymal hypodensity. In conclusion, although solid abdominal organs are rarely affected by COVID-19, clinicians must be familiar with the manifestations since they are associated with the disease severity and poor outcome.

Pseudoaneurysm Screening after Pediatric High Grade Solid Organ Injury.

High grade solid organ injuries carry risk of complications, including pseudoaneurysms (PSA). The optimal approach to PSA screening among pediatric patients is unknown and may include delayed Computed Tomography Angiography (dCTA) and/or contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). This study endeavored to define dCTA/CEUS yield in PSA diagnosis after pediatric high grade solid organ injury. Patients <18y presenting to our ACS-verified Level 1 trauma center with ≥1 AAST grade ≥3 abdominal solid organ injury (kidney, liver, and spleen) were included (01/2017-10/2021). Transfers in, death <48h, and immediate nephrectomy/splenectomy were exclusions. PSA screening was pursued selectively based on attending discretion. Demographics, clinical/injury data, and outcomes were collected. Primary outcome was performance of dCTA or CEUS. Forty-two patients satisfied criteria, with median age 12.5y and ISS 22. Liver injuries were most frequent (48%), followed by spleen (33%) and kidney (19%). Initial management strategy was most commonly nonoperative (liver 60%, spleen 64%, kidney 75%). Overall, 26% underwent PSA screening at a median of hospital day 4, with dCTA (21%) or CEUS (5%). CEUS was only used among liver injuries (10%), with no PSA identified. One PSA was diagnosed on dCTA after splenic injury and was managed with observation. PSA screening occurs infrequently after pediatric high grade solid organ injury, potentially due to concerns about radiation exposure from dCTA which would be mitigated with CEUS. Further delineation of PSA incidence and yield of screening investigations are needed to avoid missing this important diagnosis and to determine the diagnostic accuracy of dCTA and CEUS.