Head Abbreviated Injury Scale Research Articles

Accuracy between prehospital and hospital diagnosis in helicopter emergency medical services and its consequences for trauma care.

For optimal prehospital trauma care, it is essential to adequately recognize potential life-threatening injuries in order to correctly triage patients and to initiate life-saving measures. The aim of the present study was to determine the accuracy of prehospital diagnoses suspected by helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS). This retrospective multicenter study included patients from the Swiss Trauma Registry with ISS ≥ 16 or AIS head ≥ 3 transported by Switzerland's largest HEMS and subsequently admitted to one of twelve Swiss trauma centers from 01/2020 to 12/2020. The primary outcome was the comparison of injuries suspected prehospital with the final diagnoses obtained at the hospital using the abbreviated injury scale (AIS) per body region. As secondary outcomes, prehospital interventions were compared to corresponding relevant diagnoses. Relevant head trauma was the most commonly injured body region and was identified in 96.3% (95% CI: 92.1%; 98.6%) of the cases prehospital. Relevant injuries to the chest, abdomen, and pelvis were also common but less often identified prehospital [62.7% (95% CI: 54.2%; 70.6%), 45.5% (95% CI: 30.4%; 61.2%), and 61.5% (95% CI: 44.6%; 76.6%)]. Overall, 7 of 95 (7.4%) patients with pneumothorax received a chest decompression and in 22 of 39 (56.4%) patients with an instable pelvic fracture a pelvic binder was applied prehospital. Approximately half of severe chest, abdominal, and pelvic diagnoses made in hospital went undetected in the challenging prehospital environment. This underlines the difficult circumstances faced by the rescue teams. Potentially life-saving interventions such as prehospital chest decompression and increased use of a pelvic binder were identified as potential improvements to prehospital care.

Does an early, balanced resuscitation strategy reduce the incidence of hypofibrinogenemia in hemorrhagic shock?

ObjectivesSome centers have recommended including concentrated fibrinogen replacement in massive transfusion protocols (MTPs). Given our center’s policy of aggressive early balanced resuscitation (1:1:1), beginning prehospital, we hypothesized that our rates...

Utilizing ultra-early continuous physiologic data to develop automated measures of clinical severity in a traumatic brain injury population

Determination of prognosis in the triage process after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is difficult to achieve. Current severity measures like the Trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) and revised trauma score (RTS) rely on additional information from the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the Injury Severity Score (ISS) which may be inaccurate or delayed, limiting their usefulness in the rapid triage setting. We hypothesized that machine learning based estimations of GCS and ISS obtained through modeling of continuous vital sign features could be used to rapidly derive an automated RTS and TRISS. We derived variables from electrocardiograms (ECG), photoplethysmography (PPG), and blood pressure using continuous data obtained in the first 15 min of admission to build machine learning models of GCS and ISS (ML-GCS and ML-ISS). We compared the TRISS and RTS using ML-ISS and ML-GCS and its value using the actual ISS and GCS in predicting in-hospital mortality. Models were tested in TBI with systemic injury (head abbreviated injury scale (AIS) ≥ 1), and isolated TBI (head AIS ≥ 1 and other AIS ≤ 1). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to evaluate model performance. A total of 21,077 cases (2009–2015) were in the training set. 6057 cases from 2016 to 2017 were used for testing, with 472 (7.8%) severe TBI (GCS 3–8), 223 (3.7%) moderate TBI (GCS 9–12), and 5913 (88.5%) mild TBI (GCS 13–15). In the TBI with systemic injury group, ML-TRISS had similar AUROC (0.963) to TRISS (0.965) in predicting mortality. ML-RTS had AUROC (0.823) and RTS had AUROC 0.928. In the isolated TBI group, ML-TRISS had AUROC 0.977, and TRISS had AUROC 0.983. ML-RTS had AUROC 0.790 and RTS had AUROC 0.957. Estimation of ISS and GCS from machine learning based modeling of vital sign features can be utilized to provide accurate assessments of the RTS and TRISS in a population of TBI patients. Automation of these scores could be utilized to enhance triage and resource allocation during the ultra-early phase of resuscitation.

The association between head injury and facial fracture treatment: an observational study of hospitalized bicyclists from a level 1 trauma centre

PurposeTo compare the types of facial fractures and their treatment in bicyclists admitted to a level 1 trauma centre with major and minor-moderate head injury.MethodsRetrospective analysis of data from bicycle-related injuries in the period 2005–2016 extracted from the Oslo University Hospital trauma registry.ResultsA total of 967 bicyclists with head injuries classified according to the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) were included. The group suffering minor-moderate head injury (AIS Head 1–2) included 518 bicyclists, while 449 bicyclists had major head injury (AIS Head 3–6). The mean patient age was 40.2 years (range 3–91 years) and 701 patients (72%) were men. A total of 521 facial fractures were registered in 262 patients (on average 2 facial fractures per bicyclist). Bicyclists with major head injury exhibited increased odds for facial fractures compared to bicyclists with minor-moderate head injury (sex and age adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.03–3.72, p < 0.001. More specifically, there was increased odds for all midface fractures, but no difference for mandible fractures. There was also increased odds for orbital reconstruction in cyclist with major head injury compared to bicyclist with minor-moderate head injury (adjusted OR 3.34, 95% CI 1.30–8.60, p = 0.012).ConclusionBicyclists with more severe head injuries had increased odds for midface fractures and surgical correction of orbital fractures. During trauma triage, the head and the face should be considered as one unit.

The Role of Emergency Department Thoracotomy in Patients with Cranial Gunshot Wounds.

Although several society guidelines exist regarding emergency department thoracotomy (EDT), there is a lack of data upon which to base guidance for multiple gunshot wound (GSW) patients whose injuries include a cranial GSW. We hypothesized that survival in these patients would be exceedingly low. We used Pennsylvania Trauma Outcomes Study (PTOS) data, 2002-2021, and included EDTs for GSWs. We defined EDT by ICD codes for thoracotomy or procedures requiring one, with a location flagged as ED. We defined head injuries as any head abbreviated injury scale (AIS) ≥1 and severe head injuries as head AIS ≥ 4. Head injuries were "isolated" if all other body regions AIS < 2. Descriptive statistics were performed. Discharge functional status was measured in 5 domains. Over 20 years in Pennsylvania, 3,546 EDTs were performed, 2,771 (78.1%) for penetrating injuries. Most penetrating EDTs (2,003, 72.3%) had suffered GSWs. Survival among patients with isolated head wounds (n = 25) was 0%. Survival was 5.3% for the non-head-injured (n = 94/1,787). In patients with combined head and other injuries, survival was driven by the severity of the head wound - 0% (0/81) with a severe head injury (p = 0.035 vs no severe head injury), and 4.5% (5/110) with a non-severe head injury. Of the 5 head-injured survivors, 2 were fully dependent for transfer mobility, and 3 were partially or fully dependent for locomotion. Of 211 patients with a cranial injury who expired, 2 (0.9%) went on to organ donation. Though there is clearly no role for EDT in patients with isolated head GSWs, EDT may be considered in patients with combined injuries, as most of these patients have minor head injuries and survival is not different from the non-head-injured. However, if a severe head injury is clinically apparent, even in the presence of other body cavity injuries, EDT should not be pursued. Level II, retrospective observational cohort study.

Predicting outcomes in trauma patients by using reverse shock index multiplied by Glasgow coma scores (rSIG): A retrospective cross-sectional study

Introduction: This study aimed to determine the predictive value of the reverse shock index (rSI) using the Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) to predict the outcome of traumatic patients. Methods: This study included all patients with a traumatic injury aged≥18 years with ISS score≥16 and head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS)≥2 admitted to the Imam Reza hospital of Tabriz, Iran from 1 March, 2021 to 1 July, 2021. After excluding the patients with incomplete data, 216 patients were enrolled. In this study, the rSIG is the product of rSI multiplied by the GCS score. The patients’ symptoms were recorded routinely in the summary section of all patients’ records using the studied indexes. Data collection was performed using the researcher-made forms. The SPSS software v.21 was used to analyze the data. A P-value&lt;0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: The results of data analysis demonstrated that the regression model by two predicting variables of rSI and rSIG was statistically significant. Also, the model can distinguish between the patients who died and those who were discharged. In addition, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test confirmed the model’s advantage and its accuracy (χ2=14.12, df=8, P&gt;0.05). Conclusion: So, the predictive value of rSI with GCS in predicting the outcome of traumatic patients was high.

Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate versus andexanet alfa for the reversal of traumatic brain injuries

BackgroundAndexanet alfa was approved in 2018 for reversal of direct oral anticoagulants but due to issues of cost and access, four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) continues to be used for...

Is reversal of anticoagulants necessary in neurologically intact traumatic intracranial hemorrhage?

Falls are the leading cause of injury in older individuals, with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) being a common complication. Anticoagulants, such as vitamin K antagonist and direct oral anticoagulants, are increasingly utilized, and clinicians may question the necessity of reversal in patients with minor ICH, especially in the setting of increased risk of adverse events. This study aimed to identify a population of patients with minor traumatic ICH at low risk for poor-neurologic status where anticoagulant reversal may not improve outcomes. This retrospective cohort study utilized data accessed from 35 trauma centers from 2018 to 2021. Patients included had a preinjury anticoagulant regimen, ICH due to blunt trauma, Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15, an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) head score from 2 to 4, and an AIS of ≤1 for non-head regions within 24 h of hospital arrival. Patients were excluded if they required an emergent neurosurgical procedure or were on a preinjury purinergic-P2 receptor-12 protein (P2Y12) inhibitor. The primary outcome was the rate of in-hospital mortality or hospice. There were 654 patients on preinjury anticoagulation who were included with a minor traumatic ICH without neurologic deficits. Overall, 263 patients were reversed and 391 were not reversed. Twelve (4.6%) patients with in-hospital mortality or hospice were reversed compared with 19 (4.91%) patients who were not reversed (p = 0.861). A composite of hospital complications occurred in 21 (8%) reversed patients and 34 (8.7%) not reversed patients (p = 0.748). The average intensive care unit length of stay was 1.4 ± 3.4 days in the reversed group and 1.1 ± 1.8 days in the not reversed group (p = 0.069). This study found no difference in hospital outcomes between patients with minor traumatic ICH on oral anticoagulants who were neurologically intact that were reversed versus those who were not reversed. Further studies should continue to define the subset of traumatic ICH patients who may not require reversal of anticoagulation.

Concomitant severe traumatic brain injury is not associated with increased red blood cell transfusion volumes in patients with pelvic fractures: A retrospective observational study

IntroductionTraumatic brain injury (TBI)-associated coagulopathy significantly influences survival outcomes in patients with multiple injuries. Severe TBI can potentially affect systemic hemostasis due to coagulopathy; however, there is limited evidence regarding whether the risk of hemorrhage increases in patients with pelvic fractures complicated with TBI. Therefore, through multivariable analysis, we aimed to examine the association between severe TBI and increased blood transfusion requirements in patients with pelvic fractures. Materials and methodsThis retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care facility in Japan. Patients aged 16 years or older with pelvic fractures who were admitted to our intensive care unit between April 2014 and December 2021 were included in the analysis. The patients were categorized into no to mild and severe TBI groups according to whether the Head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score was 3 or higher. The primary outcome was the number of red blood cell (RBC) units transfused within 24 h after arrival at the hospital. The primary outcome was analyzed using univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses. The covariates used for the multivariable linear regression analysis were age, sex, antithrombotic therapy, mechanism of injury, Pelvic AIS score, and extravasation on contrast-enhanced computed tomography on admission. ResultsWe identified 315 eligible patients (221 and 94 in the no to mild and severe TBI groups, respectively). In the univariable analysis, the RBC transfusion volume within 24 h after arrival was significantly higher in the severe TBI group than in the no to mild TBI group (2.53-unit increase; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.46–4.61). However, in the multivariable analysis, no statistically significant association was detected between severe TBI and the RBC transfusion volume within 24 h after arrival at the hospital (0.87-unit increase; 95 % CI: −1.11–2.85). ConclusionsConcomitant severe TBI was not associated with increased RBC transfusion volumes in patients with pelvic fractures on multivariable analysis.

Evaluating mortality and 6-month functional outcomes of patients with dural venous sinus thrombosis in traumatic brain injury.

Patients with dural venous sinus thrombosis (DVST) in select populations following traumatic brain injury (TBI), including those with blunt mechanism or depressed skull fractures, have been shown to have an increased risk of mortality. The purpose of this study was to assess these findings in a mixed population of head trauma patients. The authors performed a case-control study using propensity score matching by reviewing 17 years (2004-2021) of data from their institutional trauma registry. Patients with imaging-confirmed DVST were matched to a control group of TBI patients without identified DVST based on age, sex, postresuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, and Injury Severity Score. All age groups and injury mechanisms were included with a head Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥ 3. Data on demographics, injury and radiographic characteristics, and patient outcomes were collected. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of inpatient mortality. An additional subgroup analysis of patients with concurrent DVST and blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) was planned a priori. The authors identified 9875 patients who presented to their institution over the study period with TBIs, with a 1.64% incidence of DVST. Concurrent BCVI was diagnosed in 23.5% of patients with a DVST. Following matching, the presence of DVST itself was not significantly associated with inpatient mortality (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.24-1.88). On regression analysis, penetrating injuries (8.19, 95% CI 1.21-80.0) and lower postresuscitation GCS scores (0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.84) were independently associated with inpatient mortality for patients with traumatic DVST. Significantly worse functional outcomes were observed in those with DVST at 3 months, with no significant difference at 6 months. The authors observed a prevalence of traumatic DVST of 1.64% in a mixed population of head-injured patients, with 23.5% of patients with DVST having concurrent BCVI. Traumatic DVST alone was not associated with a significantly increased risk of inpatient mortality.

Injury patterns and outcomes in motorcycle driver crashes in the United States: The effect of helmet use

BackgroundMotorcycle crashes pose a persistent public health problem with disproportionate rates of severe injuries and mortality. This study aims to analyze injury patterns and outcomes with regard to helmet use. We hypothesized that helmet use is associated with fewer head injuries and does not increase the risk of cervical spine injuries. MethodsThe National Trauma Data Bank was queried for all motorcycle driver crashes between 2007-2017. Univariable analysis was used to compare demographics, clinical data, injury patterns using abbreviated injury scale, and outcomes between helmeted motorcycle drivers and non-helmeted motorcycle drivers who were injured in traffic crashes. Independent factors associated with mortality were determined by regression analysis after adjustment for potential confounders. ResultsA total of 315,258 patients were included for analysis, 66 % of these patients were helmeted. The sample was 92.5 % male and the median age was 41 years. Non-helmeted motorcycle drivers were more likely to sustain severe head trauma (head abbreviated injury scale ≥ 3: 28.5 % vs. 13.3 %, p < 0.001), had higher intensive care unit-admission (38 % vs. 30.2 %, p<0.001), mechanical ventilation (20.1 % vs. 13 %, p<0.001) and overall mortality rates (6.2 % vs. 3.9 %, p<0.001). Cervical spine injuries occurred in 10.6 % of non-helmeted motorcycle drivers and in 9.5 % of helmeted motorcycle drivers (p<0.001). Helmet use was identified as an independent factor associated with lower mortality [OR 0.849 (0.809–0.891), p<0.001]. ConclusionHelmet use is protective for severe head injuries and associated with decreased mortality. Helmet use was not associated with increased rates of cervical spine injuries. On the contrary, fewer injuries were observed in helmeted motorcycle drivers. Public health initiatives should be aimed at enforcement of universal helmet laws within the United States and across the world.

Sex Differences in Outcome of Trauma Patients Presented with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

The objective of this study was to determine whether there is an association between sex and outcome in trauma patients presented with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). A retrospective multicenter study was performed in trauma patients aged ≥ 16 years who presented with severe TBI (Head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ≥ 4) over a 4-year-period. Subgroup analyses were performed for ages 16-44 and ≥45 years. Also, patients with isolated severe TBI (other AIS ≤ 2) were assessed, likewise, with subgroup analysis for age. Sex differences in mortality, Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS), ICU admission/length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and mechanical ventilation (MV) were examined. A total of 1566 severe TBI patients were included (831 patients with isolated TBI). Crude analysis shows an association between female sex and lower ICU admission rates, shorter ICU/hospital LOS, and less frequent and shorter MV in severe TBI patients ≥ 45 years. After adjusting, female sex appears to be associated with shorter ICU/hospital LOS. Sex differences in mortality and GOS were not found. In conclusion, this study found sex differences in patient outcomes following severe TBI, potentially favoring (older) females, which appear to indicate shorter ICU/hospital LOS (adjusted analysis). Large prospective studies are warranted to help unravel sex differences in outcomes after severe TBI.

Hypofibrinogenemia following injury in 186 children and adolescents: identification of the phenotype, current outcomes, and potential for intervention

ObjectivesRecent studies evaluating fibrinogen replacement in trauma, along with newly available fibrinogen-based products, has led to an increase in debate on where products such as cryoprecipitate belong in our resuscitation...

Mild traumatic brain injury: not always a mild injury.

In general, risk of mortality after trauma correlates with injury severity. Despite arriving in relatively stable clinical condition, however, some patients are at risk of death following mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). The study objective was delineation of patients who die in-hospital following mild isolated TBI in order to inform Emergency Department (ED) disposition and care discussions with patients and families. In this retrospective cohort study, patients from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) (2007-2018) were included if they were injured by blunt trauma and sustained a mild TBI (defined as Head Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] score of 1 or 2 and arrival Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score of 13-15). Exclusions were severe associated injuries (extracranial AIS > 2); transfers; and missing data. Patients were defined by in-hospital mortality: Survivors vs. Mortalities. Demographics, clinical/injury data, and the outcomes were collected and compared with univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis established independent factors associated with in-hospital mortality following mild TBI. In total, 932,107 patients (10% of NTDB population) met study criteria: 928,542 (99.6%) Survivors and 3,565 (0.4%) Mortalities. In general, comorbidities (including home anticoagulation, cardiac disease, and diabetes mellitus) were significantly more common among patients who died (p < 0.001), although drug and alcohol intoxication on arrival were more common among Survivors (16% vs. 7%, p < 0.001; 13% vs. 10%, p < 0.001). In terms of insurance status, Private/Commercial insurance was more common among Survivors (39% vs. 20%, p < 0.001) while Governmental Insurance was more common among Mortalities (55% vs. 36%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 was most strongly associated with death (OR 26.43, p < 0.001), followed by ED intubation (OR 10.08, p < 0.001), admission hypotension (OR 4.55, p < 0.001), and comorbidities, particularly end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (OR 3.03, p < 0.001) and immunosuppression (OR 2.18, p < 0.001). Survivors differed substantially from Mortalities after mild TBI in terms of comorbidities, intoxicants, and insurance status. Independent variables most strongly associated with in-hospital death following mild head injury included age ≥ 65, intubation in the ED, admission hypotension, and comorbidities (particularly ESRD and immunosuppression). Increased clinical vigilance, including a mandatory period of clinical observation, for patients with these risk factors should be considered to optimize outcomes and potentially mitigate death after mild TBI.

Association of Discontinuing Preinjury Beta-Adrenergic Blockade Medications With Mortality in Severe Blunt Traumatic Brian Injury.

Beta-adrenergic receptor blocker (BB) administration has been shown to improve survival after traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, studies to date that observe a benefit did not distinguish between continuation of preinjury BB versus de novo initiation of BB. To determine the effect of continuation of preinjury BB and de novo initiation of BB on risk-adjusted mortality and complications for patients with TBI. Trauma quality collaborative data (2016-2021) were analyzed. Patients were excluded with hospitalization <48 hours, direct admission, or penetrating injury. Severe TBI was identified as a head abbreviated injury scale (AIS) value of 3 to 5. Patients were placed into 4 groups based on the preinjury BB use and administration of BB during hospitalization. Propensity score matching was used to create 1:1 matched cohorts of patients for comparisons. Odd ratios of mortality accounting for hospital clustering were calculated. A sensitivity analysis was performed excluding patients with AIS >2 injuries in all other body regions to create a cohort of isolated TBI patients. A total of 15,153 patients treated at 35 trauma centers were available for analysis. Patients were divided into 4 cohort groupings related to preinjury BB use and postinjury receipt of BB. The odds of mortality was significantly reduced for patients with a TBI on a preinjury BB who had the medication continued in the acute setting (as compared with patients on preinjury BB who did not) (odds ratio [OR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.98; P = 0.04). Patients with a TBI who were not on preinjury BB did not benefit from de novo initiation of BB with regard to mortality (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.64-1.08; P = 0.2). In the sensitivity analysis, excluding polytrauma patients, patients on preinjury BB who had BB continued had a reduction in mortality when compared with patients in which BB was stopped following a TBI (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47-0.91; P = 0.01). Continuing BB is associated with reduced odds of mortality in patients with a TBI on preinjury BB. We were unable to demonstrate benefit from instituting beta blockade in patients who are not on a BB preinjury.

Geriatric trauma, frailty, and ACS trauma center verification level: Are there any correlations with outcomes?

Introduction: It remains unclear whether geriatrics benefit from care at higher-level trauma centers (TCs). We aimed to assess the impact of the TC verification level on frail geriatric trauma patients’ outcomes. We hypothesized that frail patients cared for at higher-level TCs would have improved outcomes.Study Design: Patients ≥65 years were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database (2017–2019). Patients transferred, discharged from emergency department (ED), and those with head abbreviated injury scale >3 were excluded. 11-factor modified frailty index was utilized. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed. Outcomes included discharge to skilled nursing facility or rehab (SNF/rehab), withdrawal of life-supporting treatment (WLST), mortality, complications, failure-to-rescue, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, hospital length of stay (LOS), and ventilator days.Results: 110,680 patients were matched (Frail:55,340, Non-Frail:55,340). Mean age was 79 (7), 90% presented following falls, and median ISS was 5 [2–9]. Level-I/II TCs had lower rates of discharge to SNF/rehab (52.6% vs. 55.8% vs. 60.9%; p < 0.001), failure-to-rescue (0.5% vs. 0.4% vs. 0.6%;p = 0.005), and higher rates of WLST (2.4% vs. 2.1% vs. 0.3%; p < 0.001) compared to level-III regardless of injury severity and frailty. Compared to Level-III centers, Level-I/II centers had higher complications among moderate-to-severely injured patients (4.1% vs. 3.3% vs. 2.7%; p < 0.001), and lower mortality only among frail patients regardless of injury severity (1.8% vs. 1.5% vs. 2.6%; p < 0.001). Patients at Level-I TCs were more likely to be admitted to ICU, and had longer hospital LOS and ventilator days compared to Level-II and III TCs (p < 0.05).Conclusion: Frailty may play an important role when triaging geriatric trauma patients. In fact, the benefit of care at higher-level TCs is particularly evident for patients who are frail. Level III centers may be underperforming in providing access to palliative and end-of-life care.

Emergency Department Shock Index Outperforms Prehospital and Delta Shock Indices in Predicting Outcomes of Trauma Patients

IntroductionMultiple shock indices (SIs), including prehospital, emergency department (ED), and delta (ED SI - Prehospital SI) have been developed to predict outcomes among trauma patients. This study aims to compare the predictive abilities of these SIs for outcomes of polytrauma patients on a national level. MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2017-2018). We included adult (≥18 y) trauma patients and excluded patients who were transferred, had missing vital signs, and those with severe head injuries (Head-Abbreviated Injury Scale>3). Outcome measures were 24-h and in-hospital mortality, 24-h packed red blood cells transfusions, and intensive care unit and hospital length of stay. Predictive performances of these SIs were evaluated by the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics for the entire study cohort and across all injury severities. ResultsA total of 750,407 patients were identified. Meanstandard deviation age and lowest systolic blood pressure were 53 ± 21 y, and 81 ± 32 mmHg, respectively. Overall, 24-h and in-hospital mortality were 1.2% and 2.5%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, all three SIs were independently associated with higher rates of 24-h and in-hospital mortality, blood product requirements, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay (P < 0.001). ED SI was superior to prehospital and delta SIs (P < 0.001) for all outcomes. On subanalysis of patients with moderate injuries, severe injuries, and positive delta SI, the results remained the same. ConclusionsED SI outperformed both prehospital and delta SIs across all injury severities. Trauma triage guidelines should prioritize ED SI in the risk stratification of trauma patients who may benefit from earlier and more intense trauma activations.

Does Lower Extremity Fracture Fixation Technique Influence Neurologic Outcomes in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury? The EAST Brain vs. Bone Multicenter Trial.

To determine whether lower extremity (LE) fracture fixation technique & timing (≤ 24 vs > 24 hours) impact neurologic outcomes in TBI patients. A prospective observational study was conducted across 30 trauma centers. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18, head abbreviated injury scale (AIS) score > 2, and a diaphyseal femur or tibia fracture requiring external fixation (Ex-Fix), intramedullary nailing (IMN) or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The analysis was conducted using ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and multivariable regression models. Neurologic outcomes were measured by discharge Ranchos Los Amigos Revised Score (RLAS-R). Of the 520 patients enrolled, 358 underwent Ex-Fix, IMN or ORIF as definitive management. Head AIS was similar among cohorts. The Ex-Fix group experienced more severe LE injuries (AIS 4-5) compared to the IMN group (16% vs 3%, p = 0.01) but not the ORIF group (16% vs. 6%, p = 0.1). Time to operative intervention varied between the cohorts with the longest time to intervention for the IMN group (median hours: Ex-Fix 15 [8-24] vs. ORIF 26 [12-85] vs. IMN 31[12-70], p < 0.001). The discharge RLAS-R score distribution was similar across the groups. After adjusting for confounders, neither method nor timing of LE fixation influenced the discharge RLAS-R. Instead, increasing age and head AIS score were associated with a lower discharge RLAS-R score (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.002-1.03 and OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.75-3.22) and a higher GCS motor score on admission (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73,0.97) was associated with higher RLAS-R score at discharge. Neurologic outcomes in TBI are impacted by severity of the head injury and not the fracture fixation technique or timing. Therefore, the strategy of definitive fixation of LE fractures should be dictated by patient physiology and the anatomy of the injured extremity and not by the concern for worsening neurologic outcomes in TBI patients. Level III (Prognostic/Epidemiological).

Early Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Patients with Trauma Intracranial Hemorrhage: Analysis of the Prospective Multicenter CLOTT Study.

The optimal time to initiate venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (VTEp) for patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is controversial and must balance the risks of VTE with potential progression of ICH. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early VTEp initiation after traumatic ICH. This is a secondary analysis of the prospective multicenter Consortium of Leaders in the Study of Thromboembolism (CLOTT) study. Patients with head AIS > 2 and with immediate VTEp held due to ICH were included. Patients were divided into VTEp ≤ or > 48 hours and compared. Outcome variables included overall VTE, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), progression of ICH (pICH), or other bleeding events. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed. There were 881 patients in total, 378 (43%) started VTEp ≤48 hours (early). Patients starting VTEp >48 hours (late) had higher VTE (12.4% vs 7.2%, p = .01) and DVT (11.0% vs 6.1%, p = .01) rates than the early group. The incidence of PE (2.1% vs 2.2%, p = .94), pICH (1.9% vs 1.8%, p = .95) or any other bleeding event (1.9% vs 3.0%, p = .28) were equivalent between early and late VTEp groups. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, VTEp >48 hours (OR 1.86), ventilator days >3 (OR 2.00), and risk assessment profile score ≥ 5 (OR 6.70) were independent risk factors for VTE (all p < 0.05), while VTEp with enoxaparin was associated with decreased VTE (OR 0.54, p < 0.05). Importantly, VTEp ≤48 hours was not associated with pICH (OR 0.75) or risk of other bleeding events (OR 1.28) (both p = NS). Early initiation of VTEp (≤48 h) for patients with ICH was associated with decreased VTE/DVT rates without increased risk of pICH or other significant bleeding events. Enoxaparin is superior to unfractionated heparin as VTE prophylaxis in patients with severe TBI. Level IV; Therapeutic/Care management.

Selecting patients for early interdisciplinary rehabilitation during neurointensive care after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.

Early interdisciplinary rehabilitation (EIR) in neurointensive care is a limited resource reserved for patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) believed to profit from treatment. We evaluated how key parameters related to injury severity and patient characteristics were predictive of receiving EIR, and whether these parameters changed over time. Among 1003 adult patients with moderate to severe TBI admitted over 72 h to neurointensive care unit during four time periods between 2005 and 2020, EIR was given to 578 and standard care to 425 patients. Ten selection criteria thought to best represent injury severity and patient benefit were evaluated (Glasgow Coma Scale, Head Abbreviated Injury Scale, New-Injury-Severity-Scale, intracranial pressure monitoring, neurosurgery, age, employment, Charlson Comorbidity Index, severe psychiatric disease, and chronic substance abuse). In multivariate regression analysis, patients who were employed (adjOR 1.99 [95% CI 1.41, 2.80]), had no/mild comorbidity (adjOR 3.15 [95% CI 1.72, 5.79]), needed neurosurgery, had increasing injury severity and were admitted by increasing time period were more likely to receive EIR, whereas receiving EIR was less likely with increasing age (adjOR 0.97 [95% CI 0.96, 0.98]) and chronic substance abuse. Overall predictive ability of the model was 71%. Median age and comorbidity increased while employment decreased from 2005 to 2020, indicating patient selection became less restrictive with time. Injury severity and need for neurosurgery remain important predictors for receiving EIR, but the importance of age, employment, and comorbidity have changed over time. Moderate prediction accuracy using current clinical criteria suggest unrecognized factors are important for patient selection.