The association between head injury and facial fracture treatment: an observational study of hospitalized bicyclists from a level 1 trauma centre

Abstract

PurposeTo compare the types of facial fractures and their treatment in bicyclists admitted to a level 1 trauma centre with major and minor-moderate head injury.MethodsRetrospective analysis of data from bicycle-related injuries in the period 2005–2016 extracted from the Oslo University Hospital trauma registry.ResultsA total of 967 bicyclists with head injuries classified according to the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) were included. The group suffering minor-moderate head injury (AIS Head 1–2) included 518 bicyclists, while 449 bicyclists had major head injury (AIS Head 3–6). The mean patient age was 40.2 years (range 3–91 years) and 701 patients (72%) were men. A total of 521 facial fractures were registered in 262 patients (on average 2 facial fractures per bicyclist). Bicyclists with major head injury exhibited increased odds for facial fractures compared to bicyclists with minor-moderate head injury (sex and age adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.03–3.72, p < 0.001. More specifically, there was increased odds for all midface fractures, but no difference for mandible fractures. There was also increased odds for orbital reconstruction in cyclist with major head injury compared to bicyclist with minor-moderate head injury (adjusted OR 3.34, 95% CI 1.30–8.60, p = 0.012).ConclusionBicyclists with more severe head injuries had increased odds for midface fractures and surgical correction of orbital fractures. During trauma triage, the head and the face should be considered as one unit.