Abatacept Initiation Research Articles

Predictive value of baseline concomitant glucocorticoid for abatacept-mediated long-term inhibition of radiographic progression: insights from the KURAMA cohort

Abatacept (ABT) is a biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARDs) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) when conventional synthetic DMARDs are ineffective. We aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of ABT on joint destruction in patients treated for over 2 years. Radiographic progression was evaluated using the van der Heijde-modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) by two rheumatologists at ABT initiation and after 2 years. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with structural remission, defined as the mean annual change in mTSS ≤0.5. Among the 111 patients included, 48 discontinued, and 63 continued ABT treatment until radiographic evaluation was performed. The rate of patients who achieved estimated TSS REM (yearly progression of van der Heijde modified total Sharp scores ≤0.5) was significantly lower in ABT-dropouts than in the ABT-continued group (69% vs. 48%, p = .0336 by Fisher’s exact test). Among the continued ABT cases, concomitant glucocorticoid treatment at ABT initiation was the strongest negative predictive factor of estimated TSS REM in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Radiographic progression after ABT administration should be evaluated separately for dropout and non-dropout cases. Glucocorticoids at the initiation of ABT may serve as a predictive factor for joint destruction in long-term ABT use.

Abatacept in usual and in non-specific interstitial pneumonia associated with rheumatoid arthritis

ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of abatacept (ABA) in Rheumatoid Arthritis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease (RA-ILD) according to the radiological patterns of usual (UIP) or non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP). MethodsFrom an observational longitudinal multicentre study of 263 RA-ILD patients treated with ABA, those with UIP or NSIP were selected. Lung function, chest high resolution computerised tomography (HRCT) and dyspnoea were recorded and compared in both groups from baseline to the end of follow-up (progression definitions: improvement or worsening >10% of FVC or DLCO, changes in HRCT extension and 1-point change in the mMRC scale, respectively). Differences between final and baseline visits were calculated as the average difference (95% CI) through mixed effects models regression. ResultsWe studied 190 patients with UIP (n=106) and NSIP (n=84). General features were similar in both groups except for older age, positive rheumatoid factor, and previous sulfasalazine therapy, which were more frequent in patients with UIP. ILD duration up to ABA initiation was relatively short: median 16 [4-50] and 11 [2-36] months (p=0.36) in UIP and NSIP, respectively. Mean baseline FVC and DLCO were 82% and 63% in UIP and 89% and 65% in NSIP, respectively. Both parameters remained stable during 24 months with ABA. HRCT lesions and dyspnoea improved/stabilized in 73.1% and 90.5% and 72.9% and 94.6% of UIP and NSIP patterns, respectively. ConclusionABA seems equally effective in stabilizing dyspnoea, lung function and radiological impairment in both UIP and NSIP patterns of RA-ILD. Early administration of ABA may prevent RA-ILD progression, regardless of the radiological pattern.

Efficacy and safety of abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with previous malignancy.

Abatacept (ABT) is known to lower infection risk than other biologics and is effective and safe in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, there were inconsistent reports on the impact of ABT on malignancies which are more common in the elderly and strongly related to prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ABT in patients with RA with previous malignancy in clinical practice. A multicenter, retrospective study. Patients who received ABT for RA in two hospitals in Yokohama until May 2022 were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of a history of malignancy (no previous malignancy: NP group, previous malignancy: PM group). The collected parameters were compared between the groups using propensity score matching. In this study, 312 patients were included, of whom 73 had previous malignancies when starting ABT. The age at ABT initiation was significantly higher in the PM group, the rate of methotrexate use was significantly lower in the PM group, and the Steinbrocker stage was significantly higher in the PM group. After matching these 3 factors, 68 patients were selected from each group. No significant differences in the ABT continuation rate, and malignancy incidence were observed between the two groups after ABT initiation. In addition to these factors, when matched for smoking history, interstitial lung disease, disease duration, sex, and inflammatory status, which are known risk factors for malignancy in RA, 40 patients were selected from each group. No significant differences in the ABT continuation rate, and malignancy incidence were observed between the two groups after ABT initiation. In our clinical practice, ABT was as effective and safe in patients with a history of malignancy as in those without.

AB0205 A NOVEL METHOD FOR PREDICTING 1-YEAR RETENTION OF ABATACEPT USING MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES: DIRECTIONALITY AND IMPORTANCE OF PREDICTORS

Background:In the ACTION (NCT02109666) study, multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models showed that the predictors of 1-year retention to abatacept treatment were: patient global pain assessment, country, reason for stopping last biologic, number of prior biologic treatments, abatacept monotherapy, RF/anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) status, previous neoplasms, psychiatric disorders and cardiac disorders.1 Machine learning techniques, using the gradient-boosting model, subsequently identified additional predictors of abatacept retention in patients with moderate-to-severe RA enrolled in ACTION; however, the analysis did not show the directionality of the predictors.2Objectives:To improve the clinical interpretability of the machine learning model in terms of directionality and the importance of each variable in predicting retention.Methods:Previous analyses using the gradient-boosting model to identify predictors of abatacept retention at 1 year in the ACTION study have been described.2 This analysis used SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), a mathematical framework, to show how a particular predictor value influences prediction in the context of all other predictors. Higher SHAP values indicate a higher likelihood of retention. The contribution of every variable in the model’s prediction (with the exception of country variables) was computed for each data point to capture individual variable impact. This enabled interpretation for level of importance and directionality at a patient level.Results:Using data from 2350 patients enrolled in ACTION (May 2008 to December 2013), the mean retention rate at 1 year was 59.3% (n=1393). Overall variable importance is shown in Figure 1. After removal of country variables, the top five baseline predictors of retention were: no previous corticosteroid use, ACR functional class II, ≥2 prior biologic treatments prior to abatacept initiation, abatacept monotherapy and HAQ-DI. In terms of directionality, no previous corticosteroid use, ≥2 prior biologic treatments prior to abatacept initiation, abatacept monotherapy and a higher HAQ-DI score at baseline were associated with a lower likelihood of retention; ACR functional class II was associated with a higher likelihood of retention.Conclusion:The gradient-boosting model previously identified predictors of abatacept retention from ACTION;2 the addition of SHAP in this analysis has provided information on the importance and directionality of those predictors. The most important predictor of abatacept retention was no previous corticosteroid use, which was associated with lower retention. The models and predictors identified could be further refined by using additional datasets from clinical trials. Machine learning offers an innovative and complementary approach to biostatistics and could be used to identify treatment response predictors at an individual patient level, leading to a more personalised treatment approach.

Abatacept as salvage therapy in chronic graft-versus-host disease\u2014a retrospective analysis

The immunomodulatory fusion protein abatacept has recently been investigated for the treatment of steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) in a phase 1 clinical trial. We analyzed the safety and efficacy of abatacept for cGvHD therapy in a retrospective study with 15 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and received abatacept for cGvHD with a median age of 49 years. Grading was performed as part of the clinical routine according to the National Institute of Health’s (NIH) consensus criteria at initiation of abatacept and 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months thereafter. The median time of follow-up was 191 days (range 55–393 days). Best overall response rate (ORR) was 40%. In particular, patients with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome showed significant clinical improvement and durable responses following abatacept treatment with a response rate of 89% based on improvement in lung severity score (n = 6) or stabilized lung function (n = 4) or both (n = 3). Infectious complications CTCAE °III or higher were observed in 3/15 patients. None of the patients relapsed from the underlying malignancy. Thus, abatacept appears to be a promising treatment option for cGvHD, in particular for patients with lung involvement. However, further evaluation within a phase 2 clinical trial is required.

Risk of serious infection, malignancy, or death in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with a combination of abatacept and tacrolimus: a retrospective cohort study

To evaluate whether combinatorial use of abatacept (ABT) and tacrolimus (Tac) increases the risk of adverse events compared to their individual use in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of RA patients using the Japanese multicenter database and analyzed the data of RA patients registered from April 2010 to March 2019 by comparing three treatment groups who received Tac, ABT, or a combination of both. We included patients who had initiated treatment with ABT or Tac and excluded patients who used tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, IL-6 inhibitors, and Jak inhibitors in the first year of our study. The primary outcome was the occurrence of adverse events such as infections that required hospitalization, newly diagnosed malignancy, or death from any cause after initiation of ABT or Tac. Of the 27,032 RA patients in the registry, 2009 patients were included. The Tac, ABT, and combination groups consisted of 1328, 563, and 118 patients, respectively. Primary outcome occurred in 149 (13.4%), 62 (13.5%), and 14 (13.9%) patients of the Tac, ABT, and combination groups, respectively. The incidence of adverse events between groups was not significantly different (p = 0.638). A Cox regression analysis which was adjusted for potential confounders such as age, disease activity, and concomitant use of prednisolone revealed no significant differences between groups. The combinatorial use of ABT and Tac, or ABT alone does not increase the risk of adverse events when compared to the use of Tac alone in RA patients in Japan. Key Points • This study included Japanese rheumatoid arthritis data and found that there was no significant risk when patients were treated with a combination of Tac and ABT or each drug alone.

Abatacept in interstitial lung disease associated with rheumatoid arthritis: national multicenter study of 263 patients.

To assess the efficacy of abatacept (ABA) in RA patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) (RA-ILD). This was an observational, multicentre study of RA-ILD patients treated with at least one dose of ABA. ILD was diagnosed by high-resolution CT (HRCT). We analysed the following variables at baseline (ABA initiation), 12 months and at the end of the follow-up: Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) scale (1-point change), forced vital capacity (FVC) or diffusion lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (improvement or worsening ≥10%), HRCT, DAS on 28 joints evaluated using the ESR (DAS28ESR) and CS-sparing effect. We studied 263 RA-ILD patients [150 women/113 men; mean (s.d.) age 64.6 (10) years]. At baseline, they had a median duration of ILD of 1 (interquartile range 0.25-3.44) years, moderate or severe degree of dyspnoea (MMRC grade 2, 3 or 4) (40.3%), FVC (% of the predicted) mean (s.d.) 85.9 (21.8)%, DLCO (% of the predicted) 65.7 (18.3) and DAS28ESR 4.5 (1.5). The ILD patterns were: usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) (40.3%), non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) (31.9%) and others (27.8%). ABA was prescribed at standard dose, i.v. (25.5%) or s.c. (74.5%). After a median follow-up of 12 (6-36) months the following variables did not show worsening: dyspnoea (MMRC) (91.9%); FVC (87.7%); DLCO (90.6%); and chest HRCT (76.6%). A significant improvement of DAS28ESR from 4.5 (1.5) to 3.1 (1.3) at the end of follow-up (P < 0.001) and a CS-sparing effect from a median 7.5 (5-10) to 5 (2.5-7.5) mg/day at the end of follow-up (P < 0.001) was also observed. ABA was withdrawn in 62 (23.6%) patients due to adverse events (n = 30), articular inefficacy (n = 27), ILD worsening (n = 3) and other causes (n = 2). ABA may be an effective and safe treatment for patients with RA-ILD.

Up to 5-year retention of abatacept in Belgian patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis: a sub-analysis of the international, observational ACTION study

Favorable efficacy and safety profiles have been demonstrated for abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in randomized controlled trials, but these data require validation during long-term follow-ups in routine clinical practice. This study explored long-term safety and retention rates in RA patients treated with intravenous abatacept in the Belgian cohort of the international AbataCepT In rOutiNe clinical practice (ACTION) study (NCT02109666). This non-interventional, observational, longitudinal study included Belgian patients aged ≥ 18 years with moderate-to-severe RA who started intravenous abatacept treatment as first- or second/further-line biologic therapy in routine clinical practice. Between October 2010 and December 2012, 141 patients were enrolled in this cohort, of whom 135 evaluable patients (6 biologic-naïve; 129 previously exposed to ≥ 1 prior biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs) were eligible for the descriptive analysis; 131/135 were included in the effectiveness analysis. Mean disease duration was 10.5 years (standard deviation 9.7) before abatacept initiation. RA patients presented with high disease activity and comorbidity rate, having failed multiple previous treatment options. In this cohort, the 5-year abatacept retention rate was 34% (95% confidence interval, 23−45%) per protocol, and 51% (95% confidence interval, 40−61%) when temporary discontinuations of abatacept > 84 days (n = 24) were not considered as treatment discontinuations. After 5 years of abatacept treatment, clinical outcomes were favorable [good/moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) responses in 91.7% patients]. No new safety signals were detected for abatacept in routine clinical practice. In this difficult-to-treat Belgian RA population, high retention rates, good clinical outcomes and favorable safety profile were observed with abatacept.

Actual Persistence of Abatacept in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results of the French-Ric Network.

Objectives: Data on abatacept (ABA) persistence in routine practice are limited. We aimed to study ABA persistence rates at 12 months, according to the date of initiation, and to analyze the factors associated with persistence at 12 months. Methods: We performed an observational, ambispective, multi-center study from January 2008 to July 2016, based on the French-RIC Network. We defined three groups of patients followed up for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), according to the date of initiation of ABA therapy: Group 1 (from 2007 to 31 July 2010: ABA indicated after anti-TNF failure); Group 2 (from 1 August 2010 to 31 March 2014: ABA indicated after conventional antirheumatic drugs failure); Group 3 (from 1 April 2014 to 1 July 2016: ABA available by the subcutaneous injection). Results: Among 517 patients who initiated ABA, drug persistence at 12 months was 68%. The only factor significantly associated with persistence rate at 12 months was C-reactive protein (CRP) < 10 mg/L at ABA initiation (odds ratio (OR) 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.3–0.9; p = 0.0016). There was no significant difference in drug persistence according to date of initiation, the line of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) therapy or the route of administration. Conclusions: In routine practice, over time, ABA has come to be initiated earlier in the course of therapy for RA in France. Abatacept persistence is similar to that reported in the Orencia Rheumatoid Arthritis (ORA) registry, and does not differ according to the date of initiation. The only factor found to be associated with the persistence rate at 12 months was CRP < 10 mg/L at ABA initiation.

Better Retention of Abatacept Is Associated with High Rheumatoid Factor: A Five-Year Follow-Up Study of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Recently, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) have revolutionized the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and provided patients with a higher chance of achieving clinical remission. Among them, abatacept (ABT), which selectively inhibits T cell activation through blocking costimulation signal, has been reported efficacious in controlling disease activity. Previous studies have shown that ABT has a high retention rate of up to three years with tolerable adverse events; however, it remains unclear whether this is maintained in the longer term. Here we conducted a retrospective five-year follow-up study to explore prognostic factors concerning better retention. In total, 98 patients who were treated with ABT from May 2011 to July 2019 in Osaki Citizen Hospital were enrolled, including 73 female patients (74.5%). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the retention rate of ABT. The mean age of ABT initiation was 72.1 years. Concomitant methotrexate was prescribed for 39 patients, and ABT was used as the first-line bDMARD for 65 patients. Rheumatoid factor (RF) was positive in 79 patients. One-, three-, and five-year retention rates of ABT were 83.3%, 66.2%, and 62.7%, respectively. Approximately two-thirds of discontinuation resulted from an inadequate response. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that positive RF was associated with better drug retention. Receiver operating characteristics analysis showed that patients with high RF (≥ 45 IU/mL) had better retention rate of ABT. In conclusion, ABT shows high retention rate among patients with positive RF. The present study may provide better insights when selecting bDMARDs.

Risk of exacerbation of pulmonary comorbidities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after initiation of abatacept versus TNF inhibitors: A cohort study

BackgroundBiologic agents may pose a potential risk for exacerbations of pulmonary comorbidities in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. MethodsUsing U.S. Medicare and Truven MarketScan databases, we identified three cohorts of RA patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or asthma who initiated abatacept or a TNF inhibitor (TNFi). The primary outcome was a composite exacerbation of individual pulmonary comorbidities based on inpatient or emergency department (ED) visits due to exacerbation of the given pulmonary comorbidity. To adjust for >60 baseline confounders, we used propensity-score fine stratification (PSS) and weighting. Negative binomial regression model estimated a cohort-specific incidence rate ratio (IRR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the primary outcome per database, comparing abatacept versus TNFi. Database-specific IRRs were combined using a random-effects meta-analysis. ResultsWe identified 3,295 ILD, 7,161 COPD, and 5,613 asthma patients with RA who initiated either abatacept or a TNFi. IR of composite exacerbation was high in all three pulmonary cohorts but highest in COPD cohort (3.59-11.80 per 100 person-years in ILD, 20.68-34.97 in COPD, and 4.66-13.78 in asthma). After PSS weighting, the combined IRR (95%CI) in abatacept initiators versus TNFi initiators was 0.44 (0.18-1.09) for ILD exacerbation, 0.91 (0.80-1.03) for COPD exacerbation, and 0.81 (0.54-1.22) for asthma exacerbation. ConclusionAmong patients with RA and pulmonary comorbidities, exacerbations requiring inpatient or ED visits occurred frequently after initiating abatacept or TNFi. Overall, we found no significant difference in the risk of ILD, COPD or asthma exacerbation between abatacept and TNFi initiators, but precision of our estimates is limited.

ACCELERATED DEVELOPMENT OF PULMONARY ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION IN THE SETTING OF ABATACEPT THERAPY

SESSION TITLE: Pulmonary Vascular Disease SESSION TYPE: Fellow Case Reports PRESENTED ON: 10/22/2019 3:45 PM - 4:45 PM INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare and debilitating disease, commonly related to connective tissue disease (CTD), idiopathic or hereditary in nature or due to certain drugs. New medications have been acknowledged as being a risk factor for developing PAH.There are case reports of some biologic drugs as a possible risk factor. Abatacept is a chimeric protein that inhibits T-lymphocyte activation and is used as a biologic drug to treat autoimmune diseases. We present a patient with PAH and acceleration of symptoms after initiation of Abatacept for underlying autoimmune disease. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a 46-year-old woman with mixed connective tissue disease and rheumatoid arthritis for 5 years, who presented with six weeks of rapidly progressed dyspnea on exertion, orthopnea and pedal edema. She had been evaluated 2 months prior, while on Infliximab, for mild intermittent dyspnea for the past 6 months and noted to have normal pulmonary function and echocardiogram. She was subsequently switched to Abatacept due to a intolerance with Infliximab. A month after initiation of this medication her dyspnea worsen and she presented 10 weeks after with severe dyspnea. Echocardiogram revealed moderate right ventricle (RV) dilation and estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) of 93 mmHg and right atrial pressure (RAP) of 15 mmHg. Pulmonary embolism was ruled out. Right heart catheterization (RHC) measured a mean PAP of 50 mmHg and PVR of 20 Woods units. PAH was diagnosed with WHO functional class 3. Abatacept was discontinued as a potential risk factor that accelerated symptoms.Combination therapy was initiated with Tadalafil, Ambrisentan and Furosemide, and her WHO functional class improved to 1. Repeat echocardiogram at 6 months showed PASP: 35 mmHg, RAP: 3 mmHg with normal RV size and function and markedly improved six-minute walk distance. DISCUSSION: PAH is an uncommon debilitating disease with nonspecific symptoms, making early diagnosis challenging. This makes identification of risk factors for development and progression of PAH crucial. CTD is a well-established risk factor as are certain medications. With the growing use of biologic drugs for CTD therapy, these drugs as risk factors for PAH might grow as well. To the best of our knowledge this is the second case reported with Abatacept potentially accelerating PAH symptoms in the setting of treatment for CTD. CONCLUSIONS: In an era of increasing biologic agents use in patients with CTD, who are already at risk for PAH, physicians need to be aware of this potential association. Reference #1: Promislow, S. et al. Pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with abatacept treatment for rheumatoid arthritis: A case report. Canadian Journal of Respiratory, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine. 2018 Reference #2: Gibbson, E. et al Reversible pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with interferon-beta treatment for multiple sclerosis. Can Respir J. 2015 DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Selvin Jacob, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Ginny Marmolejos, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Kartik Ramakrishna, source=Web Response

Abatacept initiation in rheumatoid arthritis and the risk of serious infection: A population-based cohort study

ObjectiveTo assess whether abatacept as initial biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis is associated with an increased risk of serious infections, including bone and joint, gastrointestinal, respiratory tract, skin and soft tissue, and urinary tract, when compared with other biologic DMARDs. MethodsWe performed a population-based cohort study among patients newly-treated with biologic DMARDs within the US-based Truven MarketScan® population and Supplemental US Medicare from 2007 to 2014. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of serious infections requiring hospitalisation associated with initiation of abatacept, compared with initiation of other bDMARDs, after controlling for age and deciles of the propensity score. ResultsThe cohort included 5,752 patients who initiated abatacept and 78,556 who initiated another biologic DMARD, of whom 193 and 1531 had a serious infection during follow-up (crude incidence rate 4.45 per 100 person-years and 3.62 per 100 person-years, respectively). Compared with other biologic DMARDs, the use of abatacept was not associated with an increased incidence of serious infections overall (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.89–1.21). The risk did not vary by duration of use (<1 year: HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.87–1.22; >1 year: HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.77–1.52). In addition, the risk was not increased for the site-specific infections. ConclusionThe use of abatacept as first biologic DMARD in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis was not associated with different risks of serious infections compared with other biologic DMARDs.

Cardiovascular (CV) Risk after Initiation of Abatacept versus TNF Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with and without Baseline CV Disease.

To evaluate the cardiovascular safety of abatacept (ABA) versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with and without underlying cardiovascular disease (CVD). We identified RA patients with and without baseline CVD who initiated ABA or TNFi by using data from 2 large US insurance claims databases: Medicare (2008-2013) and Truven MarketScan (2006-2015). After stratifying by baseline CVD, ABA initiators were 1:1 propensity score (PS) matched to TNFi initiators to control for > 60 baseline covariates. Cox proportional hazards regression estimated the HR and 95% CI for a composite endpoint of CVD including myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischemic stroke, or coronary revascularization in the PS-matched cohorts. HR from 2 databases were combined through an inverse variance-weighted fixed-effects model. We included 6102 PS-matched pairs of ABA and TNFi initiators from Medicare and 6934 pairs from MarketScan. Of these, 35.3% in Medicare and 14.0% in MarketScan had baseline CVD. HR (95% CI) for composite CVD in the overall ABA group versus TNFi was 0.67 (0.55-0.81) in Medicare and 1.08 (0.83-1.41) in MarketScan with the combined HR of 0.79 (0.67-0.92). Among patients with baseline CVD, the HR (95% CI) was 0.71 (0.55-0.92) in Medicare and 1.02 (0.68-1.51) in MarketScan, with the combined HR of 0.79 (0.64-0.98). In this large cohort of publicly or privately insured patients with RA in the United States, ABA was associated with a 20% reduced risk of CVD versus TNFi. While this observational study is subject to potential residual confounding, our results were consistent in patients with baseline CVD.

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of parotid glands before and after abatacept therapy in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome associated with rheumatoid arthritis: Utility to evaluate and predict response to treatment

Objective: To compare parotid diffusion-weighted images (DWIs) taken before and after abatacept therapy in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to examine the utility in evaluation and prediction of response to therapy.Methods: DWIs of the parotid glands taken at baseline and 52 weeks after initiation of abatacept were analyzed in nine SS patients with RA using relative standard deviation (RSD) of the entire glands and signal intensity ratio (SIR) within the residual parenchyma. The correlation between changes in RSD and SIR and changes in salivary secretion based on Saxon’s test was examined. Furthermore, baseline characteristics were compared in patients with increased and decreased salivary secretion after treatment. The predictive power of the parameter at baseline was examined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.Results: Abatacept improved salivary secretion from 2076 ± 1535 at baseline to 2857 ± 1431 mg/2 min at 52 weeks (n = 9, p = .05). Increase of salivary secretion was significantly higher in patients with decreased RSD (n = 6) than increased RSD (n = 3) (1241 ± 713, –137 ± 142 mg/2 min, p = .02). The increase and decrease in RSD completely accorded with those of salivary secretion. Furthermore, SIR was the only parameter that was significantly different between patients with posttreatment increase and decrease in salivary secretion (p = .04). ROC analysis showed the sensitivity and specificity of SIR at baseline of ≥13.0 × 10−2 for the prediction of the response to abatacept were 75.0% and 83.3%, respectively.Conclusions: Parotid DWI seems to be useful for evaluating and predicting the response in salivary secretion to abatacept in SS patients with RA.

Safety of surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated by abatacept: data from the French Orencia in Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry.

To investigate the frequency and risk factors of postoperative complications in RA patients treated with abatacept (ABA). The Orencia RA registry recruited 1012 patients receiving ABA for RA in routine care. Data from patients treated with ABA who underwent surgery were reviewed to describe the frequency of postoperative complications. Characteristics of patients and surgeries with and without complications were compared to identify factors associated with complications. We identified 205 (20.3%) patients who underwent 263 surgeries, including 176 (66.9%) orthopaedic surgeries. Nineteen (7.2%) surgeries, in 19 patients (9.3%), entailed complications, including 7 delayed wound healing (2.7% of surgeries) and 6 surgical site infections (2.3% of surgeries). The median time between the last infusion of ABA and surgery was 5.9 weeks (range: 0.3-12.0 weeks), with no significant difference between patients with and without complications. The median corticosteroids daily dosage was higher in the group with complications [10.0 (6.25-15.0) vs 6.0 (5.0-10.0) mg/day, P = 0.042]. In multivariate analysis, only the duration of ABA treatment was significantly associated with postoperative complications [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.94 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.99) for each month of treatment], as were orthopaedic surgeries compared with other kinds of surgery [aOR = 4.45 (95% CI: 1.01, 20.2)]. In RA patients treated with ABA, the rate of surgical complications was low: 7.2% and higher in case of orthopaedic procedure and a more recent initiation of ABA. The median time between surgery and the last infusion of ABA was short and did not influence the rate of postoperative complications.

Effectiveness of abatacept for patients with Sjögren’s syndrome associated with rheumatoid arthritis. An open label, multicenter, one-year, prospective study: ROSE (Rheumatoid Arthritis with Orencia Trial toward Sjögren’s syndrome Endocrinopathy) trial

Objective: To clarify the efficacy and safety of abatacept for secondary Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods: The primary endpoint of this open-labeled, prospective, observational multicenter study for secondary SS with RA was the remission rate of Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at 52 weeks after initiation of abatacept. The secondary endpoints included Saxon’s test and Schirmer’s test. Adverse events and adherence rate during the study period were also analyzed.Results: Thirty-six patients (all females) were enrolled in this study. The mean SDAI decreased significantly from 20.6 ± 11.2 (±SD) at baseline to 10.0 ± 10.5 at 52 weeks (p < 0.05). Patients with SDAI remission increased from 0 (0 week) to 12 patients (33.3%) at 52 weeks. Saliva volume assessed by Saxon’s test increased significantly from 2136 ± 1809 (0 week) to 2397 ± 1878 (24 weeks) mg/2 min (n = 34, p < 0.05). Saliva volume increased significantly from 2945 ± 2090 (0 week) to 3419 ± 2121 (24 weeks) mg/2 min in 11 patients with Greenspan grade 1 or 2 of labial salivary gland biopsy (p < 0.05), but no change was noted in 18 patients with Greenspan grade 3 or 4. Tear volume by Schirmer’s test increased significantly from 4.2 ± 4.8 (0 week) to 6.4 ± 7.8 (24 weeks) mm/5 min (n = 30, p < 0.05). The adherence rate to abatacept was 80.6% (29/36) over the 52-week period. Twelve adverse events occurred in 10 of the 36 patients, and 7 of these events were infections.Conclusion: Abatacept seems to be effective for both RA and SS related manifestations.

Decreased use of glucocorticoids in biological-experienced patients with rheumatoid arthritis who initiated intravenous abatacept: results from the 2-year ACTION study

IntroductionProlonged glucocorticoid use may increase the risk of adverse safety outcomes, including cardiovascular events. The European League Against Rheumatism and the Canadian Rheumatology Association advise tapering glucocorticoid dose as rapidly...

Prognostic factors for abatacept retention in patients who received at least one prior biologic agent: an interim analysis from the observational, prospective ACTION study.

BackgroundThe emergence of new therapies for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the paucity of head-to-head studies, and the heterogeneous nature of responses to current biologics highlight the need for the identification of prognostic factors for treatment response and retention in clinical practice. Prognostic factors for patient retention have not been explored thoroughly despite data for abatacept and other biologics being available from national registries. Real-world data from the ACTION study may supplement the findings of randomized controlled trials and show how abatacept is used in clinical practice. The aim of this interim analysis was to identify prognostic factors for abatacept retention in patients with RA who received at least one prior biologic agent.MethodsA large, international, non-interventional cohort of patients with moderate-to-severe RA who initiated intravenous abatacept in Canada and Europe (May 2008–January 2011) enrolled in the ACTION study. Potential prognostic factors for retention in this interim analysis (data cut-off February 2012; including patients from Canada, Germany, Greece, and Italy) were baseline demographics and disease characteristics, medical history, and previous and concomitant medication. Clinically relevant variables with p ≤ 0.20 in univariate analysis and no collinearity were entered into a Cox proportional hazards regression model, adjusted for clustered data. Variables with p ≤ 0.10 were retained in the final model (backward selection).ResultsThe multivariate model included 834 patients. Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody positivity (hazard ratio [95 % confidence interval]: 0.55 [0.40, 0.75], p < 0.001), failure of <2 prior anti-tumor necrosis factors (TNFs) (0.71 [0.56, 0.90], p = 0.005 versus ≥2 prior anti-TNFs), and cardiovascular comorbidity at abatacept initiation (0.48 [0.28, 0.83], p = 0.009) were associated with lower risk of abatacept discontinuation. Patients in Greece and Italy were less likely to discontinue abatacept than patients in Germany and Canada (Greece: 0.30 [0.16, 0.58]; Italy: 0.50 [0.33, 0.76]; Canada: 1.04 [0.78, 1.40], p < 0.001 versus Germany).ConclusionsReal-world prognostic factors for abatacept retention include anti-CCP positivity and fewer prior anti-TNF failures. Differences in retention rates between countries may reflect differences in healthcare systems. The finding that abatacept has potential advantages in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities needs to be confirmed in further research.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-015-0636-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The impact of patient heterogeneity and socioeconomic factors on abatacept retention in rheumatoid arthritis across nine European countries

BackgroundThere are substantial differences in accessibility to biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) across countries. The objective of this study was to analyse the impact of patient demographics, disease characteristics...