Since the recognition of the first Zn Zn bond in the dinuclear sandwich decamethyldizincocene [(h-C5Me5)Zn Zn(h-C5Me5)], [1] the chemistry of Zn Zn-bonded species has grown so rapidly that many complexes of the type LZn ZnL have been characterized and studied. Regardless of the denticity of the supporting ligands L, they all coordinate to Zn in a terminally chelating mode. However, formation of these dinuclear compounds has not been mechanistically examined. We recently described the characterization of dinuclear Zn Zn-bonded species [{k-Me2Si(NDipp)2}Zn Zn{k-Me2Si(NDipp)2}] 2 (2) (Dipp= 2,6-iPr2C6H3) from KC8 reduction of dinuclear zinc complex [Zn2(m-k -Me2Si(NDipp)2)2] (1), whereby the coordination mode of the diamido ligands dramatically changes from bridging to chelating. We thus became interested in the structural preference and the formation mechanism of Zn Zn-bonded complexes. Elaborate calculations were performed to understand the reduction of 1, and a plausible mechanism was then proposed (Scheme 1). On two-electron reduction of 1, two intermediates, Ia and Ib, are generated, and the energy difference between them is only 0.3 kcalmol . The Zn Zn-bonded mixed-valent intermediate Ia is produced by one-electron reduction of 1, and subsequently undergoes a dramatic structural rearrangement to give Ib, in which one threecoordinate and one one-coordinate Zn atoms are proposed. The exact valence of the Zn atoms in Ib is still not clear. Although the application of quantum chemical methods (ab initio molecular orbital and density functional theory) to elucidate reaction mechanisms has been very successful, most of the time it is difficult to prove the theoretically developed reaction mechanisms by experiments. This is indeed the case for the transformation from 1 to 2. Attempts to probe both intermediates Ia and Ib failed. To this end, we turned our attention from zinc to manganese and cadmium, because they not only show structural similarity in the reported M M-bonded dinuclear complexes [(k-Nacnac)M M(k-Nacnac)] (M=Zn, Mn; Nacnac= HC[C(Me)NDipp]2) and [Ar’M MAr’] (M=Zn, Cd; Ar’= 2,6-(2,6-iPr2C6H3)2C6H3), but also feature an identical M M s-bonding scheme. Herein we report structural transformations on reduction of dinuclear manganese and cadmium complexes [Mn2{k -Me2Si(NDipp)2}2] (3) and [Cd2{mk-Me2Si(NDipp)2}2] (4). Characterization of the products supports the computed mechanism shown in Scheme 1. As shown in Scheme 2, reactions of the dilithiated diamido ligand and 1 equiv of anhydrous MnCl2 and CdCl2 in diethyl ether and THF, respectively, yielded the corresponding dimeric compounds 3 and 4 in good yields. The dinuclear nature of 3 and 4 was deciphered by single-crystal X-ray crystallography, and their molecular structures are provided in Figures S1 and S2 of the Supporting Information. Complex 3 is essentially composed of two MnN2Si fourmembered rings, which are brought together by two Mn N bonds, and consequently exhibit a boat conformation with two manganese atoms at the stern and two Si atoms at the bow. Each Mn atom is embraced by three nitrogen atoms and adopts a distorted T-shaped geometry. The central Mn2N2 Scheme 1. Calculated mechanism of transformation of 1 into 2.
Read full abstract