A1 Pulley Research Articles

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Postoperative Complications Following Open A1 Pulley Release for a Trigger Finger or Thumb

Although A1 pulley release is an effective treatment to reduce pain and improve hand function, complications may occur. More insight into risk factors for complications is essential to improve patient counseling and potentially target modifiable risk factors. This study aimed to identify factors associated with complications following A1 pulley release. Patients completed baseline questionnaires, including patient characteristics, clinical characteristics, and the Michigan Hand outcomes Questionnaire. We retrospectively reviewed medical records to identify complications classified using the International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement Complications in Hand and Wrist conditions tool. Grade 1 complications comprise treatment with additional hand therapy, splinting, or analgesics, grade 2 treatment with antibiotics or steroid injections, grade 3A minor surgical treatment, grade 3B major surgical treatment, and grade 3C complex regional pain syndrome. Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the contribution of patient characteristics, clinical characteristics, and patient-reported outcome measurement scores to complications. Of the included 3,428 patients, 16% incurred a complication. The majority comprised milder grades 1 (6%) and 2 (7%) complications, followed by more severe grades 3B (2%), 3C (0.1%), and 3A (0.1%) complications. A longer symptom duration (standardized odds ratio [SOR], 1.09), ≥3 preoperative steroid injections (SOR, 3.22), a steroid injection within 3 months before surgery (SOR, 2.02), and treatment of the dominant hand (SOR, 1.34), index finger (SOR, 1.65), and middle finger (SOR, 2.01) were associated with a higher complication rate. This study demonstrates that ≥3 preoperative steroid injections and a steroid injection within 3 months before surgery were the most influential factors contributing to complications. These findings can assist clinicians during patient counseling and may guide preoperative treatment. We recommend that clinicians should consider avoiding steroid injections within 3 months before surgery and to be reluctant to perform >2 steroid injections. Prognostic II.

Symptom Duration and Diabetic Control Influence Success of Steroid Injection in Trigger Finger.

Trigger finger is one of the most common hand abnormalities, with a prevalence of 2 percent of the general population. Conservative treatment with corticosteroid injections at the A1 pulley has been shown to be a cost-effective first-line treatment. However, additional patient factors have not fully been described regarding steroid injection efficacy. The authors hypothesize that patients presenting with longer chronicity of symptoms before treatment and elevated blood glucose would have reduced success rates of steroid injection therapy. A retrospective chart review of 297 patients at a single institution was performed between 2013 and 2019. Patients were included if they presented with the diagnosis of trigger finger and were treated with initial corticosteroid injection at the A1 pulley. Steroid injection therapy alone was successful in 65 percent of patients. Patients received on average of 1.61 steroid injections. Patients who failed treatment received an average of 1.85 injections compared to 1.49 for those who had successful corticosteroid injection therapy ( p = 0.001). Presence of ipsilateral hand disease was associated with significant increase in failure of steroid injections (43.4 percent versus 30.8 percent; p = 0.032). Diabetic patients with hemoglobin A1c levels greater than 6.5 percent had a significantly higher rate of failing steroid injection therapy (71.9 percent versus 38.1 percent; p < 0.001). Patients who presented with greater than 2.5 months of symptoms had a higher failure rate of corticosteroid therapy (40.4 percent versus 29.5 percent; p = 0.048). Patients with a coexisting diagnosis of diabetes and a hemoglobin A1c level greater than 6.5 percent, ipsilateral concomitant hand disease, or presence of symptoms for greater than 2.5 months should be counseled regarding higher risk of failure of local corticosteroid injection. Risk, III.

Ultrasound-guided needle release of A1 pulley combined with corticosteroid injection is more effective than ultrasound-guided needle release alone in the treatment of trigger finger

BackgroundThe purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of ultrasonography-guided needle release of A1 pulley combined with corticosteroid injection by comparing it with ultrasound-guided needle release of the A1 pulley alone.MethodsA total of 49 patients (55 fingers, thumb) with trigger fingers were included in this retrospective study. Twenty-seven fingers were treated with ultrasound-guided needle release of the A1 pulley alone (monotherapy group), and 28 fingers were treated with needle release of the A1 pulley combined with corticosteroid injection (combination group). Visual analog scale (VAS), Froimson scale, postoperative recurrence rate, and thickness of A1 pulley at baseline, Week-2, Week-12, and Month-6 were recorded.ResultsHigher clinical cure rates were observed in the combination group at Week-2 after treatment among patients with the Froimson scale Grade III and IV (p < 0.05). Among Froimson scale Grade IV patients, the combination group had a significantly thinner thickness of A1 pulley and better articular pain relief at Week-2 (all p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in the clinical cure rate, the thickness of the A1 pulley, articular pain relief, and recurrence rate between the two groups at Week-12 and Month-6 (all p > 0.05).ConclusionsUltrasonography-guided needle release of A1 pulley plus corticosteroid injection was superior to ultrasonography-guided A1 pulley needle release alone during early-stage treatment of severe patients with trigger fingers. Moreover, ultrasonography-guided A1 pulley needle release combined with corticosteroid injection narrows the thickness of the A1 pulley. It is necessary to carry out preoperative evaluation and individualized treatment for patients of various severities.

Changes in the flexor pollicis longus tendon during spontaneous resolution of pediatric trigger thumb

The present study aimed to evaluate conformational changes in the flexor pollicis longus (FPL) tendon and inner space of the A1 pulley during spontaneous resolution of pediatric trigger thumb (PTT) and to compare them versus the normal contralateral side. We enrolled 36 patients with unilateral PTT who underwent ultrasonography twice between January 2016 and July 2020 and showed >10° improvement in thumb interphalangeal (IP) joint extension lag. Ultrasonography was used to measure the anteroposterior (AP) and radioulnar (RU) diameters of the FPL tendon proximal to the A1 pulley and of the inner space of the A1 pulley. On the side of the PTT, the average extension lag in the thumb IP joint significantly improved, from 35.6° to 14.2°. The AP and RU diameters of the FPL tendon increased by 0.3% and 1.9%, respectively, and those of the inner space of the A1 pulley increased by 15.3% and 5.0%, respectively. In the contralateral normal thumb, the AP and RU diameters of the FPL tendon increased by 12% and 9.3%, respectively, and those in the inner space of the A1 pulley increased by 9.9% and 4.6%. During improvement in IP joint extension lag, the mismatch between the enlarged FPL tendon and the inner space of the A1 pulley was reduced by their asymmetric growth.

A Biomechanical Comparison of Gliding Resistance between Modified Lim Tsai and Asymmetric Tendon Repair Techniques in Zone II Flexor Tendon Repairs.

Background: Early active motion protocols have shown better functional outcomes in zone II flexor tendon lacerations. Different techniques of tendon repair have different effects on gliding resistance, which can impact tendon excursion and adhesion formation. For successful initiation of early active mobilisation, the repair technique should have high breaking strength and low gliding resistance. Previous studies have shown the Modified Lim-Tsai technique demonstrates these characteristics. The Asymmetric repair has also shown superior ultimate tensile strength. This study aims to compare the gliding resistance between the two techniques. Methods: FDP tendons from ten fresh frozen cadaveric fingers were randomly divided into two groups, transected completely distal to the sheath of the A2 pulley and repaired using either the Modified Lim-Tsai or Asymmetric technique. The core repair was performed with Supramid 4-0 looped sutures and circumferential epitendinous sutures were done with nylon monofilament Prolene 6-0 sutures. The gliding resistance and ultimate tensile strength were then tested. Results: The gliding resistance of the Asymmetric and Modified Lim-Tsai repair techniques were 0.2 and 0.95 N respectively. This difference was significant (p = 0.008). The Modified Lim-Tsai technique had a higher ultimate tensile strength and load to 2 mm gap formation, though this was not significant. Conclusions: Gliding resistance of the Asymmetric repair is significantly less than that of Modified Lim-Tsai. Ultimate tensile strength and load to 2 mm gap formation are comparable.

The incidence and shape of the digital pulleys: a study of 192 fingers in 48 cadaveric hands.

We dissected 192 fingers in 48 fresh cadaveric hands (23 right and 25 left hands from 26 female and 22 male donors) and analysed the incidence, location, length and structure of the five annular and three cruciform pulleys. No statistically significant differences were found between left and right or between male and female hands. The A1, A2 and A4 pulleys were present in all fingers, while the incidence of other pulleys varied. We found 32 different patterns of pulley combinations. The structure of the pulleys also varied. Most important was the variation of A1, which consisted of one to four separate rings. In 18% there was no gap between the A1 and A2 pulleys. A greater understanding of the anatomical variation of the pulley system is beneficial for hand surgeons performing open or percutaneous trigger finger releases and for radiologists examining the area sonographically.

Responsiveness of PROMIS Instruments for Trigger Digit After Corticosteroid Injection or A1 Pulley Release

The purpose of the study was to determine if the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) is sufficiently sensitive to detect improvement after 2 common treatments of trigger finger: corticosteroid injection or A1 pulley release. This retrospective cohort study included 72 patients in the injection group and 51 in the A1 pulley release group. PROMIS physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and upper extremity (UE) scores were collected at baseline and 6 weeks after injection for the injection group and at baseline, and 1 week, 6 weeks, and 3 months after surgery for A1 pulley release patients. Descriptive statistics and paired t tests were used to compare PROMIS scores within each cohort. Standardized response means (SRMs) were calculated for each PROMIS domain to gauge instrument responsiveness. Average age was 62 years, 65% were female patients, and 86% were White for the steroid injection cohort, compared to 60 years, 71%, and 88%, respectively, for the A1 pulley release cohort. For the steroid injection group, mean PROMIS PI scores (-4.0 points; SRM=-0.6) and PROMIS UE scores (+3.3 points; SRM= 0.5) improved significantly at 6 weeks after injection compared to baseline. Meanwhile, A1 pulley release patients improved significantly in mean PI scores (-3.7 points; SRM=-0.5) and in UE scores (+4.9 points; SRM= 0.7) at 3 months after surgery compared to baseline. Clinical improvements after trigger digit treatments are reflected in improved PROMIS PI and UE scores that reach previously accepted minimum clinically important difference values for hand patients. PROMIS PI and UE also are more responsive than PROMIS PF in capturing improvement for trigger digit treatments. As health care payers continue to emphasize patient-reported outcomes to determine treatment value and set reimbursement rates, this study helps establish that clinical improvement after trigger digit treatments are reflected in PROMIS PI and UE domains by reaching previously established minimum clinically important difference values for hand patients.

Transosseous Multiple Finger Flexor Tendon Pulley Reconstruction

Background: Closed finger flexor tendon pulley injuries occur most frequently in rock climbing but also during other heavy finger strength work or exercises. While single pulley injuries receive a conservative therapy, multiple pulley injuries often require a surgical repair, as otherwise they will lead to contracture and loss of range of motion and functionality. While established surgical techniques, which use bone encircling tendon graft techniques, were found to produce osteonecrosis of the phalanx, our new transosseous technique avoids this problem. Indications: All triple pulley injuries (A2,3,4) (grade-4b injuries) and double pulley injuries (A2,3 or A3,4) (grade-4a injuries) are indicated, if the injury is older than 10 days at the point of therapy start or the flexor tendons bowstringing is either not redressable in the ultrasound or extended. Also, grade-4a injuries are indicated, if a secondary contracture starts to build. Technique Description: Standard palmar-sided incision, followed by debridement of the tendon sheath, pulley flap, and, if applicable, scare tissue in between the flexor tendons and the bone is performed. Wire-guided 3.0-mm drill holes at the base phalanx at the level of the former distal portion of the A2 pulley are completed. Passing of the palmaris longus tendon through the drill hole and interlacing it as a “loop and a half” follows. Distal continuation through lacing the transplant through the remaining rims of the former pulleys and the flexor tendon sheath is then performed. Securing the repair after tendon gliding control to itself is completed. Postsurgically, the splint is immobilized for 2 weeks, followed by the use of a thermoplastic pulley support ring for 4 weeks with active mobilization. Results: No complications occurred during or after the surgery. In few cases, a restricted range of motion in the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint of the respective finger of up to 3 to 5 grade occurred. One patient, who had a presurgical PIP extension deficit of 30°, which was released during the surgery, developed over time again a 20° extension deficit. The functional outcome score ranged between good and excellent, with one case being only satisfactory. The sport-specific outcome score was either good or excellent for all patients, with one patient with contracture where it was satisfactory. No osteonecrosis of the phalanx was recorded. Discussion: For multiple pulley ruptures, various surgical techniques are described. We favored a modified “loop and a half” technique with a distal continuation to the A3 pulley. This combines the advantages of the “loop and a half” technique, as the strongest, and the Weilby repair, as the most functional repair. We recently noticed some cases with osseous necrosis of the phalanx following this repair, likely due to the high pressure of the circulation of the tendon graft onto the bone and its blood vessels. Therefore, we have modified our procedure into a transosseous repair, which is presented in this article. This approach was first evaluated in a cadaver study to exclude a potential risk of osseous failure (fracture) during stress caused by the drill hole. After ruling out this risk, the transosseous technique became our standard approach, as it combines the advantages of the “loop and a half” technique with those of the Weilby repair and decreases the pressure onto the dorsal cortex of the fingers base phalanx and thus the risk of osteonecrosis.

Dynamic correction of ulnar claw hand deformity with a simple insertion into the lumbrical muscle

Numerous methods of tendon transfers are available to correct claw hand deformity. In this article, we describe a simple insertion of the transferred flexor digitorum superficialis tendon, into the lumbrical muscle and proximal tendon. Sixty patients underwent surgery for claw hand correction. These were equally divided into three groups undergoing; modified Stiles Bunnell procedure; 'lasso' insertion into A1 pulley and the lumbrical insertion procedure. Evaluation was done with proximal interphalangeal joint angle measurements, grip strength and using the Brand's criteria, 1 year after surgery. The improvements were comparable among the three groups. Insertion into the lateral bands has been a standard method of claw correction. In addition to correcting the hyperextension of the metacarpophalangeal joint, it transmits force for interphalangeal joint extension and restores the sequence of flexion of fingers, thus making the grasp effective. Insertion into the lumbrical muscle belly and proximal tendon shows similar results. It can be performed via a single incision in the palm, reducing operative time.

An Unusual Cause of Tenosynovitis by Group B Streptococcus in the Immunocompromised Patient: A Case Report

This case report describes a 49-year-old immunocompromised woman with tenosynovitis of the left middle finger caused by Group B Streptococcus (GBS). She claimed that a fishbone picked over her left middle finger. An orthopaedic surgeon operated for incision and drainage of pus discharge, wound debridement of the left middle finger and A1 and A2 pulley release. Treatment was initiated with parenteral cefepime three times per day given the growth of mixed Enterobacter species on the culture media and continued with oral cefuroxime twice daily upon discharge for one week. Unfortunately, during the orthopaedic clinic follow-up, the wound was unclean with a slough and skin necrotic patch. Therefore, Ray’s amputation of the left middle finger proceeded. This case contributes to further investigation of the GBS tenosynovitis due to the rise in GBS invasive infections and shows the importance of early diagnosing and initiating treatment with antibiotics that are effective against this pathogen.

Defining the Digit-Specific Confluence of the A1 Pulley

Variations in the description of the flexor pulley system exist, particularly in whether the A1 and A2 pulleys represent discrete or confluent entities. This has potentially important clinical relevance at the time of A1 pulley release for symptomatic trigger finger, given the goal of adequate release without overrelease. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative prevalence of confluent A1 pulleys on a digit-by-digit basis employing 2.5× loupes alone, thereby simulating a clinical surgical environment. Cadaveric anatomic specimens underwent flexor pulley system dissection under 2.5× loupe magnification by 2 hand surgeons. The presence of pulley confluence and length (measured from the proximal aspect to the distal aspect) was recorded and compared on a digit-to-digit basis. Forty-five digits, comprising 9 adult forearm or hand specimens (5 right and 4 left) obtained from 6 donors (4 men and 2 women, age: 67 ± 8 years), were dissected. A total of 19 confluent A1 pulleys were encountered, with notable digit-by-digit variation in the prevalence of confluent pulleys. There were 0 confluent pulleys observed in the thumb, compared with 6 confluent pulleys observed in the middle finger. The average overall A1 pulley length was 5.0 ± 1.5 mm, with a similar pulley length observed between the digits. A1 pulley confluence varies on a digit-to-digit basis, with no observed confluence in the thumb and the most common confluence observed in the middle finger. In the setting of intraoperatively observed pulley confluence, we suggest pulley release under traction in order to develop the plane between the A1 and A2 pulleys and, thus, confirm the complete and isolated release of the A1 pulley.

Trigger thumb preceding flexor pollicis longus tendon rupture after distal radius volar plate fixation: A case report.

IntroductionFlexor pollicis longus (FPL) tendon rupture is a known complication after a distal radius (DR) fracture and subsequent fixation with a volar plate. A commonly accepted theory is the attrition of the flexor tendon by the prominent volar plate or theoretical injury to the tendon during the initial injury. An increasingly rare complication of distal radius open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with volar plate fixation is stenosing tenosynovitis, more commonly known as trigger finger.Presentation of caseWe present a case of FPL rupture 7 years after volar plate fixation for DR fracture with thumb triggering in an elderly patient. To treat her trigger thumb, a corticosteroid injection was administered for symptomatic relief. Without resolution of her symptoms, she was scheduled for hardware removal and A1 pulley release. At her preoperative visit, she was found to have a rupture of her FPL tendon.Discussion/conclusionThis case report provides insight into an atypical presentation of delayed-onset FPL rupture and preceding trigger thumb. Especially in individuals with no inciting events, the patient's trigger thumb after volar plate distal radius ORIF may have been a warning sign for impending FPL rupture. This underscores the importance in considering potential tendon attrition as part of a differential diagnosis in a patient presenting with trigger thumb after distal radius ORIF with a volar plate. In assessing for FPL tendon rupture, diagnostic imaging modalities such as ultrasound may be utilized in evaluating this condition to prevent potential loss of function.

Techniques for Retrieval of Lacerated Flexor Tendons: A Scoping Review.

Introduction: Flexor tendon laceration is often followed by retraction of the proximal stump. The goals of this review were to describe the myriad of proximal stump retrieval surgical techniques and where available to provide the clinical evidence associated with each. Methods: A Medline and Web of Science search was performed to identify any publication whose primary purpose was to describe a tendon retrieval technique. The techniques were assigned to 8 groups. Clinical outcomes, where reported, and advantages and disadvantages of the technique as reported by the authors of the articles were analyzed. Results: Eight-hundred and forty-one publications complied with the search terms, and 33 articles were included in the current analysis. Only 2 of these articles were randomized controlled trials, and they were of low quality. Conclusion: There is no high-quality evidence to allow quantitative comparison of tendon retrieval techniques. An incremental approach can be recommended based on the qualitative review. After failed atraumatic attempts to retrieve the tendon by milking, retrieval should be done through proximal incision at the A1 pulley level, preferably without pulling the tendon out of the wound. When available, using an endoscope to retrieve the tendon appears to be a promising alternative.

Open Release of Pediatric Trigger Thumb.

The surgical procedure is easy to perform and straightforward; however, attention must be given to several details in order to avoid surgical failure and complications. General anesthesia is required for this procedure. The extremity is prepared and draped in a sterile fashion with the patient in the supine position, and a tourniquet is utilized to facilitate surgical dissection. A transverse incision is gently made just adjacent to the thumb metacarpophalangeal (MP) flexion crease, above the so-called Notta nodule. The ulnar neurovascular bundle is retracted to the side, and the Notta nodule, a local enlargement of the FPL tendon2, is visualized at the A1 pulley. The pulley is incised longitudinally to allow for full IP joint extension. After verification of full passive motion, the tendon is inspected for any further abnormalities. Then, the tourniquet is released, and the wound is closed with absorbable sutures. We recommend the use of local anesthetics for postoperative pain control. In cases of a trigger thumb stuck in extension, full tenodesis flexion of the IP joint combined with smooth, full passive extension confirms a complete release. Nonoperative treatment modalities mainly include watchful waiting for spontaneous resolution3, occupational therapy (i.e., passive exercising)4,5, and splinting therapy6. However, prolonged stretching and splinting may move the nodule to a point distal to the stenotic pulley, thus resulting in a trigger thumb locked in extension with a loss of IP flexion. Alternative surgical treatment techniques involve percutaneous trigger thumb release or open release with alternative surgical approaches (e.g., an oblique or Brunner incision)7,8. Several reports have shown that open release of a trigger thumb leads to the most reliable outcomes in terms of achievement of range of motion and complications1,9,10. The main advantage of this procedure is the perfect visualization of the FPL tendon beneath the stenotic A1 pulley, which allows for a complete A1 release with clear vision. Such visualization cannot be provided with use of percutaneous techniques, which position the neurovascular bundle in potential danger for iatrogenic injury or may lead to incomplete pulley release8. Moreover, the use of this procedure allows parents to avoid the prolonged therapy and splinting associated with nonoperative treatment. Formal rehabilitation is usually not necessary postoperatively. Open release of a trigger thumb is a safe and reliable option that leads to full range of motion in 95% of children, which is substantially higher than for nonoperative treatment with therapy (55%) and splinting (67%)1. Even delayed open release may provide satisfactory outcomes9. Although spontaneous resolution without surgery has been reported in 63% of cases3, patients with a flexion contracture of >30° showed spontaneous resolution in only 2.5% of cases10. Furthermore, the open surgical technique has been shown to have a lower rate of complications (around 3.4%)11 compared with percutaneous techniques, which showed a 3.29 times increased risk of recurrence12 and relevant injury to the neurovascular bundle8. If the A1 is fully divided, recurrence is highly unlikely. Postoperative rehabilitation is very quick following open release of a trigger thumb because closure under local anesthesia provides a painless postoperative course, wounds heal within a few days, and children are allowed to resume play immediately once a bandage is applied. The use of surgical loupes is of paramount importance to safely perform this procedure.Place the skin incision adjacent but not directly onto the palmar MP flexion crease for better scar formation.Divide the skin very gently because the A1 pulley is located directly under the skin, and the FPL and radial nerve can be harmed easily. Retract the ulnar neurovascular bundle aside so as to allow for safe preparation until A1 division.Divide the A1 pulley until the Notta nodule on the FPL can safely glide distally into full IP extension. In some cases with large, distally-sitting nodules, the pulley incision must be extended distally into the oblique bundle.A sign that the entire A1 pulley is released is seeing the corner formed by the distal edge of the pulley and the longitudinal cut in the pulley. Additionally, the cut halves of the fully released pulley will rest completely in the sagittal plane of the thumb, no longer converging over the FPL tendon.Tight bands can exist proximal and distal to the A1 pulley and should be released as well if present.Check for a tight IP volar plate following A1 division, which may require postoperative splinting.For thumbs stuck in extension, tenodesis can be utilized to verify complete A1 release.Utilize absorbable sutures, local anesthesia, and a bulky dressing to allow a comfortable postoperative course. IP = interphalangealMP = metacarpophalangealFPL = flexor pollicis longusROM = range of motionANOVA = analysis of variance.

Modified Acupotomy versus Percutaneous Release for Trigger Thumb: A Retrospective Study.

BackgroundAcupotomy is now increasingly used for trigger thumb, while recent evidence showed it increased the risk of nerve injury. Based on the close proximity of the neurovascular bundles and the A1 pulley, we designed a modified acupotomy. Given that percutaneous release is the common surgical treatment, this retrospective study aimed to compare the effect and safety of modified acupotomy versus percutaneous release for trigger thumb.MethodsThis is a retrospective study. All patients with trigger thumb were retrieved in the electronic records of the Department of Pain Medicine at the Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2016 to September 2018. Both short-term (3 months) and long-term (2 years) outcomes were evaluated using the criteria established through Gilberts et al.’s questionnaire, including triggering, residual pain, stiffness, digital nerve injury, scar, infection and satisfaction. Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare differences between two groups.ResultsA total of 305 patients with 334 trigger thumbs treated with either modified acupotomy (n = 194 thumbs) or percutaneous release (n = 140 thumbs) were included. Of them, 221 (72.5%) were female, and the mean age was 56.2 ± 10.0 years. The mean duration of trigger thumb lasted for 7.5 ± 3.6 months. At 3 months, all triggering were alleviated by both therapies. Although more digital nerve injury occurred in the percutaneous release (0 [0%] thumbs vs 5 [3.6%] thumbs, P = 0.012), more residual pain (30 [15.5%] thumbs vs 6 [4.3%] thumbs; rate ratio, 3.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.54–8.43; P = 0.001) and less satisfaction occurred in the modified acupotomy group. At 2 years, more recurrent triggering, residual pain and digital nerve injury occurred in the percutaneous release group (2 [1.0%] thumbs vs 12 [8.6%] thumbs; rate ratio, 0.12; 95% CI: 0.03–0.53; P = 0.001; 9 [4.6%] thumbs vs 22 [15.7%] thumbs; rate ratio, 0.30; 95% CI: 0.14–0.62 P < 0.001; 0 [0%] thumbs vs 4 [2.9%] thumbs, P = 0.030, respectively). Moreover, satisfaction was significantly better in the modified acupotomy group.ConclusionThe modified acupotomy had better long-term outcomes and satisfaction than the percutaneous release for trigger thumb, although percutaneous release has less residual pain and better satisfaction in the short term. The modified acupotomy is a treatment option for trigger thumb.

A New Test for Trigger Finger: The Lenox Independent Flexion Test.

Background: The diagnosis of trigger finger (TF) in patients who do not demonstrate triggering at presentation can be challenging. We have been using a new test for TF - the Lenox Independent Flexion Test (LIFT). The aim of this study is to determine the sensitivity of LIFT in diagnosing TF. We hypothesise that LIFT will be more sensitive compared to the classic physical exam finding of triggering or locking with active range of motion (AROM). Methods: This is a prospective study of consecutive patients with TF over a 5-month period. Patients with the onset of trigger following trauma and trigger of the thumb were excluded. Patients were examined for tenderness over the first annular (A1) pulley, triggering or locking with AROM, and the LIFT was performed. A two-proportion test was used to determine whether the LIFT was more sensitive than triggering with AROM. Results: The study included 85 patients with 118 TFs. The average age of patients was 63 years and the study included 49 women. There were 69, 49, 0 and 0 grade I, II, III and IV TF, respectively. 108 fingers (92%) had a history of catching or locking of the affected digit, 110 (93%) had tenderness over the A1 pulley, 49 (44%) had triggering or locking with AROM and 102 (91%) had a positive LIFT. The LIFT was found to be more sensitive when compared to triggering with AROM (p < .001). Conclusion: The LIFT is more sensitive than triggering with AROM in the diagnosis of trigger digits. This test is especially useful in the diagnosis of TF in patients who do not have triggering at presentation. Level of Evidence: Level III (Diagnostic).

Ultrasound visualization of the thumb annular pulleys: A cadaveric validation study.

The thumb annular pulley system is unique from the other digits and is integral to normal thumb function. Injuries to this pulley system can present a diagnostic challenge. No prior study has evaluated the ability of ultrasound (US) to evaluate all four thumb pulleys. To validate the sonographic visualization of all four thumb pulleys. Prospective cadaveric laboratory investigation. Academic center procedural skills laboratory. Twelve unembalmed cadaveric hands from seven adult male donors ages 78-89 years with body mass index 21.9-26.6kg/m2 . Based on anatomic descriptions, a single examiner used a standardized protocol and high-frequency linear transducers to identify the A1, variable (Av), oblique (Ao), and A2 pulleys of the thumb in 10 cadaveric hands. As part of the validation process, the presumed Ao pulley was injected with diluted colored latex using US guidance. Two additional cadaveric specimens were dissected for detailed study of the thumb pulley system. Correlation between the four anatomic pulleys as revealed by dissection and the US findings, including identification of latex location with respect to the Ao pulley. US correctly identified all four thumb pulleys as distinct anatomic structures and the sonographic appearance of the pulleys correlated with the dissection in all 10 specimens. Latex was observed in the Ao pulley in 100% of the cadavers. Ultrasound can be used to accurately identify all four thumb pulleys, including distinct Ao and Av pulleys, and should be considered in the evaluation of thumb pulley injuries. This is the first study to validate the US visualization of the annular pulley system of the thumb.

Factors associated with self-reported pain and hand function following surgical A1 pulley release.

Surgical A1 pulley release can considerably reduce pain and improve hand function, but individual outcomes are highly variable. This study aimed to identify factors contributing to self-reported pain and hand function 3months postoperatively. We included 2681 patients who had received surgical treatment for a trigger finger or thumb and who completed the Michigan Hand outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ). Hierarchical linear regression models were used to investigate patient and clinical characteristics associated with postoperative pain and hand function. For both pain and hand function, the most influential factors associated with worse outcomes were worse MHQ scores at baseline (β 0.38 and 0.33, respectively) and ≥3 preoperative steroid injections (β -0.36 and -0.35). These factors indicated that patients with severe preoperative symptoms represent a group with a more advanced disease that is more difficult to treat. These findings can assist clinicians in patient counselling, expectation management and decision-making about the timing of the intervention.Level of evidence: II.

A1 Pulley Tenderness as a Modification to Tenderness along the Flexor Sheath in Diagnosing Pyogenic Flexor Tenosynovitis.

Background:Pyogenic flexor tenosynovitis (PFT) is frequently diagnosed by physical examination according to the Kanavel signs. This study proposes a modification of the Kanavel sign “tenderness over the course of the flexor sheath” by including palpation of the A1 pulley to increase specificity for diagnosis.Methods:A retrospective review was performed over 8 months for patients in the emergency department who received a consult to hand surgery to rule out PFT. Two cohorts, nonPFT infections and PFT infections, were studied for the presence or absence of the four Kanavel signs, as well as tenderness specifically over the A1 pulley on the affected digit(s) or T1 pulley of the thumb.Results:There were a total of 33 patients in the two cohorts (21 nonPFT, 12 PFT) with statistically significant differences with regard to the presence of all the Kanavel signs. A1 pulley tenderness had the greatest odds ratio, positive predictive value, specificity, and accuracy when compared with all Kanavel signs. When used in conjunction with each Kanavel sign, there was an increase in specificity in all four signs. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed increased area under the curve with A1 pulley tenderness added, indicating improved ability to classify hand infections as PFT versus nonPFT.Conclusion:Although the classic Kanavel signs have shown reliable clinical utility, this study finds that tenderness at the A1 pulley can be a useful specification of “tenderness over the course of the flexor sheath” to help with the diagnosis of PFT.

Primary Resection of the Ulnar Slip of Flexor Digitorum Superficialis in the Persistently Triggering Patient After A1 Pulley Release.

The purpose of this study was to determine the occurrence of patients undergoing primary trigger finger release (TFR) that underwent ulnar superficialis slip resection (USSR) for decompression and to determine which digit was most commonly affected. A retrospective chart review was conducted of all cases of open TFR performed by a single surgeon. The following data were obtained: age, sex, laterality, affected digit, and consideration for USSR. All patients failed nonoperative treatment of at least 1 steroid injection. The occurrence of patients who underwent TFR and USSR and which digit(s) most commonly underwent USSR were determined. The average patient age that underwent USSR, frequency by sex, and relative occurrence of USSR in each digit were computed. Statistical calculations were conducted using χ2 analysis (P < .05). A total of 911 primary open TFRs were performed in 631 patients over a 16-year period. A total of 20 TFRs in 20 patients underwent USSR (2.2%). The long finger was the most commonly affected digit (40%) that required simple decompression. Within all USSR cases, the long finger was the most commonly affected digit. The index finger was the second most affected (30%), and there were no cases in the small finger. This study determined the occurrence of primary TFR cases that underwent USSR, with the long finger being the most commonly affected digit. Surgeons may consider this additional procedure to perform a larger decompression than simple A1 pulley release alone.