A3 Fractures Research Articles

Time until union in absolute vs. relative stability MIPO plating in simple humeral shaft fractures.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of absolute stability (AS) versus relative stability (RS) performed through a minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in AO/OTA 12A1 and 12A2 fractures on healing and the time to radiographic union. This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients treated with plate fixation for AO/OTA type 12A1-A2 fractures at a single institution. Patients were grouped according to the type of stability used in their surgery. Time until radiographic union was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, which was compared by long-rank test between both types of surgical techniques. A total of 70 patients were included in this study with 35 patients in each group. The median follow-up was 9 (IQR 6-14) months. The median time to radiographic union was significantly lower in the AS group than in the RS group: 12 (interquartile range (IQR) 10-14) weeks versus 18 (IQR 16-19) weeks, respectively (p < 0.001). Non-union was seen in two cases (7%) in the relative stability group. Three patients in the RS group developed a post-operative radial nerve palsy. The main finding of this study is that the median time to radiographic union was significantly shorter in the patients treated with AS compared to those with a RS technique. These findings support the recommendations of the AO foundation in that simple metaphyseal fractures (type A) that require surgical treatment should be treated with an AS construct. RS techniques should be reserved to multifragmentary fractures where fragment preservation of blood supply is paramount.

Factors associated with the development of screw cut-out after the fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fractures with a proximal femoral nail

Objective: To reveal the factors associated with screw cut-out in the fixation of proximal femur intertrochanteric fractures with a proximal femoral nail (PFN).&#x0D; Material and Method: Patients who were diagnosed with proximal femoral intertrochanteric fractures and were being treated and followed up in our hospital between January 2014 and January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The hip fracture types of the patients were determined according to the American Foundation/American Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification. AO/OTA 31-A1, A2 and A3 type fractures were included in the study. Twenty-seven patients with PFN fixation failure and screw cut-out (cut-out group, 11.4%) were compared with 208 patients who had successful osteosynthesis without cut-out (non-cut-out group, 88.6%). Age, gender, affected side, follow-up time, PFN design, tip-apex distance (TAD), calcar-referenced TAD, fracture type, reduction quality, posteromedial support loss, lag screw position, Singh index, and collo-diaphyseal angle (CDA) were compared between the two groups.&#x0D; Results: The two groups significantly differed in terms of TAD and calcar-referenced TAD (p = 0.002 and 0.001, respectively). In the evaluation of reduction quality according to the Baumgaertner scale and the Garden alignment index, a significant difference was found between the two groups (p = 0.021 and 0.002, respectively). A significant difference was also observed between the two groups in terms of screw position and posteromedial cortex continuity (p = 0.009 and 0.037, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in relation to age, gender, affected side, CDA, PFN design, and osteoporosis severity.&#x0D; Conclusion: Fracture type, poor reduction quality, loss of posteromedial support, TAD, calcar-referenced TAD, and lag screw position were found to be associated factors in the development of screw cut-out. Apart from the type of fracture, these factors that are under the control of the surgeon generally show the importance of anatomical reduction and accurate screw placement.

Treating traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures using minimally invasive percutaneous stabilization plus balloon kyphoplasty: a 102-patient series

BackgroundThere is no consensus on the treatment for spinal injuries resulting in thoracolumbar fractures without neurological impairment. Many trauma centers are opting for open surgery rather than a neurointerventional approach...

Biodegradable cement augmentation of gamma nail osteosynthesis reduces migration in pertrochanteric fractures, a biomechanical in vitro study

BackgroundCut-out of gamma nail often results from poor primary bone stability, suboptimal reduction (varus) and excentric placement of the head element which may lead to “instability” and frequently requires revision.Various studies have shown that augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate cement increases the primary stability of osteosynthesis. However, it has not yet been widely used in fracture treatment due to certain disadvantages, e.g., the lack of osteointegration, the formation of an interface membrane or the presence of toxic monomers. Few studies show that biodegradable bone cements increase the stability of osteosynthesis in different anatomical regions and therefore could be an alternative to polymethylmethacrylate cement in the treatment of pertrochanteric fractures. MethodsTwo biomechanical situations were simulated using 24 Sawbones (simple and multifragmentary pertrochanteric fractures; AO-classification 31-A1 and 31-A2. Both groups were stabilized using the Gamma3® nailing system with and without biodegradable bone cement. Sawbones underwent the same cyclic loading test, simulating 10.000 gait cycles loading the bones with three times body weight. Migration was determined by comparing computed tomography scans recorded before and after the mechanical testing. The three-dimensional migration of the lag screw was calculated, and the rotation of the head around the longitudinal axis was determined. FindingsBiodegradable cement reduced migration by approximately 35% in 31-A1 fractures (25.4% in 31-A2 fractures) and the rotation of the head around the lag screw by approximately 37% in 31-A1 fractures (17.8%, 31-A2). InterpretationUse of biodegradable bone cement improved the primary stability of gamma nail osteosynthesis in the biomechanical model.

Managing Incomplete and Complete Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures (AO Spine A3 and A4). Results from a Prospective Single-Center Study Comparing Posterior Percutaneous Instrumentation plus Mini-Open Anterolateral Fusion versus Single-Stage Posterior Instrumented Fusion

The treatment strategy for thoracolumbar burst fractures is still debated. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical and radiologic outcomes of a 2-stage strategy with immediate posterior percutaneous instrumentation and delayed anterolateral fusion (group A) versus a single-stage open posterior instrumented fusion (group B). Demographics and clinical and surgical data of patients operated for AO Spine A3 and A4 fractures were prospectively collected. Vertebral height and deformity were evaluated before and after surgery. Visual analog scale score for back pain, Oswestry Disability Index, and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey results for quality-of-life assessment were collected during follow-up. Among the 110 patients enrolled, 66 were allocated to group A and 44 to group B; the most common fractured level was T12 (34%). Postoperative complications were higher in group B, especially the wound infection rate (18% vs. 3%), and pseudomeningocele (14% vs. 0%). The 2-stage approach allowed an average long-term gain of 15.8° at the local kyphosis of fractured vertebra and 5.8° at the regional level (Cobb angle), versus 15.4° and 5.5° in group B. At 2 years follow-up, both groups showed significant functional improvements; however, the visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index metrics seemed more favorable for group A patients (P < 0.0001 vs. P < 0.003). A complete fusion rate was obtained in 100% of group A vs. 65% of group B. Our study indicates that percutaneous instrumentation and anterior fusion or an expandable cage lead to excellent long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes with a lower complication rate and higher fusion rate than those of open posterior approaches.

Removal of cement-augmented screws in distal femoral fractures and the effect of retained screws and cement on total knee arthroplasty: a biomechanical investigation

BackgroundGiven the increasing number of osteoporotic fractures of the distal femur, screw augmentation with bone cement is an option to enhance implant anchorage. However, in implant removal or revision surgeries, the cement cannot be removed from the distal femur without an extended surgical procedure. Therefore, the aims of this study were to investigate (1) whether cement augmentation has any influence on screw removal and removal torque, and (2) whether the implantation of a femoral component of a knee arthroplasty and its initial interface stability are affected by the remaining screws/cement.Material and methodsEight pairs of fresh-frozen human female cadaveric distal femurs (mean age, 86 years) with a simulated AO/OTA 33 A3 fracture were randomized in paired fashion to two groups and fixed with a distal femoral locking plate using cannulated perforated locking screws. Screw augmentation with bone cement was performed in one of the groups, while the other group received no screw augmentation. Following biomechanical testing until failure (results published separately), the screws were removed and the removal torque was measured. A femoral component of a knee arthroplasty was then implanted, and pull-out tests were performed after cement curing. Interference from broken screws/cement was assessed, and the maximum pull-out force was measured.ResultsThe mean screw removal torque was not significantly different between the augmented (4.9 Nm, SD 0.9) and nonaugmented (4.6 Nm, SD 1.3, p = 0.65) screw groups. However, there were significantly more broken screws in in the augmented screw group (17 versus 9; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the pull-out force of the femoral component between the augmented (2625 N, SD 603) and nonaugmented (2653 N, SD 542, p = 0.94) screw groups.ConclusionThe screw removal torque during implant removal surgery does not significantly differ between augmented and nonaugmented screws. In the augmented screw group, significantly more screws failed. To overcome this, the use of solid screws in holes B, C, and G can be considered. Additionally, it is possible to implant a femoral component for knee arthroplasty that retains the initial anchorage and does not suffer from interference with broken screws and/or residual cement.Level of Evidence 5

Intramedullary nailing versus sliding hip screw for A1 and A2 trochanteric hip fractures.

This study evaluated variation in the surgical treatment of stable (A1) and unstable (A2) trochanteric hip fractures among an international group of orthopaedic surgeons, and determined the influence of patient, fracture, and surgeon characteristics on choice of implant (intramedullary nailing (IMN) versus sliding hip screw (SHS)). A total of 128 orthopaedic surgeons in the Science of Variation Group evaluated radiographs of 30 patients with Type A1 and A2 trochanteric hip fractures and indicated their preferred treatment: IMN or SHS. The management of Type A3 (reverse obliquity) trochanteric fractures was not evaluated. Agreement between surgeons was calculated using multirater kappa. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess whether patient, fracture, and surgeon characteristics were independently associated with choice of implant. The overall agreement between surgeons on implant choice was fair (kappa = 0.27 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25 to 0.28)). Factors associated with preference for IMN included USA compared to Europe or the UK (Europe odds ratio (OR) 0.56 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.67); UK OR 0.16 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.22); p < 0.001); exposure to IMN only during training compared to surgeons that were exposed to both (only IMN during training OR 2.6 (95% CI 2.0 to 3.4); p < 0.001); and A2 compared to A1 fractures (Type A2 OR 10 (95% CI 8.4 to 12); p < 0.001). In an international cohort of orthopaedic surgeons, there was a large variation in implant preference for patients with A1 and A2 trochanteric fractures. This is due to surgeon bias (country of practice and aspects of training). The observation that surgeons favoured the more expensive implant (IMN) in the absence of convincing evidence of its superiority suggests that surgeon de-biasing strategies may be a useful focus for optimizing patient outcomes and promoting value-based healthcare. Cite this article: Bone Joint J2021;103-B(4):775-781.

Local bone quality measure and construct failure prediction: a biomechanical study on distal femur fractures

IntroductionThe aim of this investigation was to better understand the differences in local bone quality at the distal femur and their correlation with biomechanical construct failure, with the intention to identify regions of importance to optimize implant anchorage.Materials and methodsSeven fresh–frozen female femurs underwent high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) to determine bone mineral density (BMD) within three different regions of interest (distal, intermedium, and proximal) at the distal femur. In addition, local bone quality was assessed by measuring the peak torque necessary to break out the trabecular bone along each separate hole of a locking compression plate (LCP) during its instrumentation. Finally, biomechanical testing was performed using cyclic axial loading until failure in an AO/OTA 33 A3 fracture model.ResultsLocal BMD was highest in the distal region. This was confirmed by the measurement of local bone quality using DensiProbe™. The most distal holes represented locations with the highest breakaway torque resistance, with the holes on the posterior side of the plate indicating higher values than those on its anterior side. We demonstrated strong correlation between the cycles to failure and local bone strength (measured with DensiProbe™) in the most distal posterior screw hole, having the highest peak torque.ConclusionThe local bone quality at the distal femur indicates that in plated distal femur fractures the distal posterior screw holes seem to be the key ones and should be occupied. Measurement of the local bone strength with DensiProbe™ is one possibility to determine the risk of construct failure, therefore, thresholds need to be defined.

Implants for trochanteric fractures in Norway: the role of the trochanteric stabilizing plate\u2014a study on 20,902 fractures from the Norwegian hip fracture register 2011\u20132017

BackgroundThe trochanteric stabilizing plate (TSP) is used as an adjunct to the sliding hip screw (SHS) in unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. We wanted to describe the choice of implant for trochanteric fractures with a focus on the TSP in Norway.MethodsA total of 20,902 fractures from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register treated surgically in 43 hospitals from 2011 to 2017 were included. Logistic regression analyses were performed to detect factors potentially influencing implant choice.ResultsThe mean age was 83 years, and 15,137 (72%) were women. An SHS was used in 13,273 (63%) fractures, of them 4407 (33%) with a TSP. Fracture classification was the most important determinant of TSP. In cases where an SHS was used, the odds ratio (OR) for using a TSP was 14 for AO/OTA 31A2 fractures and 71 for AO/OTA 31A3 and subtrochanteric fractures, compared to AO/OTA 31A1 fractures. The probability of receiving a TSP was higher in urban, academic, and high-volume hospitals (OR 1.2 to 1.3) and lower in Central and Northern Norway (OR 0.3 to 0.7). The use of an intramedullary nail (IMN) (n = 7629 (36%)) was also to a degree decided by fracture classification (OR 1.8 to 5.3). However, hospital factors, with OR 0.1 to 0.4 for IMN in academic, urban, and high-volume hospitals and OR 1.5 to 2.6 outside South-Eastern Norway (all p < 0.001), were also important.ConclusionsFracture classification was the main determinant for TSP use. Any additional benefit from a TSP on postoperative fracture stability or clinical outcome needs to be clarified.

Back to the future in traumatic fracture shapes of lumbar spine: An analysis of risk of kyphosis after conservative treatment.

Introduction:Nonosteoporotic burst vertebral fracture could commonly be treated with conservative or surgical approach. Currently, decision-making process is based on thoracolumbar (TL) AO spine severity injury score. However, some factors could affect posttraumatic kyphosis (PTK) and could be taken into account. The aim of the present study is to identify if axial and sagittal fracture shape and initial kyphosis are the risk factors for PTK.Materials and Methods:All consecutive patients treated between 2016 and 2017 for TL vertebral fracture with conservative treatment were retrospectively evaluated in the study. Only type A3 and A4 vertebral fractures were included in the study. Patients suffering from osteoporosis or other metabolic bone disease, aged above 60 years old were excluded from the study. Initial and 6 months X-ray from injury were analyze to evaluate local kyphosis and region of injury while initial assessment was performed with computed tomography to better identify fracture type and in some cases magnetic resonance imaging to exclude posterior ligament complex injury. Axial and sagittal view of the vertebral plate was analyzed and classified in three shapes according to fragment comminution and dislocation. Statistical analysis was performed trough STATA13 software. Student's t-test was used to evaluate the differences between initial and follow up kyphosis; odds ratio (OR) was used to evaluate the role of initial kyphosis, vertebral sagittal and axial fracture shape as a risk factor for PTK. Kruskal–Wallis test was used to assess the differences among vertebral shape fractures and final kyphosis. Fisher's exact test was used to assess the differences between fracture patterns and final kyphosis.Results:An initial kyphosis >10° (OR 36.75 P = 0.015), shape c vertebral plate (OR 147 P = 0.0015), and sagittal shape 3 (OR 32.25 P = 0.0025) are strongly related with PTK. Kruskal–Wallis test revealed a statistically significant difference among axial fracture shape (P < 0.0001) and sagittal fracture shape (P = 0.004) and also for initial kyphosis >10° (P < 0.0001). Fisher's exact test showed a significant difference for final kyphosis among pattern c3 and other patterns of fracture (P = 0.0001).Conclusions:A burst type lumbar vertebral fracture affecting a patient with initial local kyphosis >10° and comminution and displacement of vertebral plate and vertebral body is at high risk to develop a local kyphosis >20° in the follow-up if treated conservatively.

Judet's quadricepsplasty after total hip arthroplasty and Thompson's quadricepsplasty: A case report

Judet quadricepsplasty provides a gradual release of knee extension contracture occurring due to intrinsic and extrinsic reasons. We herein present a 68-year-old male patient with a fragmented right femur AO (arbeitsgemeinschaft für osteosynthesefragen) Type A3 fracture, which occurred because of an in-vehicle traffic accident 30 years ago. The fracture was fixed with an anterior plate-screw with open reduction, and knee extension contracture had developed after the operation. The distinctive features of this case include a previous, unsuccessful, ipsilateral V-Y quadricepsplasty, an ipsilateral total hip arthroplasty with anterior approach six months ago and a persistent extension contracture for over 30 years. Gradual releasing techniques, as described by Judet, were performed under general anesthesia and sterile conditions with the patient in supine position. Intraoperatively, two displaced screws were detected on the anterior femur, which had adhered to the vastus medialis muscle, and fibrosed. Adhesions were dissected and screws were removed. Before the release of the proximal adhesion of the rectus muscle, a forced external rotation of hip joint was performed to assure that adequate fibrotic tissue had formed on the anterior facet of the joint capsule to prevent anterior instability. Five recurrent knee joint effusions developed after surgery, which were aspirated by needle. Joint fluids were clear and there were no reproductions of any microorganisms. By the end of an uneventful, two-year follow-up period, final knee range of motion was 0-90 degrees. Loss of extension and extensor muscle power had entirely improved by 6 months. In a patient with hip prosthesis, provided that adequate fibrosis has formed on the anterior facet of the joint capsule, rectus release may not cause instability. In cases resistant to rehabilitation, if there is implant, fibrosis or hypertrophic callus which may cause irritation at any level of the knee extensor mechanism, we suggest their resection for a more even anterior cortex contour.

A prospective study of functional outcome of treatment of supracondylar fracture of femur by locking compression plate

Aim: To evaluate the functional outcome of supracondylar femur fracture treated by locking compression plate. Materials and Methods: Our study consists of 20 cases of supracondylar femur fracture operated at Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopaedics from November 2015 to march 2017.Functional outcome was assessed through Neers scoring system. All the cases in the study were posttraumatic. Mean duration of follow up was 11 months Results: There were 7 male patients and female were 13.Average age of the patients was 40.5 years with age ranging from 18 years to77 years.14 cases involved the right femur whereas 7 left sided femur fracture occured. The study included only one case of compound type 1 femur fracture and 19 cases were closed supracondylar femur fractures. The mode of injury was RTA for 12 cases and 8 cases had history of self-fall. Only 3 cases had associated injuries. In patients with associated injuries early rehabilitation were delayed but results were comparable with other cases of the study. In our study Muller type A3 was the most common fracture presentation which consists of 7 cases followed by 5 type A1 fractures. There were 4 cases of type C1 fractures, 2 cases of type C3 fracture and one case in each type A2 and C2 group. 5 cases were operated under MIPPO technique which were extraarticular fractures. Further all fractures which had articular involvement were operated on standard open approach. Average surgical procedure timing was 101.5 minutes in our study. Most of the patients had excellent postoperative knee flexion with average knee flexion of 119 degrees. Average duration of radiological union was 19.3 weeks and average duration of weight bearing was 20.3 weeks.1 patient in the study had delayed union, 2 cases had a extensor lag of 5 degree while 1 patient had an extensor lag of 10 degrees. 10 cases in the study had fracture union without any complications. Stiffness was present in 7 cases, Knee pain was reported in 3 cases. 1 cases had shortening of 1cm .Superficial infections were reported in two cases which responded to intravenous antibiotics based on pus culture report. There was no incidence of deep surgical site infection in our study. In our study there was one case of implant failure requiring revision surgery. The patient had a episode of fall 3 months after primary surgery. Radiograph showed implant failure with varus deformity at the fracture site and no signs of callus formation. Keywords: LCP, Supracondylar femur fracture, Distal femur fracture, Functional outcome

Factors Affecting the Outcome of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures Managed With Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-Rotation 2: A Prospective Outcome Study in Elderly Indian Population

BackgroundThe proximal femoral nail anti-rotation Asia (PFNA 2) is an implant designed for unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures in Asians as the PFNA was designed for Caucasians and had various complications when applied to the Asian population due to the femoral geometrical mismatch. This study observes the functional outcomes and complications associated with PFNA 2 in unstable intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly Indian population.MethodsSixty-one above 60 years old patients with an unstable intertrochanteric fracture who were operated with PFNA 2 were included in this prospective observational study. They were followed up for one year. The functional and radiographic evaluations were done at 6, 12, 20 weeks, and the functional outcome was evaluated at the end of one year. Association of age, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade, AO Foundation classification, osteoporosis to the functional outcome of modified Harris hip score (MHHS) was evaluated.ResultsType A2 fractures demonstrated a statistically higher-good reduction than Type A3 (Student t-test, P < 0.05). The difference in mean surgical duration in Type A3 (45.47 minutes) and Type A2 (40.30 minutes) was statistically significant (Student t-test, P < 0.05). Mean blood loss was 110.66 ml (SD = 48.40 ml). MHHS at 6, 12, 20 weeks, and one year were 40.37, 63.93, 79.03, and 82.34, respectively. At the end of the year, 46 (82.1%) patients achieved good scores, eight (14.3%) achieved fair scores, and two (3.5%) achieved poor scores. There was one case of nonunion and medial migration of the helical blade. The mortality rate was 6.55% at the end of one year.ConclusionA good reduction was associated with a better functional outcome. PFNA 2 is an efficient implant in managing unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly Indian patients with good outcomes, low morbidity rates, and mortality. Implant mismatch was not a problem in the Indian population. However, large multi-centric studies with a larger sample size are required. Moreover, achieving a good reduction cannot be over-emphasized in unstable intertrochanteric fractures, especially in the elderly, to achieve a good functional outcome.

Differentiation of Traumatic Osteoporotic and Non-Osteoporotic Vertebral AO A3 Fractures by Analyzing the Posterior Edge Morphology-A Retrospective Feasibility Study.

Background: Differentiation between traumatic osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic vertebral fractures is crucial for optimal therapy planning. We postulated that the morphology of the posterior edge of the cranial fragment of A3 vertebral fractures is different in these entities. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to develop and validate a simple method to differentiate between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic A3 vertebral fractures by morphological analysis. Methods: A total of 86 computer tomography scans of AO Type A3 (cranial burst) vertebral body fractures (52 non-osteoporotic, 34 osteoporotic) were included in this retrospective study. Posterior edge morphology was analyzed using the sagittal paramedian slice with the most prominent shaped bulging. Later, the degree of bulging of the posterior edge fragment was quantified using a geometric approach. Additionally, the Hounsfield units of the broken vertebral body, the vertebra above, and the vertebra below the fracture were measured. Results: We found significant differences in the extent of bulging comparing osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic fractures in our cohort. Using the presented method, sensitivity was 100%, specificity was 96%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 94%. In contrast, by evaluating the Hounsfield units, sensitivity was 94%, specificity 94% and the PPV was 91%. Conclusions: Our method of analysis of the bulging of the dorsal edge fragment in traumatic cranial burst fractures cases allows, in our cases, a simple and valid differentiation between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic fractures. Further validation in a larger sample, including dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements, is necessary.

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Trochanteric AO/OTA 31A2 Fractures: Comparison between Helical Blade and Lag Screw - A Retrospective Cohort Study.

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of AO/OTA type 31A2 fractures treated by the use of trochanteric nails either with a blade or a screw. This study was designed retrospectively. Between May 2007 and May 2014, a total of 144 patients with trochanteric fractures were admitted to the clinic, and only 65 of them met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-two of them (blade group) were treated with a helical blade and the rest of the 33 patients (screw group) were treated with a screw. The mean ages of the patients were 76.01 and 75.82, respectively (p = 0.905). The mean follow-up time was 27.6 months (blade group: 34.2 ± 19.1 months; screw group: 18.6 ± 7.9 months; p < 0.001). Between these two groups, we evaluated the differences in tip apex distances (TAD), calcar-referenced tip-apex distances (Cal-TAD), implant positions, cut-out rates, and implant failures. Functional outcomes were measured with the help of the Harris Hip Score. No significant differences were seen between the blade and screw groups by means of cutting out, implant positions, and varus collapse. Cutting out was seen in a total of six patients (blade group n = 2; screw group = 4; p = 0.672) and varus collapse in nine patients (blade group n = 5, screw group n = 4; p = 0.733). Harris Hip Scores were similar between the two groups (blade group: 72.70 ± 18.43; screw group: 80.83 ± 18.75; p = 0.84).

Nailing unstable pertrochanteric fractures: does size matters?

New generation cephalomedullary nails are, currently, widely used for the treatment of trochanteric proximal femoral fractures. This study aims to compare the midterm outcomes and complication rates in patients with unstable 31A2 fractures treated with two different lengths of nails. Retrospective study including 123 pertrochanteric proximal femoral fractures 31A2 treated with Gamma3 nail® between January/2017 and January/2019. 19 patients were excluded, resulting in a total of 104 patients with a minimum follow-up of 1year. Two groups, Long Dynamic Gamma3 Nail (LGN) and Short Static Gamma3 Nail (SGN), with 52 patients each were compared. Mean age was 81years (range 50-99), being 78% female. Preoperative variables included: age, medical comorbidities, mobility, anesthetic risk, associated fractures, hemoglobin and hematocrit values. Postoperatively, functional and radiological results, quality of life, hemoglobin and hematocrit concentration, transfusion requirements, mobility, and pain were evaluated. Additionally, perioperative complications were also analyzed, such as malunion, non-union, infection rates, cut-outs, and peri-implant fractures. A correct radiological fracture reduction was obtained in 73% of the cases (73% SGN/74% LGN). Two patients in LGN group had intraoperative complications (greater trochanter fractures). 38% of the patients with LGN presented nail tip impaction upon the distal anterior femoral cortex, associated with anterior knee pain. Blood loss and operative time was statistically different between groups. Despite the previous, no differences in clinical outcomes and quality of life were found. The present study comparing two lengths of the Gamma3 Nail in 31A2 fractures showed no overall differences in clinical and radiological outcomes, and complication rates. However, the use of LGN was associated with a statistically significant higher blood loss and operative time, and a tendency for increased need for transfusion, and anterior knee pain and reoperation rate. Therefore, we recommend the use of locked SGN in the treatment of 31A2 fractures.

Excellent outcomes after double-locked plating in very low periprosthetic distal femoral fractures.

Very low periprosthetic distal femur fractures (PPDFFs) are rare injuries and often have a relatively high failure rate after single lateral locked plating. The double plating technique yields good outcomes in osteoporotic fractures of the distal femur. To date, there is limited information on double-locked plate fixation of very low PPDFFs. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and complications of surgically treated very low PPDFFs using double-locked plate fixation. Between January 2013 and December 2018, sixty-one consecutive patients with PPDFFs have been conducted. Only Su type III PPDFFs with double-locked plate fixation through a lateral minimally invasive approach and a medial subvastus approach to the distal femur were analyzed. Patients were encouraged to perform straight leg raising exercises and active knee motion on the second postoperative day. Assisted weight bearing from the early postoperative days was supported, and full weight-bearing was allowed after healing the fracture site. All patients were evaluated according to the time to union, limb alignment, range of knee motion, Knee Society Score, and presence of complications. Twenty one patients (17 females and 4 males, mean age 76years, range 56-90) were included in the study. There were 10 of 33-A1, 6 of 33-A2 and 5 of 33 A3 fractures, according to the AO classification. Of 21 patients, 20 achieved union at an average of 14weeks postoperatively. Postoperative limb alignment was satisfactory in all cases, with an average mechanical distal lateral femur angle of 89° and average mechanical posterior distal femur angle of 86°. All patients recovered the knee joint motion similar to that of the contralateral side, and daily life pre-injury. The average knee and function scores were 94 and 89, respectively. There were one case of non-union and three cases of superficial wound infection, which resolved after intravenous antibiotic therapy. Double locked plating showed excellent radiographic and functional outcomes with few complications in patients with very low PPDFFs. Based on these promising results, we propose the consideration of double-locked plate fixation in the treatment of very low PPDFFs.

Reduce the fractured central endplate in thoracolumbar fractures using percutaneous pedicle screws and instrumentational maneuvers: Technical strategy and radiological outcomes.

Traumatic thoracolumbar burst fracture is a common condition without a clear consensus on the best treatment approach. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) techniques are widely used in practice, while its ability to correct fracture deformity is relatively weak, especially for the central area of the endplate. In this study, we reported a novel technique to reduce the fractured central endplate in thoracolumbar burst fractures. The new reduction technique uses six percutaneous pedicle screws for the fractured vertebra and its adjacent vertebrae. Pedicle screws implanted in the two adjacent vertebrae were parallel to the superior vertebral endplate, as routinely required. Two monoaxial pedicle screws implanted in the fractured vertebra were placed toward the anteroinferior portion of the fractured vertebral body. After routine instrumentation and ligamentotaxis reduction, the bolt heads of the four screws implanted in the adjacent vertebrae were first tightened, and then the bolt heads of the screws implanted in the fractured vertebra were gradually tighten to elevate the collapsed endplate. A fundamental principle of this technique is to implant the pedicle screw in the fractured vertebra towards the anteroinferior portion of the vertebra in such a way that the angle between the pedicle screw and the rod is oblique on lateral fluoroscopy. As such, when the bolt heads were tightened, the pedicle screws can be swung up to reduce the endplate fragments. The novel technique was performed in 24 patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar AO type A3 fractures. The middle vertebral height ratio was significantly improved from 69.7%±7.6% after routine reduction to 85.1%±4.5% postoperatively (p<0.01). No complication was noticed for this new reduction technique. At 6-month follow-up, no significant correction loss of the middle and posterior vertebral height ratios, Cobb angle, and vertebral wedge angle was observed, while 5.8% of correction loss was observed for the anterior vertebral height ratio. The described reduction technique is simple, safe, and effective in reducing the collapsed central endplate in thoracolumbar burst fractures. Such a practical reduction strategy does not need additional medical costs.

Clinical and Radiological Assessment of Interbody Fusion and Short-Segment Fixation in Dorso-Lumbar Fractures

Background: Spine fractures account for a large portion of musculoskeletal injuries worldwide. Approximately 75% to 90% of spinal fractures occur in the thoracic and lumbar spine, with most of these occurring at the thoracolumbar junction (T10-L2). Surgical treatment has demonstrated better clinical and radiological results than conservative treatment. Objective: To evaluate the outcome of short-segment fixation with interbody fusion in dorsolumbar fractures clinically and radiologically. Patients and Methods: This study took place at the Neurotrauma Unit of Neurosurgery Department, Zagazig University Hospitals. It included sixteen patients with thoracolumbar fractures treated by short-segment open transpedicular posterior fixation with interbody fusion. Results: Male was the predominant sex (68.7%), mean age was 37.88 years (range: 19-55 years) and the residence in rural areas was 50 % and in urban areas was 50 %. Housewives were the predominant occupation and constitute 31.3%. 81.3% of patients were married. The most prevalent AO spine type of fracture was A3 fracture where it constituted 62.5% of patients, the level of fracture was L2 in 50 % of patients & about 38% had severe pain as reported on VAS score. In our Study there was significant change in ASIA score 12 weeks postoperatively. While 62.5% had E score preoperatively, 87.5% had it 12 weeks postoperatively and 12.5% turned had score C 12 weeks preoperatively versus no one postoperatively had C ASIA score. Conclusion: Surgical treatment of thoracic and lumbar fractures allows for immediate stabilization of the spine, restoration of sagittal alignment, and the possibility of spinal canal decompression.

Minimally Invasive Osteosynthesis of Transtrochanteric Fractures with Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS).

The method presented here consists of a minimally invasive surgical technique for osteosynthesis of transtrochanteric fractures with Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) 135°. It is indicated in the treatment of 31-A1 and 31-A2 fractures (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen Classification - AO) that meet the prerequisites required for using DHS. The surgery is performed, preferably, before 48 hours after the fracture. With the use of the same instruments as the traditional surgical technique and the aid of the C-arm, a closed reduction of the fracture and implantation of the DHS is performed by a 2-cm surgical incision, through dissection of the underlying tissues, with minimal bleeding and damage to the soft parts. In the immediate postoperative period, the patient is encouraged to orthostatism and walk with full load, which anticipates hospital discharge and favors early functional rehabilitation. Outpatient return is scheduled at 2, 6, 12 and 24 weeks postoperatively, with radiographic evaluation to assess fracture healing.