30-day Morbidity Research Articles

30-day morbidity and mortality of revisional bariatric surgery – An international multi-centre collaborative (BROAD) study

IntroductionRevisional bariatric surgery (RBS) for insufficient weight loss/weight regain or metabolic relapse is increasing worldwide. There is currently no large multinational, prospective data on 30-day morbidity and mortality of RBS. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the 30-day morbidity and mortality of RBS at participating centres. MethodsAn international steering group was formed to oversee the study. The steering group members invited bariatric surgeons worldwide to participate in this study. Ethical approval was obtained at the lead centre. Data were collected prospectively on all consecutive RBS patients operated between 15th May 2021 to 31st December 2021. Revisions for complications were excluded. ResultsA total of 65 global centres submitted data on 750 patients. Sleeve gastrectomy (n = 369, 49.2 %) was the most common primary surgery for which revision was performed. Revisional procedures performed included Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in 41.1 % (n = 308) patients, One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) in 19.3 % (n = 145), Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) in 16.7 % (n = 125) and other procedures in 22.9 % (n = 172) patients. Indications for revision included weight regain in 615(81.8 %) patients, inadequate weight loss in 127(16.9 %), inadequate diabetes control in 47(6.3 %) and diabetes relapse in 27(3.6 %). 30-day complications were seen in 80(10.7 %) patients. Forty-nine (6.5 %) complications were Clavien Dindo grade 3 or higher. Two patients (0.3 %) died within 30 days of RBS. ConclusionRBS for insufficient weight loss/weight regain or metabolic relapse is associated with 10.7 % morbidity and 0.3 % mortality. Sleeve gastrectomy is the most common primary procedure to undergo revisional bariatric surgery, while Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the most commonly performed revision.

Short- and long-term predictive power of the preoperative Geriatric Assessment components in older patients undergoing cholecystectomy.

<b><br>Introduction:</b> Increasing numbers of older patients will require laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Physicians may have doubts when qualifying these patients for elective surgeries since older age is considered a risk factor for complications. Determining biological age, using a Geriatric Assessment (GA), should be the key factor in the preoperative assessment.</br> <b><br>Aim:</b> The aim of this study was to determine which GA components and frailty alone are most useful for predicting postoperative outcomes in both short- and long-term follow-up.</br> <b><br>Materials and methods:</b> 219 consecutive patients aged ≥70 years underwent surgery and were followed up prospectively for 12 months. The preoperative GA consisted of functionality, physical activity, comorbidity, polypharmacotherapy, nutrition, cognition, mood, and social support domains. Logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the predictive ability of GA.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> GA, frailty, and chronological age were not predictive of major 30-day morbidity. There were significantly more overall postoperative complications in the frail group than in the fit group (21% vs 4%), with mainly minor (Clavien-Dindo I, II) and medical (16 patients; 72.7%) complications. There were no significant differences in the rate of major and surgical complications (8 patients; 36.4%) between frail and fit patients. Only frailty was a predictor of 1-year mortality odd ratio 12.17 (2.47-59.94) P = 0.002.</br> <b><br>Conclusions:</b> Performing GA before elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies seems unnecessary for the evaluation of short-term outcomes but helpful for the assessment of long-term outcomes. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed also in older frail patients.</br&gt.

Kidney transplant utilising donors after circulatory death: The first report from the African continent.

At Groote Schuur Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa, the number of deceased organ donors has declined over the past 2 decades, necessitating a more liberal approach to donor selection. In 2007, measures to expand the deceased kidney donor pool were implemented, including an HIV positive-to-positive transplant programme and the utilisation of extended-criteria donors as well as donors after circulatory death (DCDs). To report on our institutional experience with DCD kidney transplants and to encourage this approach among other African centres to improve access to transplantation. An observational cohort study of consecutive DCD kidney transplants at Groote Schuur Hospital over a 17-year period was performed. Primary endpoints were 1-, 2- and 5-year graft and patient survival. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), 30-day morbidity, length of stay, and donor and recipient clinical characteristics. Fifteen DCD procurements were performed, with no kidneys discarded. Thirty kidney transplants were performed, with a median (interquartile range) cold ischaemic time of 11.5 (8 - 14) hours. The incidence of DGF was 60.0%, and 30-day morbidity (other than DGF) was 20.0%. Graft survival at 1, 2 and 5 years was 100%, 96.0% and 73.7%, respectively. Patient survival at 1, 2 and 5 years was 93.3%, 93.3% and 88.4%, respectively. Long-term graft and patient survival was comparable with the international literature. DCD may present a unique opportunity to expand deceased donation throughout Africa, particularly in areas affected by a lack of brain death legislation and religious or cultural objections to donation after brain death.

The Impact of Postoperative COVID-19 Infection on 30-day Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Introduction: Preoperative Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections are associated with postoperative adverse outcomes. However, there is limited data on the impact of postoperative COVID-19 infection on postoperative outcomes of common general surgery procedures.Objective: To evaluate the impact of postoperative COVID-19 diagnosis on laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes.Methods: Patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis, acute cholecystitis, or gallstone pancreatitis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with or without intraoperative cholangiogram were identified using the 2021 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Patients were categorized into two groups: patients with and without a postoperative COVID-19 diagnosis. Coarsened Exact Matching was used to match the groups based on preoperative risk factors, and outcomes were compared.Results: A total of 47,948 patients were included. In the aggregate cohort, 31% were male, and mean age was 50years. Age, BMI, smoking, COPD, CHF, preoperative sepsis, and ASA class were significantly different between the two groups. After matching, there were no differences in characteristics. 30-day morbidity (OR = 2.7, 95% CI 1.4-5.1), pneumonia (OR = 5.0, 95% CI 1.7-15.0), DVT (OR = 8.22, 95% CI 1.0-66), reoperation (OR = 9.3, 95% CI 1.2-73.8), and readmission (OR = 4.8, 95% CI 2.3-10.1) continued to be significantly worse in the matched cohort.Conclusion: Postoperative COVID-19 infection was associated with worse outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. These findings suggest that even postoperative COVID-19 diagnosis increases the risk for adverse outcomes in patients recovering from laparoscopic cholecystectomy and may indicate that precautions should be taken and new COVID-19 infections even after surgery should be closely monitored.

Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Miniaturized Robotic-Assisted Surgery System in Colectomy: A Prospective, Investigational Device Exemption Clinical Study Using the IDEAL Framework.

Robotics has increased rates of minimally invasive surgery, with distinct advantages over open surgery. However, current commercially available robotic platforms have device and system issues that limit robotic-assisted surgery expansion. To demonstrate the safety and efficacy of a novel miniaturized robotic-assisted surgery device in colectomy. Prospective, Investigational Device Exemption clinical study following the idea, development, exploration, assessment, and long-term follow-up framework (stage 2b, exploration). Three centers with high-volume robotic colorectal cases and surgeons. Patients scheduled for a right or left colectomy for benign or malignant disease. Colectomy with the novel miniaturized robotic-assisted surgery device. For safety, intraoperative and device-related adverse events and 30-day morbidity. For efficacy, successful completion of predefined procedural steps without conversion. Thirty patients (13 women, 17 men) were analyzed. The mean age was 59.4 (SD 13.4) years. Seventy percent of patients (n = 21) were overweight/obese and 53.3% of patients (n = 16) had prior abdominal surgery. Forty percent of patients had malignant and 60% had benign disease. Cases were 15 right and 15 left colectomies. Overall operative time was a median of 146 (range, 80-309) minutes; console time was 70 (range, 34-174) minutes. There were no conversions to open surgery and no intraoperative or device-related adverse events. In 100% of patients (n = 30), the primary dissection was completed, and hemostasis was maintained with the novel miniaturized robotic-assisted surgery device. The morbidity rate was 26.7% minor and 3.3% major. The median length of stay was 2 days. There were no mortalities. Single-arm study, short-term follow-up. This first clinical study of a novel miniaturized robotic-assisted surgery device along the IDEAL framework demonstrated that it was safe and effective. Given this success, further assessment and long-term follow-up of the miniaturized robotic-assisted surgery device are planned for comparative clinical and economic effectiveness in colorectal surgery. See Video Abstract . ANTECEDENTES:La robótica ha aumentado las tasas de cirugía mínimamente invasiva, con claras ventajas sobre la cirugía abierta. Sin embargo, las plataformas robóticas actualmente disponibles comercialmente tienen problemas con los dispositivos y sistemas que limitan la expansión de la cirugía asistida por robot.OBJETIVO:Demostrar la seguridad y eficacia de un novedoso dispositivo de cirugía asistida por robot miniaturizado en colectomía.DISEÑO:Estudio clínico prospectivo de investigación de exención de dispositivo siguiendo el marco IDEAL (Etapa 2b, exploración).ESCENARIO:Tres centros con cirujanos y casos colorrectales robóticos de gran volumen.PACIENTES:Pacientes programados para colectomía derecha o izquierda por enfermedad benigna o maligna.INTERVENCIÓN:Colectomía con el nuevo dispositivo de cirugía asistida por robot miniaturizado.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Para la seguridad, eventos adversos intraoperatorios y relacionados con el dispositivo y morbilidad a 30 días. Para la evaluación de la eficacia, la finalización exitosa de los pasos predefinidos sin conversión.RESULTADOS:Se analizaron treinta pacientes (13 mujeres, 17 hombres). La edad media fue 59,4 (DE 13,4) años. El 70% (n=21) tenía sobrepeso/obesidad y el 53,3% (n=16) había tenido cirugía abdominal previa. El 40% tenía enfermedad maligna y el 60% benigna. Los casos fueron 15 colectomías derechas y 15 izquierdas. La mediana del tiempo operatorio general fue de 146 (rango, 80-309) minutos; 70 (rango, 34-174) minutos fue el tiempo de consola. No hubo conversiones a cirugía abierta ni eventos adversos intraoperatorios o relacionados con el dispositivo. En el 100% (n=30), se completó la disección primaria y se mantuvo la hemostasia con el novedoso dispositivo de cirugía asistida por robot miniaturizado. La tasa de morbilidad menor fue de un 26,7% y mayor un 3,3%. La mediana de estadía fue de 2 días. No hubo mortalidad.LIMITACIONES:Estudio de un solo brazo, corto plazo de seguimiento.CONCLUSIONES:Este primer estudio clínico de un novedoso dispositivo de cirugía asistida por robot miniaturizado según el marco IDEAL demostró que era seguro y eficaz. Dado este éxito, se planean evaluaciones adicionales y seguimiento a largo plazo del dispositivo de cirugía asistida por robot miniaturizado para comparar la efectividad clínica y económica en la cirugía colorrectal. (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio ).

Comparison of early surgical outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection reported by a busy district general hospital in England

Robotic platforms provide a stable tool with high-definition views and improved ergonomics compared to laparoscopic approaches. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the intra- and short-term postoperative results of oncological resections performed robotically (RCR) and laparoscopically (LCR) at a single centre. Between February 2020 and October 2022, retrospective data on RCR were compared to LCR undertaken during the same period. Parameters compared include total operative time, length of stay (LOS), re-admission rates, 30-day morbidity. 100 RCR and 112 LCR satisfied inclusion criteria. There was no difference between the two group’s demographic and tumour characteristics. Overall, median operative time was shorter in LCR group [200 vs. 247.5 min, p < 0.005], but this advantage was not observed with pelvic and muti-quadrant resections. There was no difference in the rate of conversion [5(5%) vs. 5(4.5%), p > 0.95]. With respect to perioperative outcomes, there was no difference in the overall morbidity, or mortality between RCR and LCR, in particular requirement for blood transfusion [3(3%) vs. 5(4.5%), p 0.72], prolonged ileus [9(9%) vs. 15(13.2%), p 0.38], surgical site infections [5(4%) vs. 5(4.4%), p > 0.95], anastomotic leak [7(7%) vs. 5(4.4%), p 0.55], and re-operation rate [9(9%) vs. 7(6.3%), p 0.6]. RCR had shorter LOS by one night, but this did not reach statistical significance. No difference was observed in completeness of resection but there was a statically significant increase in lymph node harvest in the robotic series. Robotic approach to oncological colorectal resections is safe, with comparable intra- and peri-operative morbidity and mortality to laparoscopic surgery.

Judgment Errors in Surgical Care.

Human error is impossible to eliminate, particularly in systems as complex as healthcare. The extent to which judgment errors in particular impact surgical patient care or lead to harm is unclear. The American College of Surgeons NSQIP (2018) procedures from a single institution with 30-day morbidity or mortality were examined. Medical records were reviewed and evaluated for judgment errors. Preoperative variables associated with judgment errors were examined using logistic regression. Of the surgical patients who experienced a morbidity or mortality, 18% (31 of 170) experienced an error in judgment during their hospitalization. Patients with hepatobiliary procedure (odds ratio [OR] 5.4 [95% CI 1.23 to 32.75], p = 0.002), insulin-dependent diabetes (OR 4.8 [95% CI 1.2 to 18.8], p = 0.025), severe COPD (OR 6.0 [95% CI 1.6 to 22.1], p = 0.007), or with infected wounds (OR 8.2 [95% CI 2.6 to 25.8], p < 0.001) were at increased risk for judgment errors. Specific procedure types and patients with certain preoperative variables had higher risk for judgment errors during their hospitalization. Errors in judgment adversely impacted the outcomes of surgical patients who experienced morbidity or mortality in this cohort. Preventing or mitigating errors and closely monitoring patients after an error in judgment is prudent and may improve surgical safety.

Tailoring postoperative management through sentinel lymph node biopsy in low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer - the SENTRY clinical trial.

While total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy without lymph node staging are standard for low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer, certain histopathologic factors revealed after surgery can necessitate additional interventions. Our study assessed the influence of sentinel lymph node biopsy on postoperative decision-making. In the SENTRY trial (July 2021 - February 2023), we enrolled patients with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA-IB low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer. Laparoscopic sentinel lymph node mapping using indocyanine green was performed alongside total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Subsequent management changes based on sentinel lymph node biopsy results were evaluated. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04972682). Of the 100 enrolled participants, a bilateral detection rate of 91% was observed with a median detection time of 10 min (interquartile range 8-13 min). Sentinel lymph node metastases were found in 8% (N = 8) of participants. Postoperative FIGO staging increased in 15% (N = 15) and decreased in 5% (N = 5) of patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy results altered the adjuvant treatment plan for 20% (N = 20): external beam radiotherapy was omitted in 12% (N = 12) while 6% (N = 6) had external beam radiotherapy +/- systemic chemotherapy added due to sentinel lymph node metastases. In 2% (N = 2), the external beam radiotherapy field was expanded with the paraaortic region. No intraoperative complications were reported and no 30-day major morbidity and mortality occurred. Throughout a median follow-up of 14 (95% CI 12-15 months, neither patient-reported lymphedema nor pelvic recurrence surfaced in the cohort. Sentinel lymph node biopsy using indocyanine green is a safe procedure and allows tailoring adjuvant therapy in presumed low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer. It assists in avoiding external beam radiotherapy overtreatment and introducing additional modalities when necessary.

Automated CT Analysis of Body Composition as a Frailty Biomarker in Abdominal Surgery

Prior studies demonstrated consistent associations of low skeletal muscle mass assessed on surgical planning scans with postoperative morbidity and mortality. The increasing availability of imaging artificial intelligence enables development of more comprehensive imaging biomarkers to objectively phenotype frailty in surgical patients. To evaluate the associations of body composition scores derived from multiple skeletal muscle and adipose tissue measurements from automated segmentation of computed tomography (CT) with the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) and adverse outcomes after abdominal surgery. This retrospective cohort study used CT imaging and electronic health record data from a random sample of adults who underwent abdominal surgery at 20 medical centers within Kaiser Permanente Northern California from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020. Data were analyzed from April 1, 2022, to December 1, 2023. Body composition derived from automated analysis of multislice abdominal CT scans. The primary outcome of the study was all-cause 30-day postdischarge readmission or postoperative mortality. The secondary outcome was 30-day postoperative morbidity among patients undergoing abdominal surgery who were sampled for reporting to the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. The study included 48 444 adults; mean [SD] age at surgery was 61 (17) years, and 51% were female. Using principal component analysis, 3 body composition scores were derived: body size, muscle quantity and quality, and distribution of adiposity. Higher muscle quantity and quality scores were inversely correlated (r = -0.42; 95% CI, -0.43 to -0.41) with the HFRS and associated with a reduced risk of 30-day readmission or mortality (quartile 4 vs quartile 1: relative risk, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.56-0.67) and 30-day postoperative morbidity (quartile 4 vs quartile 1: relative risk, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.52-0.67), independent of sex, age, comorbidities, body mass index, procedure characteristics, and the HFRS. In contrast to the muscle score, scores for body size and greater subcutaneous and intermuscular vs visceral adiposity had inconsistent associations with postsurgical outcomes and were attenuated and only associated with 30-day postoperative morbidity after adjustment for the HFRS. In this study, higher muscle quantity and quality scores were correlated with frailty and associated with 30-day readmission and postoperative mortality and morbidity, whereas body size and adipose tissue distribution scores were not correlated with patient frailty and had inconsistent associations with surgical outcomes. The findings suggest that assessment of muscle quantity and quality on CT can provide an objective measure of patient frailty that would not otherwise be clinically apparent and that may complement existing risk stratification tools to identify patients at high risk of mortality, morbidity, and readmission.

Early safety outcomes of laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass in patients with class III, IV, and V obesity.

The extremely obese patient deserves special consideration: significant comorbidities, technical difficulties, and increased postoperative morbidity and mortality are all expected in this patient population. The study compared early postoperative complications (≤30-day) following one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) morbidity in patients with morbid obesity class IV obesity, body mass index (BMI) ≥50-59.9kg/m2, and class V obesity, BMI ≥60 patients. We retrospectively reviewed perioperative OAGB outcomes in three BMI groups. Operative time, length of stay (LOS), and overall early postoperative complication rates were studied. Patient-reported complications were ranked by Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC). Between January 2017-December 2021, consecutive patients with obesity class III (n=2950), IV (n=256), and V (n=23) underwent OAGB. BMI groups were comparable in sex, age, and associated comorbidities. Mean operative time was significantly longer in the higher BMI groups: class III (66.5±25.6min), IV (70.5±28.7min), and V (80.0±34.7min), respectively (p=0.018); no difference in LOS. In respective BMI classes, ≤30-day complication rates were 3.2%, 3.5%, and 4.3% (p=0.926). The respective number of patients with CDC grades of one to two were 45 (1.5%), 6 (2.3%), and 1 (4.3%), p=0.500; and in grade ≥3a, 25 (0.8%), 1 (0.4%), 0 (0.0%), p=0.669. There was 0.06% mortality (n=2 in 3229), both in BMI class III. OAGB is a safe BS procedure in patients with class III, IV, and V obesity in the perioperative term with comparable ≤30-day morbidity in the three BMI groups.

Management of depth to achieve timely arteriovenous fistula utilization

ObjectiveFailure to achieve timely arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) utilization due to excessive depth (>6 mm) remains an ongoing concern for dialysis access. This study evaluates the outcomes of radiocephalic (RCF) and brachiocephalic (BCF) fistula elevation required for access utilization. MethodsA retrospective review of all patients undergoing first-time autologous access over 10 years was undertaken. RCF and BCF were analyzed, and cases of initial access failure due to depth alone were selected for study. Primary and staged brachio-basilic AVF were excluded. Outcomes of early thrombosis, line placement, maturation (successful progression to hemodialysis [HD), reintervention, and functional dialysis (continuous HD for 3 consecutive months) were examined. ResultsFrom January 2012 to December 2022, 1733 patients (67% female; mean age, 61 ± 14 years) underwent autologous AVF placement. Of these, 298 patients (17%) had depth-related AVF access issues (BCF, 71% and RCF, 29%). Nineteen percent of these AVFs underwent a primary balloon-assisted maturation (BAM), and 2% had side branch coil embolization before consideration for elevation. The average time to intervention for depth was 11 ± 4 weeks after primary creation. During elevation, side branch ligation occurred in 38% of cases, and 15% underwent intraoperative BAM, The pre-elevation depth was 8.2 ± 3.1 mm, and the mean post-elevation depth was 4.7 ± 2.9 mm (P = .002). Early thrombosis (<18 days) occurred in 4% of cases. There was no mortality, and the 30-day major adverse cardiac event rate was 2%, with a 30-day morbidity of 5%, which was driven by wound issues. Six percent of the AVFs underwent follow-up BAM within 3 months. Mean maturation of the AVFs was 74% ± 3% vs 72% ± 3% (P = .58) for the elevation vs no-elevation groups at 24 weeks, respectively. However, there was an increase in tunneled central line placement in pre-emptive fistula patients due to the delay in maturation (elevation, 17% vs no-elevation, 8%; P = .008). There was a mean successful access time of 6 ± 3 weeks after elevation (16 ± 4 weeks after access creation). There was a median of 2.4 secondary interventions per year after elevation compared with a median of 2.7 secondary interventions per year without elevation. Mean access functionality was 68% ± 8% vs 75% ± 8% at 3 years for the elevation vs no-elevation groups, respectively (P = .25). ConclusionsElevation of deep BCF and RCF occurs late after placement but can be successfully achieved with low morbidity and satisfactory long-term functionality. It results in an increase in tunneled central line placement in pre-emptive fistula patients. Elevation is a valuable adjunct to AVF maturation and enhances an autologous access policy.

Evaluation of risk factors for postoperative neurologic intensive care admission after brain tumor craniotomy: A single-center longitudinal study.

Perioperative variable parameters can be significant risk factors for postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission after elective craniotomy for intracranial neoplasm, as assessed by various scoring systems such as Cranio Score. This observational study evaluates the relationship between these factors and early postoperative neurological complications necessitating ICU admission. In total, 119 patients, aged 18 years and above, of either sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades I-III, scheduled for elective craniotomy and tumor excision were included. The primary objective was to evaluate the relationship between perioperative risk factors and the incidence of early postoperative complications as a means of validation of the Cranio Score. The secondary outcomes studied were 30-day postoperative morbidity/mortality and the association with patient-related risk factors. Forty-five of 119 patients (37.82%) required postoperative ICU care with the mean duration of ICU stay being 1.92 ± 4.91 days. Tumor location (frontal/infratemporal region), preoperative deglutition disorder, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) less than 15, motor deficit, cerebellar deficit, midline shift >3 mm, mass effect, tumor size, use of blood products, lateral position, inotropic support, elevated systolic/mean arterial pressures, and duration of anesthesia/surgery were associated with a higher incidence of ICU care. Maximum (P = 0.035, AOR = 1.130) and minimum systolic arterial pressures (P = 0.022, Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) = 0.861) were the only independent risk factors. Cranio Score was found to be an accurate predictor of complications at a cut-off point of >10.52%. The preoperative motor deficit was the only independent risk factor associated with 30-day morbidity (AOR = 4.66). Perioperative hemodynamic effects are an independent predictor of postoperative ICU requirement. Further Cranio Score is shown to be a good scoring system for postoperative complications.

Feasibility of Robot-Assisted Cytoreductive Surgery With Upper-Abdominal Peritonectomy for Pseudomyxoma Peritonei With Low Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index: A Pilot Study.

Our study's objective was to provide the method for, and preliminary findings from, robot-assisted cytoreductive surgery (r-CRS) combined with upper-abdominal peritonectomy in pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) with limited peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM). We conducted a retrospective pilot study on consecutive patients with PSM secondary to pseudomyxoma peritonei with a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) of under 10 who were indicated for r-CRS combined with upper-abdominal peritectomy. Perioperative and 30-day major morbidity and mortality characteristics were analyzed and compared with cases in which laparoscopic CRS (l-CRS) was performed under the same conditions. Six patients underwent r-CRS combined with an upper-abdominal partial peritonectomy. Their mean PCI was 4.83. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in all patients. The mean duration of the operation was 156.8 minutes. There was no major complication and no mortality. The mean length of hospital stay after surgery was 6.33 days. r-CRS resulted in less blood loss, a lower C-reactive protein level, and a shorter length of hospital stay that were significantly different compared with those of l-CRS. This is the initial technical report of a robotic approach for CRS combined with upper-abdominal peritonectomy. r-CRS with a combined upper-abdominal peritonectomy was shown to be safe and feasible for PMP with limited PSM.

Robotic-assisted reoperative ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: robotic pouch excision and pouch revision.

Up to 20% of patients with ileal pouch will develop pouch failure, ultimately requiring surgical reintervention. As a result of the complexity of reoperative pouch surgery, minimally invasive approaches were rarely utilized. In this series, we present the outcomes of the patients who underwent robotic-assisted pouch revision or excision to assess its feasibility and short-term results. All the patients affected by inflammatory bowel diseases and familial adenomatous polyposis who underwent robotic reoperative surgery of an existing ileal pouch were included. Twenty-two patients were included; 54.6% were female. The average age at reoperation was 51 ± 16years, with a mean body mass index of 26.1 ± 5.6kg/m2. Fourteen (63.7%) had a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis at reoperation, and seven (31.8%) had Crohn's disease. The mean time to pouch reoperation was 12.8 ± 11.8years. Seventeen (77.3%) patients underwent pouch excision, and five (22.7%) had pouch revision surgery. The mean operative time was 372 ± 131min, and the estimated blood loss was 199 ± 196.7ml. The conversion rate was 9.1%, the 30-day morbidity rate was 27.3% (with only one complication reaching Clavien-Dindo gradeIIIB), and the mean length of stay was 5.8 ± 3.9days. The readmission rate was 18.2%, the reoperation rate was 4.6%, and mortality was nihil. All patients in the pouch revisional group are stoma-free. Robotic reoperative pouch surgery in highly selected patients is technically feasible with acceptable outcomes.

373 Modified 5-Item Frailty Index: A Useful Tool for Assessing the Impact of Frailty on Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality Following Surgical Fixation of Thoracolumbar Fractures

INTRODUCTION: The modified 5-item frailty index (mFI-5) is a comorbidity-based risk stratification tool that has been shown to predict adverse events following various neurological surgeries. METHODS: The 2011-2021 American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) dataset was used to identify patients undergoing fusion surgeries for thoracolumbar spine fractures. The mFI-5 score was calculated based on the presence of the 5 comorbidities: congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, partially dependent or totally dependent functional health status, and hypertension. Multivariate analysis was used to assess the independent impact of increasing mFI-5 score on postoperative 30-day morbidity and mortality while controlling for baseline clinical characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 66,904 patients were included in our analysis (54.2% female, mean age 62.27 ± 12.93 years). On univariate analysis, higher mFI-5 score was significantly associated with increased risks of superficial surgical site infection(SSI), deep SSI, wound dehiscence, unplanned reoperation, pneumonia, unplanned intubation, postoperative ventilator use, progressive renal insufficiency, acute renal failure, urinary tract infection, stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, bleeding requiring transfusion, sepsis, septic shock, and longer hospital length of stay (LOS). On multivariate logistic regression, increasing mFI-5 score versus mFI-5 = 0 was associated with higher odds of overall complications (mFI-5 =2: odds ratio [OR] 1.44 CI: 1.35–1.52, p &lt; 0.001; mFI-5 = 1: OR 1.18 CI: 1.12–1.24, p &lt; 0.001) and 30-day mortality (mFI-5 =2: OR 2.32 CI: 1.60–3.37, p &lt; 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that frailty, when measured using the mFI-5, independently predicts postoperative complications, hospital LOS, and 30-day mortality after surgical repair of thoracolumbar fractures. These findings are important for risk stratification in patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion surgery and for standardization in reporting outcomes after those procedures.

Long-term survival outcomes of robotic total gastrectomy for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer: a prospective study.

Robotic gastrectomy is a safe and feasible approach for gastric cancer (GC); however, its long-term oncological efficacy remains unclear. We evaluated the long-term survival outcomes and recurrence patterns of patients with locally advanced proximal GC who underwent robotic total gastrectomy (RTG). This prospective study (FUGES-014 study) enrolled 48 patients with locally advanced proximal GC who underwent RTG between March 2018 and February 2020 at a tertiary referral teaching hospital. Patients who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) in the FUGES-002 study were enrolled in a 2:1 ratio to compare the survival outcomes between RTG and LTG. The primary endpoint of the FUGES-014 study was postoperative 30-day morbidity and has been previously reported. Here we reported the results of 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), 3-year overall survival (OS), and recurrence patterns. After propensity score matching, 48 patients in the RTG and 96 patients in the LTG groups were included. The 3-year DFS rates were 77.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 66.1-89.9%) for the RTG and 68.8% (95% CI 60.1-78.7%) for the LTG groups ( P =0.261). The 3-year OS rates were not significantly different between the groups (85.4% vs. 74.0%, P =0.122). Recurrence occurred in nine patients (18.8%) in the RTG and 27 (28.1%) patients in the LTG groups ( P =0.234). Recurrence patterns and causes of death were similar between the groups ( P >0.05). The oncological outcome of RTG was non-inferior to that of LTG. Thus, RTG might be an alternative surgical treatment for locally advanced proximal GC.

Sequential surgeries following transversus abdominis release for abdominal wall reconstruction: Insights from a single-center analysis

IntroductionAbdominal surgery following transversus abdominis release (TAR) procedure commonly involves incisions through the previously implanted mesh, potentially creating vulnerabilities for hernia recurrence. Despite the popularity of the TAR procedure, current literature regarding post-AWR surgeries is limited. This study aims to reveal the incidence and outcomes of post-TAR non-hernia-related abdominal surgeries of any kind. MethodsAdult patients who underwent non-hernia-related abdominal surgery following ventral hernia repair with concurrent TAR procedure and permanent synthetic mesh in the Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health between January 2014 and January 2022 were queried from a prospectively collected database in the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative. We evaluated 30-day wound morbidity, perioperative complications, and long-term hernia recurrence. ResultsA total of 1137 patients who underwent TAR procedure were identified, with 53 patients (4.7%) undergoing subsequent non-hernia-related abdominal surgery post-TAR. Small bowel obstruction was the primary indication for reoperation (22.6%), and bowel resection was the most frequent procedure (24.5%). 49.1% of the patients required urgent or emergent surgery, with the majority (70%) having open procedures. Fascia closure was achieved by absorbable sutures in 50.9%, and of the open cases, fascia closure was achieved by running sutures technique in 35.8%. 20.8% experienced SSO, the SSOPI rate was 11.3%, and 26.4% required more than a single reoperation. A total of 88.7% were available for extended follow-up, spanning 17–30 months, resulting in a 36.1% recurrent hernia diagnosis rate. ConclusionsAbdominal surgery following TAR surgery is associated with significant comorbidities and significantly impacts hernia recurrence rates. Our study findings underscore the significance of making all efforts to minimize reoperations after TAR procedure and offers suggestions on managing the abdominal wall of these complex cases.

Preoperative routine measurement of NT-proBNP predicts postoperative morbidity after non-cardiac surgery with intermediate or high surgical risk: an observational study

BackgroundChronic heart failure (HF) is a common clinical condition associated with adverse outcomes in elderly patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. This study aimed to estimate a clinically applicable NT-proBNP cut-off that predicts postoperative 30-day morbidity in a non-cardiac surgical cohort.MethodsOne hundred ninety-nine consecutive patients older than 65 years undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery with intermediate or high surgical risk were analysed. Preoperative NT-proBNP was measured, and clinical events were assessed up to postoperative day 30. The primary endpoint was the composite morbidity endpoint (CME) consisting of rehospitalisation, acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), acute kidney injury (AKI), and infection at postoperative day 30. Secondary endpoints included perioperative fluid balance and incidence, duration, and severity of perioperative hypotension.ResultsNT-proBNP of 443 pg/ml had the highest accuracy in predicting the composite endpoint; a clinical cut-off of 450 pg/ml was implemented to compare clinical endpoints. Although 35.2% of patients had NT-proBNP above the threshold, only 10.6% had a known history of HF. The primary endpoint was the composite morbidity endpoint (CME) consisting of rehospitalisation, acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), acute kidney injury (AKI), and infection. Event rates were significantly increased in patients with NT-proBNP > 450 pg/ml (70.7% vs. 32.4%, p < 0.001), which was due to the incidence of cardiac rehospitalisation (4.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.018), ADHF (20.1% vs. 4.0%, p < 0.001), AKI (39.8% vs. 8.3%, p < 0.001), and infection (46.3% vs. 24.4%, p < 0.01). Perioperative fluid balance and perioperative hypotension were comparable between groups. Preoperative NT-proBNP > 450 pg/ml was an independent predictor of the CME in a multivariable Cox regression model (hazard ratio 2.92 [1.72–4.94]).ConclusionsPatients with NT-proBNP > 450 pg/ml exhibited profoundly increased postoperative morbidity. Further studies should focus on interdisciplinary approaches to improve outcomes through integrated interventions in the perioperative period.Trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00027871, 17/01/2022

Association of social determinants of health-related diagnosis codes with postoperative outcomes.

The association of an individual's social determinants of health-related problems with surgical outcomes has not been well-characterized. The objective of this study was to determine whether documentation of social determinants of a health-related diagnosis code (Z code) is associated with postoperative outcomes. This retrospective cohort study included surgical cases from a single institution's national surgical quality improvement program (NSQIP) clinical registry from October 2015 to December 2021. The primary predictor of interest was documentation of a Z code for social determinants of health-related problems. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative morbidity. Secondary outcomes included postoperative length of stay, disposition, and 30-day postoperative mortality, reoperation, and readmission. Multivariable regression models were fit to evaluate the association between the documentation of a Z code and outcomes. Of 10,739 surgical cases, 348 patients (3.2%) had a documented social determinants of health-related Z code. In multivariable analysis, documentation of a Z code was associated with increased odds of morbidity (20.7% vs. 9.9%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-2.53), length of stay (median, 3 vs. 1day; incidence rate ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.33-1.67), odds of disposition to a location other than home (11.3% vs. 3.9%; aOR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.89-4.33), and odds of readmission (15.3% vs. 6.1%; aOR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.45-2.73). Social determinants of health-related problems evaluated using Z codes were associated with worse postoperative outcomes. Improved documentation of social determinants of health-related problems among surgical patients may facilitate improved risk stratification, perioperative planning, and clinical outcomes.

O62: Five year followup of the abdominal aortic aneurysm Get Fit Trial: a randomised controlled trial of exercise to improve fitness in patients with AAA

Abstract Aims Improved fitness of patients on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm(AAA) surveillance is predicted to reduce cardiovascular events and improve perioperative morbidity and mortality. The AAA GetFit Trial was a randomised control trial comparing community exercise programme(CEP) with standard care which demonstrated improved CardioPulmonary Exercise Test-related fitness in AAA patients to inform a definitive RCT. This study aims to investigate longer-term five-year clinical outcomes of these individuals. Methods The AAA GetFit trial recruited participants from Greater Manchester’s AAA Surveillance programme, and randomly assigned participants to either i)24-week CEP with choice of gym or home exercises, or ii) standard clinical care. We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes from this trial over five-year follow-up reviewing whether they underwent operative repair, 30-day postoperative morbidity, cardiovascular event, and mortality. We defined 30-day post-operative morbidity using Clavien-Dindo classification≥3. Results In total, 56 participants were recruited, 28 were randomised to CEP group, 86% were males. Mean age at time of enrolment was 72.8(SD5.7) years. At five-year follow-up, mortality in control and CEP were 60%(n=6) and 40%(n=4). In each group, 36%(n=20) underwent operative repair. There was no perioperative mortality. One perioperative morbidity occurred in control subject. Cardiovascular events(n=8) occurred in 7% and 21% control and CEP, respectively. Mean diameter of aneurysm increased in both CEPvsControl(0.89vs0.82cm). Conclusions The AAA GetFit trial showed significant benefits in cardiovascular fitness through community-based exercise. Clinical outcomes thus far were similar in both groups, there is an indication CEP improves perioperative outcomes.