American Joint Committee On Cancer 8th Research Articles

Survival risk stratification based on prognosis nomogram to identify patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who may benefit from postoperative adjuvant therapy

ObjectiveThe purpose of the study is to develop a prognosis nomogram for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients with radical resection and to identify patients who may benefit from postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy through survival risk stratification.MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled patients who underwent esophagectomy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from July 2015 to June 2017. Patients with stage I-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received radical R0 resection with or without postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy were included. Further, patients were randomly allocated into two groups (training and validation cohorts) with a distribution ratio of 7:3. The prognosis nomogram was constructed based on independent factors determined by univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration curve were adopted to evaluate the discriminative ability and reliability of the nomogram. The accuracy and clinical practicability were respectively assessed by C-index values and decision curve analysis (DCA), and further contrasted the nomogram model and the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system. In addition, survival risk stratification was further performed according to the nomogram, and the effect of postoperative adjuvant therapy on each risk group was appraised by the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.ResultsA total of 399 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were recruited in this study, including the training cohort (n = 280) and the validation cohort (n = 119). The nomogram-related AUC values ​​for 1, 3, and 5-year OS were 0.900, 0.795, and 0.802, respectively, and 0.800, 0.865, 0.829 in the validation cohort, respectively. The slope of the calibration curve for both cohorts was close to 1, indicating good consistency. The C-index value of the nomogram was 0.769, which was higher than that of the AJCC 8th TNM staging system by 0.061 (p < 0.001). Based on the prognosis nomogram, patients were stratified into three risk groups (low, medium, and high), and there were obvious differences in prognosis among the groups (p < 0.001). Furthermore, postoperative adjuvant therapy has been shown to enhance the 5-year survival rate by over 15% among patients classified as medium- and high-risk.ConclusionThe constructed nomogram as developed resulted in accurate and effective prediction performance in survival outcomes for patients with stage I-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent radical R0 resection, which is superior to the AJCC 8th TNM staging system. The survival risk stratification had potential clinical application to guide further personalized adjuvant therapy.

The prognostic value of the 8th American Joint Committee on cancer anatomic and prognostic stage groups for penile cancer: A multicenter collaboration study

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the value of 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) anatomic and prognostic stage groups for penile cancer patients and explore whether there is room for improvement. MethodsThe clinical and histopathologic data from 16 centers between 2000 and 2021 were assessed according to the 8th AJCC anatomic and prognostic stage groups. Kaplan–Meier plots were used to estimate the disease-specific survival (DSS) of the patients. The accuracy of the staging systems was investigated using the Harrell's concordance index (C-index). ResultsThe 5-year DSS rates for patients with stages 0is/a, I, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IV (stage 0 to stage IV) disease were 100 %, 98.9 %, 85.5 %, 81.1 %, 65.8 %, 34.4 %, and 23.2 %, respectively (p0is/a–I=0.798, pI–IIA<0.001, pIIA–IIB=0.486, pIIB–IIIA<0.001, pIIIA–IIIB<0.001, pIIIB–IV=0.004, ptotal<0.001). According to the modified model 1 system, the 5-year DSS rates without survivorship overlap for patients with stages 0is/a, I, II, IIIA, IIIB, and IV disease were 100 %, 98.9 %, 87.8 %, 65.8 %, 34.4 %, and 23.2 %, respectively (p0is/a–I=0.798, pI–II<0.001, pII–IIIA=0.002, pIIIA–IIIB<0.001, pIIIB–IV=0.004, ptotal<0.001). Similarly, according to the modified model 2 system, the 5-year DSS rates without survivorship overlap for patients with stages 0is/a, I, II, IIIA, IIIB, and IV disease were 100 %, 99.0 %, 85.8 %, 65.8 %, 34.4 %, and 23.2 %, respectively (p0is/a–I=0.757, pI–II<0.001, pII–IIIA=0.008, pIIIA–IIIB<0.001, pIIIB–IV=0.004, ptotal<0.001). The C-index of the simple modified staging systems were not inferior to those of the AJCC anatomic and prognostic stage groups. These results were confirmed by the bootstrap internal validation. ConclusionThere is still room for improvement about 8th AJCC anatomic and prognostic stage groups. The improved models, which are more concise and convenient, had a similar predictive value.

Development of a staging system for hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach based on multicenter data: A retrospective cohort study: A Staging System for Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach.

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is a rare subtype of gastric cancer (GC) with a poor prognosis. Furthermore, the current pathological staging system for HAS does not distinguish it from that for common gastric cancer (CGC). The clinicopathological data of 251 patients with primary HAS who underwent radical surgery at 14 centers in China from April 2004 to December 2019 and 5082 patients with primary CGC who underwent radical surgery at 2 centers during the same period were retrospectively analyzed. A modified staging system was established based on the differences in survival. After 1:4 propensity score matching (PSM), 228 patients with HAS and 828 patients with CGC were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis showed patients with HAS had a poorer prognosis compared with CGC. Multivariate analysis identified pN stage, CEA level, and perineural invasion (PNI) as independent prognostic factors in patients with HAS. A modified pT (mpT) staging was derived using recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) incorporating PNI and pT staging. The modified pathological staging system (mpTNM) integrated the mpT and the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pN definitions. Multivariate analysis showed that mpTNM stage outperformed other pathological variables as independent predictors of OS and RFS in patients with HAS. The mpTNM staging system exhibited significantly higher predictive accuracy for 3-year OS in patients with HAS (0.707, 95% CI: 0.650-0.763) compared to that of the 8th AJCC staging system (0.667, 95% CI: 0.610-0.723, P<0.05). Analysis using the Akaike information criterion favored the mpTNM staging system over the 8th AJCC staging system (824.69 vs. 835.94) regarding the goodness of fit. The mpTNM stages showed improved homogeneity in survival prediction (likelihood ratio: 41.51 vs. 27.10). Comparatively the mpTNM staging system outperformed the 8th AJCC staging system in survival prediction, supported by improvements in the net reclassification index (NRI: 47.7%) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI: 0.083, P<0.05). Time-dependent ROC curve showed that the mpTNM staging system consistently outperformed the 8th AJCC staging system with increasing observation time. The mpTNM staging system exhibited superior postoperative prognostic accuracy for patients with HAS compared to the 8th AJCC staging system.

Comparative Effectiveness of the Revised American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System.

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual is periodically updated. This study aims to examine the staging performances in delineating stage-specific survival curves and to evaluate the reclassification of cases based on the 7th and 8th AJCC editions in Taiwan. Data were sourced from the Taiwan Cancer Registry for cases diagnosed in 2017 (7th edition) and 2018 (8th edition), each with a 2-year follow-up period. Performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the Lorenz curve-derived Gini index, along with 2-year survival rates for evaluating patient prognoses. The 8th edition showed superior staging in four specific cancer types. Oropharyngeal cancer exhibited more variable 2-year survival rates across stages, and liver cancer showed a clearer decline in survival rates with advancing stages. The 8th edition also improved prognostic staging for non-small cell lung cancer and reclassified 26.4% of stage 4 prostate cancer patients under the 7th edition into stages 3 or 4A, showing 2-year survival rates above 90%. Our study highlights the 8th edition's refined capacity for stage-specific survival distinctions and reclassification of cases to enhance prognostication in certain cancers within Taiwan. We recommend a comprehensive evaluation when adopting a new edition or version.

Establishment of a nomogram model for predicting distant metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a comparative analysis of different lymph node staging systems based on the SEER database

The purpose of this study was to compare the predictive value of different lymph node staging systems and to develop an optimal prognostic nomogram for predicting distant metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Our study involved 6364 patients selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and 126 patients from China. Independent risk factors for distant metastasis were screened by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, and a model-based comparison of different lymph node staging systems was conducted. Furthermore, we developed a nomogram for predicting distant metastasis using the optimal performance lymph node staging system. The lymph node ratio (LNR), log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS), age, primary site, grade, tumor size, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th Edition T stage, and radiotherapy recipient status were significant predictors of distant metastasis in PDAC patients. The model with the LODDS was a better fit than the model with the LNR. We developed a nomogram model based on LODDS and six clinical parameters. The area under the curve (AUC) and concordance index (C-index) of 0.753 indicated that this model satisfied the discrimination criteria. Kaplan–Meier curves indicate a significant difference in OS among patients with different metastasis risks. LODDS seems to have a superior ability to predict distant metastasis in PDAC patients compared with the AJCC 8th Edition N stage, PLN and LNR staging systems. Moreover, we developed a nomogram model for predicting distant metastasis. Clinicians can use the model to detect patients at high risk of distant metastasis and to make further clinical decisions.

A retrospective study on adjuvant chemotherapy in retinoblastoma: validation of the new recommendation against treatment for pT2a tumors based on the 8th AJCC classification

BackgroundRetinoblastoma (RB) is an intraocular malignant tumor detected in early childhood with variable global impact. Histopathological classification of the tumor in enucleated globes with RB is the key for the decision of adjuvant chemotherapy use. We aim to validate the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in cases with combined pre-laminar/intralaminar optic nerve (ON) invasion and focal choroidal invasion according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th classification.MethodsThis is a retrospective study conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH) and King Khalid Eye Specialist Hospital (KKESH) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia of all RB cases who underwent enucleation over 22 years (2000 to 2021). The histopathological findings were reviewed to identify the enucleated globes classified as pT2a tumors, as an inclusion criterion. Basic demographic and clinical data were collected via chart review Simple descriptive and basic statistical analysis of the data was used where applicable.ResultsThirty-one patients who had an enucleated globe with RB that fit into the above classification were included. Sixteen were males and 15 were females. The median age was 14 months (IQR = 14 months). Most of the patients (93.5%) had no family history of RB. The commonest presentation was leukocoria in 87.1% followed by squint in 32.3%. Fourteen patients (45.2%) were treated by enucleation alone while 17 patients (54.8%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. Out of these, 7 patients had unilateral RB and the remaining 10 patients had bilateral RB. None of our patients developed recurrence or metastatic disease irrespective of the indication for adjuvant chemotherapy use after a maximum period of follow up reaching 17.84 years and a median of 10.6 years (IQR = 5.92).ConclusionsIn patients with 8th AJCC histopathological classification of pT2a, chemotherapy following enucleation might not be justified. The outcome in our untreated group of patients did not differ from the treated group with the absence of metastasis after a relatively long period of follow up with a median exceeding 10 years in both groups. Therefore, the risk and benefit of post enucleation adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of unilateral RB should be carefully decided and discussed with the primary caregivers taking into consideration the most recent evidence and recommendations in the literature.

Outcome of Upfront Surgically Resected Patients of Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Factors Affecting it: Experience from Tertiary Care Facility in North India.

Oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) is the most aggressive subsite among oral cancers. The poor survival rate has been primarily attributed to high loco-regional recurrence. Two recent developments viz. incorporation depth of invasion (DOI) in American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM 8th edition and elective neck dissection in clinically negative neck have potential to improve survival. We in our study have tried to look at overall survival and factors affecting patients of only OTSCC. 144 patients of OTSCC operated upfront between July 2017 and December 2023 were included in our study. Selective neck dissection was done in all patients with clinically negative neck. T staging was done using both AJCC TNM 7th and 8th edition. Primary objective of the study was to determine the overall survival and factors affecting it. The secondary objectives were to determine the disease-free survival and to look at the effect of forementioned new developments in patients in OTSCC. Mean overall survival and disease-free survival in our study cohort was 48.8 months and 48.3 months respectively in follow up period ranging from 2 months to 75 months. DOI > 10 millimetres and involved margins were factors significantly associated with survival on multivariate analysis. Lymph node metastasis was detected in 32(35.2%) patients out of 91 patients with clinically negative neck and 31(21.6%) of patients were upstaged from T1/T2 in AJCC TNM 7th to T3/T4 according to AJCC TNM 8th edition. The 5-years overall survival of our patients was about 54% with nearly half of our patients presenting in stage III and stage IV. There is need to create awareness in general population as the impact of the new changes will only be seen if patients present at an early stage.

Traversing the Terrain: Potential Pitfalls within the AJCC 8th Edition Staging System for Lip and Oral Cavity Cancers.

In 1977, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) introduced the inaugural Cancer Staging Manual, which implemented the T (tumor extent), N (regional lymph node status), and M (presence or absence of distant metastasis) staging system. This systematic approach aimed to convey the extent of disease across various cancer types, providing clinicians with a practical framework to plan treatment strategies, predict prognosis, and assess outcomes. The AJCC 8th edition, effective from January 1, 2018, continues this tradition. However, certain shortcomings persist in the AJCC 8th edition, as identified through clinical experience. Specifically, challenges arise in accurately assessing depth of invasion in unique histological variants of oral squamous cell carcinoma (e.g., Oral verrucous carcinoma, Carcinoma cuniculatum, and Papillary squamous cell carcinoma) and minor salivary gland tumors. Additionally, discrepancies exist in the perception of bone invasion patterns and in reporting practices. There is also a need for staging guidelines for malignant odontogenic tumors and multifocal tumors of the oral cavity, supplemented by diagrammatic representations. Lastly, there is a call for comprehensive staging criteria for carcinomas of the ear, external auditory canal, and temporal bone. We advocate for the inclusion of these considerations in future editions of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual.

LI-RADS Category Can Be a Post-Surgical Prognostic Factor for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis or Chronic Hepatitis B

&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Introduction:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) categorization has been proposed as a potential prognostic indicator for primary liver neoplasms in patients with liver cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis B. This multicenter study aimed to determine whether LI-RADS categorization can offer additional post-surgical prognostic value for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA) when used in conjunction with the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) guidelines. &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Methods:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Patients with high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma, surgically confirmed ICCAs, and available preoperative MRI were enrolled. LI-RADS categorization of ICCAs was performed using MRI features, and multivariate analyses were conducted incorporating LI-RADS category, AJCC staging, and clinicopathologic factors to evaluate their predictive value for postoperative recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). In patients with early recurrence (&amp;lt;2 years), the percentages of AJCC stage I and LR-M or LR tumor-in-vein (TIV) were calculated, respectively. &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Results:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Among the 166 ICCAs analyzed, 13.3% (22/166) were classified as LR-4/5, 77.7% (129/166) as LR-M, and 9.0% (15/166) as LR TIV. Classifications according to the 8th AJCC guidelines for patients with available post-surgical pathologic data and follow-up imaging were 40.6% (63/155) stage I tumors, 23.9% (37/155) stage II, and 35.5% (55/155) stage III. Multivariate analysis revealed that LI-RADS category (LR-M or LR-TIV) was a significant factor for predicting both RFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.86, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.02) and OS (HR = 3.18, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.03). Additionally, AJCC staging (II or III) was a significant factor for RFS (HR = 3.90, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &amp;lt; 0.001) and OS (HR = 3.29, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &amp;lt; 0.001), male sex was a significant factor for RFS (HR = 1.89, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.006) and OS (HR = 2.23, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.002), and positive resection margin was a significant factor for OS (HR = 1.91, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.03). Among the 80 patients with early recurrence, 97.5% displayed LR-M or LR-TIV features, while 11.3% were AJCC stage I patients. &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; The MRI-based preoperative LI-RADS categorization of ICCA provides additional post-surgical prognostic value beyond the AJCC guidelines, with significant implications for both RFS and OS.

Abstract PO3-15-08: Validation for prognostic staging based AJCC 8th edition with nuclear grade in Japanese breast cancer patients: A multicenter retrospective study

Abstract Introduction. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition of breast cancer classification introduced the concept of "prognostic stage," which is based on anatomic classification (TNM classification) plus four biomarkers: estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2), and histological grading (HG). In Japan, however, the introduction of histological classification has been passive and slow, and the nuclear grading (NG) has been used so far. Objective. Our aim is to compare the prognostic staging classification in the AJCC, 8th edition which substitutes NG for HG (AJCC8th-NG) with the TNM classification, and to confirm the usefulness of AJCC8th-NG classification. Methods. We collected 5229 patients with primary breast cancer operated on between 2005 and 2013 at six institutions affiliated with Kyushu University Hospital in Japan, for whom prognosis was available. We retrospectively evaluated the 7-year survival rates based on the TNM classification and the AJCC8th-NG classification, based on the pathological diagnosis of their surgeries. Results. Median age was 58 years (24-99), 5210 (99.6%) were female, and the 7-year survival rate of all eligible patients was 93.2%. The changes in the number of cases by stage were observed as follows: Stage 0 (16.5%), Stage IA (42.3% to 56.2%), Stage IB (0.3% to 8.8%), Stage IIA (21.5% to 6.9%), Stage IIB (9.7% to 3.1%), Stage IIIA (3.9% to 3.5%), Stage IIIB (1.5% to 1.9%), Stage IIIC (2.1% to 0.9%), Stage IV (1.9%). The changes in 7-year survival rates were observed as follows: Stage 0 (96.1%), Stage IA (96.8% → 96.5%), Stage IB (93.7% → 93.4%), Stage IIA (93.1% → 87.8%), Stage IIB (88.5% → 84.6%), Stage IIIA (86.9% → 80.4%), Stage IIIB (78 .7% to 84.4%), Stage IIIC (79.8% to 58.4%), and Stage IV (51.9%). (TNM classification →AJCC8th-NG classification) Both TNM classification and AJCC8th-NG classification were significantly associated with prognosis. AJCC8th-NG classification was more stratified. In AJCC 8th-NG Stage IB, which is the largest population in all patients, 42% of that were triple-negative type (TN) downstaging from TNM Stage IA and 58% were luminal type downstaging from TNM Stage II-IIIA. In AJCC 8th-NG Stage IIIC, which was changed the most with biomarkers, 52% of that were TN upstaging from TNM Stage IIIA-IIIB. On the other hand, 50% of AJCC 8th-NG Stage IIIB with a favorable prognosis were ER-positive or HER2-positive downstaged from TNM Stage IIIC. Discussion TN breast cancer generally has a poor prognosis. However, HER2-positive breast cancer, which used to have a poor prognosis, is said to have a favorable prognosis after the availability of anti-HER2 drugs. This time, we examined cases after 2005 when anti-HER2 drugs became available in Japan, but the results did not show that HER2-positive breast cancer had a better prognosis than HER2-negative breast cancer. In this study, we were unable to confirm the use of anti-HER2 drugs. In the AJCC 8th classification, it seems necessary to consider whether or not treatment is being provided. If all patients are treated, the prognostic stratification will become clearer. Conclusion. Our study could show that AJCC8th-NG classification was useful for predicting prognosis same as AJCC8th classification in the relatively large cohort. Citation Format: Kazuhisa Kaneshiro, Mai Yamada, Saori Hayashi, Kenichiro Koga, Michiyo Saimura, Naoki Otomo, Shuyo Umeda, Keisei Anan, Masayuki Okido, Takafumi Morisaki, Masafumi Nakamura, Makoto Kubo. Validation for prognostic staging based AJCC 8th edition with nuclear grade in Japanese breast cancer patients: A multicenter retrospective study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-15-08.

Abstract PO5-27-01: Comparison between the 7th and the 8th edition of TNM Staging System of American joint committee on Cancer(AJCC) for Breast Cancer Patients, diagnosed and treated at King Abdulaziz Medical City

Abstract Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with different biological and molecular characteristics that affect local recurrence, metastases, prognoses, and response to available therapies. The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for breast cancer has incorporated the biological and molecular characteristics, tumor grade, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor status(Her-2)and tumor grade, into the traditional anatomical 7th edition that only considers tumor size, lymph nodes status, and distant metastases. The aim of this study is to compare the 7th to 8th editions of the AJCC staging system for prognostic impact, assess the effect of the new edition on the treatment and treatment outcome Method A retrospective cohort study was performed for all breast cancer patients, diagnosed between (2013 -2019) and underwent upfront surgery at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC).Patients’ clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, surgical, therapeutic, and follow-up data were retrieved. Overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate analysis using Fisher's exact test was used to compare staging systems' prognostic accuracy. Multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to identify factors independently associated with disease outcome Results A total of 169 female patients were included, the 8th AJCC staging system resulted in a reallocation of 108 (63.9%) of the patients to a different stage group. The majority were downstaged(60.9%) while only 3% were upstaged, most of the upstaged patients had a triple-negative subtype (80%). The change in overall stage for the 8th edition was most significant in stage I (an increase by 140.3%), followed by stage II (downstaged by 74.3%) and stage III (downstaged by 49.7%) compared to the 7th edition. Critically 42.8% of all downstaged patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy were found to have received unnecessary chemotherapy after applying the 8th AJCC staging system as per National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical practice guidelines recommendations. The 8th AJCC staging system was a better prognostic predictor of disease survival, patients in 8th AJCC stage 3 had a higher tendency to develop metastases and die because of their disease (P-value 0.03, 0.051, respectively). Conclusions: Our comparison revealed that the AJCC 8th edition staging system is superior and more comprehensive than the 7th, in term of prognostic value, and in defining the precise adjuvant therapy Figure 1 Comparison of the 7th AJCC and the 8th AJCC staging system Citation Format: Nafisa Abdelhafiez, Abdulmohsen Alkushi, Lolwah Alriyees, Mohammad Arabi, Faris Alsalamah, Emad Masuadi, Ahmad Omair, Mohammad Alkaiyat, Hussam Shehata. Comparison between the 7th and the 8th edition of TNM Staging System of American joint committee on Cancer(AJCC) for Breast Cancer Patients, diagnosed and treated at King Abdulaziz Medical City [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-27-01.

Utilizing the AJCC 8th Staging to Discriminate Survival Outcomes in HPV-associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging 8th edition introduced major changes in the TNM staging of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) based on the human papillomavirus (HPV) status. This study aimed to observe how well the AJCC staging 8th edition precisely discriminates survival outcomes in patients with HPV-associated OPSCC using a large population database. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2010 and 2016, 7,448 patients with HPV-associated OPSCC were enrolled. Patients diagnosed with OPSCC and tested positive for HPV with information on the TNM staging according to the AJCC staging 7th edition were selected. Next, T-, N-, and clinical staging were reconstructed based on the AJCC staging 8th edition. Survival probabilities in both AJCC staging 7th and 8th editions were estimated and compared. Most patients (93.44%) were down-staged from the 7th to the 8th edition. The AJCC staging 8th edition showed more discriminatory power in predicting survival of patients with HPV-associated OPSCC than the AJCC staging 7th edition, regardless of the primary subsites. Additionally, clinical stage I patients with HPV-associated OPSCC according to the AJCC 8th edition showed better prognosis in case of high T staging than high N staging. Clinical staging according to the AJCC 8th edition compared to that of the 7th edition was an independent prognostic factor in patients with HPV-associated OPSCC. This study emphasizes the advantages of the new classification system for discriminating survival in HPV-associated OPSCC according to various factors.

Evaluation of AJCC staging system and proposal of a novel stage grouping system in retroperitoneal liposarcoma: the Fudan Zhongshan experience.

Overall survival (OS) varies significantly among individuals with heterogeneous retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLS), even among those with the same clinical stage. Improved staging of RPLS is a critical unmet need, given the disappointing results of external validations of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system. The cohort study included 220 consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection for primary RPLS at the largest sarcoma centre of Fudan University in China from September 2009 to August 2021, combined with 277 adult patients with RPLS in the SEER database from 1975 to 2020. Data analysis was performed from December 2021 to December 2022. Patients were retrospectively restaged according to the 8th and 7th editions of the TNM staging system as well as the new TNM (nTNM) staging system. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Comparative analysis of postoperative survival was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between subgroups were tested using the log-rank test. The OS prediction nomogram was generated based on baseline variables and tumour characteristics. Harrell's consistency index (C-index), area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC), and calibration curves were used to evaluate the performance of the nomogram. A total of 497 patients were enrolled in the study, including 282 (56.7%) male patients. The median follow-up was 51 months (interquartile range, IQR, 23-83), and the OS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 87.9%, 75.3%, and 64.9%, respectively. According to the staging distribution of the AJCC 7th edition, 6 patients were stage IA (1.2%), 189 patients were stage IB (38%), 12 patients were stage IIA (2.4%), 150 patients were stage IIB (30.1%), 131 patients were stage III (26.3%), and 9 patients were stage IV (1.8%). With the 8th edition staging, this distribution changed: 6 patients (1.2%) were stage IA, 189 patients (38%) were stage IB, 12 patients (2.4%) were stage II, 24 patients (4.8%) were stage IIIA, 257 patients (51.7%) were stage IIIB, and 9 patients (1.8%) were stage IV. 182 patients (36.6%) were reclassified according to the nTNM staging system with the new T stage classification. The C-index and log-rank score improved after implementation of nTNM implementation. The nTNM system was associated with improved identification of high-risk patients compared with the AJCC 7th and 8th TNM. The FNCLCC stage proved to be highly prognostic with significant intergroup differences in OS. The calibration curve shows a high degree of agreement between the actual OS rate and the nomogram estimated OS rate. Compared with 8th AJCC TNM, 7th AJCC TNM staging system showed a more homogeneous staging distribution and a slight improvement in the prognostic accuracy of RPLS. The revised T-stage and nTNM systems showed better risk stratification performance. The FNCLCC stage was found to have high prognostic value, further emphasising histological grade is the least negligible prognostic factor in predicting patient survival. The constructed nomogram model enables individualized prognostic analysis and helps to develop risk-adapted therapy for RPLS patients.

Development and validation of a nomogram for Siewert II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: a retrospective analysis.

Due to the complex histological type and anatomical structures, there has been considerable debate on the classification of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), especially Siewert II AEG. Furthermore, neither the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) [esophageal adenocarcinoma (E) or gastric cancer (G)] nor the AJCC 8th TNM (E or G) accurately predicted the prognosis of patients with Siewert II AEG. This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing the survival and prognosis of patients with Siewert II AEG and establish a new and better prognostic predictive model. A retrospective study. Patients with Siewert II AEG, retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases, were assigned to the training set. Patients retrieved from a single tertiary medical center were assigned to the external validation set. Significant variables were selected using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to construct the nomogram. Nomogram models were assessed using the concordance index (C-index), a calibration plot, decision curve analysis (DCA), and external validation. Age, tumor grade, and size, as well as the T, N, and M stages, were included in the nomograms. For the SEER training set, the C-index of the nomogram was 0.683 (0.665-0.701). The C-index of the nomogram for the external validation set was 0.690 (0.653-0.727). The calibration curve showed good agreement between the nomogram estimations and actual observations in both the training and external validation sets. The DCA showed that the nomogram was clinically useful. The new predictive model showed significant accuracy in predicting the prognosis of Siewert II AEG.

Real-world relapse-free survival data on adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy for patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent stage III melanoma.

We aimed to compare the relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients treated with adjuvant anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) therapy for a first diagnosis of stage III melanoma to patients treated after resection of the recurrences. Patients treated with adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy after complete resection of stage III melanoma between September 2018 and January 2021, were included. Depending on when adjuvant anti-PD-1 treatment was initiated, patients were divided over 2 cohorts: for the first diagnosis (cohort A) or for a second or subsequent diagnosis (cohort B) of stage III melanoma. Clinical data and RFS were compared between cohorts. 66 patients were included: 37 in cohort A, 29 in cohort B. Median follow-up time from the start of adjuvant therapy was 21 months and 17 months in cohorts A and B, respectively. Significant differences in ulceration of the primary tumor ( P = 0.032), stage according to the 7th AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer , P = 0.026) and type of metastatic involvement ( P = 0.005) were found between cohorts. In cohorts A and B, 18 (49%) and 8 (28%) patients developed a recurrence and the 1-year RFS was 51% and 72%, respectively. In cohort B, RFS remained longer in the patients of which the interval between first diagnosis of stage III melanoma and start of adjuvant therapy was >48 months compared to ≤48 months (83% vs. 65%, P = 0.253). This study demonstrates that patients with recurrent stage III disease, not previously treated with adjuvant systemic therapy, may derive similar benefit to a first diagnosis of stage III patients if access to adjuvant therapy changes.

Subserosal Layer and/or Pancreatic Invasion Based on Anatomical Features as a Novel Prognostic Indicator in Patients with Distal Cholangiocarcinoma.

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition T-staging system for distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) proposes classification according to the depth of invasion (DOI); nevertheless, DOI measurement is complex and irreproducible. This study focused on the fibromuscular layer and evaluated whether the presence or absence of penetrating fibromuscular invasion of DCC contributes to recurrence and prognosis. In total, 55 patients pathologically diagnosed with DCC who underwent surgical resection from 2002 to 2022 were clinicopathologically examined. Subserosal layer and/or pancreatic (SS/Panc) invasion, defined as penetration of the fibromuscular layer and invasion of the subserosal layer or pancreas by the cancer, was assessed with other clinicopathological prognostic factors to investigate recurrence and prognostic factors. According to the AJCC 8th edition, there were 11 T1, 28 T2, and 16 T3 cases, with 44 (80%) cases of SS/Panc invasion. The DOI was not significantly different for both recurrence and prognostic factors. In the multivariate analysis, only SS/Panc was identified as an independent factor for prognosis (hazard ratio: 16.1; 95% confidence interval: 2.1-118.8, p = 0.006). In conclusion, while the determination of DOI in DCC does not accurately reflect recurrence and prognosis, the presence of SS/Panc invasion may contribute to the T-staging system.

Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for patients with laryngeal cancer with synchronous or metachronous lung cancer.

The objective of this study was to examine the independent prognostic factors of laryngeal cancer with synchronous or metachronous lung cancer (LCSMLC), and to generate and verify a clinical prediction model. In this study, laryngeal cancer alone and LCSMLC were defined using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Risk factors of patients with LCSMLC were analyzed through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Independent prognostic factors were selected by Cox regression analyses, on the basis of which a nomogram was constructed using R code. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were applied to test the application of a risk stratification system. Finally, we conducted a comparison of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system of laryngeal cancer with the new model of nomogram and risk stratification. For further validation of the nomogram, data from patients at two Chinese independent institutions were also analyzed. According to the eligibility criteria, 32 429 patients with laryngeal cancer alone and 641 patients with LCSMLC from the SEER database (the training cohort) and additional 61 patients from two Chinese independent institutions (the external validation cohort) were included for final analyses. Compared with patients with laryngeal cancer who did not have synchronous or metachronous lung cancer, age, sex, race, primary site of laryngeal cancer, grade, and stage were risk factors for LCSMLC, while marriage, surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy are not their risk factors. Age, two cancers' interval, pathological type, stage, surgery, radiation, primary lung site, and primary throat site were independent prognostic predictors of LCSMLC. The risk stratification system of high-, medium-, and low-risk groups significantly distinguished the prognosis in different patients with LCSMLC, regardless of the training cohort or the validation cohort. Compared with the 6th AJCC TNM stage of laryngeal cancer, the new model of nomogram and risk stratification showed an improved net benefit. Age, sex, race, primary site of laryngeal cancer, grade, and stage were risk factors for LCSMLC. An individualized clinical prognostic predictive model by nomogram was generated and validated, which showed superior prediction ability for LCSMLC.

Preoperative MRI features predicting very early recurrence of intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma after R0 resection: a comparison with the AJCC 8th edition staging system.

This study aimed to establish a nomogram based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features to predict the very early recurrence (VER, less than 6months) of intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC) after R0 resection. This study enrolled a group of 193 IMCC patients from our institution between March 2010 and January 2022. Patients were allocated into the development cohort (n=137) and the validation cohort (n=56), randomly, and the preoperative clinical and MRI features were collected. Univariate and multivariate stepwise logistic regression assessments were adopted to assess predictors of VER. Nomogram was constructed and certificated in the validation cohort. The performance of the prediction nomogram was evaluated by its discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. The performance of the nomogram was compared with the T stage of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition staging system. Fifty-three patients (27.5%) experienced VER of the tumor and 140 patients (72.5%) with non-VER, during the follow-up period. After multivariate stepwise logistic regression, number of lesions, diffuse hypoenhancement on arterial phase, necorsis and suspicious lymph nodes were independently associated with VER. The nomogram demonstrated significantly higher area under the curve (AUC) of 0.813 than T stage (AUC=0.666, P=0.006) in the development cohort, whereas in the validation cohort, the nomogram showed better discrimination performance, with an AUC of 0.808 than T stage (0.705) with no significantly difference (P=0.230). Decision curve analysis reflected the clinical net benefit of the nomogram. The nomogram based on preoperative MRI features is a reliable tool to predict VER for patients with IMCC after R0 resection. This nomogram will be helpful to improve survival prediction and individualized treatment.

Clinical outcome of surgical resection for multifocal T2-T3 hepatocellular carcinoma up to 3 nodules: a comparative analysis with a single nodule.

Although the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system seems to underestimate the impact of curative-intent surgical resection for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), recent studies have indicated favorable results for the surgical resection of multiple HCC. This study aimed to assess clinical outcomes and feasibility of surgical resection for multifocal HCC with up to three nodules compared with single tumor cases. Patients who underwent surgical resection for HCC with up to three nodules between 2009 and 2020 were included, and those with the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition, T1 and T4 stages were excluded to reduce differences in disease distribution and severity. Finally, 81 and 52 patients were included in the single and multiple treatment groups, respectively. Short- and long-term outcomes including recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), were evaluated. All patients were classified as Child-Pugh class A. RFS and OS were not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.176 and P=0.966, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that transfusion and intrahepatic metastasis were significantly associated with recurrence (P=0.046 and P=0.005, respectively). Additionally, intrahepatic metastasis was significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio, 1.989; 95% confidence interval, 1.040-3.802; P=0.038). Since there was no significant difference in survival between the single and multiple groups among patients with AJCC 8th stage T2 and T3, surgical resection with curative intent could be considered with acceptable long-term survival for selected patients with multiple HCC of up to three nodules.

Prediction of postoperative recurrence in resectable pancreatic body/tail adenocarcinoma: a novel risk stratification approach using a CT-based nomogram.

To identify prognostic CT features that predict recurrence in patients with resectable pancreatic body/tail adenocarcinoma (PBTA) and construct a CT-based nomogram for preoperative risk stratification. A total of 258 patients with resectable PBTA who underwent upfront surgery were retrospectively enrolled (development cohort, n = 172; validation cohort, n = 86), and their clinical and CT features were analyzed. Stepwise Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to identify prognostic features and construct a predictive nomogram for recurrence-free survival (RFS). The prognostic performance of the CT-based nomogram was validated and compared to the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pathological staging system. In the development cohort, the following five CT features for predicting recurrence were identified to construct the nomogram: tumor density in the venous phase, tumor necrosis, adjacent organ invasion, splenic vein invasion, and superior mesenteric vein/portal vein abutment. In the validation cohort, the CT-based nomogram showed a concordance index of 0.65 (95% confidence interval: 0.58-0.73), which was higher than the 8th AJCC staging system. The area under the curves of the nomogram for predicting recurrence at 0.5, 1, and 2years were 0.66, 0.71, and 0.72, respectively. Patients were categorized into high- and low-risk groups with 1-year recurrence probabilities of 0.73 and 0.43, respectively. The proposed nomogram provided accurate recurrence risk stratification for patients with resectable PBTA in a preoperative setting and may be used to facilitate clinical decision-making. The proposed CT-based nomogram, based on easily available CT features, may serve as an effective and convenient tool for stratifying further the recurrence risk of patients with pancreatic body/tail adenocarcinoma. • The CT-based nomogram, incorporating five commonly used CT features, successfully preoperatively stratified patients with resectable PBTA into distinct prognosis groups. • Tumor density in the venous phase, tumor necrosis, splenic vein invasion, adjacent organ invasion, and superior mesenteric vein/portal vein abutment were associated with RFS in patients with resectable PBTA. • The CT-based nomogram exhibited better predictive performance for recurrence than the 8th AJCC staging system.