Abstract Introduction Bromelain based Enzymatic Debridement (ED) has been introduced as an additional concept to the burn surgeon’s armamentarium, and is best indicated for mid-to deep dermal burns with mixed patterns. Increasing evidence has been published on special regions and settings, adressing success and limitations of ED for improved patient care. To better guide ED in view of the increasing experience, there is a need to publish updated consensus guidelines with user-orientated recommendations. Methods A multiprofessional expert panel of plastic surgeons and burn care specialists from 10 European countries was convened, to assist in developing current recommendations for best practices with use of ED. Consensus statements were based on peer-reviewed publications and clinical relevance. For consensus agreement, the methodology employed was an agreement algorithm based on a modification of the Willy and Stellar method. For this study on ED, consensus was considered when there was at least 80 % agreement to each statement. Results The updated consensus guidelines from 2019 refer to a diversity of experience and practice patterns of 1232 summarized patient cases in Europe (2017: 500 cases), reflecting the impact of the published recommendations. Forty-three statements were formulated, addressing the following topics: indications, pain management and anesthesia, large surface indication, timing of application for various indications, preparation and application, post-interventional wound management, skin grafting, outcome, scar and revision management, cost-effectiveness, patient′s perspective, logistic aspects and training strategies. The degree of consensus was remarkably high, with consensus in 42 of 43 statements (97.7%), while no consensus was achieved on the role of outpatient treatment/ED as day cases in minor burns in experienced burn centers. A classifications with regard to timing of application for ED was introduced, with „immediate/ very early“(≤12h), early (12-72h) or delayed (>72h) treatment. All further recommendations are addressed in the presentation. Conclusions The updated guidelines in this paper represent further refinement of the recommended indication, application and post-interventional management for the use of ED. The published statements contain detailed, user-orientated recommendations aiming to align current and future users and prevent unnecessary pitfalls. The significance of this work is reflected by the magnitude of patient experience behind it, larger than the total number of patients treated in all published ED clinical trials. Applicability of Research to Practice These consensus guidelines may serve as refined user-orientated recommendations for implementation and successful application of ED in further countries (e.g. USA) based on the evidence and experience of 1232 summarized patient cases.