7-point Subjective Global Assessment Research Articles

Evaluation of Nutrition Assessment Tools Compared With Body Cell Mass for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Chronic Kidney Disease

We compared the subjective global assessment (SGA) and a range of SGA-based assessment tools with body cell mass (BCM) in patients with stage IV and V predialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD). This was a cross-sectional, observational study. The study took place at a public tertiary hospital predialysis outpatient clinic. A total of 56 consecutive consenting patients with CKD (61% were male; age [mean +/- standard deviation] 70.2 +/- 11.6 years; glomerular filtration rate 22.2 +/- 6.8 mL/min). Nutrition status was the main outcome measure. In this population, the prevalence of malnutrition was 19.6% (n = 11, SGA B; no C ratings). Malnutrition was associated with lower BCM (mean BCM, 26.3 vs. 33.4 kg, P = .007, measured by total body potassium), body weight (64.8 vs. 76.1 kg, P = .042), body mass index (23.7 vs. 27.6 kg/m(2), P = .015), and greater weight loss over the previous 6 months (-6.2 vs. -0.1 kg, P = .004). BCM had a weak relationship with 7-point SGA (P = .267), malnutrition inflammation score (r = -0.27 P = .063), and patient-generated SGA (r = -0.27 P = .060). There was no association for either measure of nutrition status (SGA or BCM) with albumin, glomerular filtration rate, or C-reactive protein. SGA in its original form most accurately delineated malnutrition by depleted BCM and is the most appropriate tool for cross-sectional assessment of nutrition status in patients with predialysis CKD.

Comprehensive malnutrition inflammation score as a marker of nutritional status in Chinese peritoneal dialysis patients

Malnutrition is common among peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. However, the ideal marker of nutritional status in PD patients remained controversial. We studied 165 unselected adult PD patients. We compared the comprehensive Malnutrition-Inflammation Score (MIS) and the 7-point Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) score. The mean age was 59.2 +/- 11.5 years. Seventy patients were male. MIS significantly correlated with the SGA score (r =-0.667, P < 0.001). Of the 165 patients, 132 (80.0%) had similar classification of nutritional status by SGA and MIS (Group I); 17 (10.3%) were classified as normal by SGA but moderately malnourished by MIS (Group II), while 16 (9.7%) were classified as normal by MIS but moderately malnourished by SGA (Group III). Group II had been dialysed longer than Group I (71.7 +/- 50.3 vs 40.7 +/- 37.5 months, P = 0.011). As compared with Group I, Group III was more likely to require helper for PD exchange (37.5%vs 9.7%, P = 0.004), marginally more likely to be diabetic (62.5%vs 35.6%, P = 0.085) and had a slightly higher Charlson's comorbidity score (6.13 +/- 1.78 vs 4.98 +/- 2.1, P = 0.085), although the latter two were not statistically significant. MIS has a reasonable correlation with the conventional SGA score in PD patients. Patients with limited self-care capability, diabetes and multiple comorbidities probably had worse score (i.e. worse nutrition) revealed by SGA than by MIS, while patients who had been dialysed longer had worse score revealed by MIS than by SGA.