50-mg Group Research Articles

Upadacitinib Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Crohn’s Disease

BackgroundUpadacitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, is under investigation for the treatment of Crohn’s disease.MethodsIn two phase 3 induction trials (U-EXCEL and U-EXCEED), we randomly assigned patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease to receive 45 mg of upadacitinib or placebo (2:1 ratio) once daily for 12 weeks. Patients who had a clinical response to upadacitinib induction therapy were randomly assigned in the U-ENDURE maintenance trial to receive 15 mg of upadacitinib, 30 mg of upadacitinib, or placebo (1:1:1 ratio) once daily for 52 weeks. The primary end points for induction (week 12) and maintenance (week 52) were clinical remission (defined as a Crohn’s Disease Activity Index score of <150 [range, 0 to 600, with higher scores indicating more severe disease activity]) and endoscopic response (defined as a decrease in the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease [SES-CD; range, 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe disease] of >50% from baseline of the induction trial [or for patients with an SES-CD of 4 at baseline, a decrease of ≥2 points from baseline]).ResultsA total of 526 patients underwent randomization in U-EXCEL, 495 in U-EXCEED, and 502 in U-ENDURE. A significantly higher percentage of patients who received 45-mg upadacitinib than those who received placebo had clinical remission (in U-EXCEL, 49.5% vs. 29.1%; in U-EXCEED, 38.9% vs. 21.1%) and an endoscopic response (in U-EXCEL, 45.5% vs. 13.1%; in U-EXCEED, 34.6% vs. 3.5%) (P<0.001 for all comparisons). At week 52 in U-ENDURE, a higher percentage of patients had clinical remission with 15-mg upadacitinib (37.3%) or 30-mg upadacitinib (47.6%) than with placebo (15.1%), and a higher percentage had an endoscopic response with 15-mg upadacitinib (27.6%) or 30-mg upadacitinib (40.1%) than with placebo (7.3%) (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Herpes zoster infections occurred more frequently in the 45-mg and 30-mg upadacitinib groups than in the respective placebo groups, and hepatic disorders and neutropenia were more frequent in the 30-mg upadacitinib group than in the other maintenance groups. Gastrointestinal perforations developed in 4 patients who received 45-mg upadacitinib and in 1 patient each who received 30-mg or 15-mg upadacitinib.ConclusionsUpadacitinib induction and maintenance treatment was superior to placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease. (Funded by AbbVie; U-EXCEL, U-EXCEED, and U-ENDURE ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03345849, NCT03345836, and NCT03345823.)

Tirzepatide versus insulin glargine as second-line or third-line therapy in type 2 diabetes in the Asia-Pacific region: the SURPASS-AP-Combo trial.

Tirzepatide is a once-weekly GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist. In this phase 3, randomized, open-label trial, insulin-naive adults (≥18 years of age) with type 2 diabetes (T2D) uncontrolled on metformin (with or without a sulphonylurea) were randomized 1:1:1:1 to weekly tirzepatide 5 mg, 10 mg or 15 mg or daily insulin glargine at 66 hospitals in China, South Korea, Australia and India. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of mean change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to week 40 after treatment with 10 mg and 15 mg of tirzepatide. Key secondary endpoints included non-inferiority and superiority of all tirzepatide doses in HbA1c reduction, proportions of patients achieving HbA1c < 7.0% and weight loss at week 40. A total of 917 patients (763 (83.2%) in China) were randomized to tirzepatide 5 mg (n = 230), 10 mg (n = 228) or 15 mg (n = 229) or insulin glargine (n = 230). All doses of tirzepatide were non-inferior and superior to insulin glargine for least squares mean (s.e.) reduction in HbA1c from baseline to week 40: tirzepatide 5 mg, 10 mg and 15 mg, -2.24% (0.07), -2.44% (0.07) and -2.49% (0.07), respectively, and insulin glargine, -0.95% (0.07), with a treatment difference ranging from -1.29% to -1.54% (all P < 0.001). Proportions of patients achieving HbA1c < 7.0% at week 40 were greater in tirzepatide 5-mg (75.4%), 10-mg (86.0%) and 15-mg (84.4%) groups compared to insulin glargine (23.7%) (all P < 0.001). All tirzepatide doses led to superior body weight reduction at week 40: tirzepatide 5 mg, 10 mg and 15 mg, -5.0 kg (-6.5%), -7.0 kg (-9.3%) and -7.2 kg (-9.4%), respectively, compared to insulin glargine, 1.5 kg (+2.1%) (all P < 0.001). The most common adverse events with tirzepatide were mild to moderate decreased appetite, diarrhea and nausea. No severe hypoglycemia was reported. Tirzepatide demonstrated superior reductions in HbA1c versus insulin glargine in an Asia-Pacific, predominately Chinese, population with T2D and was generally well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04093752 .

Emodepside for Trichuris trichiura and Hookworm Infection

BackgroundCurrent treatments for soil-transmitted helminth infections in humans have low efficacy against Trichuris trichiura. Emodepside — a drug in veterinary use and under development for the treatment of onchocerciasis in humans — is a leading therapeutic candidate for soil-transmitted helminth infection.MethodsWe conducted two phase 2a, dose-ranging, randomized, controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of emodepside against T. trichiura and hookworm infections. We randomly assigned, in equal numbers, adults 18 to 45 years of age in whom T. trichiura or hookworm eggs had been detected in stool samples to receive emodepside, at a single oral dose of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, or 30 mg; albendazole, at a single oral dose of 400 mg; or placebo. The primary outcome was the percentage of participants who were cured of T. trichiura or hookworm infection (the cure rate) with emodepside 14 to 21 days after treatment, determined with the use of the Kato–Katz thick-smear technique. Safety was assessed 3, 24, and 48 hours after the receipt of treatment or placebo.ResultsA total of 266 persons were enrolled in the T. trichiura trial and 176 in the hookworm trial. The predicted cure rate against T. trichiura in the 5-mg emodepside group (85% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 69 to 93]; 25 of 30 participants) was higher than the predicted cure rate in the placebo group (10% [95% CI, 3 to 26]; 3 of 31 participants) and the observed cure rate in the albendazole group (17% [95% CI, 6 to 35]; 5 of 30 participants). A dose-dependent relationship was shown in participants with hookworm: the observed cure rate was 32% (95% CI, 13 to 57; 6 of 19 participants) in the 5-mg emodepside group and 95% (95% CI, 74 to 99.9; 18 of 19 participants) in the 30-mg emodepside group; the observed cure rates were 14% (95% CI, 3 to 36; 3 of 21 participants) in the placebo group and 70% (95% CI, 46 to 88; 14 of 20 participants) in the albendazole group. In the emodepside groups, headache, blurred vision, and dizziness were the most commonly reported adverse events 3 and 24 hours after treatment; the incidence of events generally increased in a dose-dependent fashion. Most adverse events were mild in severity and were self-limited; there were few moderate and no serious adverse events.ConclusionsEmodepside showed activity against T. trichiura and hookworm infections. (Funded by the European Research Council; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05017194.)

Hydrochlorothiazide and Prevention of Kidney-Stone Recurrence

BackgroundNephrolithiasis is one of the most common conditions affecting the kidney and is characterized by a high risk of recurrence. Thiazide diuretic agents are widely used for prevention of the recurrence of kidney stones, but data regarding the efficacy of such agents as compared with placebo are limited. Furthermore, dose–response data are also limited.MethodsIn this double-blind trial, we randomly assigned patients with recurrent calcium-containing kidney stones to receive hydrochlorothiazide at a dose of 12.5 mg, 25 mg, or 50 mg once daily or placebo once daily. The main objective was to investigate the dose–response effect for the primary end point, a composite of symptomatic or radiologic recurrence of kidney stones. Radiologic recurrence was defined as the appearance of new stones on imaging or the enlargement of preexisting stones that had been observed on the baseline image. Safety was also assessed.ResultsIn all, 416 patients underwent randomization and were followed for a median of 2.9 years. A primary end-point event occurred in 60 of 102 patients (59%) in the placebo group, in 62 of 105 patients (59%) in the 12.5-mg hydrochlorothiazide group (rate ratio vs. placebo, 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92 to 1.93), in 61 of 108 patients (56%) in the 25-mg group (rate ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.79), and in 49 of 101 patients (49%) in the 50-mg group (rate ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.36). There was no relation between the hydrochlorothiazide dose and the occurrence of a primary end-point event (P=0.66). Hypokalemia, gout, new-onset diabetes mellitus, skin allergy, and a plasma creatinine level exceeding 150% of the baseline level were more common among patients who received hydrochlorothiazide than among those who received placebo.ConclusionsAmong patients with recurrent kidney stones, the incidence of recurrence did not appear to differ substantially among patients receiving hydrochlorothiazide once daily at a dose of 12.5 mg, 25 mg, or 50 mg or placebo once daily. (Funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation and Inselspital; NOSTONE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03057431.)

Maintenance intravenous iron in hemodialysis patients to minimize erythropoietin doses: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial (the MAINTAIN IRON trial)

In patients on chronic hemodialysis, there is no standard protocol for maintenance iron supplementation. This study aimed to compare two fixed-dose intravenous (IV) iron protocols to reduce erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA). We conducted a double-blinded, randomized controlled study on hemodialysis patients having ferritin levels between 200 and 700 ng/dl and transferrin saturation values between 20 and 40%. Patients were assigned to receive either 100 or 200 mg of IV iron each month. ESA was adjusted every month to keep Hb between 10 and 12 g/dl. ESA dose at 12 months was the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, absolute iron deficiency anemia (IDA), blood transfusion, adverse events, and iron withholding rate. Of the 79 eligible patients, 40 received 100 mg of IV iron, while 39 received 200 mg. At month 12, the mean monthly ESA dose in the 100-mg IV iron group was 35,706 ± 21,637 IU, compared to 26,382 ± 14,983 IU in the 200-mg group (P = 0.03). IDA was found in twelve patients (30%) in the 100-mg group and four patients (10.5%) in the 200-mg group (P = 0.05). In each group, three patients died (P = 0.9). Hospitalization, venous access thrombosis, and infection rates were similar in both groups. The withholding rate of IV iron was higher in 200-mg group (25% vs. 64.1%), but the protocol compliance was found more in 100-mg group (50% vs. 28.2%) (P = 0.001). In conclusion, monthly 200-mg IV iron infusions significantly reduce ESA doses but have a higher withholding rate. (Funded by the Kidney Foundation of Thailand and the Research Group in Nephrology and Renal Replacement Therapy from the Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University).Thai Clinical Trials Registry number, TCTR20190707001.

Rapid Onset and Sustained Efficacy of Lasmiditan Among Japanese Patients with Migraine: Prespecified Analyses of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Rapid onset and sustained efficacy are important for acute migraine treatment. Global phase3 trials have demonstrated the early onset and sustained efficacy of the 5-HT1F receptor agonist lasmiditan. In this prespecified analysis of the MONONOFU study, we assessed the onset and sustained efficacy of lasmiditan in Japanese patients with migraine. MONONOFU was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase2 study conducted in Japan (May 2019-June 2020). Eligible adults with migraine (N = 846; modified intent-to-treat population, N = 682) were randomized 7:3:7:6 to placebo, lasmiditan 50mg, 100mg, or 200mg, taken orally within 4h of moderate-to-severe migraine onset. Patients recorded headache severity and symptoms predose and 0.5-48h postdose. Sustained and modified sustained pain freedom were defined as patients who were headache pain-free 2h postdose and had no pain (sustained pain freedom) or had mild or no pain (modified sustained pain freedom) at 24 or 48h without rescue/recurrence medications. Efficacy outcomes were analyzed by logistic regression. Patients also recorded the actual time of pain-free and of meaningful pain relief (Kaplan-Meier analysis). Compared with placebo, significantly more lasmiditan-treated (100 or 200mg) patients were headache pain-free, had pain relief, were free of their most bothersome symptom, or had total migraine freedom (no headache or migraine-associated symptoms) within 30-60min. Median time to pain-free was 9.26, 6.88, 2.75, and 2.30h in placebo, 50-mg, 100-mg, and 200-mg lasmiditan groups, respectively. Significantly greater proportions of patients treated with 100 (19.7-29.5%) or 200mg (21.1-35.7%) lasmiditan had sustained or modified sustained pain freedom at 24 or 48h compared with placebo (10.4-15.8%). This prespecified analysis of data from MONONOFU has confirmed that the efficacy of lasmiditan is rapid in onset and sustained in patients with moderate-to-severe migraine in Japan. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03962738).

Effect of Different Itraconazole Dosing Regimens on Cure Rates, Treatment Duration, Safety, and Relapse Rates in Adult Patients With Tinea Corporis/Cruris

With worldwide emergence of recalcitrant and resistant dermatophytosis, itraconazole is increasingly being used as the first-line drug for treatment of tinea corporis/cruris (TCC). Apparent inadequacy with low doses has led to empirical use of higher doses and antifungal combinations. To compare cure rates, treatment durations, safety profiles, and relapse rates of itraconazole 100, 200, and 400 mg/d for the treatment of TCC. This double-blind randomized clinical trial included adult patients with treatment-naive TCC involving at least 5% body surface area. Patients were recruited from the dermatology outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi, India between March 1, 2020, and August 31, 2021. Patients were randomized to 1 of the 3 treatment groups. Biweekly blinded assessments were performed until cure or treatment failure. Posttreatment follow-up of at least 8 weeks was conducted to detect relapses. Cure rates, treatment durations, safety profiles, and relapse rates were assessed. Secondary outcomes included comparison of rapidity of clinical response and cost-effectiveness between groups. Of the 149 patients assessed, the mean (SD) age was 34.3 (12.2) years, 69 patients (46.4%) were women, and 80 patients (53.6%) were men. The difference in cure rate between the 100- and 200-mg groups was statistically nonsignificant (hazard ratio [HR], 1.44; 95% CI, 0.91-2.30; P = .12), while the difference between the 100- and 400-mg groups (HR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.78-4.62; P < .001) and between the 200- and 400-mg groups (HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.28-3.09; P = .002) was statistically significant. Mean (SD) treatment durations were statistically significantly different between the 100- and 400-mg groups (7.7 [4.7] weeks vs 5.2 [2.6] weeks; P = .03) and between the 200- and 400-mg groups (7.2 [3.8] weeks vs 5.2 [2.6] weeks; P = .004), but the difference between the 100- and 200-mg groups was not statistically significant. A total of 55 patients (47.4%) relapsed after treatment. Relapse rates were comparable across groups. No patient discontinued treatment due to adverse effects. Treatment with the 200-mg dose incurred a 63% higher cost and 400 mg a 120% higher cost over 100 mg in achieving cure. In this randomized clinical trial, high overall efficacy was observed among the 3 itraconazole doses for treatment of TCC, but with prolonged treatment durations and considerable relapse rates. Treatment with the 200- and 100-mg doses did not differ significantly in efficacy or treatment durations, while 400 mg scored over the other 2 on these outcomes. Considerable additional cost is incurred in achieving cure with the 200- and 400-mg doses. Clinical Trials Registry of India Identifier: CTRI/2020/03/024326.

Magnitude and Time Course of Response to Abrocitinib for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Emerging treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) may provide greater and faster improvement in AD signs and symptoms than current therapies. To examine JADE COMPARE (NCT03720470) data using stringent efficacy end points. Adults with moderate-to-severe AD were randomly assigned 2:2:2:1 to receive oral abrocitinib 200 or 100 mg once daily, subcutaneous dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks (600-mg loading dose), or placebo, with medicated topical therapy for 16 weeks. Stringent response thresholds were applied for Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Investigator's Global Assessment, Dermatology Life Quality Index, Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale, and Night Time Itch Scale severity. At week 16, 48.9%, 38.0%, and 38.8% of the abrocitinib 200-mg, 100-mg, and dupilumab groups, respectively, achieved greater than or equal to 90% improvement from baseline in EASI versus 11.3% placebo; 14.9%, 12.6%, and 6.5% achieved Investigator's Global Assessment 0 (clear) versus 4.8% placebo; 29.7%, 21.6%, and 24.0% achieved Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (no/minimal impact on quality of life) versus 10.6% placebo; and 57.1%, 44.5%, and 46.1% achieved Night Time Itch Scale severity 0/1 (no/minimal night-time itch) versus 31.9% placebo. Kaplan-Meier median time to greater than or equal to 90% improvement from baseline in EASI was 59, 113, and 114 days in the abrocitinib 200-mg, 100-mg, and dupilumab groups, respectively, and was not evaluable for placebo; median time to Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale 0/1 (no/very minimal itch) was 86 and 116 days for abrocitinib 200-mg and dupilumab groups, respectively, and was not evaluable for abrocitinib 100-mg and placebo groups. A greater proportion of patients treated with abrocitinib than placebo had almost complete control of AD signs and symptoms.

A first-in-human, phase 1a dose-escalation study of the selective MEK1/2 inhibitor FCN-159 in patients with advanced NRAS-mutant melanoma

BackgroundA phase 1a first-in-human study evaluated the safety/tolerability, preliminary antitumour activity and pharmacokinetics of the oral MEK1/2 inhibitor FCN-159 in Chinese patients with advanced, NRAS-mutant melanoma. Patients and methodsPatients received a single FCN-159 dose at assigned levels, proceeding to continuous dosing (once daily [QD] for 28-day cycles) if no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred within the next 3 days. Dose escalation was initiated after review of data for the previous dose level. The primary end-point was incidence of DLTs after the first dose. ResultsThirty-three patients were enrolled across nine FCN-159 dose groups (0.2–15 mg QD). One DLT occurred: grade 3 folliculitis in the 15-mg group. There was one grade >3 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), death of unknown aetiology (not FCN-159 related). The most common FCN-159–related TEAE was rash (36.4%), and the incidence of grade ≥3 FCN-159–related TEAEs was 15.2%. Antitumour activity at QD doses <6 mg was limited; therefore, efficacy data are presented only for doses ≥6 mg (n = 21). The objective response and clinical benefit rates were 19.0% (four partial responses) and 52.4%, respectively. Median (95% confidence interval) duration of response and progression-free survival were 4.8 months (2.8–not reached) and 3.8 months (1.8–5.6), respectively. FCN-159 exposure increased dose-proportionately; geometric mean terminal half-life was 29.9–56.9 h. ConclusionsFCN-159 was well tolerated and demonstrated promising antitumour activity at doses ≥6 mg QD in patients with advanced, NRAS-mutant melanoma. The recommended phase 2 dose was 12 mg QD. ClinicalTrials.gov identifierNCT03932253. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03932253.

Trial of Prasinezumab in Early-Stage Parkinson’s Disease

BackgroundAggregated α-synuclein plays an important role in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. The monoclonal antibody prasinezumab, directed at aggregated α-synuclein, is being studied for its effect on Parkinson’s disease.MethodsIn this phase 2 trial, we randomly assigned participants with early-stage Parkinson’s disease in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive intravenous placebo or prasinezumab at a dose of 1500 mg or 4500 mg every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. The primary end point was the change from baseline to week 52 in the sum of scores on parts I, II, and III of the Movement Disorder Society–sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS; range, 0 to 236, with higher scores indicating greater impairment). Secondary end points included the dopamine transporter levels in the putamen of the hemisphere ipsilateral to the clinically more affected side of the body, as measured by 123I-ioflupane single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT).ResultsA total of 316 participants were enrolled; 105 were assigned to receive placebo, 105 to receive 1500 mg of prasinezumab, and 106 to receive 4500 mg of prasinezumab. The baseline mean MDS-UPDRS scores were 32.0 in the placebo group, 31.5 in the 1500-mg group, and 30.8 in the 4500-mg group, and mean (±SE) changes from baseline to 52 weeks were 9.4±1.2 in the placebo group, 7.4±1.2 in the 1500-mg group (difference vs. placebo, –2.0; 80% confidence interval [CI], –4.2 to 0.2; P=0.24), and 8.8±1.2 in the 4500-mg group (difference vs. placebo, –0.6; 80% CI, –2.8 to 1.6; P=0.72). There was no substantial difference between the active-treatment groups and the placebo group in dopamine transporter levels on SPECT. The results for most clinical secondary end points were similar in the active-treatment groups and the placebo group. Serious adverse events occurred in 6.7% of the participants in the 1500-mg group and in 7.5% of those in the 4500-mg group; infusion reactions occurred in 19.0% and 34.0%, respectively.ConclusionsPrasinezumab therapy had no meaningful effect on global or imaging measures of Parkinson’s disease progression as compared with placebo and was associated with infusion reactions. (Funded by F. Hoffmann–La Roche and Prothena Biosciences; PASADENA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03100149.)

Trial of Anti-BDCA2 Antibody Litifilimab for Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus

BackgroundBlood dendritic cell antigen 2 (BDCA2) is a receptor that is exclusively expressed on plasmacytoid dendritic cells, which are implicated in the pathogenesis of lupus erythematosus. Whether treatment with litifilimab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against BDCA2, would be efficacious in reducing disease activity in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus has not been extensively studied.MethodsIn this phase 2 trial, we randomly assigned adults with histologically confirmed cutaneous lupus erythematosus with or without systemic manifestations in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous litifilimab (at a dose of 50, 150, or 450 mg) or placebo at weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12. We used a dose–response model to assess whether there was a response across the four groups on the basis of the primary end point, which was the percent change from baseline to 16 weeks in the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index–Activity score (CLASI-A; scores range from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating more widespread or severe skin involvement). Safety was also assessed.ResultsA total of 132 participants were enrolled; 26 were assigned to the 50-mg litifilimab group, 25 to the 150-mg litifilimab group, 48 to the 450-mg litifilimab group, and 33 to the placebo group. Mean CLASI-A scores for the groups at baseline were 15.2, 18.4, 16.5, and 16.5, respectively. The difference from placebo in the change from baseline in CLASI-A score at week 16 was −24.3 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI] −43.7 to −4.9) in the 50-mg litifilimab group, −33.4 percentage points (95% CI, −52.7 to −14.1) in the 150-mg group, and −28.0 percentage points (95% CI, −44.6 to −11.4) in the 450-mg group. The least squares mean changes were used in the primary analysis of a best-fitting dose–response model across the three drug-dose levels and placebo, which showed a significant effect. Most of the secondary end points did not support the results of the primary analysis. Litifilimab was associated with three cases each of hypersensitivity and oral herpes infection and one case of herpes zoster infection. One case of herpes zoster meningitis occurred 4 months after the participant received the last dose of litifilimab.ConclusionsIn a phase 2 trial involving participants with cutaneous lupus erythematosus, treatment with litifilimab was superior to placebo with regard to a measure of skin disease activity over a period of 16 weeks. Larger and longer trials are needed to determine the effect and safety of litifilimab for the treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus. (Funded by Biogen; LILAC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02847598.)

Upadacitinib: The New Jak Inhibitor in Town

Danese S, Vermeire S, Zhou W, et al. Upadacitinib as induction and maintenance therapy for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: results from three phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized trials. Lancet. 2022;399:2113–2128. Upadacitinib is an oral small molecule that has preferential inhibition of JAK1 that also inhibits JAK2, JAK3, and tyrosine kinase. Danese et al performed 3 phase III multicenter, double-blind, randomized trials assessing the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib as induction and maintenance therapy in patients with moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis. The 2 induction studies were UC1 and UC2, with each randomizing in a 2:1 ratio over 300 patients to upadacitinib 45 mg every other day, and over 150 patients to placebo. Patients who had a clinical response after 8 weeks of upadacitinib were eligible to enter UC3 (a maintenance study), where approximately 150 patients were each randomized to either upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg every other day or placebo for 52 weeks. The primary end points were clinical remission defined by an adapted Mayo score of ≤2, with a stool frequency score ≤1 and not greater than baseline, rectal bleeding score of 0, and an endoscopic subscore of ≤1 without friability. Secondary end points included improvements in endoscopic score, endoscopic remission, clinical response, histological improvement, bowel urgency, abdominal pain, inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire scores, mucosal healing and change in baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness therapy score. Significantly more patients achieved clinical remission with upadacitinib 45 mg compared with placebo at 8 weeks (26% vs 5%, Δ 21% in UC1; 33% vs 4%, Δ 29% in UC2). In UC3, upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg was significantly superior to placebo in maintaining clinical remission at 52 weeks (42% and 52% vs 12%, Δ31% and Δ39%, respectively). All secondary end points were achieved in UC3 in the 15-mg and 30-mg groups compared with placebo. Upadacitinib showed similar safety and withdrawal profiles when compared with placebo. Events of cancer, adjudicated major adverse cardiac events, or venous thromboembolism were reported infrequently. There were no treatment-related deaths. The study limitations include the lack of data beyond 52 weeks. It also did not allow any dose optimization or de-escalation, and hence the benefits of these strategies remain unknown. Despite these limitations, upadacitinib demonstrated a positive efficacy and safety profile and could be an effective treatment option for patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Excitingly, phase III trials have also reported positive signals for upadacitinib in achieving both induction and maintenance in patients with Crohn’s disease (Gastroenterology 2020;158:2123–2138) and hence real-world and long-term data will be paramount to help position this drug appropriately. This study highlights the potential of selective JAK inhibition and provides signals that optimizing JAK selectivity may culminate in more efficacious and safe drugs in inflammatory bowel disease.

Efficacy and safety of artesunate for patients with IgA nephropathy: a study protocol for a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

BackgroundIgA nephropathy is the most common glomerular disease and is a common cause of progression to end-stage renal disease in patients with kidney diseases. Proteinuria levels are critical for the prognosis of patients with IgA nephropathy, but many patients are still unable to effectively control their proteinuria levels after receiving RAAS blockers. Antimalarial drugs have shown good efficacy in the treatment of kidney disease in previous studies; however, there have been no strictly designed randomized controlled trials to confirm the clinical efficacy of artesunate for treating IgA nephropathy patients. Therefore, we designed this clinical trial to compare the effect of artesunate versus placebo in patients with IgA nephropathy.MethodsThis study is a randomized, double-blind, three-group-parallel, placebo-controlled clinical trial. One hundred and twenty eligible IgA nephropathy patients at risk of progression will be randomly divided into the artesunate 100-mg group, artesunate 50-mg group, and placebo group. Changes in proteinuria and renal function will be measured 6 months after the intervention. The levels of Gd-IgA1 and anti-Gd-IgA1 in the patient’s blood will also be tested to explore the possible immune mechanisms.DiscussionClinical evidence supporting artesunate treatment of IgA nephropathy is currently lacking, and we expect that the results of this trial will provide high-quality clinical evidence for artesunate as a treatment option for IgA nephropathy in the future.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000038104. Registered on 10 September 2020

Oral tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor PF-06826647 demonstrates efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in participants with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in a phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Psoriasis treatments lack durable efficacy and have inconvenient administration, highlighting the need for new therapies. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, PF-06826647, in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. This phase 2b, double-blind study randomized participants to oral, once-daily PF-06826647 (1:1:2:2:2) 50:100:200:400mg:placebo (16weeks), then 200 or 400mg (24weeks) (NCT03895372). The primary end point was a proportion of participants achieving psoriasis area severity index (PASI) 90 at week 16. Secondary end points (PASI50/75/90/100; Physician's Global Assessment) and safety were assessed to week 40. Overall, 178 participants were treated. A significantly greater proportion of participants (risk difference % [90% CI]) achieved PASI90 in the 200-mg (33.0 [18.0, 47.1], P=.0004) and 400-mg (46.5 [30.6, 60.6], P<.0001; week 16) groups versus placebo. Significant increases from placebo were observed for all secondary end points (200 and 400mg; weeks 6-16; P<.05); increases were evident to week 40 (categorical data). PF-06826647 was well tolerated and most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild/moderate. Eighteen participants discontinued due to treatment-emergent adverse events (14 arising from laboratory abnormalities). Limitations included the large proportion of White males and non-placebo-controlled extension. PF-06826647 200 and 400mg once daily showed significant efficacy versus placebo at week 16 and was well tolerated over 40weeks.

Comparative efficacy and safety ofdotinurad, febuxostat, and benzbromarone in hyperuricemic patients with or without gout: Anetwork meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

We aimed to assess the relative efficacy and safety of dotinurad (2 mg), benzbromarone (50 mg), and febuxostat (40 mg) in hyperuricemic patients with or without gout. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dotinurad (2 mg), benzbromarone (50mg), febuxostat (40 mg), and placebo in hyperuricemic patients with or without gout. Four RCTs, including 516 patients, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The number of patients who achieved the target serum uric acid (sUA) level was significantly higher in the febuxostat 40-mg group than in the placebo group (OR 660.50, 95% credible interval (CrI) 75.47-19,584.80). The ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that febuxostat 40 mg was more likely to achieve the best target sUA level (SUCRA = 0.849), followed by dotinurad 2 mg (SUCRA = 0.651), benzbromarone 50 mg (SUCRA = 0.501), and placebo (SUCRA < 0.001). The frequency of adverse drug reactions in the dotinurad 2-mg group, and in the benzbromarone 50-mg group tended to be lower than in the febuxostat 40-mg group. Febuxostat 40 mg and dotinurad 2 mg tended to be more effective than benzbromarone 50 mg, while dotinurad 2 mg and benzbromarone 50 mg tended to be safer than febuxostat 40 mg in hyperuricemic patients with or without gout.

A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Exploring Safety and Tolerability of Sulthiame in Sleep Apnea.

Rationale: Current therapies for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are limited by insufficient efficacy, compliance, or tolerability. An effective pharmacological treatment for OSA is warranted. Carbonic anhydrase inhibition has been shown to ameliorate OSA. Objectives: To explore safety and tolerability of the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor sulthiame (STM) in OSA. Methods: A 4-week double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled dose-guiding trial was conducted in patients with moderate and/or severe OSA not tolerating positive airway pressure treatment. Measurements and Main Results: Intermittent paresthesia was reported by 79%, 67%, and 18% of patients receiving 400 mg STM (n = 34), 200 mg STM (n = 12), and placebo (n = 22), respectively. Dyspnea was reported after 400 mg STM (18%). Six patients in the higher dose group withdrew because of adverse events. There were no serious adverse events. STM reduced the apnea-hypopnea index from 55.2 to 33.0 events/h (-41.0%) in the 400-mg group and from 61.1 to 40.6 events/h (-32.1%) after 200 mg (P < 0.001 for both). Corresponding placebo values were 53.9 and 50.9 events/h (-5.4%). The apnea-hypopnea index reduction threshold of ⩾50% was reached in 40% of patients after 400 mg, 25% after 200 mg, and 5% after placebo. Mean overnight oxygen saturation improved by 1.1% after 400 and 200 mg (P < 0.001 and P = 0.034, respectively). Patient-related outcomes were unchanged. Conclusions: STM showed a satisfactory safety profile in moderate and/or severe OSA. STM reduced OSA, on average, by more than 20 events/h, one of the strongest reductions reported in a drug trial in OSA. Larger scale clinical studies of STM in OSA are justified. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu (2017-004767-13).

EDP-938, a Respiratory Syncytial Virus Inhibitor, in a Human Virus Challenge

BackgroundRespiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection causes substantial morbidity and mortality among infants, older adults, and immunocompromised adults. EDP-938, a nonfusion replication inhibitor of RSV, acts by modulating the viral nucleoprotein.MethodsIn a two-part, phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled challenge trial, we assigned participants who had been inoculated with RSV-A Memphis 37b to receive EDP-938 or placebo. Different doses of EDP-938 were assessed. Nasal-wash samples were obtained from day 2 until day 12 for assessments. Clinical symptoms were assessed by the participants, and pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained. The primary end point was the area under the curve (AUC) for the RSV viral load, as measured by reverse-transcriptase–quantitative polymerase-chain-reaction assay. The key secondary end point was the AUC for the total symptom score.ResultsIn part 1 of the trial, 115 participants were assigned to receive EDP-938 (600 mg once daily [600-mg once-daily group] or 300 mg twice daily after a 500-mg loading dose [300-mg twice-daily group]) or placebo. In part 2, a total of 63 participants were assigned to receive EDP-938 (300 mg once daily after a 600-mg loading dose [300-mg once-daily group] or 200 mg twice daily after a 400-mg loading dose [200-mg twice-daily group]) or placebo. In part 1, the AUC for the mean viral load (hours×log10 copies per milliliter) was 204.0 in the 600-mg once-daily group, 217.7 in the 300-mg twice-daily group, and 790.2 in the placebo group. The AUC for the mean total symptom score (hours×score, with higher values indicating greater severity) was 124.5 in the 600-mg once-daily group, 181.8 in the 300-mg twice-daily group, and 478.8 in the placebo group. The results in part 2 followed a pattern similar to that in part 1: the AUC for the mean viral load was 173.9 in the 300-mg once-daily group, 196.2 in the 200-mg twice-daily group, and 879.0 in the placebo group, and the AUC for the mean total symptom score was 99.3, 89.6, and 432.2, respectively. In both parts, mucus production was more than 70% lower in each EDP-938 group than in the placebo group. The four EDP-938 regimens had a safety profile similar to that of placebo. Across all dosing regimens, the EDP-938 median time to maximum concentration ranged from 4 to 5 hours, and the geometric mean half-life ranged from 13.7 to 14.5 hours.ConclusionsAll EDP-938 regimens were superior to placebo with regard to lowering of the viral load, total symptom scores, and mucus weight without apparent safety concerns. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03691623.)

Effect of Subcutaneous Tirzepatide vs Placebo Added to Titrated Insulin Glargine on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

The effects of tirzepatide, a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, as an addition to insulin glargine for treatment of type 2 diabetes have not been described. To assess the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide added to insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control. Randomized phase 3 clinical trial conducted at 45 medical research centers and hospitals in 8 countries (enrollment from August 30, 2019, to March 20, 2020; follow-up completed January 13, 2021) in 475 adults with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control while treated with once-daily insulin glargine with or without metformin. Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive once-weekly subcutaneous injections of 5-mg (n = 116), 10-mg (n = 119), or 15-mg (n = 120) tirzepatide or volume-matched placebo (n = 120) over 40 weeks. Tirzepatide was initiated at 2.5 mg/week and escalated by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks until the assigned dose was achieved. The primary end point was mean change from baseline in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at week 40. The 5 key secondary end points included mean change in body weight and percentage of patients achieving prespecified HbA1c levels. Among 475 randomized participants (211 [44%] women; mean [SD] age, 60.6 [9.9] years; mean [SD] HbA1c, 8.31% [0.85%]), 451 (94.9%) completed the trial. Treatment was prematurely discontinued by 10% of participants in the 5-mg tirzepatide group, 12% in the 10-mg tirzepatide group, 18% in the 15-mg tirzepatide group, and 3% in the placebo group. At week 40, mean HbA1c change from baseline was -2.40% with 10-mg tirzepatide and -2.34% with 15-mg tirzepatide vs -0.86% with placebo (10 mg: difference vs placebo, -1.53% [97.5% CI, -1.80% to -1.27%]; 15 mg: difference vs placebo, -1.47% [97.5% CI, -1.75% to -1.20%]; P < .001 for both). Mean HbA1c change from baseline was -2.11% with 5-mg tirzepatide (difference vs placebo, -1.24% [95% CI, -1.48% to -1.01%]; P < .001]). Mean body weight change from baseline was -5.4 kg with 5-mg tirzepatide, -7.5 kg with 10-mg tirzepatide, -8.8 kg with 15-mg tirzepatide and 1.6 kg with placebo (5 mg: difference, -7.1 kg [95% CI, -8.7 to -5.4]; 10 mg: difference, -9.1 kg [95% CI, -10.7 to -7.5]; 15 mg: difference, -10.5 kg [95% CI, -12.1 to -8.8]; P < .001 for all). Higher percentages of patients treated with tirzepatide vs those treated with placebo had HbA1c less than 7% (85%-90% vs 34%; P < .001 for all). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events in the tirzepatide groups vs placebo group were diarrhea (12%-21% vs 10%) and nausea (13%-18% vs 3%). Among patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control despite treatment with insulin glargine, the addition of subcutaneous tirzepatide, compared with placebo, to titrated insulin glargine resulted in statistically significant improvements in glycemic control after 40 weeks. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04039503.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Tolerability of Opicapone in Healthy Chinese and Caucasian Subjects: An Open-Label, Single-Center, Phase1 Study.

IntroductionThis study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of single and multiple doses of opicapone (OPC) in healthy Chinese and Caucasian subjects.MethodsIn this open-label, single-center, phase 1 study, eligible Chinese subjects received one of three OPC doses (25, 50, or 100 mg), and Caucasian subjects received either 25 or 50 mg of OPC. All subjects were administered a single dose of OPC, whereas subjects in the 50-mg OPC group continued to receive once-daily doses of 50 mg OPC for 10 days. The primary endpoint was to evaluate and compare the plasma concentrations and PK parameters of OPC and its main metabolite, and erythrocyte-soluble catechol-O-methyltransferase (S-COMT) activity in Chinese subjects with that of Caucasian subjects. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the safety of OPC in Chinese subjects. The estimated results for geometric mean ratios (GMRs) were evaluated with the standard bioequivalence (BE) limits between 80% and 125% to evaluate the ethnic differences. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4.ResultsIn total, 70 subjects (45 Chinese, 25 Caucasian) were enrolled; the majority of them were male (85.7%). The plasma exposure of both OPC and BIA 9-1103 increased in an approximately dose-proportional manner in both populations. Maximum S-COMT inhibition ranged from 79% to 95% after a single dose and was about 94% after a 10-day once-daily regimen in both populations. The point estimates of GMRs (Chinese/Caucasian) and 90% CI, except Cmax in 25-mg and 50-mg OPC groups, for PK and PD parameters were within 80% to 125%. Furthermore, no new risks or safety concerns associated with OPC were identified, indicating a tolerable safety profile in healthy Chinese subjects.ConclusionEthnicity had no significant impact on PK and PD parameters after single or multiple doses of OPC, and OPC was safe and tolerable in healthy Chinese subjects.Trial RegistrationChiCTR number, CTR20192230.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40120-021-00314-8.

Characteristics of wearing-off and motor symptoms improved by safinamide adjunct therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease: A post hoc analysis of a Japanese phase 2/3 study

IntroductionPatients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience various motor and non-motor symptoms. We conducted a post hoc analysis of a Japanese phase 2/3 study of safinamide (50 or 100 mg/day) in patients with Parkinson's disease and wearing-off to evaluate response according to background factors. Safinamide efficacy against major motor symptoms was also assessed. MethodsMultiple regression analyses in safinamide-treated patients (50 or 100 mg/day) assessed changes in daily ON-time without troublesome dyskinesia (hereafter referred to as ON-time) according to baseline clinical variables. Subgroup analyses by baseline Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III score were also conducted. We evaluated cardinal motor symptoms using the UPDRS. ResultsIn the multiple regression analysis, changes in ON-time were related to baseline non-motor symptoms (UPDRS part I score) and ON-time in the 50-mg group, but no relationships with non-motor symptoms were observed in the 100-mg group. Additionally, in the subgroup analysis of patients with more severe motor symptoms (UPDRS part III score > 20), a significant improvement in ON-time was observed only with 100 mg/day (p = 0.01). At both doses, safinamide significantly improved cardinal motor symptom scores (bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor, axial symptoms, and gait disturbances). ConclusionsThe observed response profile to the 50-mg/day dose may be related to baseline non-motor symptoms, but this was not true for the 100-mg/day dose. Both safinamide doses improved major motor symptoms in levodopa-treated patients with PD.