6-month Progression-free Survival Research Articles

Perioperative Modified FOLFIRINOX for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignant tumor, and durable disease control is rare with the current standard of care, even for patients who undergo surgical resection. To assess whether neoadjuvant modified 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (mFOLFIRINOX) leads to early control of micrometastasis and improves survival. This open-label, single-arm, phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial for resectable PDAC was conducted at the Yale Smilow Cancer Hospital from April 3, 2014, to August 16, 2021. Pancreatic protocol computed tomography was performed at diagnosis to assess surgical candidacy. Data were analyzed from January to July 2023. Patients received 6 cycles of neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX before surgery and 6 cycles of adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX. Whole blood was collected and processed to stored plasma for analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels. Tumors were evaluated for treatment response and keratin 17 (K17) expression. The primary end point was 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Additional end points included overall survival (OS), ctDNA level, tumor molecular features, and K17 tumor levels. Survival curves were summarized using Kaplan-Meier estimator. Of 46 patients who received mFOLFIRINOX, 31 (67%) were male, and the median (range) age was 65 (46-80) years. A total of 37 (80%) completed 6 preoperative cycles and 33 (72%) underwent surgery. A total of 27 patients (59%) underwent resection per protocol (25 with R0 disease and 2 with R1 disease); metastatic or unresectable disease was identified in 6 patients during exploration. Ten patients underwent surgery off protocol. The 12-month PFS was 67% (90% CI, 56.9-100); the median PFS and OS were 16.6 months (95% CI, 13.3-40.6) and 37.2 months (95% CI, 17.5-not reached), respectively. Baseline ctDNA levels were detected in 16 of 22 patients (73%) and in 3 of 17 (18%) after 6 cycles of mFOLFIRINOX. Those with detectable ctDNA levels 4 weeks postresection had worse PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 34.0; 95% CI, 2.6-4758.6; P = .006) and OS (HR, 11.7; 95% CI, 1.5-129.9; P = .02) compared with those with undetectable levels. Patients with high K17 expression had nonsignificantly worse PFS (HR, 2.7; 95% CI, 0.7-10.9; P = .09) and OS (HR, 3.2; 95% CI, 0.8-13.6; P = .07). This nonrandomized controlled trial met its primary end point, and perioperative mFOLFIRINOX warrants further evaluation in randomized clinical trials. Postoperative ctDNA positivity was strongly associated with recurrence. K17 and ctDNA are promising biomarkers that require additional validation in future prospective studies. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02047474.

TRLS-16. RESULTS FROM SJDAWN: A ST JUDE CHILDREN’S RESEARCH HOSPITAL PHASE 1 STUDY EVALUATING MOLECULARLY DRIVEN DOUBLET THERAPIES FOR ALL CHILDREN WITH REFRACTORY OR RECURRENT CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM (CNS) MALIGNANT NEOPLASMS AND YOUNG ADULTS WITH SHH MEDULLOBLASTOMA

Abstract BACKGROUND Pediatric CNS tumors have recurring molecular aberrations that modulate the cell cycle. We hypothesized that ribociclib, a brain-penetrant CDK4/6 inhibitor, given in doublet combinations could benefit patients with CNS malignancies. SJDAWN (NCT03434262) was launched to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety, pharmacokinetics, and early efficacy of doublets. METHODS Patients >1 and <40 years with recurrent/refractory CNS malignancy were stratified into 3 strata. Escalating dose-levels in 28-day cycles were evaluated in each stratum by rolling-6 design with an expansion cohort at the highest tolerated dose-level. RP2D was declared if ≤3 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred in 12 patients. Stratum A evaluated ribociclib/gemcitabine in group3/group4 (Grp3/4) MB and ependymoma (EPN). Stratum B evaluated ribociclib/trametinib in malignancies not eligible for stratum A or C. Stratum C evaluated ribociclib/sonidegib in skeletally mature patients with SHH-MB, TP53 wildtype with chr9q loss and/or PTCH1 mutation. Tumor, blood, and CSF samples were analyzed. RESULTS From 2018-2022, 68 patients enrolled: 33 in A (22 Grp3/4-MB, 11 EPN); 28 in B (15 HGG, 13 other); 7 SHH-MB in C. The RP2D was gemcitabine 1250mg/m2 IV day 1, 15 and ribociclib 350mg/m2 PO 1-21 days for A; trametinib 0.025mg/kg PO days 1-14 and ribociclib 280mg/m2 PO days 7-21 for B; and not established for C. DLTs included neutropenia (A), thrombocytopenia (B), mucositis (B), and rash (C). The 6-, 12-, and 24-month progression-free survival (PFS) was 42%(26%-58%), 18%(8%-33%), and 12%(4%-26%) in A, 18%(7%-34%), 4%(1%-15%), and 0% in B, 71%(30%-92%), 43%(13%-73%), and 0% in C. PFS beyond 2-years was observed in 3 Grp3/4-Subgroup3 MBs and 1 EPN. Amplification of CDK6, CCND2, and MYCN in serial CSF samples suggested a mechanism of resistance. CONCLUSIONS Ribociclib doublets are tolerated, and the lengthy survival of some patients suggests a selective benefit.

TRLS-10. CLINICAL TRIAL IN PROGRESS - CONNECT2007: PHASE I/II STUDY OF LUTATHERA IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT AND/OR PROGRESSIVE HIGH-GRADE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM (CNS) TUMORS AND MENINGIOMAS THAT DEMONSTRATE UPTAKE ON DOTATATE PET

Abstract BACKGROUND Somatostatin type-2A receptors (SST2A) regulate cell growth through complex downstream modulation of proliferation and apoptosis signaling, thereby representing a potential therapeutic target. Lutetium (177Lu-DOTATATE), a radionuclide therapy which binds SST2A and delivers local radiation via beta particle emission, gained FDA approval for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, a disease characterized by SST2A expression. Potential expansion of Lutathera into pediatric neuro-oncology is supported by evidence that medulloblastoma, other embryonal tumors, and meningiomas consistently express membranous SST2A, exhibit corresponding uptake on SST2A-radiolabeled nuclear imaging (DOTATATE PET), and have demonstrated radiographic response to SST2A-targeted therapy, suggesting sufficient CNS penetration to achieve therapeutic benefit. METHODS CONNECT2007 (NCT05278208) is an international, multicenter phase I/II study investigating safety and efficacy of Lutathera in children and adults with SST2A-expressing CNS tumors. Patients with recurrent/progressive high-grade CNS tumors and meningiomas can undergo screening, consisting of DOTATATE PET imaging for functional confirmation of SST2A expression, requiring adequate uptake (Krenning score ≥2) by central review. The phase I cohort will enroll patients aged 4-<12 years to determine the pediatric recommended phase II dose (RP2D) following a Rolling Six design, with three potential dose levels, starting at the adult RP2D (200mCi), scaled by body surface area. The phase II cohort will enroll patients aged ≥12 years to assess anti-tumor activity through evaluation of 6-month progression-free survival in medulloblastoma/embryonal tumors (descriptive in other histologies). Lutathera is administered intravenously, with concurrent amino acids for nephroprotection, dosed every 8 weeks for up to 4 cycles. Longitudinal correlative studies include 1) evaluating prevalence, heterogeneity, and clinical, histologic molecular, and radiographic predictors of SST2A expression, 2) characterizing radiation dosimetry of Lutathera in organs at risk of toxicity and within CNS to assess tumor penetration, and 3) identifying imaging and molecular biomarkers of response. Enrollment began in January 2023; both cohorts remain open to accrual.

Randomized Phase III Study of Amcenestrant Plus Palbociclib Versus Letrozole Plus Palbociclib in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Primary Results From AMEERA-5.

AMEERA-5 investigated amcenestrant (oral selective estrogen receptor [ER] degrader) plus palbociclib versus letrozole plus palbociclib as first-line treatment for ER-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/HER2-) advanced/metastatic breast cancer (aBC). In AMEERA-5 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04478266), a double-blind, double-dummy, international phase III trial, adult pre-/post-menopausal women and men without previous systemic therapy for ER+/HER2- aBC were randomly assigned 1:1 to amcenestrant 200 mg once daily + standard palbociclib dosage (125 mg once daily, 21 days on/7 days off) or letrozole 2.5 mg once daily + standard palbociclib dosage, stratified by de novo metastatic disease, postmenopausal women, and visceral metastasis. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), compared using a stratified log-rank test with one-sided type I error rate of 2.5%. Secondary end points included overall survival (key secondary), pharmacokinetics, and safety. Between October 14, 2020, and December 2, 2021, 1,068 patients were randomly assigned to amcenestrant + palbociclib (N = 534) or letrozole + palbociclib (N = 534). At the interim analysis (median follow-up 8.4 months), the stratified hazard ratio for PFS was 1.209 (95% CI, 0.939 to 1.557; one-sided P value = .9304); therefore, the study was stopped for futility. The 6-month PFS rate was 82.7% (95% CI, 79.0 to 85.8) with amcenestrant + palbociclib versus 86.9% (95% CI, 83.5 to 89.6) with letrozole + palbociclib. In the amcenestrant + palbociclib versus letrozole + palbociclib groups, treatment-emergent adverse events (any grade) occurred in 85.6% versus 85.4% of patients and grade ≥3 events in 46.3% versus 60.8%, respectively. The AMEERA-5 study was discontinued on the basis of the recommendation of the data monitoring committee at the interim futility analysis. No new safety signals were identified.

Efficacy comparison of fruquintinib, regorafenib monotherapy or plus programmed death-1 inhibitors for microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer.

Regorafenib (R) and fruquintinib (F) are the standard third-line regimens for colorectal cancer (CRC) according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, but both have limited efficacy. Several phase 2 trials have indicated that R or F combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors can reverse immunosuppression and achieve promising efficacy for microsatellite stable or proficient mismatch repair (MSS/pMMR) CRC. Due to the lack of studies comparing the efficacy between F, R, F plus programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, and R plus PD-1 inhibitors (RP), it is still unclear whether the combination therapy is more effective than monotherapy. To provide critical evidence for selecting the appropriate drugs for MSS/pMMR metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients in clinical practice. A total of 2639 CRC patients were enrolled from January 2018 to September 2022 in our hospital, and 313 MSS/pMMR mCRC patients were finally included. A total of 313 eligible patients were divided into F (n = 70), R (n = 67), F plus PD-1 inhibitor (FP) (n = 95) and RP (n = 81) groups. The key clinical characteristics were well balanced among the groups. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the F, R, FP, and RP groups was 3.5 months, 3.6 months, 4.9 months, and 3.0 months, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 14.6 months, 15.7 months, 16.7 months, and 14.1 months. The FP regimen had an improved disease control rate (DCR) (P = 0.044) and 6-month PFS (P = 0.014) and exhibited a better trend in PFS (P = 0.057) compared with F, and it was also significantly better in PFS than RP (P = 0.030). RP did not confer a significant survival benefit; instead, the R group had a trend toward greater benefit with OS (P = 0.080) compared with RP. No significant differences were observed between the R and F groups in PFS or OS (P > 0.05). FP is superior to F in achieving 6-month PFS and DCR, while RP is not better than R. FP has an improved PFS and 6-month PFS compared with RP, but F and R had similar clinical efficacy. Therefore, FP may be a highly promising strategy in the treatment of MSS/pMMR mCRC.

Brain metastases in clinical trial participants with KRAS-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving docetaxel: Pooled data analysis

ObjectivesLimited data are available on central nervous system (CNS) efficacy with standard-of-care therapies for KRAS-mutated (KRASmut) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence and progression of brain metastases in KRASmut advanced NSCLC treated with docetaxel using pooled data from historical clinical trials. Materials and MethodsData from phase 2/3 trials of docetaxel-containing regimens in advanced NSCLC were sourced from the Medidata platform. Analysis was restricted to stage IIIB-IV KRASmut NSCLC with disease progression after ≥ 1 systemic anticancer therapy. Participants with asymptomatic, treated, and stable brain metastases were included. Endpoints included 12-month CNS disease control rate (CNS-DCR) and CNS progression per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; progression-free survival (PFS); and overall survival (OS). Data were pooled and analyses stratified by baseline brain metastases status. ResultsA total of 595 participants were included in the analysis (62 [10%] with baseline brain metastases and 533 [90 %] without). Among participants with brain metastases, 17 (27.4 %) had CNS progression during docetaxel treatment and 12-month CNS-DCR was 75.8 %; 45 (8.4 %) participants without baseline brain metastases developed brain metastases during treatment. In an analysis restricted to patients with metastatic disease, outcomes with and without baseline brain metastases included: median PFS, 3.3 and 4.9 months (p < 0.005); 12-month PFS, 5 % and 16 %; median OS, 6.9 and 10.4 months (p < 0.005); and 12-month OS, 20 % and 44 %, respectively. ConclusionThese findings establish CNS progression rates with docetaxel in previously treated KRASmut advanced NSCLC and facilitate interpretation of data from ongoing randomized clinical trials of novel KRAS-targeted therapeutic strategies vs. docetaxel.

Results from the randomized phase 3 DREAMM-8 study of belantamab mafodotin plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone (BPd) vs pomalidomide plus bortezomib and dexamethasone (PVd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

LBA105 Background: Use of triplet/quadruplet therapies for 1L MM raises the need for novel combinations at first relapse, which belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) combos may address. In DREAMM-7, BVd led to a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and a strong trend in improved overall survival (OS) vs daratumumab-Vd in patients (pts) with ≥1 prior therapy. We report results from DREAMM-8 (NCT04484623), which tested a different belamaf combo (BPd) and met its primary endpoint of independent review committee–assessed PFS at a prespecified interim analysis. Methods: DREAMM-8 is a phase 3, open-label, randomized, multicenter trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of BPd vs PVd in RRMM pts who received ≥1 prior line of therapy (LoT), including lenalidomide. Pts were randomly assigned 1:1 to BPd (28-d cycles): belamaf 2.5 mg/kg IV (D1, C1), 1.9 mg/kg (D1, C2+) + pom 4 mg (D1-21, all C) + dex 40 mg (D1, QW, all C), or PVd (21-d cycles): pom 4 mg (D1-14, all C) + bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 SC (D1, 4, 8, 11 [C1-8]; and D1, 8 [C9+]) + dex 20 mg (day of and 1 day after bortezomib dose). Results: 155 pts were randomly assigned to BPd and 147 to PVd. With a median (range) follow-up of 21.78 mo (0.03-39.23), median PFS (95% CI) was not reached (NR; 20.6-NR) with BPd vs 12.7 mo (9.1-18.5) with PVd (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37-0.73; P&lt;0.001). 12-month PFS rate (95% CI) was 71% (63-78%) with BPd vs 51% (42-60%) with PVd. ORR (95% CI) was 77% (70.0-83.7%) with BPd vs 72% (64.1-79.2%) with PVd; rate of complete response or better (95% CI) was 40% (32.2-48.2%) with BPd vs 16% (10.7-23.3%) with PVd. Median duration of response (95% CI) was NR (24.9-NR) with BPd vs 17.5 mo (12.1-26.4) with PVd. A positive trend favoring BPd was seen for OS (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.53-1.14); follow up for OS is ongoing. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in &gt;99% and 96% of pts in the BPd and PVd arms, respectively. Of pts treated with BPd, 89% had ocular AEs (CTCAE grade 3/4, 43%) vs 30% (grade 3/4, 2%) in the PVd arm. AEs were generally manageable, and broadly consistent with known safety profile of individual agents. Conclusions: The DREAMM-8 study demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful PFS benefit with BPd vs PVd in RRMM with &gt;1 prior LoT. BPd also led to deeper and more durable responses, showed a favorable OS trend, and had a manageable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT04484623 . [Table: see text]

Ipilimumab and nivolumab plus UV1, an anticancer vaccination against telomerase, in advanced melanoma.

LBA9519 Background: The combination of ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO) remains a standard of care for patients with advanced melanoma, especially those with poor prognostic factors, albeit with a significant risk of toxicity. Therapeutic cancer vaccines are ideally positioned to improve outcomes without significantly increasing toxicity. UV1 is a therapeutic cancer vaccine generating T-cell responses against the universal cancer antigen telomerase. In a Phase I trial in melanoma (N = 30), UV1 plus pembrolizumab demonstrated a tolerable safety profile, a complete response rate of 33%, median PFS of 18.9 months, and 2-year OS rate of 73.3%. Recently, results from a randomized Phase II trial indicated a longer overall survival and a higher response rate for previously treated patients with advanced mesothelioma receiving UV1 in combination with IPI-NIVO (1). Methods: In this Phase II, open-label, multicenter study, we randomly assigned treatment-naïve patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma (stage IIIb-IIId or IV) to IPI 3mg/kg + NIVO 1mg/kg for 4 cycles, followed by NIVO 480 mg as maintenance, with or without 8 intradermal injections of 300 µg UV1 (+GM-CSF). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) according to RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, and safety. Results: A total of 156 patients underwent randomization; 78 patients were assigned to the IPI-NIVO-UV1 arm and 78 patients to the IPI-NIVO arm. The median age was 60, 48% had M1C or D disease, 38% had LDH &gt;upper limit of normal, and 42% had a positive BRAF mutation status. With a minimum follow-up of 18 months, the 12-month PFS rate was 57% in both arms (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.59-1.55, p value 0.845). The ORR was similar with IPI-NIVO-UV1 compared to IPI-NIVO, at 60% vs 59%, respectively (Odds ratio 1.12, 95% CI 0.58-2.16, p value 0.867). The 12-month OS rate was 87% and 88%, respectively (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.60-2.20, p value 0.674). The occurrence of grade &gt;3 adverse events was similar in both treatment arms. Conclusion: UV1 did not improve on outcomes of IPI-NIVO, in terms of PFS. Longer follow-up is required for the accurate assessment of OS. No significant toxicity increases were observed with the addition of UV1. Data from a biomarker driven cohort are awaited. 1. Helland et al, Eur J Cancer 2024. Clinical trial information: NCT04382664 .

Ramucirumab for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the current real world: a Japanese single-arm study post-REACH-2 (The R-evolution study)

SummaryThis study aimed to complement the results of the REACH-2 study by prospectively evaluating the safety and efficacy of ramucirumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a real-world setting. This was an open-label, nonrandomized, multicenter, prospective study conducted at 13 institutions in Japan (jRCTs031190236). The study included Child–Pugh Class A patients with advanced HCC who had received pretreatment with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) or lenvatinib. Ramucirumab was introduced as a second-line treatment after Atez/Bev or lenvatinib and as a third-line treatment after Atez/Bev and lenvatinib. Between May 2020 and July 2022, we enrolled 19 patients, including 17 who received ramucirumab. Additionally, seven patients received lenvatinib, another seven patients received Atez/Bev, and three patients received Atez/Bev followed by lenvatinib as prior treatment. The primary endpoint was a 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate, which was 14.3%. The median PFS and overall survival were 3.7 and 12.0 months, respectively. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were hypertension (23.5%), proteinuria (17.6%), and neutropenia (11.8%). The discontinuation rate due to AEs was 29.4%. Six patients progressed from Child–Pugh A to B after treatment with ramucirumab. Thirteen patients were eligible for post-ramucirumab treatment, including systemic therapy. Despite the limited number of patients, the efficacy of ramucirumab was comparable to that observed in the REACH-2 study when used after lenvatinib and Atez/Bev. However, the incidence of AEs was higher than that in the REACH-2 study.

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in older patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma: A multicenter study.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, despite being a potentially curative therapy in relapsed or refractory (RR) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), remains underutilized in older patients due to limited clinical data. We therefore studied the safety and efficacy of CAR-T therapy in older patients with RR LBCL in the real-world setting. Patients aged ≥65 years with RR LBCL, treated with anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy at 7 US institutions were included in this multicenter, retrospective, observational study. In total, 226 patients were included. Median age at infusion was 71 years (range 65-89). Best objective and complete response rates were 86% and 62%, respectively. Median follow-up after infusion was 18.3 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.9 months, with 6- and 12-month PFS estimates of 54% and 44%, respectively. The nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rate was 10.9% at day 180, primarily due to infections, and not impacted by the age groups. Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity occurred in 7% and 26%, respectively. In univariate analysis, no significant difference in PFS was seen regardless of the age groups or CAR-T type, whereas ECOG PS ≥2, elevated LDH, bulky disease, advanced stage, extranodal involvement, the need for bridging therapy, and prior bendamustine exposure were associated with shorter PFS. These findings support the use of CAR-T in older patients, including those aged ≥80 years. The age at CAR-T therapy did not influence safety, survival, and NRM outcomes. Older patients should not be excluded from receiving CAR-T therapy solely based on their chronological age.

Survival Impact of Inflammation-based Prognostic Scores in Metastatic or Unresectable Esophageal Cancer Treated With Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy.

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy has been indicated as the first-line treatment for metastatic or unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, pretreatment biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes remain unclear. We investigated the predictive value of inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients treated with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy. The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were calculated before initial treatment in 65 eligible patients with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer receiving pembrolizumab plus CF therapy, and the relationship between these biomarkers and clinical outcomes was analyzed. The objective response rate (ORR) and progression disease (PD) were observed in 51% and 21% of all patients. Patients with PNI<39 have significantly worse treatment responses than those with PNI≥39 (ORR; 28% vs. 60%, PD; 44% vs. 13%, P =0.020). Progression-free survival (PFS) is significantly associated with the PNI and CAR ( P <0.001 and P =0.004, respectively). Overall survival (OS) is associated with PNI, CAR, and PLR ( P <0.001, P =0.008, and P =0.018, respectively). The PNI cutoff value of 39 is identified as an independent factor for PFS (odds ratio=0.27, 95% CI: 0.18-0.81, P =0.012) and OS (odds ratio=0.22, 95% CI: 0.08-0.59, P =0.003). Patients with PNI<39 have significantly worse 6-month PFS and 1-year OS than those with PNI≥39 (27.8% vs. 66.7%, 27.2% vs. 81.1%, respectively). In conclusion, inflammation-based prognostic scores are associated with survival in patients treated with pembrolizumab plus CF therapy. Pretreatment PNI is a promising candidate for predicting treatment response and survival.

Absolute Lymphocyte Count and Outcomes of Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Idecabtagene Vicleucel: The US Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium Real- World Experience

Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) has shown impressive efficacy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). This study aimed to investigate the impact of absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) on the survival outcomes of RRMM patients treated with standard of care (SOC) ide-cel. Data were collected retrospectively from 11 institutions in the U.S. Impact of ALC parameters including pre-apheresis (pre-A), pre-lymphodepletion (pre-LD), absolute and percent difference from pre-A to pre-LD on clinical outcomes after ide-cel were examined using survival analysis. A new ALC profile was created based on univariate analysis that comprises 3 groups: normal (≥1 × 109/L) pre-LD ALC (LDN), low (<1 × 109/L) pre-LD ALC (LDL) + percent reduction <37.5 (%RL), and LDL ALC + percent reduction ≥37.5 (%RH). A total of 214 SOC ide-cel recipients were included in this analysis. The median patient age was 64 years (interquartile range [IQR], 57 to 69 years), median number of prior therapies was 6 (IQR, 5 to 9), and median duration of follow-up was 5.4 months (IQR, 2.1 to 8.3 months). Most patients had both low pre-A ALC (75.3%) and pre-LD ALC (77.2%), and the reduction from pre-A to pre-LD (median, .65 to .55 × 109/L) was statistically significant. Univariate analysis showed that the LDL + %RH group had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to the LDL + %RL and LDN ALC groups (6-month PFS: 40% versus 67.6% and 60.9%; 6-month OS: 69.5% versus 87% and 94.3%). In multivariable analysis, after adjusting for age, performance status, cytogenetic risk, use of bridging therapy, and extramedullary disease, PFS did not maintain its statistical significance; however, OS remained significantly worse for LDL + %RH group compared to the LDN ALC group (hazard ratio [HR], 4.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 17), but the difference between the LDL + %RH versus %RL groups was not statistically significant (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, .8 to 4.0). Our findings indicate that low pre-LD ALC with high %R from pre-A to pre-LD was associated with inferior survival outcomes, particularly OS, in patients who received SOC ide-cel.

Multicenter randomized phase II study of short course FOLFOX + nivolumab (Nivo) followed by maintenance Nivo +/- radiation (RT) in the first line treatment of metastatic or unresectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (mGEA).

4060 Background: Standard 1L treatment of mGEA is chemotherapy with checkpoint inhibition (CPI). However, prolonged cytotoxic therapy can impair CPI efficacy by reducing effective immune infiltration over time. Alternatively, radiotherapy (RT) can augment CPI efficacy in multiple malignancies. In this randomized phase II multicenter study, we examined short course chemotherapy and the potential of RT in improving the efficacy of CPI. Methods: This was a multicenter study of FOLFOX + Nivo for 3 months followed by maintenance Nivo with or without RT (20Gy in 5 fractions to the dominant lesion). Eligible patients had adequate end organ function, measurable disease, and were CPI candidates, regardless of PD-L1 CPS expression. Patients without progression at 2 months were randomized 1:1 to Nivo or Nivo + RT. The primary objective was to demonstrate that adding RT to Nivo in the maintenance setting improved efficacy as measured by 12-month progression free survival (PFS) rate. A secondary objective was to demonstrate that the efficacy of short course chemo is similar to continuing FOLFOX until progression (from CM649, 12-mo PFS 34% [95% CI: 30-38%] all pts). Results: Seventy-three evaluable pts enrolled from 7/11/2019 to 4/13/2023. Mean age 63.1, M:F 2.7:1. PD-L1 distribution: CPS &gt; 5 in n=37 (50.7%), CPS 1-4 16 (22%), CPS &lt;1 20 (27.4%). Seven (9.6%) patients progressed at 2 months and had a median OS of 90d (95%CI 44-178d). The remaining 66 patients were randomly assigned to Nivo maintenance (n=32), or Nivo + RT (n=34). The objective response rate for all evaluable pts is 43.8% (95%CI 32.5-55.2%). The 12-month and median PFS for all evaluable pts (n=73) is 29.5% (19.2- 40.7%) and 7.4 mo (5.7-8.6mo); for Nivo alone 34.4% (18.8- 50.6%) and 7.5mo (5.4-14.2mo), and Nivo + RT 30.0% (14.9-46.8%) and 7.8 mo (5.7-9.6mo) respectively (p=NS). The 12-month and median OS for all evaluable pts (n=73) is 60.9% (48.6-71.1%) and 16mo (10.8-22.4mo); for Nivo alone 71.9% (52.9- 84.3%) and 22.4mo (13.2-NAmo), and Nivo + RT 62.8% (43.7-76.9%) and 17.9 mo (10.3-24.5mo) respectively (p=NS). Forty-nine patients progressed after randomization, of which 30 patients were rechallenged with FOLFOX or CAPOX with continued response – median time to 2nd progression 3.93mo (range 0.5-15.2mo). Amongst patients who were rechallenged with oxaliplatin based therapy, the median time to oxaliplatin failure was 13.76 mo (range 4.4–30mo). Conclusions: Short course FOLFOX + Nivo followed by maintenance Nivo has a similar progression free and overall survival to continuing FOLFOX + Nivo until progression. Patients who receive short course chemotherapy can successfully be rechallenged with oxaliplatin. The addition of RT to maintenance Nivo does not improve CPI efficacy. Short course FOLFOX with CPI is a safe and effective 1L option for mGEA. Clinical trial information: NCT04021108 .

The clinical application of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) for immunotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer.

e14541 Background: Circulating tumor cell (CTCs) has the potential utility for screening, prognostic and predictive assessment, and offers the potential for personalized management. This trial aimed to evaluate the prognostic and predictive impact of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive CTCs in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods: Twenty-three heavily treated advanced PDAC patients were randomized to receive camrelizumab combined with apatinib or capecitabine, or placebo plus capecitabine until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, and peripheral blood CTCs samples were collected at baseline and after treatment. Forty-nine CTCs samples from 23 recruited advanced PDAC patients were detected by subtraction enrichment and immunostaining-FISH (SE-iFISH). PD-L1 expression level also was evaluated in tumor tissue samples by Immunohistochemistry (IHC). Investigator-assessed 6-month overall survival (OS) rate and 3-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was evaluated. Results: The positive detection rate of CTCs in 23 PDAC patients was 95.7%. The cell sub-types of sizes of CTC analysis showed that 58.6% CTCs was the small CTCs (Diameter &lt; 5μm). CTCs karyotypes analysis exhibited that triploid small CTCs were the main karyotype (41.2%) in small CTC, and pentaploid large CTCs was the major karyotype (74.7%) in large CTCs. PD-L1+ CTCs were detected in 43.5% of PDAC patients. Tissue PD-L1 positive detection rate was 50% (CPS &gt; 1%) in available tissue samples(n=10). The presence of PD-L1+ CTCs cohort exhibited a significant increase in 6-month OS rate (80% versus 38.5%, P &lt; 0.05) and 3-month PFS rate (70% versus 23.1%, P &lt; 0.05) compared to PD-L1- CTCs cohort. Compared with the PD-L1- CTCs patients, the combination therapy camrelizumab markedly improved the 6-month OS rates (75% versus 50%) and 3-month PFS rate (62.5% versus 25%) in PD-L1+ CTC patients. Conclusions: PD-L1+ CTCs could be considered as a favorable prognostic marker in advanced PDAC. These results suggest that PD-L1+ CTCs might be used as a predictor of the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy in advanced PDAC, and provide a new monitoring method for the precise treatment of advanced PDAC. The expanding sample size test is now ongoing. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR1900024095 .

A phase II study of plerixafor combined with whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

2075 Background: Plerixafor inhibits the binding of stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1a / CXCL12) to its receptor on CD11b+ monocytes, inhibiting vasculogenesis and tumor recurrence in preclinical models. An early phase trial demonstrated that Plerixafor administration decreased cerebral blood volume (CBV) within the irradiated field of glioblastoma patients, and that the majority of recurrences occurred outside of the irradiated field (Thomas R. et al, Clin Cancer Res). This follow up study investigates the efficacy of Plerixafor in combination with WBRT, with the hypothesis that widening the radiation therapy (RT) field with WBRT may reduce out-of-field tumor recurrence and improve survival. Methods: This was a Phase II, open-label, non-randomized, single-arm trial.Adults between 18-75 years old with newly diagnosed high grade glioma as defined by WHO 2016 criteria and KPS ≥ 60 were eligible for enrollment. Patients underwent maximal safe resection followed by 6 weeks of concurrent radiation therapy and temozolomide (TMZ). Of note, modifications to the conventional treatment paradigm included completing 30 Gy of standard intensity-modulated RT followed by 30 Gy of WBRT, as well as completing a 4-week continuous infusion of Plerixafor dosed at 400 µg/kg/day. Patients then started adjuvant TMZ after completing Plerixafor. Primary endpoint was 6-month progression free survival (PFS6) after chemoradiation. Secondary endpoints included median overall survival (mOS), adverse events (AEs), MRI-based patterns of recurrence, and neurocognitive outcomes measured by the Trail Making Test, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, and the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test. Additionally, maximum arterial spin labeling-cerebral blood flow (ASL-CBF) values of primary lesions were compared over various time points during the study. Results: 14 of 17 enrolled patients completed the Plerixafor infusion, and all 17 patients completed WBRT. Median age was 57 years. 15 patients (88.2%) were IDH wildtype and 13 patients (76.5%) were pMGMT unmethylated. 13 patients (76.5%) underwent gross total resection, 2 (11.8%) underwent subtotal resection, and 2 (11.8%) underwent biopsy only. The PFS6 was 91.7%. The mOS was 15.11 months. 3 patients discontinued Plerixafor early due to rash (n=1), rising creatinine (n=1), or worsening confusion and agitation (n=1). Common Gr2 treatment-related AEs included alopecia (n=4), nausea (n=4), and vomiting (n=2). 1 patient had Gr3 alopecia. There were no Grade 4/5 AEs. 80% of patients scored worse on their neurocognitive assessments at 6 months compared to screening. ASL-CBF values of primary lesions appeared relatively stable throughout the study. Conclusions: The combination of Plerixafor and WBRT did not improve mOS compared to the original study using focused RT only. There was an overall decline in neurocognitive performance over the course of the study. Clinical trial information: NCT03746080 .

AFT-50 EndoMAP: A phase IB/II multicohort study of targeted agents and/or immunotherapy for patients with recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer (EC).

TPS5642 Background: The landscape in the management of recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer (EC) continues to evolve. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as monotherapy or when combined with the VEGF-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, lenvatinib, have demonstrated promising response rates in patients (pts) with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) and MS-stable (MSS)/MMR-proficient (MMRp) EC, respectively. Recent studies have also shown a benefit with adding ICI to standard of care chemotherapy in the frontline setting. Pts with MSI-H/dMMR tumors seem to derive the greatest benefit. Approximately, 30% of recurrent EC pts fall into this category. Pairing ICI with targeted therapies carries the potential to elicit prolonged anti-tumor effects. Atezolizumab (Atezo) is a humanized monoclonal PD-L1 inhibitor that has demonstrated monotherapy antitumor activity in relapsed recurrent EC, and other solid tumors (e.g. NSCLC, HCC) as monotherapy and as part of combinatorial therapy. The AFT-50/EndoMAP study is a phase IB/II non-randomized, multicenter, 2-arm, multi-cohort platform trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biomarker-driven combination regimens, both with Atezo (AFT-50A) and without Atezo (AFT-50B) with biomarker-defined targeted agents in pts with recurrent or persistent EC. Methods: Eligible pts have recurrent or persistent EC with no more than 2 prior lines of therapy. FoundationOne CDx (F1CDx) NGS assay will be used for genomic tumor profiling. In AFT-50A, pts may be eligible for one of the following doublets: Atezo+talazoparib (tumors with genomic loss of heterozygosity (gLOH ≥16%), Atezo+Trastuzumab emtansine (ERBB2/HER2 mutated or amplified tumors), and Atezo+Tiragolumab (MSI-H and/or TMB-H). The Atezo+bevacizumab (biomarker unmatched) and Atezo+ipatasertib (PIK3CA/PTEN/AKT1-altered tumors) cohorts have completed accrual. Each cohort will enroll ~20 pts with potential adjustment to account for statistical and clinical considerations. AFT-50A pts will receive Atezo in addition to a targeted agent (per study-approved dosing schedule) until progression, unacceptable toxicity, pt withdrawal, death, or study termination. AFT-50B pts will be eligible for inavolisib (PIK3CAm/PTEN and AKT1wt-altered tumors) + letrozole or giredestrant + abemaciclib (RB1wt, estrogen receptor positive tumors). The primary endpoint for AFT-50A is confirmed overall response rate (ORR) for each arm, and for AFT-50B is 6-month progression free survival. Secondary endpoints include disease control rate, duration of response, OS, safety and tolerability. As a platform study, additional arms may be added, as supported by evolving understanding of EC and molecular targets. EndoMAP is actively enrolling at 20 sites in the US with a target of 25 sites nationwide. Clinical trial information: NCT04486352 .

Analysis of the LIPI score as a prognostic factor in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

e20612 Background: A field of interest is the search for new biomarkers within which inflammatory/immunological ones have taken on special relevance. The LIPI Score (Lung Immune Prognostic Index) that combines derived Neutrophil -Lymphocyte Ratio (dNRL) and LDH shows growing evidence in favor of its use. End Point: Primary: Evaluate the relationship of LIPI Score with Progression Free Survival (PFS) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immunotherapy (IO) alone or in combinationwtih Chemotherapy(CT) in the first line. Secondary: Evaluate the relationship of the LIPI Score and Objective Response Rate (ORR) and the relationship of the LIPI Score and PFS at 6 months. Methods: Metastatic NSCLC , treated first-line with IO alone or in combination between January 2018 and July 2023 at our institution, were included . The LIPI Score has 3 prognosis categories: Good (RNLd &amp;lt; 3 and LDH &amp;lt; upper limit of normal (ULN) ); Intermediate (RNLd &amp;gt; 3 or LDH &amp;gt; upper limit of normal (ULN), Poor (RNLd &amp;gt; 3 and LDH &amp;gt; upper limit of normal (ULN) Results: 67 patients were analyzed, the overall PFS was 8.58 months. Of these, 22 had a good LIPI Score, 24 had an intermediate LIPI Score and 21 had a poor LIPI Score. The PFS per group was 21.56, 8.71 and 3.18 months respectively (p &amp;lt; 0.01). The ORR was 27% in the general population and by groups: 45%, 29%, 5% respectively (p = 0.01). The 6-month PFS was 86%, 83% and 29%, respectively, by subgroup. Conclusions: We consider that the LIPI Score is a very useful tool due to its simplicity, low cost and accessibility that allows us to understand the behavior of the disease in our patients early. It is necessary to continue researching to determine what is the best therapeutic strategy for these patients based on their prognosis.

FusionVAC22_01: A phase I clinical trial evaluating a DNAJB1-PRKACA fusion transcript-based peptide vaccine combined with immune checkpoint inhibition for fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma and other tumor entities carrying the oncogenic driver fusion.

TPS2702 Background: The DNAJB1-PRKACA fusion transcript is the driving force behind tumor development in fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (FL-HCC) and other tumor types, such as oncocytic neoplasms of the pancreas and bile ducts. Consequently, it serves as a versatile target for innovative cancer therapies. Recently, the DNAJB1-PRKACA fusion protein was recognized as a source of HLA-presented neoepitopes targetable by to T cell-based immunotherapy (1). The FusionVAC-22 neoepitope, derived from DNAJB1-PRKACA fusion, is computationally predicted to bind to 1,290 different HLA class II alleles. Furthermore, it includes embedded HLA class I ligands for 13 out of the 20 most common HLA class I alleles, covering 93.8% of the global population This broad coverage enables the widespread application of FusionVAC-22-based immunotherapies. The initial use of FusionVAC-22-based peptide vaccines, adjuvanted with the TLR1/2 agonist XS15 emulsified in Montanide ISA 51 VG, in two FL-HCC patients was well-tolerated and demonstrated the induction of robust and long-lasting T cell responses. Notably, T cell responses coincided with 32 months and 13 months of progression-free survival for the respective patients. Methods: Building on these promising outcomes, we have initiated a Phase I open-label, multicentric clinical trial to assess the immunogenicity, safety, toxicity, and initial signs of efficacy of the FusionVAC-22-based peptide vaccine combined with the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) atezolizumab. The trial includes 20 patients with locally advanced or metastatic FL-HCC or other malignancies carrying the DNAJB1-PRKACA fusion transcript without available standard therapy. Key eligibility criteria involve the absence of autoimmune phenomena due to prior immunotherapy agents (≥ grade 3) and no history of tissue or organ allografts. The FusionVAC-22-based peptide vaccine is administered twice with a 4-week interval, with an option for a booster vaccination after 11 months. ICI administration begins on day 15 after the first vaccination and continues every 4 weeks for 1 year, followed by a 6-month follow-up. Primary trial objectives include assessing immunogenicity in terms of peptide-specific T cell responses up to 28 days after the second vaccination, as well as evaluating the safety and toxicity of the peptide vaccine in combination with ICI. Safety assessment is based on the frequency of adverse events according to CTCAE v5.0. Clinical efficacy is determined through iRECIST assessment on imaging. Additionally, disease control rate, quality of life, and overall and progression-free survival will be evaluated. So far, 3 out of 20 planned patients have been enrolled. 1. Bauer et al., Nat. Commun, 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT05937295 .

Real-world data comparison of time to next treatment for patients with HER2 low metastatic treated with either chemotherapy or fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki following chemotherapy in the metastatic setting.

e13169 Background: In the Destiny-04 trial, pts who received TDxd following chemo in the metastatic setting experienced 10.1 months of progression-free survival compared to 5.4 months for pts who received chemo. We sought to evaluate the TTNT, a surrogate for progression-free survival, and OS using real-world data to assess whether such pts see similar benefits beyond the clinical trial setting. Methods: We used the Integra Connect PrecisionQ real-world de-identified database of over 3 million cancer pts across 500 sites of care to identify 252 breast cancer pts for the analysis. Pts were identified as HER2 low (IHC of 1+ or an IHC of 2+ with an ISH/FISH negative result) at the time of treatment initiation following the chemo in the metastatic setting, and each started treatment on or after June 1, 2022, through December 31, 2023. The first treatment following chemo in the metastatic setting was used for comparison. TTNT was measured from the treatment start to either the initiation of a subsequent line of therapy or death. Descriptive analyses were used, proportions were compared using a chi-squared test, and TTNT and OS were analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: Median (IQR) age was 56 (47.5, 66). 100% of the pts were female; 108 (42.9%) received TDxd with a median (IQR) age of 65.5 at treatment start, and 144 (57.1%) received chemo (most commonly paclitaxel, capecitabine, carboplatin, gemcitabine) with a median (IQR) age of 64 (54, 74) at treatment. TDxd pts had higher ECOG scores (p&lt;0.05) and higher rates of lung (p&lt;0.05) and bone (p&lt;0.05) metastases. Median TTNT was 9.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.9 to 11.1) for pts who received TDxd compared to 5.4 months (95% CI, 4.6 to 6.0) for pts who received chemo ( p&lt;0.01). Median OS was not reached (NR) in TDxd pts (95% CI, 13.0 to NR) whereas it was 13.1 months (95% CI, 10.8 to NR) in the pts treated with chemo ( p&lt;0.01). The percent of TDxd pts who were deceased was 22.2% compared to 34.7% for chemo treated pts. The probability of pts on therapy after 6 months was 72.8% (95% CI, 62.3% to 80.8%) for those who received TDxd compared to 38.0% (95% CI, 28.9% to 17.1%) for those who received chemo ( p&lt;0.01). The probability of pts on therapy after 12 months was 31.4% (95% CI, 19.7% to 43.8%) for those who received TDxd compared to 17.1% (95% CI, 9.7% to 26.3%) for those who received chemo ( p&lt;0.05). Conclusions: The real-world comparison of TDxd to chemo in the metastatic setting for pts with HER2low breast cancer demonstrated a statistically significant difference in both OS and TTNT, reaffirming the results of the Destiny-04 trial. However, 57% of pts were found to not have received TDxd, suggestingan opportunity to improve outcomes in HER2low breast cancer pts.

Unveiling the cost-effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors in treating patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer: A closer look at nonmedication expenses.

1532 Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors have significantly enhanced survival outcomes in postmenopausal patients diagnosed with HR+ MBC. Their integration with endocrine therapy (ET) has become the standard of care in MBC treatment lines. There are limited economic evaluations of these innovative, yet costly, therapies. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of these drugs using EHR derived data and administrative claims to estimate cost. Methods: We used the nationwide EHR-derived Flatiron Health (FH) de-identified database to identify 3,879 patients receiving 1st line (1L) treatment for HR+ MBC (2,137 received CDK4/6i+ET and 1,742 received ET alone) between Feb 2015 and Nov 2021. SEER-Medicare claims data was used to supplement the missing cost info in the FH database to quantify monthly medication costs, drawing data from Medicare patients continuously enrolled in PARTs A, B, and D between 2015 to 2021 for at least 24 months and specific to therapeutic approaches for MBC and overall healthcare costs. The costs were adjusted by the patient characteristic: age, race, specific ET or CDK4/6i drug, and Medicare dual eligibility. The effectiveness was measured as progression-free duration in months. All costs were adjusted for inflation. The Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) analysis was conducted to examine the cost-effectiveness of CDK4/6i as compared with ET alone. Results: Average estimated monthly medication costs were $12,524 and $322 for CDK4/6i+ET and ET alone, respectively. On average, CDK4/6i+ET increased the estimated medication costs by $235,564 over the time to first progression and was associated with a gain of 3.2 months of progression-free survival as compared to ET alone, resulting in an ICER of $73,098 per month without progression. At a willingness-to-pay of $65,000 per month without progression, both groups have 50% probability of being considered cost-effective. Notably, the average estimated monthly non-medication costs (total costs-medication costs) for the CDK4/6i+ET group were $2,278 compared to $4,265 for the ET alone group (p&lt;0.001). On average, CDK4/6i+ET decreased the estimated non-medication costs by $ 22,427. For non-medication costs, the ICER drops to $7,178 per month without progression making the CDK4/6i+ET the dominant cost-effective choice over ET alone. Conclusions: Cost-effectiveness of treating HR+ MBC patients is primarily driven by the cost of CDK4/6i drug prices. However, findings highlight significantly lower overall non-medication healthcare costs using CDK4/6i+ET compared to ET alone in 1L treatment. These cost savings, however, are offset by the high medication costs of CDK4/6i. Thus, lowering the market cost of CDK4/6i drugs or targeting those who can benefit the most could shift the balance in favor of a cost-effective benefit from Medicare perspective.