10-mg Dose Research Articles

Comparison of 600 mg VS 300 mg clopidogrel loading dose for patients with ischemic heart disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract Background While a 600-mg loading dose (LD) of clopidogrel has demonstrated superior inhibition of platelet function compared to 300-mg LD, the clinical evidence supporting this superiority is limited. The debate centers on whether a higher clopidogrel LD regimen in primary percutaneous coronary intervention outperforms the standard 300 mg LD, with potential benefits being more pronounced in higher-risk patients. Balancing enhanced platelet inhibition to reduce ischemic events against the associated risk of increased bleeding remains a critical consideration in determining the optimal loading dose of clopidogrel for patients with ischemic heart disease. Purpose The objective of this meta-analysis is to validate current randomized trials that investigate the efficacy and safety of two clopidogrel loading regimens (600 mg vs 300 mg) in patients with ischemic heart disease treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Method A systematic literature search for randomized controlled trials was performed comparing 600 mg with 300 mg LD of clopidogrel using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, Clinicaltrials.gov. and Herdin PH. Studies included those between 2010 - 2023 involving human subjects. The primary efficacy endpoint was a 1-month rate of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) and the primary safety outcome was bleeding adverse effects. Result Nine randomized control studies involving 29,827 patients were included in the efficacy analysis. Mean duration of follow-up was 30 days. Only 8 studies were eligible for safety analysis. Compared with standard LD clopidogrel, high LD significantly reduced incidence of overall MACE (OR:0.82, 95% CI:0.74-0.91, p=0.0002), nonfatal myocardial infarction (OR:0.56; 95% CI:0.32-0.99, p = 0.15) and target vessel revascularization (OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.95, p = 0.03 ), without significant difference in terms of cardiac death (OR:0.89; 95% CI:0.76-1.04, p=0.15) and stroke (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.67 to 1.26, p = 0.61). However, major bleeding risk was higher in the 600 mg LD (1.9%; 261/13288) compared with 300 mg LD (2.4%; 328/13242) [OR:1.27; 95% CI:1.08-1.49, p=0.005] without significant difference in minor bleeding (OR:1.05; 95% CI:0.94-1.17, p=0.35). Conclusion The administration of 600 mg of clopidogrel LD reduces the overall risk of MACE with an associated increased risk of major bleeding in patients with ischemic heart disease undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.MACE OUTCOMES

Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of 2 Oral Formulations of Vildagliptin in Healthy Chinese Subjects.

A randomized, open-label, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of 2 oral formulations of vildagliptin tablets under both fasting and fed conditions in healthy Chinese subjects. A total of 56 healthy subjects were randomized to receive a single 50-mg dose of either a generic vildagliptin tablet (T) or the reference formulation (R). The washout period was 3 days. Blood samples were collected up to 24hours postdosing during each period and analyzed for vildagliptin using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios (T:R) of maximum serum concentration, area under the serum concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration, and area under the serum concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity were all within the predefined bioequivalence range of 80%-125%. This indicates that the generic and reference formulations are bioequivalent under both fasting and fed states. All adverse events reported were mild and transient. High-fat meals delayed absorption and reduced the maximum peak concentration of both formulations; however, they did not affect the overall exposure. Therefore, vildagliptin can be taken without regard to meals.

Liver copper concentration dynamics with different methods of injectable copper supplementation in dairy cows in New Zealand

ABSTRACT Aims To compare the responses of liver Cu concentrations in dairy cows between three forms of injectable Cu supplementation and a negative control group. Methods Across two dairy farms in North Canterbury, New Zealand, 80 mid-lactation dairy cows (n = 28 and 52 per farm) were randomly allocated to four treatment groups: (a) 100-mg or (b) 200-mg dose of Cu administered as Ca Cu EDTA; (c) 75-mg dose of Cu as disodium Cu EDTA combined with Se, Zn, and Mn; or (d) no treatment (negative control). Each treatment group contained 20 cows. Groups were balanced for age, plasma Cu and pre-treatment liver Cu concentration. Blood samples and liver biopsies were collected prior to treatment. Six liver biopsies were performed on the same cow over a period of 70 days and the concentration of liver Cu was measured over time and compared to pre-treatment baseline. A mixed, multivariable, linear regression model was constructed to determine the effect of treatment on the change in liver Cu concentration compared to pre-treatment concentrations, accounting for repeated measurements taken from each cow. Results There was a difference in the distribution of pre-treatment liver Cu concentration between farms (p = 0.008), with medians of 1,400 (IQR 1,200–1,625) and 1,050 (IQR 805–1,425) µmol/kg on Farms 1 and 2, respectively. There was an interaction between treatment group, study day, and farm, with a treatment effect confirmed only on Farm 2. In the final model, the predicted change in liver Cu concentration (compared to pre-treatment concentrations) among cows on Farm 2 that were treated with 200 mg of Ca Cu EDTA was significantly higher than that of control cows on Days 3, 14, 28 and 42, peaking on Day 14 with a difference of 325.35 (95% CI = 97.00–554.03) µmol/kg. The study found no associations between changes in liver Cu concentration and age or prior plasma Cu concentration. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.57 (95% CI = 0.45–0.66), indicating the proportion of variability in changes in liver Cu concentration attributable to inter-cow variation. Conclusions and clinical relevance This study shows there are differences in response to injectable Cu supplementation at the farm level and wide variation in liver Cu among cows from the same farm. On one farm, a 200-mg dosage of Ca Cu EDTA significantly increased liver Cu concentration for at least 42 days.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Tucatinib in Healthy Participants and Patients with Breast Cancer or Colorectal Cancer.

Tucatinib is a highly selective, oral, reversible, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Tucatinib is approved at a 300-mg twice-daily dose in adults in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine for advanced HER2-postitive (HER2+) unresectable or metastatic breast cancer and in combination with trastuzumab for RAS wild-type HER2+ unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer. This study sought to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and assess sources of PK variability of tucatinib in healthy volunteers and in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast or colorectal cancers. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed based on data from four healthy participant studies and three studies in patients with either HER2+ metastatic breast cancer or metastatic colorectal cancer using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach. Clinically relevant covariates were evaluated to assess their impact on exposure, and overall model performance was evaluated by prediction-corrected visual predictive checks. A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with linear elimination and first-order absorption preceded by a lag time adequately described tucatinib pharmacokinetic profiles in 151 healthy participants and 132 patients. Tumor type was identified as a significant covariate affecting tucatinib bioavailability and clearance, resulting in a 1.2-fold and 2.1-fold increase in tucatinib steady-state exposure (area under the concentration-time curve) in HER2+ metastatic colorectal cancer and HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, respectively, compared with healthy participants. No other covariates, including mild renal or hepatic impairment, had an impact on tucatinib pharmacokinetics. The impact of statistically significant covariates identified was not considered clinically meaningful. No tucatinib dose adjustments are required based on the covariates tested in the final population pharmacokinetic model. NCT03723395, NCT03914755, NCT03826602, NCT03043313, NCT01983501, NCT02025192.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation for Dose Optimization of GB-5001, a Long-Acting Intramuscular Injection of Donepezil, in Healthy Participants.

GB-5001 is an intramuscular (IM) formulation of donepezil under development for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. The objective of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for donepezil in both IM and oral formulations, and to optimize the IM dosage of GB-5001 using bioequivalence (BE) simulation. A population PK model of donepezil was developed using NONMEM. It was based on plasma concentration data from a Phase 1 dose escalation study, which involved a single administration of donepezil IM formulation at doses of 70, 140, and 280mg, and the oral formulation at 10mg. The model was evaluated based on goodness-of-fit plots, conditional weighted residuals, visual predictive checks, and bootstrapping. BE simulations were conducted using a parallel design between various doses of the IM formulation and the 10-mg dose of oral formulation. The PKs of donepezil were best described by a two-compartment model, which incorporated distinct absorption compartments for the IM (dual first-order absorption and simultaneous zero-order absorption with lag time) and oral (first-order absorption with lag time) formulations. Based on the simulation results, an IM dosage range of 210-215 mg in a sample size of over 92 was estimated to achieve a success rate of approximately 80% for BE. The population PK model well explained the PKs of donepezil following administration of both the IM and oral formulations. This model could be applied for the design and dose selection of future BE trials. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05525780.

Comparing the efficacy and safety of monotherapy and combination therapy with tadalafil, tamsulosin, and silodosin for distal ureteral stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectiveMedical expulsive therapy (MET) is a suitable option for facilitating stone expulsion in patients with distal ureteral stones. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of tamsulosin, silodosin, tadalafil monotherapy, and combinations on stone expulsion rate (SER) and stone expulsion time (SET), as well as their comparative safety, number of colic pain episodes, and need for analgesics. MethodsRandomized controlled trials were retrieved by searching PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to November 27, 2023. Papers in-English that compared the safety and efficacy of at least two of the above agents in adults with distal ureteral stones ≤10 mm were included. ResultsIn total, 27 studies were identified. More than half of them (n=15, 55.6%) were conducted in India. SER significantly improved with silodosin compared with tamsulosin (odds ratio [OR] 2.24, p<0.001), whereas the difference in SET was non-significant. Tadalafil achieved a significantly higher SER compared with tamsulosin (OR 1.42, p=0.040) without any difference in SET. Subgroup analysis of 5- and 10-mg doses of tadalafil showed no significant difference in SER and SET. We found no significant difference in need for analgesic (mean difference [MD −53.73, p=0.200) or the mean number of colic episodes (MD −0.42, p=0.06) between tadalafil and tamsulosin. SER and SET were not significantly different between silodosin and tadalafil. Tadalafil plus tamsulosin led to a significantly higher SER (OR 1.87, p<0.001) and SET (MD −2.99, p=0.002) compared with tamsulosin, without any significant difference in the adverse effects. ConclusionCompared with tamsulosin, SER significantly improved with silodosin, tadalafil, and the combination of tadalafil plus tamsulosin. Meanwhile, the difference in SET was only significant between tadalafil plus tamsulosin versus tamsulosin. It appears that tadalafil and silodosin have similar efficacy in SET and SER. All METs had comparable safety.

A Phase 1, Single-Dose Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Bepirovirsen in Adults with Hepatic Impairment and Healthy Participants (B-Assured).

Bepirovirsen is a developmental antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) for treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. No pharmacokinetic (PK) studies comparing participants with hepatic impairment (HI) and healthy participants (HPs) have been conducted with ASOs. Given the target patient population, characterization of bepirovirsen PK in HI was imperative. This phase 1, nonrandomized, open-label study (NCT04971928) evaluated the PKs of a single 300-mg dose of bepirovirsen in participants with HI and matched HPs, enrolled in 2 parts (Part 1: moderate HI; Part 2: mild HI). If no predefined difference in the area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 (predose) to infinite time (AUC0-∞) and maximum observed concentration (Cmax; geometric mean ratio [GMR] 0.5-1.5) was identified in Part 1, findings were applied to mild HI, eliminating Part 2. Participants were monitored for 50days post-treatment and noncompartmental analysis estimated PK parameters. Twenty-four participants (moderate HI, n=12; HP, n=12) received bepirovirsen and completed Part 1. AUC0-∞ and Cmax were lower in participants with moderate HI (GMR 0.69 and 0.67, respectively) than in HPs, while apparent clearance (CL/F)and apparent terminal phase volume of distribution (Vz/F) were higher (GMR 1.44 and 1.64, respectively), but fell within the predefined thresholds of difference for this study. Part 2 was omitted. Adverse events were mild. Moderate HI did not have a clinically relevant impact on bepirovirsen PK or safety.

A Phase I Open-Label Study of Cediranib Plus Etoposide and Cisplatin as First-Line Therapy for Patients With Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer or Metastatic Neuroendocrine Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

IntroductionSmall cell lung cancer (SCLC) is known to express high levels of the proangiogenic factor vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). We assessed the safety and tolerability of cediranib, an oral inhibitor of VEGF receptor tyrosine kinases, in combination with etoposide and cisplatin as first-line therapy for extensive-stage (ES) SCLC or metastatic lung neuroendocrine cancer (NEC). MethodsPatients received up to six 21-day cycles of etoposide (100 mg/m2, days 1-3) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2, day 1) with once-daily cediranib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Cediranib dosing started at 30 mg with de-escalation cohorts planned based on cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). An expansion cohort of 12 patients was enrolled at the recommended phase II dose. ResultsTwenty-two patients (18 with ES SCLC, 4 with NEC) received treatment. Only 4 patients were enrolled at the 30 mg cediranib dose before other studies established 20 mg/day as the recommended dose with chemotherapy. Among the 18 patients enrolled at the 20-mg dose, common adverse events included nausea/vomiting, neutropenia, and diarrhea; 8 patients (44%) had grade 1 or 2 hypertension, and 2 (11%) had grade 3 hemoptysis. For all 18 patients, the objective response rate and median progression-free survival duration were 67% and 7.9 months. Plasma levels of VEGF were significantly higher, and those of soluble VEGFR2 were significantly lower, on day 22 than at baseline but were not correlated with tumor shrinkage. ConclusionsCediranib (20 mg) plus etoposide and cisplatin is well tolerated and has promising clinical activity.

Randomized phase II dose comparison LITESPARK-013 study of belzutifan in patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Belzutifan is a first-in-class hypoxia-inducible factor subunit 2α (HIF-2α) inhibitor approved at a dose of 120 mg once daily for certain adults with VHL disease and adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) following therapy with a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) [or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)] inhibitor and a vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. However, whether the belzutifan dose could be optimized is unclear. The phase II LITESPARK-013 study (NCT04489771) enrolled patients with advanced clear cell RCC whose disease progressed after one to three prior systemic therapies, including an anti-PD-(L)1 regimen. Patients were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to receive belzutifan 120 or 200 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST version 1.1. The secondary endpoints were duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Overall, 154 patients were enrolled (120 mg: n= 76; 200 mg: n= 78). The median follow-up was 20.1 months (range 14.8-28.4). The ORR was 23.7% versus 23.1% for the 120 mg and 200 mg groups, respectively [P= 0.5312;-0.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI)-14.0% to 12.9%]. The median DOR was not reached for the 120 mg arm and was 16.1 months (2.1+ to 23.5+) for the 200 mg arm. No between-group differences were observed for PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.94, 95% CI 0.63-1.40] or OS (medians not reached; HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.65-1.90). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 35 patients (46.1%) in the 120 mg group and 36 patients (46.2%) in the 200 mg group. The efficacy of belzutifan was similar between the 120 mg dose and the 200 mg dose for previously treated clear cell RCC. Safety at both doses was consistent with the known safety profile of belzutifan. These results further support 120 mg once daily as the preferred dose for belzutifan.

Informing the Recommended Phase III Dose of Alnuctamab, a CD3 × BCMA T-Cell Engager, Using Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Analysis.

Alnuctamab, a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting T-cell engager, has demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity in the phase I study CC-93269-MM-001 treating patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Identification of a recommended Phase III dose (RP3D) was a key objective, as such population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) and exposure-response analysis was critical. Intravenous (IV) alnuctamab was administered in fixed doses (0.15-10 mg) or in step-up doses to a maximum 10-mg target dose. Subcutaneous (SC) step-up doses of 3 and 6 mg were followed by a target dose range of 10-60 mg. Concentration data from IV and SC alnuctamab administration was pooled and was well described by a two-compartment PopPK model with first-order absorption and elimination. Covariate analysis determined that the inclusion of baseline soluble BCMA (sBCMA) on clearance significantly improved model fitting. Individual exposure parameters were estimated from the final model to characterize exposure-response relationships. Switching from IV to SC administration improved the safety profile of alnuctamab by limiting the frequency of grade ≥2 CRS events. A significant exposure-CRS relationship was observed after the first SC dose, but not subsequent dose administrations. Exposure-safety analysis did not find a statistically significant relationship between increasing exposure and the probability of key safety events of interest. Logistic regression analysis for patients administered SC alnuctamab identified that increased exposure significantly increased the probability of response, although the additional benefit was minimal at exposures above 30 mg target dose. Considering the totality of exposure-response data, the clinical pharmacology assessment supported a SC RP3D of 3/6/30 mg.

Effectiveness and Safety of Varying Doses of Linezolid With Bedaquiline and Pretomanid in Treatment of Drug-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis: Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis with bedaquiline-pretomanid-linezolid regimen has demonstrated good treatment efficacy. Given linezolid's toxicity profile, prudence suggests reconsidering its dose and duration. We determined the effectiveness and safety of structured dose reduction of linezolid with bedaquiline and pretomanid in adults with pre-extensively drug-resistant (pre-XDR) or treatment-intolerant/nonresponsive multidrug-resistant (MDRTI/NR) pulmonary tuberculosis. Adults with pre-XDR or MDRTI/NR pulmonary tuberculosis were enrolled in a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial in India. Patients were randomized to 26 weeks of bedaquiline, pretomanid, and daily linezolid, at 600 mg for 26 weeks (arm 1); 600 mg for 9 weeks followed by 300 mg for 17 weeks (arm 2); or 600 mg for 13 weeks followed by 300 mg for 13 weeks (arm 3). Study end points included sustained cure, bacteriological failure, toxicity, and death. Of 403 patients enrolled, 255 (63%) were <30 years old, 273 (68%) had prior tuberculosis episodes, and 238 (59%) were malnourished. At the end of treatment, after excluding those with negative baseline cultures, cure was seen in 120 (93%), 117 (94%), and 115 (93%) in arms 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Myelosuppression seen in 85 patients each in arms 1 and 2 and 77 patients in arm 3, not significantly different. Peripheral neuropathy was noticed in 66 patients (30, 17, and 19 in arms 1, 2, and 3) at 10-26 weeks (P = .02). The linezolid dose was reduced because of toxicity in 13, 2, and 4 patients in arms 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In adults with pre-XDR or MDRTI/NR pulmonary tuberculosis, structured linezolid dose reduction to 300 mg/d is as effective as the standard 600-mg dose but with fewer cases of peripheral neuropathy when given with bedaquiline and pretomanid. Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2021/03/032189).

Bioequivalence study of two formulations of afatinib dimaleate tablets in healthy subjects under fasting conditions: A randomized, open-label, single-dose, crossover trial.

To evaluate the bioequivalence of two different afatinib dimaleate formulations in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting conditions and to assess their pharmacokinetic and safety profiles. This randomized, open-label, 2-period, crossover, bioequivalence study included 32 healthy Chinese subjects. The subjects were assigned to receive a single 40-mg dose of generic or brand-named afatinib dimaleate tablet. Blood samples were collected pre-dose and up to 120hours after dosing. Healthy subjects orally took the trial preparation (T) (afatinib maleate tablets developed by Jiangxi Shanxiang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Gan Zhou, China) and the reference preparation (R) (afatinib maleate tablets developed by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co., Ingelheim, Germany) under fasting conditions in the appropriate period according to the randomization. We measured the blood concentrations, calculated the pharmacokinetic parameters of the two preparations in the human body, and evaluated whether formulations were bioequivalent. Safety of the preparations in healthy subjects was monitored during the whole trial. Safety assessment was conducted by vital signs, physical examination, laboratory examination, and 12-lead electrocardiogram during the study, i.e., from the time the subject received the test drug to the end of the last visit. Under fasting conditions, the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios of the test/reference for afatinib dimaleate were 93.34 - 103.92% for AUC0-t, 90.26 - 105.52% for Cmax, and 93.49 - 104.05% for AUC0-∞. The 90% CI for the geometric mean ratios (test/reference) of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were within the range of 80.00 - 125.00%, indicating that the test formulation was equivalent to the reference formulation in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting conditions. Both products were similar in terms of safety.

A randomized phase 1 study of safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of MK-1088, a novel dual adenosine receptor antagonist, in healthy adult participants.

This phase 1 first-in-human study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of MK-1088, a novel, small-molecule dual inhibitor of adenosine A2A and A2B receptors. Healthy adult participants were enrolled in two panels (n = 8 each) and randomly assigned to receive MK-1088 (n = 6) or placebo (n = 2) orally in each of five treatment periods. Participants in panel A received single ascending doses of MK-1088 at 1, 10, 50, and 150mg or placebo in a fasted or fed (50mg only) state. Participants in panel B received MK-1088 at 3, 25, 100, and 224mg or placebo in a fasted state. Primary objectives were to evaluate safety, tolerability, and plasma pharmacokinetics following a single dose of MK-1088. The secondary objective was to evaluate the effects of a high-fat meal on pharmacokinetics. All participants (n = 16) completed the study (median age: 33 years [range: 20-43]; all were male). Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 1 of 6 (17%), 4 of 6 (67%), 4 of 6 (67%), and 2 of 6 (33%) participants after receiving MK-1088 at 3, 25, 100, and 224mg, respectively. No serious AEs or deaths due to any cause occurred. MK-1088 was rapidly absorbed after a single dose; half-life was ~ 11h in the 100-224mg dose range. The target concentration at 12h (> 0.3 µM) was exceeded at the 50-mg dose level. MK-1088 plasma pharmacokinetics increased dose proportionately. A high-fat meal did not significantly affect pharmacokinetics at the 50-mg dose. MK-1088 was well tolerated and demonstrated dose-proportional pharmacokinetic properties that were not affected by a high-fat meal.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Naloxegol in Pediatric Subjects Receiving Opioids.

The pharmacokinetics (PK) of naloxegol were characterized in pediatric subjects, aged 6months or older to less than 18years who either have or are at risk of developing opioid-induced constipation following single dose administration. Subjects grouped as aged 12 years or older to less than 18years, 6 months or older to less than 12years, and 6months or older to less than 6years, received a single oral dose of naloxegol at doses that were estimated to achieve plasma exposures comparable to adult 12.5- or 25-mg doses. Intensive and sparse plasma naloxegol samples were collected to assess naloxegol concentrations. Data were combined with previously collected adult PK data and used to estimate PK parameters using population PK analyses. Naloxegol PK was described using a 2-compartment model with Weibull-type absorption. Neither age nor body weight was identified as a significant covariate indicating similar PK properties in adult and pediatric subjects. PK estimates in the youngest age group were approximately 80% less than those in adults (12.5-mg equivalent dose). Exposures in the other pediatric groups were similar to those in adult equivalent doses. The PK of naloxegol were characterized as linear over the dose range, with no clinically significant covariates and comparable PK characteristics in adults and pediatric subjects aged 6months or older.

A phase 2a study investigating the effects of ritlecitinib on brainstem auditory evoked potentials and intraepidermal nerve fiber histology in adults with alopecia areata.

Reversible axonal swelling and brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) changes were observed in standard chronic (9-month) toxicology studies in dogs treated with ritlecitinib, an oral Janus kinase 3/tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma family kinase inhibitor, at exposures higher than the approved 50-mg human dose. To evaluate the clinical relevance of the dog toxicity finding, this phase 2a, double-blind study assessed BAEP changes and intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) histology in adults with alopecia areata treated with ritlecitinib. Patients were randomized to receive oral ritlecitinib 50 mg once daily (QD) with a 4-week loading dose of 200 mg QD or placebo for 9 months (placebo-controlled phase); they then entered the active-therapy extension and received ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (with a 4-week loading dose of 200 mg in patients switching from placebo). Among the 71 patients, no notable mean differences in change from baseline (CFB) in Waves I-V interwave latency (primary outcome) or Wave V amplitude on BAEP at a stimulus intensity of 80 dB nHL were observed in the ritlecitinib or placebo group at Month 9, with no notable differences in interwave latency or Wave V amplitude between groups. The CFB in mean or median IENF density and in percentage of IENFs with axonal swellings was minimal and similar between groups at Month 9. Ritlecitinib treatment was also not associated with an imbalanced incidence of neurological and audiological adverse events. These results provide evidence that the BAEP and axonal swelling finding in dogs are not clinically relevant in humans.

First-in-human study evaluating safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of lorundrostat, a novel and highly selective aldosterone synthase inhibitor.

Dysregulation of the mineralocorticoid hormone aldosterone is an increasingly prevalent cause of hypertension. Aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2) shares 93% homology to 11β-hydroxylase (CYP11B1), which produces cortisol. Lorundrostat, a highly selective inhibitor of CYP11B2, is a potential safe and effective treatment for aldosterone-dependent, uncontrolled hypertension, including treatment-resistant hypertension. Lorundrostat showed highly selective inhibition of CYP11B2 invitro, with 374-fold selectivity for CYP11B2 vs. CYP11B1. A first-in-human study of single ascending doses ranging from 5 to 800 mg and multiple ascending doses ranging from 40 to 360 mg once daily was conducted in healthy participants. After single- and multiple-dose administration, lorundrostat plasma levels peaked 1-3 h after administration with a t1/2 of 10-12 h. Plasma aldosterone decreased up to 40% with single 100-mg to 200-mg doses and up to 70% with single 400 to 800-mg doses. Plasma aldosterone returned to baseline within 16 h after single 100-mg doses and multiple once-daily 120-mg doses. Lorundrostat demonstrated a favorable safety profile in healthy participants. Dose- and exposure-dependent inhibition of renal tubular sodium reabsorption was observed across a clinically relevant dose range with no suppression of basal or cosyntropin-stimulated cortisol production and only a modest increase in mean serum potassium.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Stapokibart in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: An Open-Label Extension, Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Stapokibart/CM310, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-4 receptor α chain, has shown promising treatment benefits in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in previous phase II clinical trials. We aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of stapokibart in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Enrolled patients who previously completed parent trials of stapokibart received a subcutaneous stapokibart 600-mg loading dose, then 300mg every 2weeks up to 52weeks. Efficacy outcomes included the proportions of patients with ≥50%/75%/90% improvements from baseline of parent trials in the Eczema Area and Severity Index, Investigator's Global Assessment, and weekly average of the daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale. In total, 127 patients were enrolled, and 110 (86.6%) completed the study. At week52, the Eczema Area and Severity Index-50/75/90 response rates were 96.3%, 87.9%, and 71.0%, respectively. An Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1 with a ≥2-point reduction was achieved in 39.3% of patients at week16, increasing to 58.9% at week52. The proportions of patients with ≥3-point and ≥4-point reductions in the weekly average of daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale scores were 80.2% and 62.2%, respectively, at week52. Improvement in patients' quality of life was sustained over a 52-week treatment period. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 88.2% of patients, with an exposure-adjusted event rate of 299.2 events/100 patient-years. Coronavirus disease 2019, upper respiratory tract infection, and conjunctivitis were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events. Long-term treatment with stapokibart for 52weeks showed high efficacy and good safety profiles, supporting its use as a continuous long-term treatment option for atopic dermatitis. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04893707 (15 May, 2021).

Effect of reboxetine and citalopram on anal opening pressure in healthy women: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study.

In placebo-controlled clinical trials, reboxetine, a selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, increases urethral pressure and relieves stress urinary incontinence symptoms in women. Considering the close connection in neural regulation of the external urethral and anal sphincters, we hypothesized that reboxetine may also enhance anal sphincter pressure. Conversely, it is believed that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors may contribute to fecal incontinence by reducing anal sphincter pressure. In this study, we investigated the effect of reboxetine and citalopram on anal opening pressure in healthy female volunteers. In a double-blind, three-way crossover trial, 24 female participants received single doses of 40 mg citalopram, 8 mg reboxetine, and matching placebos, with a minimum of 8-day washout between sessions. Using anal acoustic reflectometry, we measured anal opening pressure during both resting and squeezing conditions at the estimated time of peak plasma concentration for both study drugs. Compared with placebo, reboxetine increased anal opening pressure with 23.4 cmH2O (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.5-30.2, p < 0.001) during rest and with 22.5 cmH2O (95% CI 15.2-29.8, p < 0.001) during squeeze. Citalopram did not change anal opening pressure statistically significantly compared to placebo. An 8-mg dose of reboxetine increased anal opening pressure substantially in healthy women, suggesting potential benefits for fecal incontinence symptoms. In contrast, a 40-mg dose of citalopram showed a marginal and statistically insignificant effect on anal opening pressure, indicating that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors do not contribute to fecal incontinence by reducing anal sphincter tone.

Food Effect and Pharmacokinetic Bridging of Avacopan in Caucasian and Japanese Healthy Participants.

Avacopan 30mg twice daily (BID) is approved for the treatment of severe active antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated vasculitis (granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis). Food effect on avacopan pharmacokinetics (PKs) and PK bridging in Japanese participants were examined through 2 phase 1 studies involving healthy adult participants. In Study 1, an open-label, crossover trial, participants received oral administration of a single 30-mg dose of avacopan under fasted and fed conditions. Study 2 was a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Caucasian and Japanese participants: Part A investigated single doses of 10 and 30mg of avacopan under fasted and fed conditions and Part B investigated 30 and 50mg BID avacopan. The PKs of single-dose administrations of 10 and 30mg in Japanese participants was compared with that in Caucasian participants under fasted conditions. Food substantially increased plasma avacopan area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to time infinity (AUC0-inf) by 1.72-fold, supporting the recommendation of taking avacopan with food. Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) remained relatively unchanged. The median time to reach Cmax (tmax) was delayed by 3hours. No significant food effect was observed on the active metabolite CCX168-M1 (M1) AUC. Avacopan and M1 exposures were <1.5-fold higher in Japanese participants than in Caucasian participants following multiple-dose administration of avacopan.

Dupilumab in Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that often requires continuous long-term systemic management. Long-term safety and efficacy data for treatment options are critically important. To assess the safety and efficacy of dupilumab treatment for up to 5 years in adults with moderate to severe AD. The 5-year LIBERTY AD open-label extension study was conducted from September 2013 to June 2022 at 550 sites in 28 countries. The study enrolled adult patients with moderate to severe AD who had participated in previous dupilumab clinical trials. Data were analyzed from August 2022 to February 2023. At enrollment, patients initiated a regimen of subcutaneous dupilumab, 200 mg, weekly (400-mg loading dose). The regimen was amended in June 2014 to dupilumab, 300 mg, weekly (600-mg loading dose) based on a dose-ranging study and again in November 2019 to dupilumab, 300 mg, every 2 weeks to align with the regulatory regimen approvals. The primary end points were the incidence and rate of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Key secondary end points included incidence and rate of serious TEAEs and adverse events of special interest, proportion of patients achieving an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear), and proportion of patients with 75% or more improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) from the parent study baseline. A total of 2677 patients were enrolled and treated in the open-label extension study; 1611 (60.2%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 39.2 (13.4) years. A total of 334 patients (12.5%) completed treatment up to week 260. The most common reasons for withdrawal were due to regulatory approval of dupilumab in compliance with the study protocol (810 of 1380 [58.7%]), patient withdrawal (248 of 1380 [18.0%]), and adverse events (116 of 1380 [8.4%]). Exposure-adjusted rates of TEAEs were generally stable or declined throughout the study. Common TEAEs (incidence of 5% or greater) included nasopharyngitis, worsening AD, upper respiratory tract infection, conjunctivitis, conjunctivitis allergic, headache, oral herpes, and injection-site reaction. At week 260, 220 of 326 patients (67.5%) achieved an IGA score of 0 or 1 and 288 of 324 (88.9%) achieved 75% or greater improvement in the EASI. The mean (SD) EASI score was 16.39 (14.60) at baseline and 2.75 (5.62) at end of study. In this study, there was sustained safety and efficacy of continuous long-term dupilumab treatment for adults with moderate to severe AD.