5-HT1F Receptor Research Articles

Lasmiditan for Patients with Migraine and Contraindications to Triptans: A Post Hoc Analysis.

IntroductionAs 5-HT1B receptor agonists, triptans produce vasoconstriction and have cardiovascular contraindications and precautions. Lasmiditan, a selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist, has a low affinity for 5-HT1B receptors, does not cause vasoconstriction, and is free of cardiovascular contraindications and precautions. The objective of this post hoc analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lasmiditan in patients with and without at least one triptan contraindication.MethodsPatient subgroups, with and without triptan contraindications, were analyzed from pooled patient data from four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials (SAMURAI, SPARTAN, CENTURION, and MONONOFU). Patients experiencing a single migraine attack of moderate or severe intensity were treated with lasmiditan 50 mg (SPARTAN and MONONOFU only), 100 mg, 200 mg, or placebo, and efficacy data were recorded in an electronic diary.ResultsOf 5704 patients, 207 (3.6%) patients had at least one contraindication to triptans. Overall subgroup analysis revealed that the effects of lasmiditan on pain freedom, pain relief, freedom from most bothersome symptom, disability freedom, and Patient Global Impression of Change at 2 h post-dose did not differ in patient groups with and without triptan contraindications. These outcomes generally showed a similar benefit pattern for lasmiditan in both subgroups, with all results being statistically significant in patients without contraindications, and pain relief being statistically significant in patients with contraindications. The safety and tolerability profiles of patients with triptan versus without triptan contraindications were similar, including dizziness in 18.3 to 22.8% and somnolence in 7.9 to 9.9% of patients at the highest dose of lasmiditan.ConclusionsIn pooled analyses from four trials, patients with and without triptan contraindications did not differ in their patterns of lasmiditan efficacy. Lasmiditan may be a treatment option in patients with contraindications to triptans.Trial Registration NumbersSAMURAI, NCT:02439320; SPARTAN, NCT:02605174; CENTURION, NCT:03670810; and MONONOFU, NCT:03962738.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40122-022-00388-8.

Migraine history and response to lasmiditan across racial and ethnic groups

Objective The robust enrollment in SPARTAN and SAMURAI provided the opportunity to present post-hoc descriptive details on migraine disease characteristics and treatment outcomes after treatment with lasmiditan, a selective serotonin (5-HT1F) receptor agonist, in racial and ethnic subgroups. Methods Descriptive data from racial (White [W](n = 3471) and Black or African American [AA](n = 792)) and ethnic (Hispanic or Latinx [HL](n = 775) and Non-Hispanic or Latinx [Non-HL](n = 3637)) populations are presented on pooled data from two double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized Phase 3 studies (SAMURAI [NCT02439320] and SPARTAN [NCT2605174]). Patients were treated with lasmiditan (50 (SPARTAN only), 100, or 200 mg) or placebo for a single migraine attack of moderate-to-severe intensity. Efficacy data were recorded in an electronic diary at baseline, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. Safety was evaluated and reported by occurrences of adverse events. Results Clinical characteristics were generally similar across populations. W participants had longer migraine history than AA participants, and Non-HL participants had more migraine disability than HL participants. In the lasmiditan single-attack studies, AA participants waited longer than W participants to take study drug. A higher proportion of HL participants rated baseline migraine severity as severe compared to Non-HL participants. Response to lasmiditan was similar across racial and ethnic groups, including pain response, freedom from most bothersome symptom and migraine-related disability, and safety and tolerability. Across multiple outcomes, AA and HL participants tended to report more positive outcomes. Conclusions There were few differences in demographic and clinical characteristics across racial and ethnic groups. Similar lasmiditan efficacy and safety outcomes were observed in AA versus W participants, and in HL versus Non-HL participants. Small observed differences may be driven by a tendency toward a more positive response observed across all treatment groups by AA and HL participants.

5-HT1F Receptor Agonist Ameliorates Mechanical Allodynia in Neuropathic Pain via Induction of Mitochondrial Biogenesis and Suppression of Neuroinflammation.

Neuropathic pain is a devastating disease that affects millions of people worldwide. Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) is involved in pain modulation. Several lines of evidence have indicated that 5-HT1F receptor agonists are potent inducers of mitochondrial biogenesis. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that 5-HT1F receptor agonists ameliorate mechanical allodynia in neuropathic pain via the induction of mitochondrial biogenesis and suppression of neuroinflammation. Male Sprague–Dawley rats were used to establish a neuropathic pain model via spared nerve injury (SNI). The paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) was used to evaluate mechanical allodynia. Real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to examine the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number. Western blotting and immunofluorescence were used to examine the expression of target proteins. Our results showed that mitochondrial biogenesis was impaired in the spinal cord of rats with SNI. Moreover, activation of PGC-1α, the master regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis, attenuates established mechanical allodynia in rats with neuropathic pain. In addition, the neuronal 5-HT1F receptor is significantly downregulated in the spinal cord of rats with neuropathic pain. Furthermore, the selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist lasmiditan attenuated established mechanical allodynia in rats with neuropathic pain. Finally, lasmiditan (Las) treatment restored mitochondrial biogenesis and suppressed neuroinflammation in the spinal cord of rats with SNI. These results provide the first evidence that lasmiditan ameliorates mechanical allodynia in neuropathic pain by inducing mitochondrial biogenesis and suppressing neuroinflammation in the spinal cord. Inducers of mitochondrial biogenesis may be an encouraging therapeutic option for the management of neuropathic pain.

Lasmiditan and 5-Hydroxytryptamine in the rat trigeminal system; expression, release and interactions with 5-HT1 receptors

Background5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptors 1B, 1D and 1F have key roles in migraine pharmacotherapy. Selective agonists targeting these receptors, such as triptans and ditans, are effective in aborting acute migraine attacks and inhibit the in vivo release of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in human and animal models. The study aimed to examine the localization, genetic expression and functional aspects of 5- HT1B/1D/1F receptors in the trigeminal system in order to further understand the molecular sites of action of triptans (5-HT1B/1D) and ditans (5-HT1F).MethodsUtilizing immunohistochemistry, the localization of 5-HT and of 5-HT1B/1D/1F receptors was examined in rat trigeminal ganglion (TG) and combined with quantitative polymerase chain reaction to quantify the level of expression for 5-HT1B/1D/1F receptors in the TG. The functional role of these receptors was examined ex vivo with a capsaicin/potassium induced 5-HT and CGRP release.Results5-HT immunoreactivity (ir) was observed in a minority of CGRP negative C-fibres, most neuron somas and faintly in A-fibres and Schwann cell neurolemma. 5-HT1B/1D receptors were expressed in the TG, while the 5-HT1F receptor displayed a weak ir. The 5-HT1D receptor co-localized with receptor activity-modifying protein 1 (RAMP1) in Aδ-fibres in the TG, while 5-HT1B-ir was weakly expressed and 5-HT1F-ir was not detected in these fibres. None of the 5-HT1 receptors co-localized with CGRP-ir in C-fibres.5-HT1D receptor mRNA was the most prominently expressed, followed by the 5-HT1B receptor and lastly the 5-HT1F receptor. The 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptor antagonist, GR127935, could reverse the inhibitory effect of Lasmiditan (a selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist) on CGRP release in the soma-rich TG but not in soma-poor TG or dura mater. 5-HT release in the soma-rich TG, and 5-HT content in the baseline samples, negatively correlated with CGRP levels, showing for the first time a physiological role for 5-HT induced inhibition.ConclusionThis study reveals the presence of a subgroup of C-fibres that store 5-HT. The data shows high expression of 5-HT1B/1D receptors and suggests that the 5-HT1F receptor is a relatively unlikely target in the rat TG. Furthermore, Lasmiditan works as a partial agonist on 5-HT1B/1D receptors in clinically relevant dose regiments.

Migraine.

Migraine is a common, chronic, disorder that is typically characterized by recurrent disabling attacks of headache and accompanying symptoms, including aura. The aetiology is multifactorial with rare monogenic variants. Depression, epilepsy, stroke and myocardial infarction are comorbid diseases. Spreading depolarization probably causes aura and possibly also triggers trigeminal sensory activation, the underlying mechanism for the headache. Despite earlier beliefs, vasodilation is only a secondary phenomenon and vasoconstriction is not essential for antimigraine efficacy. Management includes analgesics or NSAIDs for mild attacks, and, for moderate or severe attacks, triptans or 5HT1B/1D receptor agonists. Because of cardiovascular safety concerns, unreliable efficacy and tolerability issues, use of ergots to abort attacks has nearly vanished in most countries. CGRP receptor antagonists (gepants) and lasmiditan, a selective 5HT1F receptor agonist, have emerged as effective acute treatments. Intramuscular onabotulinumtoxinA may be helpful in chronic migraine (migraine on ≥15 days per month) and monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP or its receptor, as well as two gepants, have proven effective and well tolerated for the preventive treatment of migraine. Several neuromodulation modalities have been approved for acute and/or preventive migraine treatment. The emergence of new treatment targets and therapies illustrates the bright future for migraine management.

Headache as a Neurologic Manifestation of Systemic Disease.

Purpose of ReviewThis is an update of headache attributed to systemic disease and current therapeutic strategies. Clinical scenarios are discussed.Recent FindingsThe diagnosis of headache attributed to metabolic or systemic disorder appears in the Appendix of International Classification of Headache Disorders, Third Edition, and requires further evaluation and validation. However, recent studies characterizing headache appear in the literature. Specific treatment includes addressing underlying systemic disorders, managing concurrent primary headache, and treating comorbidities that may exacerbate headache. Evidence for specific treatment trials for headache as a symptom is lacking, including headaches post-COVID19 infection. Calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists and 5-HT1F receptor agonists are attractive options for migraine with vascular comorbidities, but long-term studies are needed. SummaryHeadache is commonly encountered as a manifestation or complication of systemic disease. Further research is needed to validate headache associated with systemic disorders and to determine optimal treatment strategies.

Do ditans and gepants have a place in acute migraine treatment?

A systematic review and meta-analysis by Yang and colleagues, published in JAMA Open Network in October 2021, found that 5-HT1F receptor agonists or “ditans” (lasmiditan) and calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonists or “gepants” (rimegepant and ubrogepant) were not as effective in reducing pain 2 hours post-dose as compared to triptans. However, the study findings concluded gepants were less likely to cause mild to moderate adverse events compared to triptans.

Efficacy of 5-HT1F agonist versus CGRP-antagonists for treatment of acute migraine: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background: Two new classes of drugs approved by USFDA for the treatment of acute migraine are non-peptide Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists (rimegepant and ubrogepant) and 5-HT1F receptor agonist lasmiditan. There are no clinical trials comparing these two classes of newer drugs. Aim and Objectives: The present network meta-analysis was conducted with the objective to compare the efficacy of orally administered lasmiditan versus CGRP-receptor antagonists (rimegepant and ubrogepant) in the treatment of acute migraine. Materials and Methods: Electronic database search in PUBMED and Cochrane library was conducted using MeSH search terms “Lasmiditan” AND “Migraine” for articles on lasmiditan; while MeSH terms “Ubrogepant” AND “Migraine;” “Rimegeapnt” AND “Migraine” were used for articles on CGRP-antagonists. Randomized or cross-over studies comparing efficacy of oral lasmiditan and two FDA approved CGRP-antagonists (rimegepant, and ubrogepant) versus other active treatment or placebo in adults with acute attack of migraine were included in the analysis. Incidence of 2 h pain-free event was the primary outcome measure while the incidence of 24 h pain-free was the secondary outcome measure compared. Both frequent and Bayesian network meta-analysis were conducted by CRSU MetaInsight software. Results: In 12 eligible studies, seven interventions were compared with total 13795 patients analyzed in the network. Higher treatment ranking for 2 h and 24 h pain-free events was observed for lasmiditan 200 mg and rimegepant 150 mg, respectively. Conclusions: There is strong evidence to conclude that lasmiditan at 200 mg is better drug for immediate (2 h) headache freedom. There is limited evidence to support rimegepant for sustained effect (beyond 24 h).

Modern strategies of targeted migraine therapy

Migraine is a chronic common neurological disorder. It is an extremely disabling and significantly reduces the quality of life of patients. Developments of the field of fundamental research and functional neuroimaging studies have improved the understanding of the pathophysiology of migraine. New specific drugs and methods of treatment have appeared. They significantly reduced the severity of headache attacks and the course of the disease. Therefore the aim of this work is to analyze and summarize the information of modern professional literature of the pathophysiology and treatment of migraine. Data on the neurophysiological features of the brain in migraine, the emergence of drugs with other therapeutic targets, such as glutamate, amylin, adrenomedullin, orexins, and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide are presented. Recommendations are given for emergency treatment of a migraine attack, depending on the severity of the attack, the degree of maladaptation of the patient, concomitant symptoms, concomitant diseases and the patient's response to treatment. Prophylactic treatment can be divided into first-, second- and third-line drugs, but the choice of drugs and the order of their use depend on local practical recommendations and availability in individual regions and cost. Efficacy, safety of new drugs for specific migraine therapy are discussed such as molecules targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (hepants and monoclonal antibodies) and serotonin 5-HT1F receptor agonists (ditans). Diagnosis and clinical management of migraine worldwide remain suboptimal. A large number of studies lead to a deeper understanding of the neurobiology of this disorder, the search for new treatment methods that are more adapted to the needs of patients and fundamentally change the approach to the disease. Keywords: calcitonin gene-related peptide, therapy, hepants, monoclonal antibodies, ditans.

Headache in 2021: clinical, biological, and genetic advances

In the past decade, the strenuous efforts of the scientific community have substantially advanced our understanding of primary headaches. This research has promoted the development of novel disease-specific treatments, such as monoclonal antibodies and small molecules targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway, and agonists of the 5-HT1F receptor. However, despite these major advances, primary headaches still constitute a challenge for clinicians and a major burden for patients and society.

Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of pyridinylmethylenepiperidine derivatives as potent 5-HT1F receptor agonists for migraine therapy.

Migraine is a common neurovascular disease which has been classified as the sixth most disabling disorder. Current migraine therapy was triptans, however, riptans can cause contraction of blood vessels. Therefore, novel drugs without cardiovascular effects emerged, such as CGRP and selective 5-HT1F receptor agonists. In this work, a series of pyridinylmethylenepiperidine derivatives were designed, synthesized and evaluated for their 5-HT1F receptor agonist activity. The results invitro showed that compound C1-C6 displayed potent agonist activities compared with positive drug lasmiditan. Pharmacokinetic properties in rat indicated that 2,4,6-trifluoro-N-(6-(fluoro(1-methylpiperidin-4-ylidene)methyl)pyridin-2-yl)benzamide (C5) possessed high AUC and good bioavailability. In two rodent models of migraine, C5 significantly inhibited dural plasma protein extravasation and c-fos expression in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis. Moreover, C5 showed no effect on vasoconstriction. Through these studies, we identified C5 as a potent 5-HT1F receptor agonist for migraine therapy.

The selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist lasmiditan inhibits trigeminal nociceptive processing: Implications for migraine and cluster headache.

Lasmiditan is a novel selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist, recently approved for acute treatment of migraine. 5-HT1F receptors are widely expressed in the CNS and trigeminovascular system. Here, we have explored the therapeutic effects of 5-HT1F receptor activation in preclinical models of migraine and cluster headache. Electrical stimulation of the dura mater or the superior salivatory nucleus in anaesthetised rats evoked trigeminovascular or trigeminal-autonomic reflex activation at the level of the trigeminocervical complex. Additionally, cranial autonomic manifestations in response to trigeminal-autonomic reflex activation were measured, via anterior choroidal blood flow alterations. These responses were then challenged with lasmiditan. We explored the tissue distribution of mRNA for 5-HT1F receptors in human post-mortem tissue and of several 5-HT1 receptor subtypes in specific tissue beds. Lasmiditan dose-dependently reduced trigeminovascular activation in a preclinical model of migraine. Lasmiditan also reduced superior salivatory nucleus-evoked activation of the trigeminal-autonomic reflex, but had no effect on cranial autonomic activation. mRNA profiling in human tissue showed expression of the 5-HT1F receptor in several structures relevant for migraine and cluster headache. Our data suggest that lasmiditan acts, at least in part, as an anti-migraine agent by reducing trigeminovascular activation. Furthermore, our results highlight a clear action for lasmiditan in a preclinical model of cluster headache. Given the proven translational efficacy of this model, our data support the potential utility of lasmiditan as a therapeutic option for the acute treatment of cluster headache attacks. This article is part of a themed issue on Advances in Migraine and Headache Therapy (BJP 75th Anniversary). To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v179.3/issuetoc.

Safety findings from CENTURION, a phase 3 consistency study of lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine

BackgroundLasmiditan (LTN) is a selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist for the acute treatment of migraine in adults. We present detailed safety findings from the placebo-controlled, double-blind Phase 3 study, of LTN treatment across 4 attacks (CENTURION).MethodsPatients were randomized 1:1:1 to LTN 200 mg (LTN200), LTN100, or a control group that received placebo for 3 attacks and LTN50 for either the 3rd or 4th attack (1:1). Safety analyses were conducted for patients who took ≥1 dose of study drug and, in some cases, those who took all 4 doses.ResultsOverall, 1471 patients treated 4494 attacks. The incidences of treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs) were - placebo, n=2 (0.4 %); LTN100, n=1 (0.2 %); LTN200, n=2 (0.4 %); no specific treatment-emergent SAE was reported in more than one patient. The most common treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with lasmiditan were dizziness, paresthesia, fatigue, nausea, vertigo, and somnolence; the vast majority were mild or moderate in severity. The incidences of these TEAEs were highest during the first attack and decreased during subsequent attacks. For patients who experienced a common TEAE with the first attack, less than 45 % experienced the same event in subsequent attacks. Patients who did not experience an event in the 1st attack infrequently experienced the same event in subsequent attacks.The time of onset of the common TEAE ranged from ~40 min to 1 h (dependent upon TEAE) and, for individual TEAE, the onset was similar across attacks. Duration was dependent upon TEAE and attack. It was shortest for paresthesia (< 2 h for all attacks); it ranged from 1.8 to 5.5 h for other common TEAEs and was generally similar across attacks.Serotonin syndrome was reported for 2 patients post LTN dosing; there were no meaningful differences across treatment groups in suicidality; there was no evidence of an increase in motor vehicle accidents.ConclusionIn this blinded, controlled, multiple-attack study, LTN was associated with generally mild or moderate CNS-related TEAEs of short duration. TEAEs tended to decrease in frequency across the 4 attacks.Trial registrationNCT03670810

Safety and Risk of Medication Overuse Headache in Lasmiditan and Second-Generation Gepants: A Rapid Review

The treatment of migraine is often complicated by insufficient headache relief, a miscellany of side effects and the risk of developing Medication Overuse Headache (MOH). Novel acute therapies have been recently developed and are now in the early post-marketing phase. Lasmiditan is a highly selective serotonin receptor agonist that binds to the 5-HT1F receptor, while ubrogepant and rimegepant antagonize the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor. All three medications are now prescribed in a real-world setting, and an adequate level of knowledge is the starting point for rational use. In this rapid systematic review, we have established what is known about lasmiditan, ubrogepant and rimegepant, highlighting the most relevant safety aspects available from published studies and speculating about their risk of MOH.

Newer Horizon for Treatment of Acute Attack of Migraine: Lasmiditan and Ubrogepant.

Migraine is characterized by severe, intermittent headache attacks with associated symptoms including nausea, vomiting, phonophobia, and photophobia. Still Triptans (selective 5-HT1B/D agonists) are considered as the first-line therapy in acute attack of migraine. Recently two new drugs Lasmiditan and Ubrogepant were approved by United States Food and Drug Administration in acute attack of migraine with or without aura in adults. Lasmiditan is a highly selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist which demonstrated superiority to placebo in the acute treatment of migraine in adults with moderate/severe migraine disability in two similarly designed phase-3 trials, SAMURAI and SPARTAN. Ubrogepant is a novel small molecule oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist. The approval was supported by two pivotal phase-3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (ACHIEVE I and ACHIEVE II) that evaluated the efficacy, safety, tolerability. Hopefully, these two drugs may soon be a new addition to the mounting armory of drugs against migraine and may fulfill a substantial unmet need.

Lasmiditan efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine was independent of prior response to triptans: Findings from the CENTURION study.

A significant proportion of triptan users exhibit an insufficient response or inadequate tolerability to a triptan, and some may develop a contraindication. Lasmiditan, a selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist, may be an option for these individuals. We assessed lasmiditan efficacy in a subgroup of patients in CENTURION (Phase 3 migraine consistency study) who exhibited an insufficient response to triptans, including a subgroup with insufficient response due to efficacy only. Patients were randomized to lasmiditan 200 mg for four attacks, lasmiditan 100 mg for four attacks, or placebo for three and lasmiditan 50 mg for one attack. Triptan insufficient responders were pre-defined as patients with insufficient efficacy or tolerability, or who developed a contraindication. In triptan insufficient responders, lasmiditan was superior to placebo (p < 0.05) for pain freedom beginning at 1 h (both doses); pain relief beginning at 0.5 (200 mg) or 1 h (100 mg); migraine-related disability freedom, much/very much better on the Patient Global Impression of Change, and most bothersome symptom freedom at 2 h; sustained pain freedom; and need for rescue medication. Lasmiditan showed benefit for consistency of effect across attacks for 2-h pain freedom and pain relief. Findings were similar in triptan responders and triptan naïve patients and when the triptan insufficient response definition was based on efficacy only. Lasmiditan was efficacious across multiple clinically relevant endpoints in the acute treatment of migraine independent of prior response to triptans.Trial Registration: CENTURION (NCT03670810); SAMURAI (NCT02439320); SPARTAN (NCT02605174).

The Effect and Safety of 5-HT1F Receptor Agonist Lasmiditan on Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background Migraine has a great impact on public health. Current acute therapies do not satisfy all migraineurs. The novel serotonin 5-HT1F receptor agonist appears more promising for aborting migraine attacks. Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of lasmiditan in treating acute migraine attacks. Methods The literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which assessed the effect and safety of lasmiditan on migraine. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. Results were extracted and pooled as risk ratios (RRs) with a fixed or random-effects model. Results Based on the four included RCTs, pooled estimates showed that lasmiditan with the 50 mg, 100 mg, and 200 mg doses was superior to placebo at 2 h after the first dose in terms of pain freedom, absence of migraine-associated symptoms, headache relief, no/mild disability, and global impression of change (very much/much better) (RRs ranged from 1.13 to 1.96), except for nausea-free and vomiting-free. Both lasmiditan 100 mg and 200 mg resulted in significantly fewer patients using rescue medication (100 mg: RR = 0.75, 95% CI (0.61, 0.92), P = 0.007; 200 mg: RR = 0.81, 95% CI (0.66, 0.99), P = 0.04) at 2-24 h postdose, compared with placebo. Safety data showed that the proportion of patients reporting at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and the incidence of most common TEAEs such as dizziness, paresthesia, fatigue, somnolence, and nausea was higher in the lasmiditan groups (50 mg, 100 mg, and 200 mg), compared with placebo. There was no significant difference between lasmiditan and placebo in terms of cardiovascular-related TEAEs (RR = 2.75, 95% CI (0.81, 9.37), P = 0.11). Compared with lasmiditan 100 mg, lasmiditan 200 mg was more effective in pain freedom at 2 h after the first dose (RR = 0.83, 95% CI (0.74, 0.94), P = 0.004) but associated with a higher risk of reporting at least one TEAE (RR = 0.88, 95% CI (0.81, 0.96), P = 0.006). Conclusions Lasmiditan with the 50 mg, 100 mg, and 200 mg doses are effective and safe in acute migraine treatment. Lasmiditan 200 mg is more effective than lasmiditan 100 mg in pain freedom, while lasmiditan 100 mg is better tolerated in the short-term follow-up. Further larger sample-size RCTs are required to verify the applicability and tolerability in the long term.

Bench to bedside understanding of migraine pathophysiology

Migraine is a common, complex brain disorder whose pathophysiology is being unravelled by bench to bedside and back iterative advances [ [1] Goadsby P.J. Holland P.R. Martins-Oliveira M. Hoffmann J. Schankin C. Akerman S. Pathophysiology of Migraine- A disorder of sensory processing. Physiol. Rev. 2017; 97: 553-622 Google Scholar ]. Migraine consists of overlapping, parallel “phases” that offer insights into brain areas for laboratory exploration. Pain in migraine involves the activation, or perception of activation, of the pain-producing innervation of intracranial structures, notably the dura mater. The first, ophthalmic division, can be activated by direct stimulation in experimental animals to activate pathways of potential interest. Second order activation occurs in the trigemiinocervical complex that projects, with decussation, in the quintothalamic tract to the neurons of the ventroposteromedial thalamus. Triptans, serotonin 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists, gepants, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists, and ditans, 5-HT1F receptor agonists, each reduce nociceptive signalling in this pathway, and are effective in the acute treatment of migraine. Blockade of the pathway with monoclonal antibodies directed at the peptide, or its canonical receptor, are effective in the preventive treatment of migraine. Remarkably, gepants can have both acute attack effects and preventive effects in migraine. Brain imaging has demonstrated activations in the region of the hypothalamus in migraineurs in the premonitory phase in nitrogylcerin-triggered attacks or in spontaneous attacks. Given premonitory symptoms such as somnolence, yawning, thirst and polyuria, diencephalic structures offer a target for further bench-based studies. Understanding migraine neurobiology has generated new therapies and is likely to continue to do.

Lasmiditan: Acute Migraine Treatment Without Vasoconstriction. A Review.

Objective: To review the efficacy and safety of the newly Food and Drug Administration approved drug lasmiditan, and its place in therapy in the treatment of acute migraine attacks. Data Sources: A literature search of Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar was preformed (September 1999 to May 2021) using the following search terms: acute migraine treatment, triptans, lasmiditan, Reyvow, Rimegepant, Nurtec, Ubrogepant, Ubrelvy, migraine, vasoconstriction, and cardiovascular risk. Product labeling, https://www.clinicaltriasl.gov, and product monographs were also reviewed. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Relevant English-language studies were considered. Data Synthesis: Lasmiditan is the first in its class approved for acute migraine treatment. Lasmiditan exerts its therapeutic effect through agonism at the 5-HT1F receptor, which has been shown to produce no vasoconstriction in preclinical models. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: It is both scientifically and clinically relevant to review lasmiditan and determine the value of an acute migraine drug that does not induce vasoconstriction. Patients with preexisting cardiovascular conditions for which current migraine therapy is contraindicated may benefit from therapeutic use of lasmiditan. However, the potential cardiovascular benefit needs to be weighed against the increased central nervous system risks observed with lasmiditan. Conclusions: Lasmiditan is an oral tablet drug that is used for acute migraine abortive treatment and data suggest that it does not induce vasoconstriction, a common side effect often observed with the current first-line abortive migraine treatment drug class, triptans. This is especially important in acute migraine patients with cardiovascular risk factors in which triptan use is contraindicated.

Acute Treatments for Episodic Migraine in Adults

Migraine is common and can be associated with significant morbidity, and several treatment options exist for acute therapy. To evaluate the benefits and harms associated with acute treatments for episodic migraine in adults. Multiple databases from database inception to February 24, 2021. Randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews that assessed effectiveness or harms of acute therapy for migraine attacks. Independent reviewers selected studies and extracted data. Meta-analysis was performed with the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman variance correction or by using a fixed-effect model based on the Mantel-Haenszel method if the number of studies was small. The main outcomes included pain freedom, pain relief, sustained pain freedom, sustained pain relief, and adverse events. The strength of evidence (SOE) was graded with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. Evidence on triptans and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was summarized from 15 systematic reviews. For other interventions, 115 randomized clinical trials with 28 803 patients were included. Compared with placebo, triptans and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs used individually were significantly associated with reduced pain at 2 hours and 1 day (moderate to high SOE) and increased risk of mild and transient adverse events. Compared with placebo, calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists (low to high SOE), lasmiditan (5-HT1F receptor agonist; high SOE), dihydroergotamine (moderate to high SOE), ergotamine plus caffeine (moderate SOE), acetaminophen (moderate SOE), antiemetics (low SOE), butorphanol (low SOE), and tramadol in combination with acetaminophen (low SOE) were significantly associated with pain reduction and increase in mild adverse events. The findings for opioids were based on low or insufficient SOE. Several nonpharmacologic treatments were significantly associated with improved pain, including remote electrical neuromodulation (moderate SOE), transcranial magnetic stimulation (low SOE), external trigeminal nerve stimulation (low SOE), and noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation (moderate SOE). No significant difference in adverse events was found between nonpharmacologic treatments and sham. There are several acute treatments for migraine, with varying strength of supporting evidence. Use of triptans, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, dihydroergotamine, calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonists, lasmiditan, and some nonpharmacologic treatments was associated with improved pain and function. The evidence for many other interventions, including opioids, was limited.