5-year Cumulative Incidence Of Relapse Research Articles

CSRP2 transcript levels after consolidation therapy increase prognostic prediction ability in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Quantification of measurable residual disease (MRD) correlates with the risk of leukemia recurrence in adults with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, it remains unknown whether collecting data on cysteine and glycine-rich protein 2 (CSRP2) transcript levels, after completing the second course of consolidation, improves prognosis prediction accuracy. A total of 204 subjects with B-cell ALL were tested for CSPR2 transcripts after completing the second course of consolidation using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and divided into high (N = 32) and low (N = 172) CSRP2 expression cohorts. In multivariable analyses, subjects with high expression of CSRP2 had a higher 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38-4.76; P = 0.003), lower 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR = 3.22, 95% CI 1.75-5.93; P < 0.001), and overall survival (OS) (HR = 4.59, 95% CI 2.64-7.99; P < 0.001) in the whole cohort, as well as in the multi-parameter flow cytometry (MPFC) MRD-negative cohort (for CIR, HR = 2.70, 95% CI 1.19-6.12; for RFS, HR = 4.37, 95% CI 1.94-9.85; for OS, HR = 4.90, 95% CI 2.43-9.90; all P < 0.05). Prognostic analysis showed that allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) could significantly improve the prognosis of patients with high CSRP2 expression (allo-HSCT vs chemotherapy: 5-year CIR, 52% vs 91%; RFS, 41% vs 9%; OS, 38% vs 20%; all P< 0.05). Our data indicate that incorporating data from CSPR2 transcript levels to the MRD-testing at the end of the second course of consolidation therapy enhances prognosis prediction accuracy in adults with B-cell ALL.

Intensive chemotherapy with or without gemtuzumab ozogamicin in patients with NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia (AMLSG 09–09): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial

Acute myeloid leukaemia with mutated NPM1 is associated with high CD33 expression and intermediate-risk cytogenetics. The aim of this study was to evaluate intensive chemotherapy with or without the anti-CD33 antibody-drug conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin in participants with newly diagnosed, NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia. This open-label, phase 3 trial was conducted at 56 hospitals in Germany and Austria. Eligible participants were 18 years or older and had newly diagnosed NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. Participants were randomly assigned, using age as a stratification factor (18-60 years vs >60 years), 1:1 to the two treatment groups using allocation concealment; there was no masking of participants and investigators to treatment groups. Participants received two cycles of induction therapy (idarubicin, cytarabine, and etoposide) plus all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) followed by three consolidation cycles of high-dose cytarabine (or an intermediate dose for those older than 60 years) and ATRA, without or with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (3 mg/m2 administered intravenously on day 1 of induction cycles 1 and 2, and consolidation cycle 1). The primary endpoints were short-term event-free survival and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population (overall survival was added as a co-primary endpoint after amendment four of the protocol on Oct 13, 2013). The secondary endpoints were event-free survival with long-term follow-up, rates of complete remission, complete remission with partial haematological recovery (CRh), and complete remission with incomplete haematological recovery (CRi), cumulative incidences of relapse and death, and number of days in hospital. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00893399) and has been completed. Between May 12, 2010, and Sept 1, 2017, 600 participants were enrolled, of which 588 (315 women and 273 men) were randomly assigned (296 to the standard group and 292 to the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group). No difference was found in short-term event-free survival (short-term event-free survival at 6-month follow-up, 53% [95% CI 47-59] in the standard group and 58% [53-64] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group; hazard ratio [HR] 0·83; 95% CI 0·65-1·04; p=0·10) and overall survival between treatment groups (2-year overall survival, 69% [63-74] in the standard group and 73% [68-78] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group; 0·90; 0·70-1·16; p=0·43). There was no difference in complete remission or CRi rates (n=267 [90%] in the standard group vs n=251 [86%] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group; odds ratio [OR] 0·67; 95% CI 0·40-1·11; p=0·15) and complete remission or CRh rates (n=214 [72%] vs n=195 [67%]; OR 0·77; 0·54-1·10; p=0·18), whereas the complete remission rate was lower with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (n=172 [58%] vs n=136 [47%]; OR 0·63; 0·45-0·80; p=0·0068). Cumulative incidence of relapse was significantly reduced by gemtuzumab ozogamicin (2-year cumulative incidence of relapse, 37% [95% CI 31-43] in the standard group and 25% [20-30] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group; cause-specific HR 0·65; 0·49-0·86; p=0·0028), and there was no difference in the cumulative incidence of death (2-year cumulative incidence of death 6% [4-10] in the standard group and 7% [5-11] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group; HR 1·03; 0·59-1·81; p=0·91). There were no differences in the number of days in hospital across all cycles between treatment groups. The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (n=135 [47%] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group vs n=122 [41%] in the standard group), thrombocytopenia (n=261 [90%] vs n=265 [90%]), pneumonia (n=71 [25%] vs n=64 [22%]), sepsis (n=85 [29%] vs n=73 [25%]). Treatment-related deaths were documented in 25 participants (4%; n=8 [3%] in the standard group and n=17 [6%] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group), mostly due to sepsis and infections. The primary endpoints of the trial of event-free survival and overall survival were not met. However, an anti-leukaemic efficacy of gemtuzumab ozogamicin in participants with NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia is shown by a significantly lower cumulative incidence of relapse rate, suggesting that the addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin might reduce the need for salvage therapy in these participants. The results from this study provide further evidence that gemtuzumab ozogamicin should be added in the standard of care treatment in adults with NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia. Pfizer and Amgen.

Effects of isolated central nervous system involvement evaluated by multiparameter flow cytometry prior to allografting on outcomes of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains a major strategy to cure patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether isolated flow cytometry (FCM)-positive central nervous system (CNS) involvement before allo-HSCT is clinically significant. The effects of isolated FCM-positive CNS involvement prior to transplantation on the outcomes of 1406 ALL patients with complete remission (CR) were retrospectively investigated. Patients were classified into isolated FCM-positive CNS involvement (n=31), cytology-positive CNS involvement (n = 43), and negative CNS involvement (n = 1332) groups. Among the three groups, the 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) values were 42.3%, 48.8%, and 23.4%, respectively (P<0.001). The 5-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) values were 44.7%, 34.9%, and 60.8%, respectively (P<0.001). Compared with the negative CNS group (n=1332), the 5-year CIR of the pre-HSCT CNS involvement group (n=74) was higher (46.3% vs. 23.4%, P<0.001], and the 5-year LFS was inferior (39.1% vs. 60.8%, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that four variables, T-cell ALL, in second complete remission or beyond (CR2+) at HSCT, pre-HSCT measurable residual disease positivity, and pre-HSCT CNS involvement, were independently associated with a higher CIR and inferior LFS. A new scoring system was developed using the following four variables: low-risk, intermediate-risk, high-risk, and extremely high-risk groups. The 5-year CIR values were 16.9%, 27.8%, 50.9%, and 66.7%, respectively (P<0.001), while the 5-year LFS values were 67.6%, 56.9%, 31.0%, and 13.3%, respectively (P<0.001). Our results suggest that ALL patients with isolated FCM-positive CNS involvement are at a higher risk of recurrence after transplantation. Patients with pre-HSCT CNS involvement had higher CIR and inferior survival outcomes.

FLT3-ITD Allelic Ratio and NPM1 Mutation Do Not Impact Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with FLT3-ITD after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective Propensity Score- Matching Study

FLT3-ITD mutation has consistently been correlated with poor outcomes in AML patients. Allo-HSCT (allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation) plays a major role in curing blood diseases. Whether allo-HSCT can eliminate the detrimental effects of FLT3-ITD mutation in AML patients remains debatable. In addition, studies showed that FLT3-ITD allelic ratio (AR) and NPM1 mutation appear to further influence the prognostic utility of FLT3-ITD in patients with FLT3-ITD-mutated AML. The influence of NPM1 mutation and AR on FLT3-ITDmut patients remains unclear in our database. To compare the survival outcomes following allo-HSCT between FLT3-ITDmut and FLT3-ITDwt patients and further analyze the influence of NPM1 and AR on outcomes. 118 FLT3-ITDmut patients and 497 FLT3-ITDwt patients with allo-HSCT were matched 1:3 on the propensity score using a nearest-neighbor matching with a caliper size of 0.2. 430 AML patients were considered, including 116 FLT3-ITDmut patients and 314 FLT3-ITDwt patients. OS (overall survival) and LFS (leukemia-free survival) of FLT3-ITDmut patients were similar to FLT3-ITDwt (2-year OS:78.5% vs 82.6%, P=0.374; 2-year LFS: 75.1% vs 80.8%, P= 0.215). A cut-off of 0.50 was applied to define subgroups with a low or high AR of FLT3-ITD, no significant CIR (cumulative incidence of relapse) and LFS differences were observed between the low AR and high AR groups (2-year CIR: P=0.617; 2-year LFS: P=0.563). CIR and LFS were comparable when patients were grouped according to the presence or absence of NPM1 and FLT3-ITD (2-year CIR: P=0.356; 2-year LFS: P=0.159). Additionally, the CIR and LFS of FLT3-ITDmut and FLT3-ITDwt patients tended to be different after MSD-HSCT (matched-sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation) (2-year CIR: P= 0.072; 2-year LFS: P= 0.084), however, the differences were not observed in patients with haplo-HSCT (2-year CIR: P= 0.59; 2-year LFS: P= 0.794). The presence of MRD before transplantation and non-CR1 were risk factors related to inferior outcomes in a multivariate analysis, regardless of FLT3-ITD or NPM1 status. Our results suggested that allo-HSCT, especially haplo-HSCT, may overcome the adverse effect of FLT3-ITD mutation, regardless of the NPM1 status or AR. Allo-HSCT could be an ideal option for AML patients with FLT3-ITD.

Impact of T-cell Receptor Status on Mutational Landscape and Outcome in T-ALL.

Impact of T-cell Receptor Status on Mutational Landscape and Outcome in T-ALL.

Unmanipulated haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for pediatric de novo acute megakaryoblastic leukemia without Down syndrome in China: A single-center study.

AMKL without DS is a rare but aggressive hematological malignant disease in children, and it is associated with inferior outcomes. Several researchers have regarded pediatric AMKL without DS as high-risk or at least intermediate-risk AML and proposed that upfront allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in first complete remission might improve long-term survival. We conducted a retrospective study with twenty-five pediatric (< 14 years old) AMKL patients without DS who underwent haploidentical HSCT in the Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking University People's Hospital from July 2016 to July 2021. The diagnostic criteria of AMKL without DS were adapted from the FAB and WHO: ≥ 20% blasts in the bone marrow, and those blasts expressed at least one or more of the platelet glycoproteins: CD41, CD61, or CD42. AMKL with DS and therapy related AML was excluded. Children without a suitable closely HLA-matched related or unrelated donor (donors with more than nine out of 10 matching HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DR, and HLA-DQ loci), were eligible to receive haploidentical HSCT. Definition was adapted from international cooperation group. All statistical tests were conducted with SPSS v.24 and R v.3.6.3. The 2-year OS was 54.5 ± 10.3%, and the EFS was 50.9 ± 10.2% in pediatric AMKL without DS undergoing haplo-HSCT. Statistically significantly better EFS was observed in patients with trisomy 19 than in patients without trisomy 19 (80 ± 12.6% and 33.3 ± 12.2%, respectively, P = 0.045), and OS was better in patients with trisomy 19 but with no statistical significance (P = 0.114). MRD negative pre-HSCT patients showed a better OS and EFS than those who were positive (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively). Eleven patients relapsed post HSCT. The median time to relapse post HSCT was 2.1 months (range: 1.0-14.4 months). The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 46.1 ± 11.6%. One patient developed bronchiolitis obliterans and respiratory failure and died at d + 98 post HSCT. AMKL without DS is a rare but aggressive hematological malignant disease in children, and it is associated with inferior outcomes. Trisomy 19 and MRD negative pre-HSCT might contribute to a better EFS and OS. Our TRM was low, haplo-HSCT might be an option for high-risk AMKL without DS.

Unique Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation Protocol for Patients with Hematologic Malignancy

Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) haploidentical (haplo-) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) requires more hematopoietic progenitor and stem cells (HPSCs) to promote engraftment and immune reconstitution and needs a stronger graft-versus-leukemia effect. Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) offer advantages over bone marrow; however, the use of higher-dose non-T cell-depleted (non-TCD) in vitro PBSCs may increase the occurrence of severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). This prospective, single-arm clinical study was performed to investigate using high-dose non-TCD in vitro PBSCs as the graft source, using fludarabine/Ara-C/busulfan (FAB) as the conditioning regimen, using rabbit antithymocyte globulin to remove T cells in vivo, and enhancing GVHD prophylaxis with an IL-2 receptor antagonist in RIC-haplo-HSCT in patients with hematologic malignancies age 50 to 70 years or <50 years with comorbidities (Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index score ≥2) classified as intermediate to high risk. The primary endpoint was day 100 acute GVHD (aGVHD). A total of 47 patients were enrolled; the median age was 52 years (range, 30 to 68 years), the median duration of follow-up was 34 months (range, 2 to 99 months), and the medium-infused doses of mononuclear cells, CD34+ cells, and CD3+ cells were 15.93×108/kg, 8.68×106/kg, and 5.57×108/kg, respectively. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD at day 100 was 30.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.9% to 44.8%), and that of grade III-IV aGVHD was 10.2% (95% CI, .6% to 19.8%). The 2-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 34.9% (95% CI, 19.0% to 50.8%). The 2-year cumulative incidences of localized and extensive cGVHD were 26.1% (95% CI, 11.80% to 40.40%) and 8.7% (95% CI, 3.26% to 20.65%), respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 17.3% (95% CI, 5.1% to 29.5%), the 2-year overall survival rate was 71.2% (95% CI, 57.9% to 84.5%), and the 2-year disease-free survival rate was 66.2% (95% CI, 52.1% to 80.3%). The incidence of aGVHD was not high, and the overall efficacy was good. This study demonstrates that this unique RIC-haplo-PBSC transplantation protocol was effective in treating hematologic malignancies. Nonetheless, larger prospective multicenter clinical trials and experimental studies should be performed to further confirm our findings.

The Impact of Graft CD3+ T-Cell Dose on the Outcome of T-Cell Replete Human Leukocyte Antigen-Mismatched Allogeneic Hematopoietic Peripheral Blood Stem Cells Transplantation.

Data on whether the graft CD3-positive (CD3+) T-cell dose in T-cell-replete human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched allogeneic hematopoietic peripheral blood stem cells transplantation (PBSCT) influences post-transplant outcomes are controversial. Using King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC) Blood and Marrow Transplantation (BMT) Registry database, 52 adult subjects, receiving the first T-cell-replete HLA-mismatched allogeneic hematopoietic PBSCT for acute leukemias or myelodysplastic syndrome, were identified, from January 2017 to December 2020. The cutoff value of graft CD3+ T-cell dose was identified using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) formula and Youden's analysis. Subjects were divided into two cohorts: cohort 1 with low CD3+ T-cell dose (n = 34) and cohort 2 with high CD3+ T-cell dose (n = 18). Correlative analyses were performed between CD3+ T-cell dose and the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), relapse, relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). P-values were two-sided and considered significant when P < 0.05. Subject covariates were displayed. Subject's characteristics were comparable, except for higher nucleated cells and more female donors in the high CD3+ T-cell cohort. The 100-day cumulative incidence of acute GvHD (aGvHD) was 45±7% and 3-year cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD (cGvHD) was 28±6.7%. There was no statistically significant difference between the two cohorts in aGvHD (50% vs. 39%, P = 0.4) or cGvHD (29% vs. 22%, P = 0.7). The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 67.5±16.3% for low compared with 14.3±6.8% for high CD3+ T-cell cohort (P = 0.018). Fifteen subjects relapsed and 24 have died, 13 due to disease relapse. There was an improvement in 2-year RFS (94% vs. 83%; P = 0.0022) and 2-year OS (91% vs. 89%; P = 0.025) in low CD3+ T-cell cohort compared with high CD3+ T-cell cohort. Graft CD3+ T-cell dose is the only significant risk factor for relapse (P = 002), and OS (P = 0.030) in univariate analysis which was maintained in multivariate for relapse (P = 0.003), but not for OS (P = 0.050). Our data suggest that high graft CD3+ T-cell dose is associated with lower risk of relapse, and might improve long-term survival, but has no influence on the risk of developing aGvHD or cGvHD.

The effect of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, decitabine, and busulfan–cyclophosphamide versus busulfan–cyclophosphamide conditioning on relapse in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia evolving from myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial

Relapse remains high in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome-refractory anaemia with excess blasts (RAEB) or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia evolving from myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). We aimed to investigate whether granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and decitabine plus busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning reduced relapse compared with busulfan-cyclophosphamide in this population. We did an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial at six hospitals in China. Eligible patients (aged 14-65 years) had myelodysplastic syndrome-RAEB or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia evolving from myelodysplastic syndrome, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and HSCT comorbidity index of 0-2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning or busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning. Randomisation was done with permuted blocks (block size four) with no stratification and was implemented through an interactive web-based response system, which was independent of study site staff and investigators. G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning comprised G-CSF 5 μg/kg daily subcutaneously (days -17 to -10), decitabine 20 mg/m2 daily intravenously (days -14 to -10), busulfan 3·2 mg/kg daily intravenously (days -7 to -4), and cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg daily intravenously (days -3 and -2). Busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning comprised the same dose and duration of busulfan and cyclophosphamide. The primary endpoint was 2 year cumulative incidence of relapse. All efficacy and safety endpoints were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02744742; the trial is complete. Between April 18, 2016, and Sept 30, 2019, 297 patients were screened for eligibility, 202 of whom were randomly assigned to G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide (n=101) or busulfan-cyclophosphamide (n=101) conditioning. 123 (61%) participants were male and 79 (31%) were female. Median follow-up was 32·4 months (IQR 10·0-43·0). The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 10·9% (95% CI 5·8-17·9) in the G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide group and 24·8% (16·8-33·5) in the busulfan-cyclophosphamide group (hazard ratio 0·39 [95% CI 0·19-0·79]; p=0·011). Within 100 days after transplantation, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events in the G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide group and the busulfan-cyclophosphamide group were infections (34 [34%] and 32 [32%]), acute graft-versus-host disease (30 [30%] and 30 [30%]), and gastrointestinal toxicity (28 [28%] and 29 [29%]). 11 (11%) patients in the G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide group and 13 (13%) in the busulfan-cyclophosphamide group died of adverse events. There were no treatment related deaths. Our results suggest that G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning is a better choice than busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome-RAEB or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia evolving from myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing allogeneic HSCT. This conditioning could be a suitable therapuetic option for this patient population. None. For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Cladribine- and decitabine-containing conditioning regimen has a low post-transplant relapse rate in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

To reduce the risk of relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), there have been continuing efforts to optimize the conditioning regimens. Our study aimed to analyze the risk factors associated with the relapse of relapsed/refractory (R/R), high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) post-transplant and the efficacy of a new conditioning regimen involving decitabine and cladribine. Clinical data of 125 patients with R/R AML, high-risk AML and high-risk MDS who underwent allo-HSCT were collected. In addition, 35 patients with R/R AML, high-risk AML and high-risk MDS received treatment with a new conditioning regimen including decitabine and cladribine. Cox regression analysis was used to identify risk factors associated with OS, RFS and relapse. Among 125 patients who underwent allo-HSCT, CR before allo-HSCT and matched sibling donors were independent protective factors for OS. DNMT3A abnormality was an independent risk factor for both relapse and RFS. Among 35 patients who received a new conditioning regimen containing decitabine and cladribine, only six patients relapsed and 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 11.7%. Moreover, this new regimen showed efficient MRD clearance early after allo-HSCT. The combined decitabine- and cladribine-based conditioning regimen showed a low relapse rate and a high survival without an increased incidence of GVHD or adverse effects and thus has potential for use in allo-HSCT for R/R AML, high-risk AML and high-risk MDS.

Fludarabine plus reduced-intensity busulfan versus fludarabine plus myeloablative busulfan in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) offers a possible cure for patients with relapsed and refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) through potentially beneficial graft versus lymphoma effects. However, allogeneic HCT is associated with high nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Fludarabine with reduced-intensity busulfan (Flu/Bu2) and myeloablative busulfan (Flu/Bu4) are commonly used in conditioning regimens for allogeneic HCT; however, data on their use in patients with NHL is limited. We investigated the effect of busulfan dose on outcomes by comparing Flu/Bu2 and Flu/Bu4 in patients with NHL who underwent allogeneic HCT. Our study included 415 adult patients with NHL who received Flu/Bu2 (315 patients) or Flu/Bu4 (100 patients) between January 2008 and December 2019. All patients were enrolled in the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program 2 of the Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. The primary endpoint was the 5-year overall survival (OS). To minimize potential confounding factors that may influence outcomes, we performed propensity score matching. The 5-year OS was 50.6% (95% confidence interval (CI), 39.4%–60.8%) and 32.2% (95% CI, 22.4–42.4%) in the Flu/Bu2 and Flu/Bu4 groups, respectively (p = 0.006). The hazard ratio comparing the two groups was 2.13 (95% CI, 1.30–3.50; p = 0.003). Both groups had a similar 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (38.2% vs 41.3%; p = 0.581), and the Flu/Bu4 group had a higher cumulative incidence of 5-year NRM (15.7% vs 31.9%; p = 0.043). In this study, Flu/Bu4 was associated with worse OS compared with Flu/Bu2 because of high NRM in patients with NHL.

Prognostic factors of second hematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplantation among hematological malignancy patients relapsed after first hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A single center study.

We aimed to evaluate prognostic factors of a second allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT2) among hematological malignancy patients who have relapsed after the first allo-HSCT(allo-HSCT1). We retrospectively analyzed 199 hematological malignancy patients who received allo-HSCT2 as a salvage treatment post allo-HSCT1 relapse between November 2012 and October 2021. The median age at allo-HSCT2 was 23 (range: 3-60) years. The median time to relapse after HSCT1 was 9 (range: 1-72) months. Prior to allo-HSCT2, patients had the following hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity indexes (HCT-CI): 127 with a score of 0, 52 with a score of 1, and 20 with a score of 2 or greater. Fifty percent of patients received chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy following HSCT1 relapse. Disease status was minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete remission (CR) among 119 patients, MRD-positive CR among 37 patients and non-remission (NR) for 43 patients prior to allo-HSCT2. Allo-HSCT2 was performed from a new donor in 194 patients (97.4%) and 134 patients (67.3%) received a graft with a new mismatched haplotype. The median follow-up time was 24 months (range: 6-98 months), and the 2-year OS and LFS were 43.8% ± 4.0% and 42.1% ± 4.1%, respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 30.0%±4.8% and 38.5%±3.8%, respectively. Cox regression multivariate analysis showed that disease statusof MRD-negative CR, HCT-CI score of 0 prior to allo-HSCT2, and new mismatched haplotype donor were predictive factors of improved OS and LFS compared to patients without these characteristics. Based on these three favorable factors, we developed a predictive scoring system for patients who received allo-HSCT2. Patients with a prognostic score of 3 who had the three factors showed a superior 2-year OS of 63.3% ± 6.7% and LFS of 63.3% ± 6.7% and a lower CIR of 5.5% ± 3.1% than patients with a prognostic score of 0. Allo-HSCT2 is feasible and patients with good prognostic features prior to allo-HSCT2 -disease status of CR/MRD- and HCT-CI score of 0 as well as a second donor with a new mismatched haplotype could have the maximal benefit from the second allo-HSCT. Allo-HSCT2 is feasible and patients with good prognostic features prior to allo-HSCT2 -disease status of CR/MRD- and HCT-CI score of 0 as well as a second donor with a new mismatched haplotype could have the maximal benefit from the second allo-HSCT.

Antihuman T lymphocyte porcine immunoglobulin combined with cyclosporine as first-line immunosuppressive therapy for severe aplastic anemia in China: a large single-center, 10-year retrospective study.

Antihuman T lymphocyte porcine immunoglobulin (p-ATG) has been the most common ATG preparation in immunosuppressive therapy (IST) in Chinese patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) since 2009. This study aimed to evaluate the early hematologic response and long-term outcomes of a large cohort of patients with SAA who received p-ATG plus cyclosporine (CsA) as first-line therapy from 2010 to 2019. This is a single-center retrospective study of medical records. We analyzed the data of 1023 consecutive patients with acquired aplastic anemia (AA) who underwent p-ATG combined with CsA as a first-line IST treatment from 2010 to 2019 at our department. The median age of the patients was 24 (4-75) years, and the median follow-up time was 57.2 months (3 days-137.5 months). There was an early mortality rate of 2.8% with a median death time of 0.9 months (3 days-2.9 months). The overall response rates were 40.6% and 56.1% at 3 and 6 months, respectively. The 5-year cumulative incidences of relapse and clonal evolution were 9.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.2-16.0%] and 4.5% (95% CI = 1.4-10.6%), respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival rates were 83.7% (95% CI = 81.1-86.0%) and 50.4% (95% CI = 47.1-53.5%), respectively. p-ATG combined with CsA for the treatment of AA is effective and safe, and p-ATG can be used as an alternative ATG preparation for the standard IST regimen in areas in which h-ATG is not available.

Intensity of induction regimen and outcomes among adults with Ph+ALL undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are essential for the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) and have allowed for effective, low intensity induction regimens including no or minimal chemotherapy. Whether the use of low intensity induction regimens impacts outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHCT) is less understood. We identified consecutive adult patients with Ph+ ALL undergoing alloHCT in first complete remission (CR1) at our center from 2010 to 2021 and examined the impact of pre-transplant induction intensity on outcomes. Among the 87 identified patients, 44 (51%) received low intensity induction and 43 (49%) received induction with high intensity chemotherapy. Patients receiving low intensity induction were older (median age 60 vs. 47 years, p < 0.01). Following induction, measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity by BCR::ABL1 RT-PCR was similar in the low and high intensity induction cohorts (54% and 52% respectively). Receipt of reduced intensity transplant conditioning was not associated with intensity of induction regimen (39% vs. 19% in low vs. high, respectively, p = 0.06). At a median follow-up of 21 months from transplant, there was no difference between low and high intensity induction with respect to 2-year disease-free survival (58% vs. 56%), 2-year overall survival (62% vs. 63%), 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (9% vs. 17%), and 2-year non-relapse mortality (33% vs. 29%). We also found no difference in outcomes when patients were segmented by both induction and conditioning regimen intensities. Our retrospective analysis suggests that induction intensity does not impact post-transplant outcomes among patients with Ph+ ALL transplanted in CR1.

Allogeneic Blood or Marrow Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma: The Importance of Graft Source

The use of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for graft-versus host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis has revolutionized allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (alloBMT), but there is limited published experience in peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL). We sought to assess outcomes in patients with PTCL who underwent alloBMT with PTCy. We reviewed the charts of all adult patients age ≥18 years who underwent alloBMT with nonmyeloablative conditioning and PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis at the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center between January 2004 and December 2020. Sixty-five patients were identified. The median age was 59 years (range, 24 to 75 years). Lymphoma histology included PTCL not otherwise specified (n=24), anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma (n=14), angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma (n=7), enteropathy-associated T cell lymphoma (n=6), hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma (n=4), and others (n=10). Eleven patients were in first complete remission (17%); the remaining patients were in first partial remission or underwent salvage therapy to at least PR prior to transplantation. Forty-eight patients underwent alloBMT from a haploidentical related donor (74%), 10 from a fully matched donor (15%), and 7 from a mismatched unrelated donor (11%). All patients received fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and total body irradiation (TBI). The graft source was bone marrow (BM) in 46 patients (71%) and peripheral blood (PB) in 19 patients (29%); all patients in the BM cohort received 200 cGy TBI, and most patients in the PB cohort (15 of 19) received 400 cGy TBI. GVHD prophylaxis comprised PTCy, mycophenolate mofetil, and a calcineurin inhibitor or sirolimus. With a median follow-up of 2.8 years (range, 290 days to 14.2 years), the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) for the entire cohort was 49% (95% confidence interval [CI], 38% to 64%), and the 2-year overall survival (OS) was 55% (95% CI, 44% to 69%). Outcomes were significantly improved in those receiving PB compared to those receiving BM, including a 2-year PFS of 79% (95% CI 63% to 100%) versus 39% (95% CI, 27% to 56%), 2-year OS of 84% (95% CI, 69% to 100%) versus 46% (95% CI, 33% to 63%), and 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse of 5% (95% CI, 0 to 16%) versus 33% (95% CI, 19% to 46%), with no difference in GVHD and nonrelapse mortality. AlloBMT with PTCy is safe and well-tolerated in patients with PTCL. Our data suggest that increasing the TBI dose to 400 cGy and using PB allografts may offer improved disease control and better survival outcomes, though additional studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in 2nd Line DLBCL in 2022, Still the Standard of Care ? a Monocentric Experience

Introduction: Patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after frontline chemotherapy have a dismal prognosis. Salvage chemotherapy followed by high dose consolidation chemotherapy supported with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can achieve cure in about 50%, and remains the standard of care for fit patients under 70 yo. Nevertheless, this approach is less effective for patients with primo-refractory disease (refractory to 1st line CT or experiencing relapse during the 12 months after completion of 1st line treatment). With the advent of autologous CAR T cells targeting CD19 in second line of treatment, the place of ASCT must be redefined based on robust clinical data to offer candidate patients their best available treatment. As part of this "choose wisely" approach, we report the outcomes of patients receiving ASCT as consolidation therapy at our center. Methods: we report the retrospective experience of a monocentric transplantation program. Inclusion criteria were: 1) R/R DLBCL 2) In response to salvage therapy according to Deauville score criteria. Complete response (CR) was defined as Deauville scores 1-2-3, partial response (PR) as Deauville 4 or 5. 3) ASCT between 2010 and 2020 at IPC, Marseille 4) Conditioning regimen with BEAM or Bendamustine-Eam. The patients were stratified according to the NCCN-IPI in 2 groups: low risk (NCCN-IPI≤3) and high risk (NCCN-IPI>3). Univariate analyses included age, aaIPI, NCCN IPI and disease status pre ASCT. Multivariate analyse included disease status pre ASCT and NCCN-IPI Results: Ninety eight patients with a median age of 57 yo (26-71) were included. Most of them were primary refractory (52 patients, 53%). Patients received a median number of 2 lines of chemotherapy (2-4) before ASCT. At time of reinjection, all were in response (78% were in CR and 22% in PR). With a median follow up of 42 months (33-60), 3 year progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 68% and 82% respectively, and 3 year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 27%. In the whole group, 12 month NRM was 2%.Age was not associated with an increased risk of NRM (SHR 2.3 CI95 [0.44-12.24], p:0.3) . Three year PFS and OS were significantly higher in patients who underwent ASCT in CR: 3 years PFS 74% CR vs. 43% PR (HR 3.04 95CI [1.5-6.17], p: 0.001.), 3 year OS 88% CR vs 61% PR (HR 4.53 95CI [1.74-11.81 ], p< 0.001.). This was confirmed by multivariate analyse (HR 3.08 95CI [1.50,6.29] , p=0.0021 for PFS and HR 5.4 95CI [1.99-14.65 ], p=0.0009 for OS). Disease status at the time of ASCT and NCCN IPI >3 were strongly associated with PFS and OS (3 year PFS 71% CR and NCCN IPI ≤3 vs. 17% PR and NCCNIPI >3 (HR 5.62 95CI [2.03-15.54], p<.001 ) . Three year OS for CR and NCCN IPI ≤3 vs. PR and NCCNIPI >3 were: 86% vs. 17% (HR 16.15 95CI [4.87-53.57], p<.001). In the primary refractory group, 3 year PFS, OS and CIR were 70%, 75% and 22% respectively. No differences were observed with non primary refractory group (3 years PFS 66% vs. 70%, p=0.56 , 3 years OS 90% vs 75%, p= 0.077) Conclusion : We confirm that ASCT provides good disease control with few toxicity and remains a valid option in 2nd line DLBCL until 70 years of age. However, our results appear to be superior to previously published reports, even more in the group of primary refractory diseases, possibly due to a strict selection of patients achieving complete response after salvage therapy. Disease status before ASCT remains the most relevant parameter to predict survival, and should be incorporated in treatment decision algorithms to elect the optimal treatment sequence. Questions remain about the best strategy for patients in PR before ASCT, and we await long term results of randomized phase 3 CART cells studies (ZUMA7, TRANSFORM). According to our results, given the unfavorable prognosis of the group of patients in PR and NCCN IPI ≥ 3 could be the subgroup of patients that would most certainly benefit from CART cells. In conclusion, the best 2nd line strategy between ASCT and CAR T cells should be decided according to response quality, the access to CAR T cells program and economic impact. Moreover, the combination of pre treatment prognostic factors ( NCCN IPI) and pre-ASCT response to treatment could be even more halpful to choose the best consolidation treatment. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

A Novel Risk Stratification Model for Cytogenetically Normal Acute Myeloid Leukemia with FLT3-ITD Mutation

Introduction Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutations are observed in about 30 % of patients with newly diagnosed cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML) and has now been acknowledged to be associated with a poor survival. However, long-term follow-up revealed a high degree of heterogeneity in the clinical prognosis of these patients. Further risk stratification to identify high-risk patients is urgently needed. Methods A total of 106 patients with CN-AML and FLT3-ITD mutations who visited the People's Hospital of Peking University from 2007-2019 were included, and target region sequencing was performed by 266 gene panel. Patients were randomly divided into training and validation cohort according to the ratio of 7:3. Molecular and clinical data in training cohort were incorporated to construct a nomogram model. Cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), Relapse-free survival (RFS) and survival by allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and consolidation chemotherapy were compared. Results Clinical variables, genes, and genetic groups with mutations occurring in more than 10 patients were enrolled for univariate analysis of RFS (allo-HSCT was recorded as a censored event). And to avoid bias patients with RFS ≤ 4.57 months (median interval from complete remission to allo-HSCT) would be excluded from the subsequent analyses unless receiving an allo-HSCT was treated as a censored event. Three variables were eventually entered into the nomogram analysis: DNMT3A mutation (+ vs. -), minimal residual disease detected by multiparameter flow cytometry (MPFC-MRD) at the end of the 2nd course of consolidation chemotherapy (CON2) (+ vs. -, represents ≥ vs. ＜0.01%), typical ITDs (+ vs. -, represents ITDs have insertion sequences that exactly match wild-type FLT3 gene vs. ITDs have insertion sequences containing other exogenous nucleotides). And the model demonstrated good discrimination in both the training and validation cohort with C-index value of 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.7-0.86), 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.95), respectively. The Nomogram model was constructed as: Score = 1.44×DNMT3A mutation+2.16×MFPC-MRD-0.94×typical ITDs (Figure 1, A). According to the variables in nomogram model, patients with risk scores ≤ 0 were assigned to the low-risk subgroup (N = 39) and the rest were assigned to the high-risk subgroup (N = 67). The 5-year RFS was significantly higher in the low-risk group than in the high-risk group (training cohort, HR 3.68 [1.16-11.66], P = 0.002; validation group, HR 4.45 [1.52-13.00], P = 0.03) (Figure 1, B-C). We then interrogated the effect of consolidation chemotherapy and allo-HSCT as post-remission therapies in the two risk subgroups. Allo-HSCT did not further improve the prognosis of patients in the low-risk group (allo-HSCT vs. chemotherapy, 5-year CIR, HR 0.46 [0.11-1.93], P = 0.29; 5-year RFS, HR 0.41 [0.09-1.86], P = 0.24; 5-year survival, HR 0.91 [0.18-4.68], P = 0.91) (Figure 2, A-D). In contrast, in the high-risk group of patients, transplantation showed a significant survival benefit (5-year CIR, HR 0.21 [0.06-0.74], P = 0.01; 5-year RFS, HR 0.23 [0.06-0.80], P = 0.01; 5-year survival, HR 0.25 [0.06-1.11], P = 0.05) (Figure 2, E-H). Conclusion Our study suggests that risk stratification by our novel nomogram scoring system can identify patients at high risk of relapse in CN-AML with FLT3-ITD mutations and allo-HSCT further benefits their prognosis. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Clinical Characteristics and Stratified Analysis of Ph-like Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children: A Retrospective Study from China

Objective: Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (All), also known as BCR-abl1 like ALL, has a negative BCR-abl1 fusion gene, and the gene expression profile overlaps significantly with Ph+ ALL. PH like ALL contains a variety of genomic changes, including ABL class fusion (abl1, abl2, CSF1R, PDGFRB, PDGFRA); JAK pathway gene (JAK2), chemokine receptor gene (CRLF2) or MEK-ERK pathway genes, that activate kinases and cytokine receptors. Herein, we analyzed the clinical characteristics and outcome of 24 childhood Ph-like ALL cases in single center, and performed a stratified analysis. Methods: This retrospective study of Ph-like B-ALL other than Ph+ ALL was performed in patients aged 1-16 years and treated from April 2015 to October 2020 according to the CCCG-ALL-2015 protocols in our center in China. The baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients were collected. The 4-year event-free survival (EFS) and 4-year overall survival (OS) were estimated by use of Kaplan-Meier methods, and the 4-year cumulative incidence of relapse was calculated by use of a competing risk model gray test. The comparison was performed between groups by use of log rank test. Results: We identified 24 pediatric patients with newly diagnosed Ph-like B-ALL, including 16 males (66.7%) and 8 females (33.3%). The median age was 7 years old (1-16 years old). Median leukocyte count was 31.8 (2.65-846.5) × 10^9/L。4(17%) of 24 patients were PDGFRB fusion-positive, 2 (8%) were ABL1 fusion-positive, 2 (8%) were ABL2 fusion-positive, 1 (4%) were PDGFRA fusion-positive, 1 (4%) were JAK2 fusion-positive, and 14 (59%) were CRLF2 fusion-positive. The 4-year EFS was 70.6% (95% CI, 60·5-79·1), the 4-year OS was 81·1% (95% CI, 68·6-87·5), and the 4-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 16.7%. Overall survival was significantly different between the groups (p=0·037), that were 100% in patients who were ABL1 fusion positive, 92.9% in those who were CRLF2 fusion-positive, 50% in those who were ABL2 fusion-positive, and 49% in those who were PDGFRB fusion-positive. Conclusion: Ph-like ALL in children are characterized by an older age and a high white blood cell count at diagnosis. Ph-like ALL is a heterogeneous group of disorders, Overall survival was significantly different between the different genomic groups. Children with abl1 positive or CRLF2 positive had better survival, while those with PDGFRB positive or abl2 positive had a poor outcome. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia with Pdgfrb Fusions: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Objective: PDGFRB fusions in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is rare. PDGFRB fusions was mainly observed in B-ALL, but also in T-ALL. Previous studies were mostly limited to anecdotal cases, suggesting that this subtype of ALL had low rate of remission and poor prognosis. The addition of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) to intensive chemotherapy may improve the outcome, but lack of long-term survival data. Herein, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics, survival and prognostic factors for 28 pediatric patients with PDGFRB fusions ALL. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study included pediatric patients with newly diagnosed PDGFRB fusion ALL after treatments according to the CCCG-ALL-2015 and CCCG-ALL-2020 protocols from April 2015 to April 2022 in 10 hospitals in China. All patients completed the followed up. The baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes of these patients, including complete remission, drug resistance, relapse, treatment-related mortality and minimal residual disease (MRD) at end of induction therapy, as well as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) were collected. The outcome was compared between patients treated with and without TKI. Fisher test and nonparametric rank sum test were used for comparative analysis. 4-year event-free survival (EFS) and 4-year overall survival (OS) were estimated by use of Kaplan-Meier methods, and the 4-year cumulative incidence of relapse was calculated by use of a competing risk model gray test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by use of Cox regression. Results: We identified 28 pediatric patients with newly diagnosed PDGFRB fusion ALL, which accounted for approximately 0.5% of childhood ALL. In all 28 patients, 21 (75%) were male and 7 (25%) were female; the median age was 10 (1-16) years old; median white blood cell (WBC) was 29.8 (1.6-627.7) × 10^9/L; 24 (85.7%) were acute B-lymphoblastic leukemia and 4 (14.3%) were acute T-lymphoblastic leukemia; one case (3.5%) was observed accompanied by the CNS involvement at diagnosis. Twenty of the patients received TKI treatment. Only 6 patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. For all 28 patients, the median follow-up was 25.5 (3-77) months, the 4-year EFS was 29.2% (95% CI, 13.6-36.4), the 4-year OS was 42.1% (95% CI, 30.6-61.4), and the 4-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 58% (95% CI, 45·6-70·1). Patients in TKI group had a high rate of complete remission after induction therapy compared with those in no-TKI group (90% vs 63.6%). However, no significant differences were observed in the 4-year EFS and 4-year OS between TKI group and no-TKI group (EFS, 21.1% vs 43.8%, P=0.925; OS, 50.1% vs 36.5%, P=0.807). The cumulative incidences of relapse between these two groups also have no remarkable differences (P >0.05). Among the 6 patients who underwent HSCT, 2 patients who achieved CR1 survived and 4 died. Univariate analysis showed that minimal residual disease (MRD) ≥10-4 after induction therapy for D46 and IKZF1 positive had a poor prognosis (all P <0.05). MRD≥10-4 at the end of induction therapy is an independent risk factor for poor prognosis (hazard ratio of event-free, 9.101 [95% CI 2.03-40.86], P =0·004, compared to those with a MRD of <10-4). Conclusion: Pediatric ALL patients with PDGFRB fusions have a poor outcome. This subtype of ALL is associated with high-risk clinical features such as older age, high WBC count at diagnosis, high MRD after induction therapy, and increased risk of leukemia relapse. The addition of TKI to chemotherapy can improve the early remission rate of treatment, but does not improve the long-term survival. Profitably, the TKI treatment can provide an opportunity for subsequent treatment, including HSCT. Additionally, HSCT has indeed potential to reduce the relapse rate for this subtype patients. HSCT is recommended for this subtype patients who achieve CR1. The MRD≥10-4 or more at the end of induction therapy was independently predictive factor for unfavorable outcome and stratified treatment based on MRD may improve survival of these patients. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Impact of Timing of Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: A University of California Hematologic Malignancies Consortium Retrospective Analysis

Background: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is potentially curable when high-dose methotrexate-based induction is followed with intensive consolidation, which can consist of non-myeloablative chemotherapy (NMA-C) or myeloablative chemotherapy (MAC) followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT). Although the efficacy of autoHCT has been demonstrated, very limited data is available regarding the optimal timing of autoHCT, i.e., to transplant in first complete remission (CR1) or second or later CR (CR2+). Moreover, the choice of consolidation differs between centers. Recently, the CALGB 51101 trial showed that MAC leads to improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to NMA-C, but limiting this finding are that more patients who were randomized to receive NMA-C went off treatment prior to consolidation, either as a result of progression or death. To clarify the optimal timing of autoHCT in PCNSL and to support the findings of the CALGB 51101 trial, we conducted a multi-center retrospective analysis. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients ≥18 years treated at the University of California campuses in Davis, Fresno, Irvine, and Los Angeles who were diagnosed between January 2005-July 2021. Patients were divided into three cohorts: cohort A included those who underwent autoHCT in CR1, cohort B included those who underwent autoHCT in CR2+, and cohort C included those who underwent NMA-C in CR1 (irrespective of whether or not they underwent autoHCT in CR2+). In the first set of analyses, outcomes were compared between cohort A and B, and in the second set, outcomes were compared between cohort A and C. CR was defined by the lack of enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging. Patients in cohort A and B who were not in CR at the time of autoHCT, and those in cohort C not in CR at the time of NMA-C, were excluded. The primary endpoint was 2-year overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were 2-year progression-free survival (PFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM) and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). Time-to-event analyses were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared by a log-rank test. NRM and CIR were calculated through a competing risk model, with NRM serving as a competing risk for CIR and vice versa. Univariate analyses were performed via Cox proportional hazards model. Patients alive at the end of the study were censored at their last follow-up date. Results: 69 unique patients were included, and their baseline characteristics are described in Table 1. 36 patients were included in cohort A, 10 in cohort B, and 28 in cohort C, 5 of whom underwent autoHCT in CR2+. The median follow-up times of cohorts A, B, and C were 67, 73, and 52 months, respectively. The 2-year OS from the time of diagnosis in cohort A was 94.3% (95% CI, 86.9-100) vs 90.0% (95% CI, 73.2-100) in cohort B (P=0.42), and 84.0% (95% CI, 70.7-99.8) in cohort C (P=0.072). The 2-year PFS from the time of transplant in cohorts A vs B were 91.2% (95% CI, 82.2-100) vs 67.5 (95% CI, 43-100) (P=0.008). The 2-year PFS from the time of diagnosis in cohorts A vs C were 91.4% (95% CI, 82.6-100) vs. 80.5% (95% CI, 66.4-97.6) (P=0.0016) (Figure 1). The 2-year NRM and CIR for cohorts A vs B were 5.8% vs 21.2% (P=0.179) and 2.9% vs 11.3% (P=0.037), respectively. The 2-year NRM and CIR for cohorts A vs C were 5.8% vs 3.6% (P=0.74) and 2.9% vs 16.0% (P<0.001) respectively. Univariate analyses including all 69 unique patients were performed for OS and PFS, and there were no significant associations based on age <60 vs ≥60 years, gender, ECOG performance status ≤1 vs ≥2, center of origin, and thiotepa/busulfan/cyclophosphamide (TBC) vs thiotepa/carmustine (TT-BCNU) conditioning. Conclusion: Although limited by the sample size and retrospective nature, whether autoHCT for PCNSL was performed in CR1 or CR2+ did not impact OS in our analysis, but CIR was higher and PFS was lower when autoHCT was performed in CR2+. Supporting the Alliance trial, autoHCT in CR1 produced longer PFS than NMA-C and patients deemed appropriate candidates for MAC consolidation in CR1 should be considered for autoHCT in this setting. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal