The purpose of this report was to compare the numerical analysis for different cooling efficiency of a cable tunnel system when installing one additional cable trough or three cable troughs for cable circuit 100% or 70% heat load. Cable tunnel system is widely known for it is use for high voltage transmission in an underground. Due to the cables generating large quantities of heat, water pipes and air ventilation were used in the tunnel to cool down the transmission cable. To investigate the cooling efficiency of a tunnel, research for benchmark case was carried out. A Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) benchmark analysis about 2D natural convection inside the square cavity was investigated to further understand the air movement inside the square medium. Ansys Fluent was carried out for benchmark cases of heat transfer natural convection inside the square cavity and to check whether Ansys Fluent can be used for any CFD and heat transfer purposes by validating the results with previous studies. The benchmark case used a 2D square with different active temperature side walls and adiabatic walls for top and bottom side. From the benchmark simulations with different Rayleigh Number, a number representing buoyancy-driven of a fluid from 103 to 105 affected air differently and the heat transfer natural convection inside the square. At different Rayleigh Number air forms a recirculation passing the active walls and adiabatic walls. After investigated the benchmark, the results were used to validate with previous studies. To validate the results was by using Nusselt Number, ratio of convective to conductive. The benchmark case results were validated and Ansys Fluent proven can be used for CFD and heat transfer purposes. Two 3D cable tunnel were modelled with 100-meter length after concluded the benchmark. The two tunnel models were based on the number of cable troughs installed. The first tunnel was with one cable trough and two cable circuits on the bottom, as for the second tunnel was with one bottom cable circuit and three cable troughs. Cable tunnel simulations were based on cable circuit for 100% heat load and 70% heat load with each heat load case was given different water flow rate of 4.25 L/s and 6.5 L/s. A total of eight scenario cases were carried out to determine which provided a better cooling efficiency choice. The analysis for cable tunnel cases on how the copper cables cooled down through heat transfer of natural convection inside the cable trough, which the heat then was removed from the cable circuit by air and continue to the outside of the tunnel. During the heat transfer processes, conductivity was present as not all heat were removed by air and water, but continue to through the walls of the tunnel and to the ground soil. Based on the simulations, a cable tunnel with three cable troughs was proven more cooling efficiency compared tunnel with one cable trough. Some scenarios did not meet the criteria, due to insufficient heat relocation by air and water. The cooling efficiency was determined by which has the better balance heat relocation by air, water, and ground, also considering the comfort and safety of human inside the tunnel.
Read full abstract