I am not a crafty person. I do not enjoy working with my hands all that much. So when I started to read over the book Makerspaces: A Practical Guide for Librarians, the first thing I thought was “I don't think so!” However, the idea is actually a pretty good one. As one librarian who has a makerspace in her library put it: “Not only do we continue the important work of preservation and access that we have done all along, but…libraries will support content creation” (p. 15). All the libraries profiled in the book are either public, community, or academic. No special libraries participated in a survey that the author conducted on makerspaces in libraries in 2013. Looking at it from one perspective, special libraries—or in this case, medical or health sciences libraries—already support content creation when we support our patrons in their, or our own, endeavors to publish research results. Maybe someday we may actually be able to publish the journals or books in our own makerspaces! In any case, many of the libraries use their makerspaces to enhance their schools' curricula, particularly in science, technology, engineering, and medicine (STEM) education, and in problem-based learning. Libraries also conduct workshops and activity programs in their makerspaces, as well as let their patrons use the makerspaces for their own projects. They might start the space because they saw a need that it would fill for their community. They are now participating in maker fairs and camps, and some who have no space in their libraries have a mobile makerspace. According to some of the librarians working in the libraries profiled in the book, not every library will, or can, or should do everything. A makerspace can have anything from knitting supplies and Legos to 3D printers and Raspberry Pi. Depending on space, budget, and your makerspace users, pick what is most popular and work from there. You do not need every piece of equipment or tool; you may be able to use equipment from other departments, if you are an academic library, for instance. Some special considerations include noise, dirt and mess, electricity, safety, and ventilation, as well as space. The Oakland, California, Public Library has a tool lending library (full disclosure: my library is right down the street). As always when a library is thinking of adding a program or service, the staff still looks at space, budget, staffing, patron interest and feedback, measures of success, and so forth. The author, an academic librarian, does fairly well discussing these issues throughout the book in the context of the profiled libraries. I like that the author let the librarians speak about their own libraries. John. J. Burke does a good job of explaining the history and background of making and makerspaces. The results of the survey are included in an appendix. The tables and figures are numerous, although I am not sure they really increase the book's utility. There is a bibliography that includes the references from the chapters; are both necessary? The index is adequate. The author's basic purpose and premise for the book are that every library will become a makerspace in one way or another. And he may be right. While I was working on this review, I read an article about GE starting a makerspace in one of its subsidiaries [1]. If you know nothing about makerspaces or if you would like to start one for your library, this book is a good place to start.