The arterial sheath remains a cause of vascular complications, restricted mobility, and discomfort in patients who have undergone percutaneous interventional procedures. The rate of vascular complications and bleeding increases with longer sheath dwell times. Larger sheath sizes further elevate this risk, as might the administration of antithrombotic agents and intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Arterial closure devices have been advocated as a means of increasing patient comfort and facilitating rapid ambulation after interventional procedures, while possibly decreasing complication rates. Arterial closure with the 8Fr or 10Fr suture-based Prostar-Plus (Perclose Inc., Redwood City, California) has previously been shown to provide effective hemostasis. Use of the 6Fr suture-based Techstar has been shown to be effective for closure of 6Fr sheaths, but use of the smaller 6Fr device for 7Fr and 8Fr holes has not been systematically examined. Although the 8Fr device can provide hemostasis for 8Fr sheaths effectively, the current version requires subcutaneous dissection with formation of a soft tissue tract from the skin to the level of the artery. Such a tract can lead to continuous oozing, particularly in the presence of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade. Potentially, such a tract may also increase the risk of infection. Therefore, use of a smaller device to close the hole formed by a larger sheath, without the need for tract formation, could represent an advance in suture-based arterial closure. The goal of this study was to determine if such an approach is safe and effective. • • • The Closer trial is a prospective registry of 380 patients conducted at 10 centers in the United States from March 2000 to December 2000. Of these, 160 patients undergoing coronary or peripheral intervention through 7Fr to 8 Fr sheaths had percutaneous sutures deployed before sheath placement (“preclose” arm), with tying of sutures after sheath removal. The preclose arm of the Closer trial was prespecified and independently powered for analysis. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. The technique of preclosure involves initial placement of a smaller size sheath than the size intended for the procedure (Figure 1). Specifically, a 6Fr sheath was placed initially. An angiogram of the femoral artery was performed to ensure placement of the sheath above the bifurcation of the superficial femoral artery and the profunda femoris branch. A femoral artery diameter of at least 5 mm and absence of any significant atheroma at the puncture site were required. If these conditions were met, then the sheath was exchanged over a guidewire for the 6Fr Closer device. The device was positioned in the artery, the sutures deployed, and the device removed over the wire, with placement of the 7Fr or 8Fr sheath. The interventional procedure was performed and once completed, the sheath was removed and the sutures tied, obtaining hemostasis. If the operator elected to maintain arterial access during this last step, the wire was reintroduced as the knot was tightened, with the wire removed just before the knot was cinched. The prespecified historical control consisted of interventional patients randomized to manual compression from the Suture To Ambulate aNd Discharge (STAND II) trial. The primary safety end point was the incidence of 30-day major groin complications, whereas the primary efficacy end point was time to discharge, measured from the time of sheath removal to the time the patient left the hospital. Secondary end points included time to hemostasis and ambulation, as well as device and procedural success. Differences in means were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Tests of significance were performed using the nonparametric Wilcoxon method. Statistical calculations were performed with Intercooled Stata 6.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, Texas) and Microsoft Excel 5.0 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, Washington). The mean activated clotting time was 232 seconds in the Closer patients. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, other than more From the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland Ohio; Evanston Hospital, Evanston, Illinois; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Arkansas Heart Hospital, Little Rock, Arkansas; Arizona Heart Institute, Phoenix, Arizona; Sacred Heart Hospital, Pensacola, Florida; Fountain Valley Regional Hospital, Fountain Valley, California; and the St. Joseph’s Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia. Dr. Bhatt’s address is: Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine/Desk F25, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44195. E-mail: bhattd@ccf.org. Manuscript received August 29, 2001; revised manuscript received and accepted November 27, 2001.