30-day Major Adverse Cardiac Events Research Articles

Safety and efficiency of implementation of high-sensitivity troponin T in the assessment of emergency department patients with cardiac chest pain.

For emergency department (ED) patients with cardiac chest pain, introduction of high-sensitivity troponin (hsTnT) pathways has been associated with reductions in length of stay of less than 1h. At two urban Canadian sites, we introduced hsTnT on January 26, 2016. While the prior diagnostic algorithm required troponin testing at 0 and 6h, serial hsTnT serial testing was conducted at 0 and 3h. We identified consecutive patients who presented with cardiac chest pain from January 1, 2015, to March 31, 2017, along with 30-day outcomes. The primary outcome was a missed 30-day major adverse cardiac event, (MACE) defined as death, revascularization, or readmission for myocardial infarction occurring in a patient-discharged home with a minimizing diagnosis and without cardiac-specific follow-up. Secondary outcomes included admission rate, ED length of stay, and MACE. We compared pre- and post- implementation periods using descriptive methods and repeated this analysis in patients with noncardiac chest pain. We collected 5585 patients with cardiac chest pain, (2678 pre- and 2907 post-introduction) and 434 had (7.8%, 95% CI 7.1 to 8.5%) MACE, with 1 missed MACE. (0.2%, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.3%). Admission rate was stable at 24.1% pre- and 23.7% while median length of stay decreased from 464 to 285 min, a difference of 179 min. (95% CI 61 to 228 min). For 11,611 patients with noncardiac chest pain, admission rate (9%) and length of stay (191 versus 193 min) remained constant. Implementation of hsTnT for evaluation of ED chest pain patients was safe and associated with a 3-h decrease in length of stay.

Effectiveness of accelerated diagnostic protocols for reducing emergency department length of stay in patients presenting with chest pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

In recent years, there has been an increase in the use of accelerated diagnostic protocols (ADPs) and high-sensitivity troponin assays (hsTn) for the assessment of chest pain in emergency departments (EDs). This study aimed to quantitatively summarize the operational and clinical outcomes of ADPs implemented for patients with suspected cardiac chest pain. To be considered eligible for inclusion, studies must have implemented some form of ADP within the ED for evaluating adult (age ≥18 years) patients presenting with chest pain using Tn assays. The primary outcome was ED length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients admitted and the proportion with 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Thirty-seven articles involving 404,566 patients met the inclusion criteria, including five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 32 observational studies. A significant reduction in total ED LOS was reported in 22 observational studies and four RCTs. Emergency departments with longer baseline ED LOS showed significantly larger reductions in LOS after ADP implementation. This observed association persisted after adjusting for both the change in serial Tn measurement interval and transition from conventional Tn assay to an hsTn assay (β = -0.26; 95% CI, -0.43 to -0.10). Three studies reported an increase in the proportion of patients admitted after introducing an ADP, one of which was significant while 15 studies reported a significant decrease in admission proportion. There was moderate heterogeneity among the 13 studies that reported MACE proportions, with a non-significant pooled risk ratio of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.86-1.04). Implementation of ADPs for chest pain presentations decreases ED LOS, most noticeably within sites with a high baseline LOS; this decreased LOS is seen even in the absence of any change in troponin assay type. The decrease in LOS occurred alongside reductions in hospital admissions, while not increasing MACE. The observed benefits translated across multiple countries and health regions.

Impact of admission glucose and 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events on patients with chest pain in an emergency setting: insights from the China EMPACT registry.

Although the association between admission glucose (AG) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is well-documented, its relationship with 30-day MACE in patients presenting with cardiac chest pain remains unclarified. In light of this, this study aims to examine the correlation between AG levels and the incidence of MACE in patients with chest pain in an emergency setting. We consecutively enrolled patients who presented to the emergency department for chest pain symptoms within 24 h from the EMPACT cohort in Eastern China (clinicaltrials.gov, Identifier: NCT02536677). The primary outcome was 30-day MACE, including all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, urgent target vessel revascularization, stroke, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac arrest (CA). The associations of AG levels with 30-day MACE were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression models. Among 1,705 patients who were included in this study, 154 (9.03%) patients met the primary outcome at 30 days. The average age of the patients was 65.23 ± 12.66 years, with 1,028 (60.29%) being male and 500 (29.33%) having diabetes. The median AG levels were 7.60 mmol/L (interquartile range: 6.30-10.20). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed significant differences in the 30-day MACE risk (P < 0.001 according to the log-rank test). We found that the highest AG level (Q4) was associated with increased MACE risk compared with the lowest AG level [adjusted hazard radio (aHR): 2.14; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2-3.815; P = 0.010]. In addition, Q4 level was also associated with increased all-cause death risk (aHR: 3.825; 95% CI: 1.613-9.07; P = 0.002) and increased CA risk (aHR: 3.14; 95% CI: 1.251-7.884; P = 0.015). An elevated AG level significantly correlates with a higher incidence of 30-day MACE in patients with acute chest pain. The findings reveal the importance of managing AG levels to potentially reduce the risk of adverse cardiac events.

Association of a Novel Electronic Form for Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment With Reduction in Cardiac Consultations and Testing: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Preoperative cardiac risk assessment is an integral part of preoperative evaluation; however, there is significant variation among providers, leading to inappropriate referrals for cardiology consultation or excessive low-value cardiac testing. We implemented a novel electronic medical record (EMR) form in our preoperative clinics to decrease variation. This study aimed to investigate the impact of the EMR form on the preoperative utilization of cardiology consultation and cardiac diagnostic testing (echocardiograms, stress tests, and cardiac catheterization) and evaluate postoperative outcomes. A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients who underwent outpatient preoperative evaluation prior to an elective surgery over 2 years were divided into 2 cohorts: from July 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022 (pre-EMR form implementation), and from July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023 (post-EMR form implementation). Demographics, comorbidities, resource utilization, and surgical characteristics were analyzed. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for differences between the 2 cohorts. The primary outcomes were the utilization of preoperative cardiology consultation, cardiac testing, and 30-day postoperative major adverse cardiac events (MACE). A total of 25,484 patients met the inclusion criteria. Propensity score matching yielded 11,645 well-matched pairs. The post-EMR form, matched cohort had lower cardiology consultation (pre-EMR form: n=2698, 23.2% vs post-EMR form: n=2088, 17.9%; P<.001) and echocardiogram (pre-EMR form: n=808, 6.9% vs post-EMR form: n=591, 5.1%; P<.001) utilization. There were no significant differences in the 30-day postoperative outcomes, including MACE (all P>.05). While patients with "possible indications" for cardiology consultation had higher MACE rates, the consultations did not reduce MACE risk. Most algorithm end points, except for active cardiac conditions, had MACE rates <1%. In this cohort study, preoperative cardiac risk assessment using a novel EMR form was associated with a significant decrease in cardiology consultation and testing utilization, with no adverse impact on postoperative outcomes. Adopting this approach may assist perioperative medicine clinicians and anesthesiologists in efficiently decreasing unnecessary preoperative resource utilization without compromising patient safety or quality of care.

Postoperative outcomes in patients with anemia undergoing carotid revascularization

BackgroundPreoperative anemia is associated with worse postoperative morbidity and mortality after major vascular procedures. Limited research has examined the optimal method of carotid revascularization in patients with anemia. Therefore, we aim to compare the postoperative outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA), transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS), and transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) among patients with anemia. Study designThis is a retrospective review of patients with anemia undergoing CEA, TFCAS, and TCAR in the Vascular Quality Initiative database between 2016 and 2023. We defined anemia as a preoperative hemoglobin level of <13 g/dL in men and <12 g/dL in women. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Logistic regression models were used for multivariate analyses. ResultsOur study included 40,383 CEA (59.3%), 9159 TFCAS (13.5%), and 18,555 TCAR (27.3%) cases in patients with anemia. TCAR patients were older and had more medical comorbidities than CEA and TFCAS patients. TCAR was associated with a decreased 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-0.59; P < .001), in-hospital MACE (aOR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.46-0.75; P < .001) compared with TFCAS. Additionally, TCAR was associated with a 20% decrease in the risk of 30-day mortality (aOR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65-0.98; P = .03) and a similar risk of in-hospital MACE (aOR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77-1.01; P = .07) compared with CEA. Furthermore, TFCAS was associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality (aOR, 2; 95% CI, 1.5-2.68; P < .001) and in-hospital MACE (aOR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.4-2; P < .001) compared with CEA. ConclusionsIn this multi-institutional national retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database, TFCAS was associated with a high risk of 30-day mortality and in-hospital MACE compared with CEA and TCAR in patients with anemia. TCAR was associated with a lower risk of 30-day mortality compared with CEA. These findings suggest TCAR as the optimal minimally invasive procedure for carotid revascularization in patients with anemia.

Associations Between Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Score and Long-Term Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Analysis of More Than 27,000 Patients

BackgroundThe dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) score was developed to identify patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who are likely to derive benefit (score ≥ 2) or harm (score < 2) from extended DAPT beyond 1 year after PCI in terms of ischemic and bleeding outcomes. We examined the associations between DAPT score at index PCI and long-term mortality from an all-comers PCI registry in patients receiving DAPT according to the standard of care. MethodsWe retrospectively examined prospectively collected data from the Melbourne Interventional Group PCI database (2005-2018) and grouped patients as having DAPT score ≥ 2 or < 2. Long-term mortality was assessed from the Australian National Death Index linkage. The primary end point was long-term mortality as determined using survival analysis. Secondary end points included in-hospital events and 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularisation. ResultsOf 27,740 study patients, 9402 (33.9%) had DAPT score ≥ 2. Patients with DAPT score ≥ 2 were younger, included more women, and had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. Patients with DAPT score ≥ 2 had higher in-hospital mortality (3.0% vs 1.0%), major bleeding (2.3% vs 1.6%), 30-day MACE (7.1% vs 3.1%), and long-term mortality at a median follow-up of 5.17 years (21.9% vs 16.5%) P < 0.001 for all. ConclusionsOne-third of all-comer patients undergoing PCI had a DAPT score ≥ 2 with greater short-term ischemic and bleeding risk, and higher long-term mortality. Risk assessment with the DAPT score may guide the duration and intensity of DAPT beyond the early post-PCI period.

High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T and Frailty Predict Short-Term Mortality in Patients ≥75 Years Undergoing Emergency Abdominal Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study.

An elevated cardiac troponin concentration is a prognostic factor for perioperative cardiac morbidity and mortality. In elderly patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery, frailty is a recognized risk factor, but little is known about the prognostic value of cardiac troponin in these vulnerable patients. Therefore, we investigated the prognostic significance of elevated high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) concentration and frailty in a cohort of elderly patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. We included consecutive patients ≥75 years of age who presented for emergency abdominal surgery, defined as abdominal pathology requiring surgery within 72 hours, in a university hospital in Norway. Patients who underwent vascular procedures or palliative surgery for inoperable malignancies were excluded. Preoperatively, frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and blood samples were measured for hs-cTnT. We evaluated the predictive power of CFS and hs-cTnT concentrations using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Cox proportional hazard regression with 30-day mortality as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included (1) a composite of 30-day all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac event (MACE), defined as myocardial infarction, nonfatal cardiac arrest, or coronary revascularization; and (2) 90-day mortality. Of the 210 screened and 156 eligible patients, blood samples were available in 146, who were included. Troponin concentration exceeded the 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL) in 83% and 89% of the patients pre- and postoperatively. Of the participants, 53% were classified as vulnerable or frail (CFS ≥4). The 30-day mortality rate was 12% (18 of 146). Preoperatively, a threshold of hs-cTnT ≥34 ng/L independently predicted 30-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 3.14, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-9.45), and the composite outcome of 30-day mortality and MACE (HR 2.58, 95% CI, 1.07-6.49). In this model, frailty (continuous CFS score) also independently predicted 30-day mortality (HR 1.42, 95% CI, 1.01-2.00) and 30-day mortality or MACE (HR 1.37, 95% CI, 1.02-1.84). The combination of troponin and frailty, 0.14 × hs-cTnT +4.0 × CFS, yielded apparent superior predictive power (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve [AUC] 0.79, 95% CI, 0.68-0.88), compared to troponin concentration (AUC 0.69, 95% CI, 0.55-0.83) or frailty (AUC 0.69, 95% CI, 0.57-0.82) alone. After emergency abdominal surgery in elderly patients, increased preoperative troponin concentration and frailty were independent predictors of 30-day mortality. The combination of increased troponin concentration and frailty seemed to provide better prognostic information than troponin or frailty alone. These results must be validated in an independent sample.

Symptoms and coronary risk factors predictive of adverse cardiac events in chest pain patients in an Asian emergency department: the need for a local prediction score.

Clinical assessment is pivotal in diagnosing acute coronary syndrome. Our study aimed to identify clinical characteristics predictive of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in an Asian population and to derive a risk score for MACE. Patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain and non-diagnostic 12-lead electrocardiograms were recruited. Clinical history was recorded in a predesigned template. Random glucose and direct low-density lipoprotein measurements were taken, in addition to serial troponin. We derived the age, coronary risk factors (CRF), sex and symptoms (ACSS) risk score based on multivariate analysis results, considering age, CRF, sex and symptoms and classifying patients into very low, low, moderate and high risk for MACE. Comparison was made with the ED Assessment of Chest Pain Score (EDACS) and the history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, troponin (HEART) score. We also modified the HEART score with the CRF that we had identified. The outcomes were 30-day and 1-year MACE. There were a total of 1689 patients, with 172 (10.2%) and 200 (11.8%) having 30-day and 1-year MACE, respectively. Symptoms predictive of MACE included central chest pain, radiation to the jaw/neck, associated diaphoresis, and symptoms aggravated by exertion and relieved by glyceryl trinitrate. The ACSS score had an area under the curve of 0.769 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.735-0.803) and 0.760 (95% CI: 0.727-0.793) for 30-day and 1-year MACE, respectively, outperforming EDACS. Those in the very-low-risk and low-risk groups had <1% risk of 30-day MACE. The ACSS risk score shows potential for use in the local ED or primary care setting, potentially reducing unnecessary cardiac investigations and admission.

Next-generation transcarotid artery revascularization: TransCarotid flOw Reversal Cerebral Protection And CGUARD MicroNET-Covered Embolic Prevention Stent System To Reduce Strokes - TOPGUARD Study.

Stent-assisted carotid artery revascularization employing surgical cutdown for transcervical access and dynamic flow reversal (TCAR) is gaining popularity. TCAR, despite maximized intra-procedural cerebral protection, shows a marked excess of 30-day neurologic complications in symptomatic vs. asymptomatic stenoses. The TCAR conventional single-layer stent (free-cell area 5.89mm2) inability to seal embologenic lesions may be particularly relevant after the flow reversal neuroprotection is terminated. We evaluated peri-procedural and 30-day major adverse cerebral and cardiac events (MACCE) of TCAR (ENROUTE, SilkRoad Medical) paired with MicroNET-covered neuroprotective stent (CGuard, InspireMD) in consecutive patients at elevated risk of complications with transfemoral/transradial filter-protected stenting (increased lesion-related and/or access-related risk). CGuard (MicroNET free cell area ≈0.02-0.03 mm2) has level-1 evidence for reducing intra- and abolishing post-procedural lesion-related cerebral embolism. One hundred and six increased-risk patients (age 72 [61-76] years, median [Q1-Q3]; 60.4% symptomatic, 49.1% diabetic, 36.8% women, 61.3% left-sided index lesion) were enrolled in three vascular surgery centers. Angiographic stenosis severity was 81 (75-91)%, lesion length 21 (15-26)mm, increased-risk lesional characteristics 87.7%. Study stent use was 100% (no other stent types). 74.5% lesions were predilated; post-dilatation rate was 90.6%. Flow reversal duration was 8 (5-11)min. One stroke (0.9%) occurred in an asymptomatic patient prior to establishing neuroprotection (index lesion disruption with the sheath insertion wire); there were no other peri-procedural MACCE. No further adverse events occurred by 30-days. 30-day stent patency was 100% with normal velocities and absence of any in-stent material by Duplex Doppler. Despite a high proportion of increased-risk lesions and clinically symptomatic patients in this study, TCAR employing the MicroNET-covered anti-embolic stent showed 30-day MACCE rate <1%. This suggests a clinical role for combining maximized intra-procedural prevention of cerebral embolism by dynamic flow reversal with anti-embolic stent prevention of peri- and post-procedural cerebral embolism (TOPGUARD NCT04547387).

Point-of-care high-sensitivity cardiac troponin in suspected acute myocardial infarction assessed at baseline and 2 h.

Strategies to assess patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI) using a point-of-care (POC) high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay may expedite emergency care. A 2-h POC hs-cTnI strategy for emergency patients with suspected AMI was derived and validated. In two international, multi-centre, prospective, observational studies of adult emergency patients (1486 derivation cohort and 1796 validation cohort) with suspected AMI, hs-cTnI (Siemens Atellica® VTLi) was measured at admission and 2 h later. Adjudicated final diagnoses utilized the hs-cTn assay in clinical use. A risk stratification algorithm was derived and validated. The primary diagnostic outcome was index AMI (Types 1 and 2). The primary safety outcome was 30-day major adverse cardiac events incorporating AMI and cardiac death. Overall, 81 (5.5%) and 88 (4.9%) patients in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively, had AMI. The 2-h algorithm defined 66.1% as low risk with a sensitivity of 98.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 89.3%-99.9%] and a negative predictive value of 99.9 (95% CI 99.2%-100%) for index AMI in the derivation cohort. In the validation cohort, 53.3% were low risk with a sensitivity of 98.9% (95% CI 92.4%-99.8%) and a negative predictive value of 99.9% (95% CI 99.3%-100%) for index AMI. The high-risk metrics identified 5.4% of patients with a specificity of 98.5% (95% CI 96.6%-99.4%) and a positive predictive value of 74.5% (95% CI 62.7%-83.6%) for index AMI. A 2-h algorithm using a POC hs-cTnI concentration enables safe and efficient risk assessment of patients with suspected AMI. The short turnaround time of POC testing may support significant efficiencies in the management of the large proportion of emergency patients with suspected AMI.

Timing of P2Y12 Inhibitor Administration in Patients With STEMI Undergoing Primary PCI

BackgroundThe optimal timing of P2Y12 inhibitor administration in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has not been completely elucidating. ObjectivesThis analysis from a prospective multicenter registry sought to assess the safety and effectiveness of P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment in patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within a regional STEMI network. MethodsPretreatment was defined as P2Y12 inhibitor administration before coronary angiography. Endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE), major bleeding, and net adverse clinical events, a composite of MACE or major bleeding, within 30 days of index admission. Association of P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment with outcomes was modeled using doubly robust weighted estimators based on propensity score analysis. ResultsOf 1,624 patients included, 1,033 received P2Y12 inhibitors before angiography and 591 in the catheterization laboratory (cath lab). The non-pretreated cohort more often had history of coronary artery disease and were more likely to receive antiplatelet therapy before the index admission. After adjustment for confounding and dependent censoring, pretreatment with P2Y12 inhibitors predicted lower risk of MACE (adjusted HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.37-0.76), without increasing bleeding risk (adjusted HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.36-1.05), resulting in superior net clinical benefit (adjusted HR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.26-0.86) compared with in-cath lab administration of P2Y12 inhibitors. There was a significant treatment-by-time interaction for MACE risk, whereby the observed benefits of pretreatment only became apparent when time between P2Y12 inhibitor administration and PCI was longer than 80 minutes. ConclusionsIn contemporary patients with STEMI transferred for primary PCI, pretreatment with P2Y12 inhibitors was associated with a significant time-dependent reduction of 30-day MACE without increasing bleeding risk.

Comparative Analysis of Outcomes of Unibody Endoprosthesis and Aortobifemoral Bypass for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

Aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) has traditionally been treated with aortobifemoral bypass (ABF). Unibody endograft (UBE) for AIOD, however, has been increasingly utilized in selected patients. We report outcomes of patients undergoing ABF or UBE for AIOD. Patients (2016-2021) undergoing elective ABF or UBE with a unibody device for AIOD were identified at an academic institution. Chi-square and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to evaluate outcomes by group. One hundred thirty-one patients undergoing UBE or ABF were screened, with 82 included. Twenty-one patients underwent UBE (25.6%) and 61 (74.4%) underwent ABF. UBE patients were older (63.8 vs. 58.2years; P=0.01), with a higher prevalence of diabetes (52.4 vs. 19.7%; P=0.004). Significant differences were seen between UBE and ABF including a shorter surgery length (214 vs. 360min; P=0.0001), less blood loss (300 vs. 620mls; P=0.001), larger minimum aortic diameter (14.6 vs. 12.6; P=0.0006), larger common iliac artery (9.5 vs. 7.9; P=0.005) and lower postoperative ankle-brachial index (0.8 vs. 0.9; P=0.04). There were no differences in TASC C/D iliac lesions in the UBE than ABF group (66.6% vs. 63.9%; P<0.82) or Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus classification femoropopliteal lesions. Unadjusted analysis revealed no significant differences between UBE and ABF for 30-day mortality (0 vs. 1.6%; P=1), stroke (0 vs. 3.3%; P=1), or major adverse cardiac events (4.8 vs. 4.9%; P=1). There were no significant differences in mid-term surgical outcomes over a mean follow-up period of 23.7months between UBE and ABF groups; specifically endovascular (0 vs. 8.2%; P=0.3) or open/hybrid reintervention (9.5 vs. 14.8%; P=0.7) with similar limb occlusion (4.8 vs. 27.8; P=0.12). Kaplan-Meier estimated primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency at 36months were similar with 94%, 100%, and 94% for UBE and 86%, 95%, and 86% for ABF, respectively. Estimated survival at 36months was 95% for UBE and 97% for ABF (P=0.8). Equivalent outcomes were seen between AIOD treated with UBE or ABF in similar patient populations. Mid-term outcomes such as reintervention and patency are similar for UBE and ABF. We still recommend ABF over UBE as a primary modality of treatment in surgically fit patients with greater complexity aortoiliac lesions and with smaller arterial diameters, especially women.

The prognostic value of HEART score in patients with known heart failure evaluated at the emergency department for acute chest pain

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (United States). Background Chest pain is a common and concerning symptom in emergency care, often necessities further risk stratification for adverse cardiovascular events on short-term follow up. Patients with known heart failure (HF) constitutes a unique sub-population that would greatly benefit from short-term risk stratification to guide appropriate clinical interventions and optimize resource allocation. HEART (History, ECG, Age, Risk factors, Troponin) is a well-validated risk score that has been shown to outperform other clinical risk scores in patients with chest pain. It remains unknown if HEART score can be safely used in patients with known HF presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. Purpose We sought to evaluate the prognostic value of HEART score in patients with known HF compared to their counterparts. Method This was a prospective observational cohort study of consecutive adult patients evaluated at the emergency department for non-traumatic chest pain. HEART score was computed from charts by independent physician reviewers. The primary study outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as acute coronary syndrome, invasive revascularization, reinfarction, death, cardiac arrest, ventricular tachyarrhythmia, or acute exacerbation within 30 days of indexed admission. Outcomes were adjudicated by two independent reviewers (Kappa = 0.908). Classification performance between groups was compared using area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and negative predictive value (NPV). Results Our cohort included 4,132 patients (age 59±16, 47% female, 33% Black). Overall, 921 patients (22.3%) experienced 30-day MACE. The classification performance of HEART score in those without HF (n = 3,329, 81%) was AUROC of 0.831 (95% CI 0.813-0.848), compared to only 0.633 (95% CI 0.592-0.673) in those with known HF (n = 803, 19%) (z score = 8.771, p &amp;lt; 0.001, Figure). The sensitivity and NPV of HEART score among those without HF were 87.4% and 95.3%, compared to 81.2% and 73.3%, respectively, among those with known HF. Conclusion Our findings suggest that the prognostic value of HEART score for predicting 30-day MACE is inferior and suboptimal in patients with known HF evaluated for chest pain at the emergency department compared to their counterparts. These findings emphasize the need for more tailored risk assessment and management strategies in this specific patient population. Further research is warranted to better understand the limitations and potential enhancements of the HEART score in patients with HF.Classification Performance of HEART score

Influence of a Novel Morphology-Driven Classification on Limb Salvage after Isolated Tibial Intervention for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia

Infra-popliteal interventions for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) can be impacted by the morphology of the tibial vessels. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of a novel morphology-driven classification on the outcomes of isolated tibial intervention for CLTI. A database of patients undergoing isolated tibial interventions for CLTI at a single center between 2010 and 2020 was retrospectively queried. Patients with isolated infra-popliteal disease were identified, and their anatomy was scored as present or absent for lesion calcification (1 point), target vessel diameter<3.0mm (1 point), lesion length>300mm (1 point), and poor pedal runoff score (1 point). Patients were then divided into 3 groups: low risk (0 or 1 points), moderate risk (2 points), and high risk (3 or 4 points). Intention to treat analysis by the patient was performed. Limb-based patency (the absence of reintervention, occlusion, critical stenosis [>70%], or hemodynamic compromise with ongoing symptoms of CLTI as it related to the patency of the preoperatively determined target artery pathway) was assessed. Patient-oriented outcomes of amputation-free survival (AFS; survival without major amputation) and freedom from major adverse limb events (MALE; above ankle amputation of the index limb or major reintervention: new bypass graft, jump/interposition graft revision) were evaluated. 1,607 patients (55% male, average age 60years, 3,846 vessels) underwent tibial intervention for CLTI. The majority of the patients were diabetic and of Hispanic origin. Morphologically, 27%, 31%, and 42% of the vessels were categorized as low risk, moderate risk, and high risk, respectively. There was a significant worsening of the infra-popliteal Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) grading as the morphological risk increased. The 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were equivalent across the groups and were under the stated objective performance goal (OPG) of ≤10%. In contrast, both the 30-day MALE and the 30-day major amputations were significantly different across the groups, with the low-risk group remaining under the OPG of ≤9% and ≤4%, respectively, while the moderate risk and high risk exceeded the goal threshold. For the OPG, freedom from MALE was 60±5%, 46±5%, and 22±9% at 5years for low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups, respectively (mean±standard error of the mean; P=0.008). Overall AFS was 55±5%, 37±6%, and 18±7% at 5years for low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups, respectively (mean±standard error of the mean; P=0.003). Tibial anatomic morphology impacts isolated tibial endovascular intervention with adverse morphology associated with poorer short- and long-term outcomes. Risk stratification based on anatomic predictors should be an additional consideration as one intervenes on infra-popliteal vessels for CLTI.

Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes and Diabetes: Results from ACS QUIK Trial in India.

Despite cardiovascular disease being the leading cause of death in India, limited data exist regarding the factors associated with outcomes in patients with diabetes who suffer acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We examined 21,374 patients with AMI enrolled in the ACS QUIK trial. We compared in-hospital and 30-day major adverse cardiac events including death, re-infarction, stroke, or major bleeding in those with and without diabetes. The associations between diabetes and cardiac outcomes were adjusted for presentation and in-hospital management using logistic regression. Mean ± SD age was 60.1 ± 12.0 years, 24.3% were females, and 44.4% had diabetes. Those with diabetes were more likely to be older, female, hypertensive, and have higher Killip class but less likely to present with STEMI. Patients with diabetes had longer symptoms onset-to-arrival (median 225 vs 290 min; P < 0.001) and, in case of STEMI, longer door-to-balloon times (median, 75 vs 91 min; P < 0.001). Diabetes was independently associated with higher in-hospital death (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.46; 95% CI, 1.12-1.89), in-hospital reinfarction (aOR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.15-2.02), 30-day MACE (aOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.14-1.55) and 30-day death (aOR, 1.40; 95%CI, 1.16-1.69) but not 30-day stroke or 30-day major bleeding. Among patients presenting with AMI in Kerala, India, a considerable proportion has diabetes and are at increased risk for in-hospital and 30-day adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Increased awareness of the increased cardiovascular risk and attention to the implementation of established cardiovascular therapies are indicated for patients with diabetes in lower-middle-income countries who develop AMI. ClinicalTrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT02256658.

Management of depth to achieve timely arteriovenous fistula utilization

ObjectiveFailure to achieve timely arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) utilization due to excessive depth (>6 mm) remains an ongoing concern for dialysis access. This study evaluates the outcomes of radiocephalic (RCF) and brachiocephalic (BCF) fistula elevation required for access utilization. MethodsA retrospective review of all patients undergoing first-time autologous access over 10 years was undertaken. RCF and BCF were analyzed, and cases of initial access failure due to depth alone were selected for study. Primary and staged brachio-basilic AVF were excluded. Outcomes of early thrombosis, line placement, maturation (successful progression to hemodialysis [HD), reintervention, and functional dialysis (continuous HD for 3 consecutive months) were examined. ResultsFrom January 2012 to December 2022, 1733 patients (67% female; mean age, 61 ± 14 years) underwent autologous AVF placement. Of these, 298 patients (17%) had depth-related AVF access issues (BCF, 71% and RCF, 29%). Nineteen percent of these AVFs underwent a primary balloon-assisted maturation (BAM), and 2% had side branch coil embolization before consideration for elevation. The average time to intervention for depth was 11 ± 4 weeks after primary creation. During elevation, side branch ligation occurred in 38% of cases, and 15% underwent intraoperative BAM, The pre-elevation depth was 8.2 ± 3.1 mm, and the mean post-elevation depth was 4.7 ± 2.9 mm (P = .002). Early thrombosis (<18 days) occurred in 4% of cases. There was no mortality, and the 30-day major adverse cardiac event rate was 2%, with a 30-day morbidity of 5%, which was driven by wound issues. Six percent of the AVFs underwent follow-up BAM within 3 months. Mean maturation of the AVFs was 74% ± 3% vs 72% ± 3% (P = .58) for the elevation vs no-elevation groups at 24 weeks, respectively. However, there was an increase in tunneled central line placement in pre-emptive fistula patients due to the delay in maturation (elevation, 17% vs no-elevation, 8%; P = .008). There was a mean successful access time of 6 ± 3 weeks after elevation (16 ± 4 weeks after access creation). There was a median of 2.4 secondary interventions per year after elevation compared with a median of 2.7 secondary interventions per year without elevation. Mean access functionality was 68% ± 8% vs 75% ± 8% at 3 years for the elevation vs no-elevation groups, respectively (P = .25). ConclusionsElevation of deep BCF and RCF occurs late after placement but can be successfully achieved with low morbidity and satisfactory long-term functionality. It results in an increase in tunneled central line placement in pre-emptive fistula patients. Elevation is a valuable adjunct to AVF maturation and enhances an autologous access policy.

Clinical Outcomes of Renal Transplant Recipients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Clinical outcomes of patients with renal transplant (RT) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain poorly elucidated. Between 2014 and 2021, data were analysed for the following three groups of patients undergoing PCI enrolled in a multicentre Australian registry: (1) RT recipients (n=226), (2) patients on dialysis (n=992), and (3) chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], 30‒60 mL/min per 1.73 m2) without previous RT (n=15,534). Primary outcome was 30-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs)-composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularisation, and stroke. RT recipients were younger than dialysis and patients with CKD (61±10 vs 68±12 vs 78±8.2 years, p<0.001). Patients with RT less frequently had severe left ventricular dysfunction compared with dialysis and CKD groups (6.7% vs 14% and 8.5%); however more, often presented with acute coronary syndrome (58% vs 52% and 48%), especially STEMI (all p<0.001). Patients with RT and CKD had lower rates of 30-day MACCE (4.4% and 6.8% vs 11.6%, p<0.001) than the dialysis group. Three-year survival was similar between RT and CKD groups, however was lower in the dialysis group (80% and 83% vs 60%, p<0.001). After adjustment, dialysis was an independent predictor of 30-day MACCE (odds ratio [OR] 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44‒2.50, p<0.001), however RT was not (OR 0.91, CI 0.42‒1.96, p=0.802). Both RT (hazard ratio [HR] 2.07, CI 1.46‒2.95, p<0.001) and dialysis (HR 1.35, CI 1.02‒1.80, p=0.036) heightened the hazard of long-term mortality. RT recipients have more favourable clinical outcomes following PCI compared with patients on dialysis. However, despite having similar short-term outcomes to patients with CKD, the hazard of long-term mortality is significantly greater for RT recipients.

SVEAT score: Acute chest pain risk stratification

ObjectiveWe aimed to compare the predictive ability of the newly introduced Symptoms, history of Vascular disease, Electrocardiography, Age, and Troponin (SVEAT) score with the widely used History, ECG, Age, Risk factors, and Troponin I (HEART) score in risk stratification for 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) development among patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain complaints. MethodsThis prospective, observational, single-center study was conducted at an emergency department of a tertiary care hospital between June 2022 and January 2023. We recruited all adult patients aged 24 years and above with a primary complaint of non- traumatic chest pain at the critical care unit of the Emergency Department. Inclusion Criteria: Patients aged 24 years and above with a primary complaint of chest pain lasting >5 min. Exclusion Criteria: Patients with STEMI, pregnant individuals, those with traumatic chest pain, and those without 30-day MACE data were excluded. HEART and SVEAT scores were calculated for each participant.The performance of the SVEAT score in identifying the low-risk patient group was compared to that of the HEART score. ResultsIn the study, out of 809 patients, 589 (72.8%) were categorized as low-risk based on the SVEAT score, and 377 (46.6%) based on the HEART score. Out of these 809 patients, 115 (14.2%) experienced MACE. Within the group classified as low risk by the SVEAT score, 6 (0.7%) patients experienced MACE, while within the group classified as low risk by the HEART score, 8 (1%) patients experienced MACE. The SVEAT score had an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.916 (95% CI 0.890 to 0.942), which was found to be higher than the AUC of the HEART score (0.856, 95% CI 0.822 to 0.890). In our study, the sensitivity of the SVEAT and HEART scores was found to be 94.7% (95% CI 88.9%–98.0%) and 93.0% (95% CI 86.7%–96.9%), respectively. The specificity of both scores was 84.1% (95% CI 81.0%–86.6%) and 53.17% (95% CI 49.3%–56.6%), respectively. ConclusionWhile our study indicated a higher predictive power for MACE development with the SVEAT score compared to the HEART score, further extensive studies are necessary for its reliable implementation in emergency departments for chest pain risk classification.

Early and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Ductal Stenting Versus Surgical Aortopulmonary Shunt Among Young Infants with Duct-Dependent Pulmonary Circulation.

Surgical aortopulmonary shunting (SAPS) and ductal stenting (DS) are the main palliations in infants with cyanotic congenital heart diseases (CHD). We aimed to study the safety and efficacy of DS and to compare it with SAPS as a palliative procedure in infants with CHD and duct-dependent pulmonary circulation. Retrospective institutional clinical data review of consecutive infants aged < 3months who underwent DS or SAPS over 5years. The primary outcome was procedural success which was defined as event-free survival (mortality, need for re-intervention, procedural failure) at 30days post-procedure. The secondary outcome was defined by a composite of death, major adverse cardiovascular events, or need for re-intervention at 6months and on long-term follow-up. We included 102 infants (DS, n = 53 and SAPS, n = 49). The median age at DS and SAPS was 4days (IQR 2.0-8.5) and 8days (IQR 4.0-39.0), respectively. The median weight at intervention was 3.0kg (IQR 3.0-3.0) and 3.0kg (IQR 2.5-3.0) in the two respective arms. Tetralogy of Fallot with pulmonary atresia was the most common indication for DS and SAPS. The 30-day mortality was significantly higher in SAPS group as compared with DS group (p < 0.05). However, 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rates were similar in both groups (p = 0.29). DS was associated with shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of stay in the intensive care and hospital stay than with SAPS. At 6months, there was no significant difference in terms of mortality or event-free survival. Long-term MACE-free survival was also comparable (p = 0.13). DS is an effective and safer alternative to SAPS in infants with duct-dependent pulmonary circulation, offering reduced procedure-related mortality and morbidity than SAPS. Careful study of ductal anatomy is crucial to procedural success. However, long-term outcomes are similar in both procedures.

Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiac Events After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Machine Learning Approach with GRACE Score.

Predictive risk scores have a significant impact on patient selection and assessing the likelihood of complications following interventions in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). This study aims to explore the utility of machine learning (ML) techniques in predicting 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) by analyzing parameters, including the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score. This retrospective, multi-center, observational study enrolled 453 consecutive patients diagnosed with severe AS who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) from April 2020 to January 2023. The primary outcome was defined as a composition of MACE comprising periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular events (CVE), and all-cause mortality during the 1-month follow-up period after the procedure. Conventional binomial logistic regression and ML models were utilized and compared for prediction purposes. The study population had a mean age of 76.1, with 40.8% being male. The primary endpoint was observed in 7.5% of cases. Among the individual components of the primary endpoint, the rates of all-cause mortality, MI, and CVE were reported as 4.2%, 2.4%, and 1.9%, respectively. The ML-based Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model with the GRACE score demonstrated superior discriminative performance in predicting the primary endpoint, compared to both the ML model without the GRACE score and the conventional regression model [Area Under the Curve (AUC)= 0.98 (0.91-0.99), AUC= 0,87 (0.80-0.98), AUC= 0.84 (0.79-0.96)]. ML techniques hold the potential to enhance outcomes in clinical practice, especially when utilized alongside established clinical tools such as the GRACE score.