Mound breakwaters are widely used to protect harbors from wave attack. Wave overtopping is a key parameter on the breakwater design, since it affects the hydraulic stability, the port operativity and also generates risks to the facilities, vehicles and pedestrians. The estimation of the mean wave overtopping rate, q[m3/s/m], has been extensively analyzed in the literature (see EurOtop, 2018 and Van Gent et al., 2007). However, the maximum individual wave overtopping volume, Vmax [m3/m], can be much larger than q[m3/s/m] and it is a better variable to evaluate the direct hazards. The prediction tools of q and Vmax are mainly based on laboratory tests, where q is registered much more easily than individual wave overtopping volumes. However, few of these studies detail the methodology to identify the number of overtopping waves and the associated individual wave overtopping volumes. The estimation of Vmax is usually made in literature (see Molines et al., 2019 and EurOtop, 2018) using a 2-parameter Weibull distribution (shape and scale factor) fitted with utility functions which consider the 10%, 30% or 50% of the highest individual wave overtopping volumes. The shape factor (b) is fitted with the laboratory measurements and the scale factor (A) is obtained by forcing the mean value of the Weibull distribution to be equal to the registered mean individual wave overtopping. In this study, a fully automatic detection methodology of the individual wave overtopping waves and volumes is developed using 2D physical tests. The performance of the 2-parameter Weibull and Exponential distributions to estimate Vmax is analyzed here with four utility functions to weight the data, f(u). The full findings of this study are available in Molines et al. (2019).
Read full abstract