10-mg Group Research Articles

Characteristics of wearing-off and motor symptoms improved by safinamide adjunct therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease: A post hoc analysis of a Japanese phase 2/3 study

IntroductionPatients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience various motor and non-motor symptoms. We conducted a post hoc analysis of a Japanese phase 2/3 study of safinamide (50 or 100 mg/day) in patients with Parkinson's disease and wearing-off to evaluate response according to background factors. Safinamide efficacy against major motor symptoms was also assessed. MethodsMultiple regression analyses in safinamide-treated patients (50 or 100 mg/day) assessed changes in daily ON-time without troublesome dyskinesia (hereafter referred to as ON-time) according to baseline clinical variables. Subgroup analyses by baseline Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III score were also conducted. We evaluated cardinal motor symptoms using the UPDRS. ResultsIn the multiple regression analysis, changes in ON-time were related to baseline non-motor symptoms (UPDRS part I score) and ON-time in the 50-mg group, but no relationships with non-motor symptoms were observed in the 100-mg group. Additionally, in the subgroup analysis of patients with more severe motor symptoms (UPDRS part III score > 20), a significant improvement in ON-time was observed only with 100 mg/day (p = 0.01). At both doses, safinamide significantly improved cardinal motor symptom scores (bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor, axial symptoms, and gait disturbances). ConclusionsThe observed response profile to the 50-mg/day dose may be related to baseline non-motor symptoms, but this was not true for the 100-mg/day dose. Both safinamide doses improved major motor symptoms in levodopa-treated patients with PD.

Efficacy and safety of edoxaban tosylate hydrate 15\xa0mg in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with impaired renal function after orthopedic surgery of the lower extremities

BackgroundAlthough not indicated in the USA, edoxaban tosylate hydrate 15 mg is used for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after orthopedic surgery of the lower extremities in Japan. However, its efficacy and safety in patients with impaired renal function have not been fully evaluated. We aimed to investigate the intervention’s effectiveness in these patients.MethodsFrom 2018 to 2020, patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, hip fracture surgery, or knee arthroplasty single granule replacement and with renal dysfunction were evaluated. Safety was evaluated according to bleeding occurrence during edoxaban treatment and liver function endpoints. Patients were divided into the 15- and 30-mg oral groups, including 23 patients with impaired renal function and 209 with normal renal function, respectively.ResultsVTE incidence in the 15- and 30-mg groups was 8.7% and 8.6%, respectively; the intergroup difference was insignificant (odds ratio [OR] 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22–4.56; p = 1.00). Bleeding did not occur in the 15-mg group and was noted in 9 patients in the 30-mg group during treatment with edoxaban; the intergroup difference was insignificant (p = 1.00). The increase in aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels was 30% in the 15-mg group and 19% in the 30-mg group, with no difference between the groups (p = 0.27). Multivariate analysis showed that the dose of edoxaban was not a significant factor associated with the incidence of VTE (adjusted OR 2.31; 95% CI 0.39–13.8; p = 0.36).ConclusionsEdoxaban 15 mg in patients with impaired renal function may be as effective as edoxaban 30 mg in patients with normal renal function. However, the number of cases included in this study was small and the power was insufficient; therefore, a study with a larger sample size is desirable.

The Added Benefit of Opicapone When Used Early in Parkinson's Disease Patients With Levodopa-Induced Motor Fluctuations: A Post-hoc Analysis of BIPARK-I and -II.

Introduction: Opicapone (OPC) was efficacious in reducing OFF-time in two pivotal trials in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and end-of-dose motor fluctuations (BIPARK-I and -II). Post-hoc analyses of these trials evaluated the efficacy of OPC following pre-defined segmentation of the wide spectrum of motor fluctuations in PD.Methods: Data from matching treatment arms in BIPARK-I and -II were combined for the placebo (PLC) and OPC 50-mg groups, and exploratory post-hoc analyses were performed to investigate the efficacy of OPC 50 mg vs. PLC in subgroups of patients who were in “earlier” vs. “later” stages of both their disease course (e.g., duration of PD <6 years vs. ≥6 years) and levodopa treatment pathway (e.g., number of daily levodopa intakes <4 vs. ≥4). Efficacy variables included changes from baseline in absolute OFF-time and total ON-time.Results: The Full Analysis Set included 517 patients (PLC, n = 255; OPC 50 mg, n = 262). OPC 50 mg was significantly more effective than PLC in reducing OFF-time and increasing ON-time in the majority of subgroup analyses (p < 0.05). Moreover, patients in “earlier” stages of both their disease course and levodopa treatment pathway experienced numerically greater efficacy when using OPC 50 mg, in comparison with those in “later” stages.Conclusion: OPC 50 mg was efficacious over the whole trajectory of motor fluctuation evolution in PD patients. There was also a signal for enhanced efficacy in patients who were earlier vs. later in their disease course and levodopa treatment pathway.

Relugolix for oral treatment of uterine leiomyomas: a dose-finding, randomized, controlled trial

BackgroundUterine leiomyomas are the most common neoplasm affecting women and frequently cause heavy menstrual bleeding and pain. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonists provide fast symptom relief and show promise as a medical (non-surgical) treatment option and as a presurgical treatment to reduce leiomyoma size. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three dose levels of oral relugolix, a small molecule GnRH receptor antagonist, in Japanese women with uterine leiomyomas and heavy menstrual bleeding.Methods This phase 2, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted at 36 sites in Japan in women with uterine leiomyomas and heavy menstrual bleeding, defined as a pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC) score of ≥ 120 in one menstrual cycle. Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to relugolix 10, 20, or 40 mg, or placebo, orally once daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a total PBAC score of < 10 from week 6 to 12. A sample size of 50 patients per group was estimated to provide ≥ 95% power, based on the comparison of relugolix 40 mg with placebo using a chi-square test with a significance level of 5% (two-sided).ResultsFrom November 2011 to September 2012, 216 patients were randomized and 214 patients (99.1%) were analyzed. The proportion (difference vs. placebo) of patients that achieved the primary endpoint in the placebo and 10-, 20-, and 40-mg relugolix groups were 0%, 20.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.3–32.3, P < .001), 42.6% (95% CI: 29.4–55.8, P < .001), and 83.3% (95% CI: 73.4–93.3, P < .001), respectively. Though treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between the 20- and 40-mg groups, the incidence rates were more frequent compared with the placebo group. Most of these adverse events were mild or moderate in intensity.ConclusionsRelugolix decreased menstrual blood loss in women with uterine leiomyomas in a dose–response manner, and was generally well tolerated.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01452659, NCT01452659 (registered 17/10/2011); JAPIC Clinical Trial Information, https://www.clinicaltrials.jp, JapicCTI-111590 (registered 31/08/2011).

Biological Effects of Prostagrandin E2-EP4 Antagonist (AAT-008): Enhancement of Immunoresponse to Radiotherapy and a Potential as a Radiosensitizer

The cyclooxygenase-2 product prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) promotes tumor growth and metastasis by acting on a family of four G protein-coupled receptors (EP1-4). Recently, an antagonist of PGE2-EP4 (AAT-008) has been newly developed for clinical use. The purpose of this study is to investigate the biological effects of AAT-008 as a radiosensitizer for the treatment of murine colon cancer (CT26WT) in vivo and explore the mechanism using flow cytometry.CT26WT tumor cells transplanted into the hind legs of BALB/c mice were used. Treatments were carried out when the mean diameter of the tumors reached approximately 10 mm for tumor growth delay assay and 5 mm for flow cytometry (day 0). AAT-008 (0, 3, 10, and 30 mg/kg/day) was administered orally twice a day from day 0 to day 18. The tumor was irradiated at 9 Gy on day 3 for the radiation treatment (RT) group. In the tumor growth assay, twelve mice were used for each group. The three dimensions of each tumor were measured every other day using a caliper and the tumor doubling time was calculated. For the first flow cytometry, the dose of AAT-008 was fixed to 10 mg/kg/day. Administration of AAT-008 and RT dose were the same as in the tumor growth assay. The population of cytotoxic T-cells (CD45+CD8+CD69+: CTL) was investigated using the tumor cells on day 19. For the second flow cytometry, the dose of AAT was fixed to 30 mg/kg/day. AAT-008 was administered from day 0 to day 12. The population of CTL and the ratio of CTL / regulatory T-cells (Foxp3+: Treg) were investigated using the tumor cells on day 13.In the tumor growth delay assay, the median tumor doubling times in the 0-, 3-, 10-, and 30-mg group without RT were 3.2, 4.4, 4.4, and 5.7 days, respectively. The times in those dose groups with RT were 6.1, 6.6, 17.3, and 19.8 days, respectively (P < 0.001 between the 0- and 10-mg/30-mg groups with RT). There was no significant difference between the 10- and 30-mg groups with RT (P = 0.56). In the first flow cytometry, the mean CTL proportion of the irradiated tumors in the 10 mg + RT (n = 4) and 0 mg + RT groups (n = 5) was 43% and 31%, respectively. Of note, 67% of CTL were observed in responded mice (n = 2) in the 10 mg + RT group. In the second flow cytometry, the mean Treg proportion and the CTL/ Treg ratio of the irradiated tumors in the 30 mg + RT (n = 5) and 0 mg + RT groups (n = 5) were 4.0% and 1.5%, respectively (P = 0.02) and 10 and 22, respectively (P = 0.02).AAT-008 had a potential of enhancing radiosensitivity in the treatment of colon cancer cells. It was assumed that the optimal dose of AAT-008 with RT was 10 mg/kg/day. It was suggested that AAT-008 stimulated the immune system against the cancer cells.

Science, Medicine, and the Anesthesiologist

Science, Medicine, and the Anesthesiologist

Effects of safinamide adjunct therapy on pain in patients with Parkinson's disease: Post hoc analysis of a Japanese phase 2/3 study

IntroductionThe non-dopaminergic and dopaminergic actions of safinamide may alleviate pain in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). We investigated the efficacy of safinamide for pain when administered as an adjunct to levodopa in Japanese patients with PD. MethodsThis was a post hoc analysis of a phase 2/3 clinical study of safinamide in Japanese patients with PD who were experiencing wearing-off. Pain was assessed using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II ‘sensory symptoms’ item 17, on a scale of 0–4, and the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) ‘bodily discomfort’ domain score. Subgroup analyses, according to baseline symptoms and concomitant medications, were also performed. ResultsLeast square (LS) mean changes in the UPDRS item 17 score from baseline to Week 24 in the placebo, safinamide 50-mg and safinamide 100-mg groups during the OFF phase were 0.08, −0.15 (p = 0.0133 vs placebo) and −0.18 (p = 0.0054), respectively, and during the ON phase were 0.04, −0.08 (p = 0.0529) and −0.08 (p = 0.0505), respectively. Changes from baseline to Week 24 in PDQ-39 ‘bodily discomfort’ scores were not significantly different in safinamide groups vs placebo. The presence of moderate-to-severe bradykinesia or early-morning dystonia at baseline resulted in numerically greater effect sizes in UPDRS item 17 scores during the OFF phase. ConclusionsSafinamide 50 mg and 100 mg reduced the UPDRS item 17 score in patients with PD, especially during the OFF phase. Patients with moderate-to-severe bradykinesia and early-morning dystonia may benefit from safinamide treatment.

MM-169: ANCHOR (OP-104): Melflufen Plus Dexamethasone and Bortezomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)—Optimal Dose, Updated Efficacy and Safety Results

Context Development of resistance to standard treatments for RRMM highlights the need for novel therapies. Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide–drug conjugate (PDC) that targets aminopeptidases and rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen plus dexamethasone showed clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile in HORIZON (Richardson et al. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:757-767). Objective To provide an update of the bortezomib arm from the phase 1 part of the ANCHOR study (NCT03481556). Methods Patients with RRMM were intolerant of or refractory to a prior immunomodulatory agent, with 1-4 prior lines of therapy (LoTs). Prior treatment with a proteasome inhibitor (PI) was allowed, but patients could not be refractory to PIs in the last LoT. Melflufen (30, 40, or 20 mg intravenously; day 1 of each 28-day cycle) was administered with bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 subcutaneous on days 1, 4, 8, and 11) plus oral dexamethasone (20 mg on days 1, 4, 8, and 11; 40 mg on days 15 and 22; dose reduced if aged ≥75 years). The primary objective was to determine the optimal phase 2 dose of melflufen for this combination. Results As of the data cutoff date (October 19, 2020), 13 patients received melflufen (30 mg, n=6; 40 mg, n=7) plus dexamethasone and bortezomib. In the 30-mg and 40-mg groups, respectively, median age was 78.5 years (range, 70–82) and 70.0 years (range, 61–76); 100% and 86% received a prior PI; 33% and 14% were refractory to PIs. Confirmed overall response rate (defined as ≥ partial response) was 50% and 71%, in each group, respectively. Most common grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were thrombocytopenia (30 mg, 50%; 40 mg, 100%) and neutropenia (30 mg, 33%; 40 mg, 71%); 3 patients discontinued study treatment due to treatment-emergent AEs. Serious TRAEs occurred in 3 patients (30 mg, n=2; 40 mg, n=1). No dose-limiting toxicities occurred at either dose level. Fatal AEs occurred in 1 patient in the 30-mg group (unrelated to study treatment). Conclusions ANCHOR determined that the optimal dose of melflufen is 30 mg plus dexamethasone and bortezomib; results showed clinical activity in heavily pretreated patients. Recruitment is ongoing.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AR19, a Manipulation-Resistant Formulation of Amphetamine Sulfate, in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of AR19 in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) diagnosed by DSM-5 criteria in adults from 18 through 55 years of age. AR19 is a pellets-in-capsule, immediate-release amphetamine sulfate investigational formulation with physical and chemical barriers designed to resist manipulation to deter snorting, smoking, and intravenous injection.Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose, forced titration, multicenter trial investigated the safety and efficacy of AR19 from September 2018 to April 2019. Study participants were randomized and titrated to 20 mg or 40 mg AR19 daily or placebo. Study medication was dosed once in the morning and again 4 to 6 hours later for a period of 5 weeks. The primary efficacy measure was the total score on the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS).Results: Participants (N = 320) were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study medication. Demographics and baseline characteristics were similar across treatment groups. The least squares mean treatment differences versus placebo (97.5% CI) were -7.2 (-11.3 to -3.1) for the AR19 20-mg group and -7.3 (-11.4 to -3.2) for the AR19 40-mg group (each P < .001). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in participants in the AR19 treatment groups were insomnia, dry mouth, decreased appetite, palpitations, headache, and tachycardia and are consistent with the known safety profile of amphetamine sulfate.Conclusions: AR19 demonstrated efficacy on all endpoints and was generally well tolerated, supporting the efficacy and safety of AR19 20 mg and 40 mg in adults with ADHD.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03659929.

Atogepant for the Preventive Treatment of Migraine

BackgroundAtogepant is an oral, small-molecule, calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor antagonist that is being investigated for the preventive treatment of migraine.MethodsIn a phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned adults with 4 to 14 migraine days per month in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive a once-daily dose of oral atogepant (10 mg, 30 mg, or 60 mg) or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the mean number of migraine days per month across the 12 weeks. Secondary end points included headache days per month, a reduction from baseline of at least 50% in the 3-month average of migraine days per month, quality of life, and scores on the Activity Impairment in Migraine–Diary (AIM-D).ResultsA total of 2270 participants were screened, 910 were enrolled, and 873 were included in the efficacy analysis; 214 were assigned to the 10-mg atogepant group, 223 to the 30-mg atogepant group, 222 to the 60-mg atogepant group, and 214 to the placebo group. The mean number of migraine days per month at baseline ranged from 7.5 to 7.9 in the four groups. The changes from baseline across 12 weeks were −3.7 days with 10-mg atogepant, −3.9 days with 30-mg atogepant, −4.2 days with 60-mg atogepant, and −2.5 days with placebo. The mean differences from placebo in the change from baseline were −1.2 days with 10-mg atogepant (95% confidence interval [CI], −1.8 to −0.6), −1.4 days with 30-mg atogepant (95% CI, −1.9 to −0.8), and −1.7 days with 60-mg atogepant (95% CI, −2.3 to −1.2) (P<0.001 for all comparisons with placebo). Results for the secondary end points favored atogepant over placebo with the exceptions of the AIM-D Performance of Daily Activities score and the AIM-D Physical Impairment score for the 10-mg dose. The most common adverse events were constipation (6.9 to 7.7% across atogepant doses) and nausea (4.4 to 6.1% across atogepant doses). Serious adverse events included one case each of asthma and optic neuritis in the 10-mg atogepant group.ConclusionsOral atogepant once daily was effective in reducing the number of migraine days and headache days over a period of 12 weeks. Adverse events included constipation and nausea. Longer and larger trials are needed to determine the effect and safety of atogepant for migraine prevention. (Funded by Allergan; ADVANCE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03777059.)

Abelacimab for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism

BackgroundThe role of factor XI in the pathogenesis of postoperative venous thromboembolism is uncertain. Abelacimab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to factor XI and locks it in the zymogen (inactive precursor) conformation.MethodsIn this open-label, parallel-group trial, we randomly assigned 412 patients who were undergoing total knee arthroplasty to receive one of three regimens of abelacimab (30 mg, 75 mg, or 150 mg) administered postoperatively in a single intravenous dose or to receive 40 mg of enoxaparin administered subcutaneously once daily. The primary efficacy outcome was venous thromboembolism, detected by mandatory venography of the leg involved in the operation or objective confirmation of symptomatic events. The principal safety outcome was a composite of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding up to 30 days after surgery.ResultsVenous thromboembolism occurred in 13 of 102 patients (13%) in the 30-mg abelacimab group, 5 of 99 patients (5%) in the 75-mg abelacimab group, and 4 of 98 patients (4%) in the 150-mg abelacimab group, as compared with 22 of 101 patients (22%) in the enoxaparin group. The 30-mg abelacimab regimen was noninferior to enoxaparin, and the 75-mg and 150-mg abelacimab regimens were superior to enoxaparin (P<0.001). Bleeding occurred in 2%, 2%, and none of the patients in the 30-mg, 75-mg, and 150-mg abelacimab groups, respectively, and in none of the patients in the enoxaparin group.ConclusionsThis trial showed that factor XI is important for the development of postoperative venous thromboembolism. Factor XI inhibition with a single intravenous dose of abelacimab after total knee arthroplasty was effective for the prevention of venous thromboembolism and was associated with a low risk of bleeding. (Funded by Anthos Therapeutics; ANT-005 TKA EudraCT number, 2019-003756-37.)

Tirzepatide versus Semaglutide Once Weekly in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

BackgroundTirzepatide is a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist that is under development for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. The efficacy and safety of once-weekly tirzepatide as compared with semaglutide, a selective GLP-1 receptor agonist, are unknown.MethodsIn an open-label, 40-week, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 1879 patients, in a 1:1:1:1 ratio, to receive tirzepatide at a dose of 5 mg, 10 mg, or 15 mg or semaglutide at a dose of 1 mg. At baseline, the mean glycated hemoglobin level was 8.28%, the mean age 56.6 years, and the mean weight 93.7 kg. The primary end point was the change in the glycated hemoglobin level from baseline to 40 weeks.ResultsThe estimated mean change from baseline in the glycated hemoglobin level was −2.01 percentage points, −2.24 percentage points, and −2.30 percentage points with 5 mg, 10 mg, and 15 mg of tirzepatide, respectively, and −1.86 percentage points with semaglutide; the estimated differences between the 5-mg, 10-mg, and 15-mg tirzepatide groups and the semaglutide group were −0.15 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], −0.28 to −0.03; P=0.02), −0.39 percentage points (95% CI, −0.51 to −0.26; P<0.001), and −0.45 percentage points (95% CI, −0.57 to −0.32; P<0.001), respectively. Tirzepatide at all doses was noninferior and superior to semaglutide. Reductions in body weight were greater with tirzepatide than with semaglutide (least-squares mean estimated treatment difference, −1.9 kg, −3.6 kg, and −5.5 kg, respectively; P<0.001 for all comparisons). The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal and were primarily mild to moderate in severity in the tirzepatide and semaglutide groups (nausea, 17 to 22% and 18%; diarrhea, 13 to 16% and 12%; and vomiting, 6 to 10% and 8%, respectively). Of the patients who received tirzepatide, hypoglycemia (blood glucose level, <54 mg per deciliter) was reported in 0.6% (5-mg group), 0.2% (10-mg group), and 1.7% (15-mg group); hypoglycemia was reported in 0.4% of those who received semaglutide. Serious adverse events were reported in 5 to 7% of the patients who received tirzepatide and in 3% of those who received semaglutide.ConclusionsIn patients with type 2 diabetes, tirzepatide was noninferior and superior to semaglutide with respect to the mean change in the glycated hemoglobin level from baseline to 40 weeks. (Funded by Eli Lilly; SURPASS-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03987919.)

Effects of atorvastatin doses on serum level of procalcitonin and predictors for major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a pilot study and post hoc analysis.

Inflammation plays an important role in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Procalcitonin levels rise in response to proinflammatory stimuli. This study aimed to investigate the effects of different doses of atorvastatin on the serum inflammatory profiles, especially procalcitonin and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with AMI during hospitalization. The patients who were admitted to the Coronary Care Unit of The Third Medical Center of PLA General Hospital (Beijing, China) between January 2015 and December 2015 with a diagnosis of AMI were enrolled, and randomized to atorvastatin 20 mg/day postoperatively (20-mg group), 40 mg/day postoperatively (40-mg group) and 80 mg preoperatively+40 mg/day postoperatively (80/40-mg group). Serum procalcitonin and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were evaluated before and at 1 and 3 days after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A total of 112 patients with AMI (23 women and 89 men) were prospectively eligible for the study. There were no significant differences in most clinical data among the three groups. The 80/40-mg group showed significantly reduced serum procalcitonin levels at 1 and 3 days after PCI (P < 0.001) and reduced hs-CRP levels at 3 days P = 0.001) compared with 20-mg and 40-mg groups. Serum procalcitonin (OR, 4.593; 95% CI, 1.476-8.387; P = 0.005), hs-CRP (OR, 1.149; 95% CI, 1.012-1.338; P = 0.018), highly sensitive cardiac troponin T (OR, 1.255; 95% CI, 1.004-1.569, P = 0.009) and Gensini score (OR, 1.022; 95% CI, 1.045-1.062; P = 0.013) were independently associated with MACEs during hospitalization. The use of atorvastatin 80 mg before and 40 mg/day after PCI in patients with AMI can effectively reduce serum inflammatory factors. procalcitonin and hs-CRP were independently associated with in-hospital MACEs.

A Randomized Trial of a Transglutaminase 2 Inhibitor for Celiac Disease

BackgroundIn celiac disease, small intestinal transglutaminase 2 causes deamidation of glutamine residues in gluten peptides, which enhances stimulation of T cells and leads to mucosal injury. Inhibition of transglutaminase 2 is a potential treatment for celiac disease.MethodsIn a proof-of-concept trial, we assessed the efficacy and safety of a 6-week treatment with ZED1227, a selective oral transglutaminase 2 inhibitor, at three dose levels as compared with placebo, in adults with well-controlled celiac disease who underwent a daily gluten challenge. The primary end point was the attenuation of gluten-induced mucosal damage, as measured by the ratio of villus height to crypt depth. Secondary end points included intraepithelial lymphocyte density, the Celiac Symptom Index score, and the Celiac Disease Questionnaire score (for assessment of health-related quality of life).ResultsOf the 41 patients assigned to the 10-mg ZED1227 group, the 41 assigned to the 50-mg group, the 41 assigned to the 100-mg group, and the 40 assigned to the placebo group, 35, 39, 38, and 30 patients, respectively, had adequate duodenal-biopsy samples for the assessment of the primary end point. Treatment with ZED1227 at all three dose levels attenuated gluten-induced duodenal mucosal injury. The estimated difference from placebo in the change in the mean ratio of villus height to crypt depth from baseline to week 6 was 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15 to 0.73) in the 10-mg group (P=0.001), 0.49 (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.77) in the 50-mg group (P<0.001), and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.77) in the 100-mg group (P<0.001). The estimated differences from placebo in the change in intraepithelial lymphocyte density were −2.7 cells per 100 epithelial cells (95% CI, −7.6 to 2.2) in the 10-mg group, −4.2 cells per 100 epithelial cells (95% CI, −8.9 to 0.6) in the 50-mg group, and −9.6 cells per 100 epithelial cells (95% CI, −14.4 to −4.8) in the 100-mg group. Use of the 100-mg dose may have improved symptom and quality-of-life scores. The most common adverse events, the incidences of which were similar across all groups, were headache, nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. Rash developed in 3 of 40 patients (8%) in the 100-mg group.ConclusionsIn this preliminary trial, treatment with ZED1227 attenuated gluten-induced duodenal mucosal damage in patients with celiac disease. (Funded by Dr. Falk Pharma; CEC-3 EudraCT number, 2017-002241-30.)

The Beneficial Effect of an Intra-articular Injection of Losartan on Microfracture-Mediated Cartilage Repair Is Dose Dependent

Background: A previous publication demonstrated that the oral intake of losartan promoted microfracture-mediated hyaline-like cartilage repair in osteochondral defects of a rabbit knee model. However, an intra-articular (IA) injection of losartan may have direct beneficial effects on cartilage repair and has not been studied. Purpose: To determine the dosage and beneficial effects of an IA injection of losartan on microfracture-mediated cartilage repair and normal cartilage homeostasis. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Rabbits were divided into 5 groups (n = 6 each): a microfracture group (MFX group) and 4 different losartan treatment groups that received varying doses of IA losartan (0.1, 1, 10, and 100 mg per knee). An osteochondral defect (5 mm) was created in the trochlear groove cartilage of 1 limb in each rabbit, and 5 microfracture perforations were made in the osteochondral defect. Both the injured and the contralateral knee joints were injected with IA losartan immediately after microfracture and at 2 and 4 weeks after surgery. Rabbits were sacrificed at 6 weeks after surgery for analysis including gross observation, micro–computed tomography, histology, and reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Results: Micro–computed tomography and gross observation demonstrated comparable subchondral bone healing and hyaline-like cartilage morphology in the 0.1-, 1-, and 10-mg losartan groups relative to the MFX group. Conversely, the 100-mg losartan group showed neither bony defect healing nor cartilage repair. Histology revealed higher O’Driscoll scores and hyaline-like cartilage regeneration in the 1-mg losartan group compared with the MFX group. In contrast, the 100-mg losartan group showed the lowest histology score and no cartilage repair. An IA injection of losartan at the doses of 0.1, 1, and 10 mg did not cause adverse effects on uninjured cartilage, while the 100-mg dose induced cartilage damage. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction results showed downregulation of the transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) signaling pathway after IA losartan injection. Conclusion: An IA injection of losartan at the dose of 1 mg was most effective for the enhancement of microfracture-mediated cartilage repair without adversely affecting uninjured cartilage. Conversely, a high dose (100 mg) IA injection of losartan inhibited cartilage repair in the osteochondral defect and was chondrotoxic to normal articular cartilage. Clinical Relevance: An IA injection of losartan at an optimal dosage represents a novel microfracture enhancement therapy and warrants a clinical trial for future clinical applications.

A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical development program exploring the use of litoxetine for treating urinary incontinence.

To investigate the safety and efficacy of litoxetine, a serotonin reuptake inhibitor, in treating urinary incontinence (UI) and mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials (RCT1 and RCT2) were conducted. RCT1, which included 196 women aged 18-75 with MUI randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive 10, 20, or 40 mg litoxetine or placebo orally twice daily (BID) for 12 weeks, investigated the efficacy (including changes in patient reported outcomes) and safety of litoxetine compared to placebo. RCT2, which included 82 men and women aged 18-70 with any UI type randomly assigned 2:1 to receive 30 mg litoxetine or placebo orally BID for 8 weeks including a 2 week dose titration period, investigated the safety (including psychiatric safety) and efficacy of litoxetine compared to placebo. Efficacy was measured as the change in number of incontinence episodes per week and assessed using an analysis of covariance with missing data imputed by Predictive Mean Matching. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs) and physical examinations and analyzed using descriptive statistics. The 30-mg and placebo groups in RCT2 showed no difference in frequency of AEs, and litoxetine reduced the number of incontinence episodes per week compared to placebo. Although RCT1 suffered an unexpectedly high placebo response, and therefore did not meet the primary efficacy endpoint, 71% of participants receiving 40 mg litoxetine reported a clinically meaningful improvement in the King's Health Questionnaire. Litoxetine may be a safe, effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with UI.

Relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonist, in women with endometriosis-associated pain: phase 2 safety and efficacy 24-week results

BackgroundRelugolix is a once-daily, oral, nonpeptide, gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety of relugolix over 24 weeks in women with endometriosis-associated pain.MethodsThis phase 2, randomized, open-label, parallel-group extension study was conducted in 101 clinics in Japan. Patients (premenopausal females ≥ 20 years) who completed the preceding 12-week relugolix phase 2 study continued to receive relugolix (10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg), placebo, or leuprorelin (3.75 mg) for an additional 12 weeks. Relugolix was administered orally once daily, and leuprorelin subcutaneously once every 4 weeks. The primary outcome was safety, including bone mineral density (BMD) and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Secondary endpoints included visual analog scale (VAS) scores for endometriosis-associated pain. Analysis sets were defined as all patients who were administered the study drug.ResultsOf 487 randomized patients in the preceding study, 397 enrolled in this extension study and continued to receive placebo (n = 77), relugolix 10 mg (n = 84), relugolix 20 mg (n = 78), relugolix 40 mg (n = 89), or leuprorelin (n = 69). Baseline characteristics were similar between extension study patients and patients in the preceding study. Frequency of TEAEs including metrorrhagia, menorrhagia, and hot flush was similar in the relugolix 40-mg and leuprorelin groups. Mean (SD) change in BMD from baseline at Week 24 was − 0.2 (1.99)% for placebo; − 1.6 (2.34)%, − 2.6 (2.94)%, and − 4.9 (2.91)% for the relugolix 10-mg, 20-mg, and 40-mg groups, respectively; and − 4.4 (2.16)% for leuprorelin. Mean ± SD change from baseline in mean VAS score (mm) for pelvic pain at end of treatment was − 3.2 ± 12.16 for placebo; − 6.8 ± 10.56, − 9.0 ± 11.84, and − 11.9 ± 11.26 for the relugolix 10-mg, 20-mg, and 40-mg groups, respectively; and − 12.7 ± 12.57 for leuprorelin. Estradiol levels decreased with increasing relugolix dose and remained below postmenopausal levels throughout the 24-week relugolix 40-mg treatment period.ConclusionsTreatment with relugolix for 24 weeks was generally well tolerated and demonstrated similar pain reduction to leuprorelin in women with endometriosis. The dose-dependent loss in BMD observed with relugolix treatment was expected due to an induced hypoestrogenic state. Relugolix demonstrated a similar benefit/risk profile to injectable therapy in this phase 2 study.Trial registration NCT01452685 (ClinicalTrials.gov, registered 17/10/2011).

Safety and Efficacy of Mirogabalin for Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: Pooled Analysis of Two Pivotal Phase III Studies

PurposeMirogabalin besylate has been approved in several countries to treat peripheral neuropathic pain. This pooled analysis, using data from the two pivotal Phase III studies in Asian patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain and post-herpetic neuralgia, aimed to provide clinicians with more detailed and precise information relating to mirogabalin's safety and efficacy. MethodsData were pooled from 2 multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 14-week treatment studies of mirogabalin conducted at ∼350 study sites (Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Malaysia, and Thailand). Eligible patients in both studies were randomized in a 2:1:1:1 ratio, stratified according to a baseline average daily pain score (ADPS) of <6 or ≥6, to placebo, mirogabalin 15-mg once daily (QD), mirogabalin 10-mg twice daily (BID), or mirogabalin 15-mg BID treatment groups. Safety was assessed based on treatment-emergent adverse events identified from the adverse events collected throughout both studies. The primary efficacy end point of both studies was the change from baseline in ADPS at week 14. FindingsIn total, 1587 patients (824 with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain; 763 with post-herpetic neuralgia) who received at least 1 dose of study drug were analyzed (633 received placebo, 954 treated with mirogabalin). Treatment-emergent adverse events included somnolence (3.8%, 10.8%, 14.5%, and 19.1%) and dizziness (2.7%, 5.7%, 9.1%, and 13.1%) in patients receiving placebo, mirogabalin 15 mg QD, mirogabalin 10 mg BID, and mirogabalin 15 mg BID, respectively. In patients treated with mirogabalin 15 mg QD, 2 (0.6%) of 316 patients discontinued due to somnolence. In the mirogabalin 10-mg BID group, somnolence, edema, and peripheral edema each resulted in 3 (0.9%) of 318 patient discontinuations. In the mirogabalin 15-mg BID group, 6 (1.9%) of 320 patients discontinued due to dizziness and 3 (0.9%) due to somnolence. At week 14, mirogabalin 10 mg BID and 15 mg BID statistically significantly improved ADPS versus placebo, with least squares mean changes (95% CI) of −0.31 (−0.55, −0.08) and −0.63 (−0.86, −0.40). Post hoc analysis showed a statistically significant difference 2 days after administration in the mirogabalin 10-mg and 15-mg BID groups compared with placebo. Female sex, age ≥65 years, and baseline weight <60 kg may influence the safety of mirogabalin, particularly regarding the incidence of somnolence and dizziness, but had no notable impact on efficacy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02318706 and NCT02318719. ImplicationsThis pooled analysis showed that mirogabalin was efficacious and well-tolerated by Asian patients with peripheral neuropathic pain.

Randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial of the effects of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on plasma coenzyme Q10 concentration in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease.

To determine the dose of coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) needed to achieve at least a 3-fold increase in plasma CoQ10 concentration in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD) and congestive heart failure (CHF). 18 dogs with CHF due to MMVD and 12 healthy dogs. In a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial, dogs with MMVD were given 50 or 100 mg of water-soluble CoQ10 (ubiquinone; total daily dose, 100 mg [n = 5] or 200 mg [6]) or a placebo (7), PO, twice a day for 2 weeks in addition to regular cardiac treatment. Plasma CoQ10 concentration was measured in dogs with MMVD before (baseline) and at various time points after supplementation began and in healthy dogs once. Concentrations were compared among and within groups. No significant difference in median baseline plasma CoQ10 concentration was detected between healthy dogs and dogs with MMVD. Fold increases in plasma CoQ10 concentrations ranged from 1.7 to 4.7 and 3.2 to 6.8 for individual dogs in the 100-mg and 200-mg groups, respectively. The change in plasma CoQ10 concentration after supplementation began was significantly higher than in the placebo group at 4 hours and 1 and 2 weeks for dogs in the 200-mg group and at 1 and 2 weeks for dogs in the 100-mg group. A daily CoQ10 dose of 200 mg was sufficient to achieve at least a 3-fold increase in plasma CoQ10 concentration and may be used in CoQ10 supplementation studies involving dogs with CHF due to MMVD.

Relative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib fortreating psoriasis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

To assess the relative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib administration (5 and 10mg) twice daily in psoriasis patients. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in psoriasis patients were included in this network meta-analysis. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to combine the direct and indirect evidence from the RCTs. Five RCTs, including 3,265 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The 75% or more reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75) response rate was significantly higher in the 10-mg tofacitinib group than in the placebo group (OR, 20.53; 95% credible interval (CrI), 13.98-32.69). Similarly, the PASI75 response rate was significantly higher in the 50-mg etanercept and 5-mg tofacitinib groups than in the placebo group (OR, 18.39; 95% CrI, 10.19-36.97 and OR, 8.87; 95% CrI, 6.02-13.55, respectively). However, 10 mg tofacitinib tended to be more efficacious than 50 mg etanercept and 5 mg tofacitinib. Ranking probability based on Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that 10 mg tofacitinib had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving the PASI75 response rate, followed by 50 mg etanercept, 5 mg tofacitinib, and placebo. The Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) and PASI75 response rates showed similar distribution patterns. In contrast, the number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) or withdrawals due to AEs did not differ significantly among the 4treatment options. Tofacitinib (10mg) showed the highest efficacy for the intervention for psoriasis, followed by 50mg etanercept and 5mg tofacitinib, and was not associated with a significant risk for SAEs or AE-induced withdrawals.