12-month Overall Survival Research Articles

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with mismatch-repair deficient or microsatellite instability-high advanced cancers: a meta-analysis of phase I-III clinical trials.

Mismatch-repair deficient (dMMR) and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) cancers are associated with an increased number of somatic mutations, which can render tumors more susceptible to immune checkpoint blockade. However, a comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy profile of immune checkpoint inhibitors in this patient population across multiple cancer types is lacking. This study aims to address this knowledge gap by synthesizing data from Phase I-III clinical trials. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar from inception until June, 2024. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized comparative studies, and single-arm trials investigating immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with dMMR/MSI-H advanced cancers. The primary outcome was objective response rate (ORR), and the secondary outcomes included disease control rate (DCR), 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates. Subgroup analyses were conducted for the primary outcome stratified by major study characteristics. Of the 10802 identified studies, 19 trials in 25 studies totaling 2052 participants met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled ORR was 41.7% (95% CI, 35.7%-47.7%). The pooled DCR was 68.9% (95% CI, 62.2%-75.7%). The pooled 12-month, 24-month and 36-month OS rates were 29.1% (95% CI, 19.9%-38.3%), 35.8% (95% CI, 23.6%-48.0%), and 35.8% (95% CI, 23.6%-48.0%), respectively. The pooled 12-month, 24-month and 36-month PFS rates were 46.4% (95% CI, 39.1%-53.8%), 67.0% (95% CI, 55.2%-78.8%), and 63.1% (95% CI, 37.3%-88.9%), respectively. The study establishes the therapeutic potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors in dMMR/MSI-H advanced cancers, highlighting the importance of MSI status in this context. Further head-to-head comparisons are needed to conclusively determine MSI's predictive power relative to proficient mismatch-repair/ microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) tumors.

Phase Ib trial of durvalumab plus tremelimumab in combination with particle therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: DEPARTURE trial.

34 Background: The HIMALAYA trial established the combination of durvalumab and tremelimumab (STRIDE) as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Carbon ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) allows precise tumor targeting while sparing nearby normal tissue. Our strategy used C-ion RT to target a key tumor with macrovascular invasion (MVI) for disease management and potential MVI control, complemented by STRIDE. Recognising that C-ion RT stimulates immune responses, we posited that merging C-ion RT with STRIDE might enhance therapeutic effects. We present updated data of additional follow-up. Methods: This is a Phase Ib, multicenter study evaluating durvalumab with particle beam radiotherapy in HCC patients with MVI (Cohort A) and STRIDE (Cohort B). Both cohorts began with patients resistant to standard treatments. After safety confirmation, the study expanded to include therapy-naïve patients, totaling 15. C-ion RT begins after day 8 of the first cycle, following the initial drug dose. The relative biological effectiveness weighted dose is set at 60 Gy in four fractions over one week, targeting one representative intrahepatic nodule with MVI. The primary endpoint is adverse event rates, including dose limiting toxicity (DLT), with secondary endpoints on progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (jRCT2031210046). This analysis of OS was conducted from the additional follow-up data from the primary analysis. Results: From July 2021 to January 2023, 15 advanced HCC patients were enrolled in our study (Cohort A: 3, Cohort B: 12). Four in Cohort B were systemic therapy-naïve. All cases confirmed MVI radiologically; with tumor invasion observed in the main portal vein for 4 patients and in the inferior vena cava for one. DLT evaluations in 3 from each cohort showed no incidents. While Cohort A had no adverse events, 4 patients in Cohort B (26.7%) experienced serious treatment-related adverse events. The median PFS was a significant 4.67 months (95%CI, 1.35–6.64). At the clinical cut-off date of March 31, 2024, 10 OS events were observed. The median OS was 10.4 months (95% CI, 5.6–15.2), and the 6- and 12-month OS rates were 66.7% and 46.7%, respectively. Conclusions: The safety of STRIDE in combination with particle therapy has been confirmed in advanced HCC with MVI. This combination, especially the irradiation of tumors with MVI using C-ion RT, holds promise in managing prognostic determinant tumors and potentially enhancing OS. Clinical trial information: jRCT2031210046 .

Nivolumab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy in treatment-naive patients with advanced grade 3 Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of gastroenteropancreatic or unknown origin: The multicenter phase 2 NICE-NEC trial (GETNE-T1913)

The prognosis of patients with advanced high-grade (G3) digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) is rather poor. The addition of immune checkpoint inhibition to platinum-based chemotherapy may improve survival. NICE-NEC (NCT03980925) is a single-arm, phase II trial that recruited chemotherapy-naive, unresectable advanced or metastatic G3 NENs of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) or unknown origin. Patients received nivolumab 360 mg intravenously (iv) on day 1, carboplatin AUC 5 iv on day 1, and etoposide 100 mg/m2/d iv on days 1–3, every 3 weeks for up to six cycles, followed by nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks for up to 24 months, disease progression, death or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the 12-month overall survival (OS) rate (H0 50%, H1 72%, β 80%, α 5%). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. From 2019 to 2021, 37 patients were enrolled. The most common primary sites were the pancreas (37.8%), stomach (16.2%) and colon (10.8%). Twenty-five patients (67.6%) were poorly differentiated carcinomas (NECs) and/or had a Ki67 index >55%. The ORR was 56.8%. Median PFS was 5.7 months (95%CI: 5.1-9) and median OS 13.9 months (95%CI: 8.3-Not reached), with a 12-month OS rate of 54.1% (95%CI: 40.2-72.8) that did not meet the primary endpoint. However, 37.6% of patients were long-term survivors (>2 years). The safety profile was consistent with previous reports. There was one treatment-related death. Nivolumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy was associated with prolonged survival in over one-third of chemonaïve patients with G3 GEP-NENs, with a manageable safety profile.

6 Durable response to immunotherapy-based regimens for IMDC favorable risk patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a pooled analysis of four published randomized control phase 3 trials

Abstract Background An immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) backbone of either ICI doublet (ipilimumab-nivolumab [ipi-nivo]) or tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with ICI (such as axitinib-pembrolizumab [axi-pembro], cabozantinib-nivolumab [cabo-nivo], or lenvatinib-pembrolizumab [len-pembro]) is the current standard of care for previously untreated, metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC). The phase 3 trials that evaluated these four regimens were compared to sunitinib, with no direct head-to-head clinical trial data available. With at least 4-year follow up data available, we compared the long-term responders of the IMDC favorable risk patients enrolled in the four phase 3 trials (CheckMate 214, KEYNOTE-426, CheckMate 9ER, and CLEAR). Methods Pseudo individual patient data (IPD) was obtained from the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves using the graph digitizer software IPDfromKM R package to extract coordinates of points on the curves and applied the numerical algorithm to reconstruct survival results. The hazard ratios (HRs) of the favorable risk group for both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) comparing the experimental arms to sunitinib were extracted. Responses were measured at 24 (durable response [DR]) and 36 months (extreme durable response [EDR]) and long-term OS as OS ≥48 months. K-M method using the extracted IPD was used to estimate the survival rates at 24-month PFS, 36-month PFS, and 48-month OS. Then, we compared the survival rates at each time point using the generalized linear model for the survival rates at fixed time points obtained from the K-M method. Results Len-pembro was associated with the highest DR (57.2%) and EDR (44.5%), while ipi-nivo had the lowest DR (36.0%), and cabo-nivo had the lowest EDR (18.8%). There was no difference in 48 month-OS among regimens (p=0.11), ranging between 58.3% (cabo-nivo) and 70.6% (len-pembro). Comparing the sunitinib control arms among the four studies, a numerically higher PFS at 24 months (59%) and 36 months (40%) was observed in the CheckMate 214 trial compared to the ICI-TKI trials (25-35% and 15-20%, respectively). The 48-month OS for the sunitinib arms ranged from 55-70%, and no differences were observed among trials (p=0.55). Comparisons of survival rates for the immunotherapy arm on fixed time-points for IMDC favorable risk subset of patients Conclusions ICI-based regimens provided durable responses to a significant number of patients with favorable risk mccRCC. While TKI-ICI were associated with higher DR and EDR, no differences in OS at 48 months were observed compared to ipi-nivo or sunitinib for favorable risk disease. Longer follow-up is necessary to evaluate long-term outcomes given the favorable prognosis of these patients. We acknowledge the limitations and caveats of cross-trial comparisons.

20 Evaluating intermediate endpoints for overall survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: an IMDC study

Abstract Background In Phase 3 trials, the assessment for primary endpoint of overall survival (OS) necessitates extended follow-up periods, a larger pool of events, and higher associated costs. Hence, we sought to determine whether shorter intermediate (IEs) such as Objective Response (OR), Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) and Time to Next Therapy (TTNT) are associated with OS in patients receiving immune checkpoint (ICI)-based therapy. Methods We included all International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) patients who received contemporary first line(1L) ICI from 2013 to 2023. IEs were defined from ICI start until drug cessation or death for TTF, and initiation of next line or death for TTNT, or censored at date of last follow-up. OR included investigators-assessed complete or partial response per RECIST1.1 criteria. First, we assessed the endpoint correlations across all follow-up times of individual patient data using Kendall’s Tau (KT) correlation by a Clayton copula. A KT >0.49 indicates a strong correlation (Wicklin R., 2023). Then we evaluated associations of OS with TTF and TTNT status at the 6-month landmark using Cox regression adjusting for IMDC risk groups, metastatic sites, histology, age, and prior nephrectomy, stratified by ICI type and years of ICI start. The KT correlation was estimated by the R GJRM package (https://www.r-project.org/). All other statistical analyses were done with SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Results The cohort consisted of 1667 patients with a median follow-up of 15.4 months (IQR: 7.1-28.6). For the 6-month landmark analysis in OS, patients who died or had less than 6 months of follow-up were excluded, affecting 278 for OR, 373 for TTF, and 380 for TTNT. Median age at 1L start was 63 years (IQR: 56-70), with 73% being male and 65% undergoing nephrectomy before starting 1L. A total of 1132 patients received dual ICI, while 535 received an ICI+TKI combination. Over the entire follow-up of individual patient data, the Kendall’s Tau correlation was 0.49 (95%CI: 0.45-0.52) for TTF with OS and 0.67 (95%CI: 0.64-0.69) for TTNT with OS. The Kendall’s Tau correlations between endpoints were also similar in subgroup analyses by IMDC risk group and type of regimen and the strongest in the ICI+TKI subgroup with a Kendall’s Tau correlation of 0.73(0.66-0.78). On the 6-month OS landmark analysis (Table), patients who discontinued their 1L regimen had poor OS (adjusted HR: 2.77 (95%CI: 2.16-3.55)). Additionally, those who transitioned to a 2L therapy within the first 6 months showed worse OS, reflected by an HR of 2.82 (2.22-3.59). Patients who did not have an objective response also had worse OS (adjusted HR: 2.74 (95%CI: 2.15-3.49)). On the other hand, patients with an objective response had an 18-month OS rate (equivalent of 12-month OS post the 6-month landmark) of 91% (95%CI: 88%-93%) vs 74% (95%CI: 70%-78%) for those with no response at 6 months. Table. Landmark analysis of OS from 6 months of post therapy initiation, according to OR, TTF and TTNT event status at 6 months, in whole cohort and by IMDC and treatment groups. Conclusions Our study explored TTF, TTNT and OR as clinical IEs for OS. TTNT demonstrated the strongest association with OS, particularly in the ICI+TKI subgroup, making it a potentially clinically meaningful intermediate endpoint for evaluating treatment efficacy in ICI-based regimens.

Digital subtraction angiography-guided pancreatic arterial infusion of GEMOX chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a phase II, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing with intravenous chemotherapy

BackgroundAdvanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma lacks effective treatment options, and systemic gemcitabine-based chemotherapy offers only marginal survival benefits at the cost of significant toxicities and adverse events. New therapeutic options with better drug availability are warranted. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of digital subtraction angiography (DSA)-guided pancreatic arterial infusion (PAI) versus intravenous chemotherapy (IVC) using the gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) regimen in unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) patients.Materials and methodsThis study prospectively enrolled 51 eligible treatment-naive patients with unresectable PC to receive GEMOX treatment via PAI or IVC (1:1 ratio randomization) from December 2015 to December 2019. Cycles were repeated monthly, and each process consisted of two treatments administered bi-weekly. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), 1-year survival, 6-month survival, tumor-site subgroup survival, and incidences of adverse events were compared.ResultsThe median OS of the PAI and IVC groups were 9.93 months and 10.07 months, respectively (p = 0.3049). The median PFS of the PAI and IVC groups were 5.07 months and 4.23 months (p = 0.1088). No significant differences were found in the ORR (11.54% vs. 4%, p = 0.6312), DCR (53.85% vs. 44%, p = 0.482), and 1-year OS rate (44% vs. 20.92%, p = 0.27) in PAI and IVC groups. The 6-month OS rate was significantly higher in the PAI group (100%) than in the IVC group (83.67%) (p = 0.0173). The median OS of patients in PAI group with pancreatic head and neck tumors were significantly higher than those of body and tail tumors (12.867 months vs. 9 months, p = 0.0214). The incidences of hematologic disorders, liver function disorders, and digestive disorders in the IVC group were higher than in the PAI group (p < 0.05).ConclusionGEMOX PAI therapy presented a higher 6-month OS rate and fewer adverse events than IVC in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. Those with pancreatic head and neck tumors may yield a superior treatment outcome from PAI treatment.Trial registration numberNCT02635971.Date of registration21/12/2015.

Serum CD133-Associated Proteins Identified by Machine Learning Are Connected to Neural Development, Cancer Pathways, and 12-Month Survival in Glioblastoma.

Glioma is the most prevalent type of primary central nervous system cancer, while glioblastoma (GBM) is its most aggressive variant, with a median survival of only 15 months when treated with maximal surgical resection followed by chemoradiation therapy (CRT). CD133 is a potentially significant GBM biomarker. However, current clinical biomarker studies rely on invasive tissue samples. These make prolonged data acquisition impossible, resulting in increased interest in the use of liquid biopsies. Our study, analyzed 7289 serum proteins from 109 patients with pathology-proven GBM obtained prior to CRT using the aptamer-based SOMAScan® proteomic assay technology. We developed a novel methodology that identified 24 proteins linked to both serum CD133 and 12-month overall survival (OS) through a multi-step machine learning (ML) analysis. These identified proteins were subsequently subjected to survival and clustering evaluations, categorizing patients into five risk groups that accurately predicted 12-month OS based on their protein profiles. Most of these proteins are involved in brain function, neural development, and/or cancer biology signaling, highlighting their significance and potential predictive value. Identifying these proteins provides a valuable foundation for future serum investigations as validation of clinically applicable GBM biomarkers can unlock immense potential for diagnostics and treatment monitoring.

Outcomes of Resectable Gallbladder Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis From a Tertiary Care Centre in India.

Background Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) has deleterious outcomes, but due to its reduced incidence in Western countries, there is a paucity of data on this disease. Here we report the outcomes of a retrospective analysis of resectable gallbladder cancer from a tertiary cancer centre in eastern India. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates among patients with resectable GBC. Methods A retrospective analysis was carried out on patients who underwent radical surgery between 2007 and 2022 and received various neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy methods. Patients who had adjuvant chemoradiotherapy concurrently or who did not receive adjuvant therapy were excluded. All the baseline clinicopathological characteristics were retrieved from electronic medical records. The survival data were collected from records of follow-up visits as well as telephonic calls to the patients who were lost to follow-up. Simple proportions were used for baseline characteristics, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Results A total of 161 patients were identified, and data were captured from electronic medical records. The included patients' ages ranged between 26 and 80 years, with a median age of 56 years. Among the participants, 103 were female (64%) and 58 (36%) were male. Among the 161 patients, the median number of lymph nodes harvested was nine (ranging from one to 43), and only three patients were margin-positive. The tumour, nodes, and metastasis (TNM) distributions were as follows: pT2 in 111 patients (70.25%), pT3 in 44 patients (27.85%), and pT4 in three patients (1.90%). The nodal statuses were pN0 in 91 patients (61.9%), pN1 in 51 patients (34.69%), and pN2 in five patients (3.4%). The majority (64%) received single-agent capecitabine, 27% received gemcitabine-based platinum doublet therapy, and 4.3% received neoadjuvant therapy. Of the full sample, 2.4% received concurrent adjuvant chemo plus radiation therapy, and three patients did not receive any adjuvant therapy. Additionally, among the 161 patients, 34.16% had a relapse, with 47% being local and 52% being distant relapses. The median follow-up was 49 months (interquartile range (IQR) 23-71 months). The 24-month RFS rate was 67.1% (SD+/- 4.3%), and the 24-month OS rate was 78.1% (SD+/- 4.1%). Conclusion Our data, which is from one of the largest samples from India, show that resectable gallbladder cancer has very good outcomes after radical surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. There was a higher proportion of T2 and node-negative disease, which could have led to better survival compared to published literature.

Vedolizumab plus basiliximab as second-line therapy for steroid-refractory lower gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease.

Steroid-resistant (SR) lower gastrointestinal (LGI) tract graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is the predominant cause of morbidity and mortality from GVHD after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The role of vedolizumab in the treatment of SR-LGI acute GVHD (aGVHD) remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab combined with basiliximab as second-line therapy for SR-LGI-aGVHD. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of vedolizumab combined with basiliximab for SR-LGI-aGVHD. The primary endpoint was the overall response (OR) on day 28. Secondary and safety endpoints included durable OR at day 56, overall survival (OS), chronic GVHD (cGVHD), non-relapse mortality (NRM), failure-free survival (FFS), and adverse events. Twenty-eight patients with SR-LGI-aGVHD were included. The median time to start of combination therapy after SR-LGI-aGVHD diagnosis was 7 (range, 4-16) days. The overall response rate (ORR) at 28 days was 75.0% (95% CI: 54.8%-88.6%), and 18 achieved a complete response (CR) (64.3%, 95% CI: 44.1%-80.7%). The durable OR at day 56 was 64.3% (95% CI: 44.1%-80.7%). The 100-day, 6-month, and 12-month OS rates for the entire cohort of patients were 60.7% (95% CI: 45.1%-81.8%), 60.7% (95% CI: 45.1%-81.8%), and 47.6% (95% CI: 31.4%-72.1%), respectively. The median failure-free survival was 276 days; (95% CI: 50-not evaluable) 12-month NRM was 42.9% (95% CI: 24.1%-60.3%). The 1-year cumulative incidence of cGVHD was 35.7%. Within 180 days after study treatments, the most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were infections. Nine (32.1%) patients developed cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation complicated with bacterial infections (25.0%, CMV infection; 7.1%, CMV viremia). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation occurred in five patients (17.9%, 95% CI: 6.8%-37.6%). Only three patients (10.7%, 95% CI: 2.8%-29.4%) in our study developed pseudomembranous colitis. Vedolizumab plus basiliximab demonstrated efficacy in severe SR-LGI-aGVHD and was well-tolerated. Vedolizumab plus basiliximab may be considered a potential treatment option for patients with LGI-aGVHD.

Outcomes of venetoclax-based therapy in patients with t(11;14) light chain amyloidosis after failure of daratumumab-based therapy

Background Daratumumab’s incorporation in the upfront treatment of light chain (AL) amyloidosis has led to daratumumab (dara) refractoriness early in disease course. Patients who experience relapse or have suboptimal response to dara-based-therapy, have limited options. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of venetoclax-based therapy in t(11;14) positive AL patients who previously failed dara. Methods Thirty-one patients with AL were included in this bi-institutional retrospective analysis. Results Dara failure was due to inadequate response in 20 (65%) patients, haematologic relapse in 7 (22%), and both haematologic plus organ relapse in 4 (13%). Overall haematologic response rate to venetoclax-based therapy was 97%, with ≥ VGPR being 91%. Of the 19 evaluable patients with cardiac involvement, 14 (74%) achieved organ response. Of the 13 evaluable patients with renal involvement, 6 (46%) achieved organ response. With a median follow-up of 22 months, median time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. The 12- and 24-month TTNT rates were 74% and 56%, respectively. At data-cut-off, four patients had died, all from AL-related organ complications. The 12- and 24-month OS rates were 89% and 85%, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 26% of patients, with 6% due to infections. Conclusion These findings are encouraging for the use of venetoclax as salvage therapy post-dara failure.

Combined radiation and chemotherapy versus monotherapy for anaplastic thyroid cancer: A SEER retrospective analysis

BackgroundThe effect of combined radiation and chemotherapy (combination therapy) versus monotherapy on anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) has not yet been clear. MethodsWe identified 516 ATC patients during 2010–2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database and evaluated their survival outcome using the Kaplan-Meier method, Cox regression analysis and propensity score matching (PSM) technique. ResultsThe median overall survival (OS) among the entire cohort was 3 months (95 % confidence interval [CI], 2.58–3.42 months), and the 6- and 12-month OS rates were 29 % (95 % CI, 25.01%–32.88 %) and 13 % (95 % CI, 10.60%–16.58 %), respectively. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that ATC patients not receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy were unquestionably associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] 3.000, 95 % CI, 2.390–3.764) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR = 3.107, 95 % CI, 2.388–4.043), compared with those receiving combination therapy. However, combination therapy did not predict better prognosis compared with monotherapy (all P > 0.05). After PSM, the median OS and CSS were also not significantly improved in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone (OS, P = 0.382; CSS, P = 0.420) or radiotherapy alone (OS, P = 0.065; CSS, P = 0.251). ConclusionCombination therapy, compared to monotherapy, does not have the expected improvement in survival beyond the benefits achievable with each single-modality treatment, necessitating further prospective research to tailor its treatment management.

Intensive induction chemotherapy vs hypomethylating agents in combination with venetoclax in NPM1-mutant AML

AbstractAlthough intensive induction chemotherapy (IC) remains the standard of care for younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), hypomethylating agents + venetoclax (HMA/VEN) can lead to durable remission among older patients with nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) mutations. Whether IC or HMA/VEN is superior in patients aged ≥60 years with NPM1-mutant AML is unknown. We performed an international, multicenter retrospective cohort study of 221 patients (147 IC and 74 HMA/VEN) with previously untreated NPM1-mutant AML. Composite complete remission (cCR) (defined as CR + CR with incomplete count recovery) rate was similar for IC and HMA/VEN (cCR, 85% vs 74%; P = .067). Although overall survival (OS) was favorable with IC in unselected patients compared with HMA/VEN (24-month OS, 59% [95% confidence interval (CI), 52-69%] vs 38% [95% CI, 27-55%]; P = .013), it was not statistically different among patients aged 60-75 years (60% [95% CI, 52-70%] vs 44% [95% CI, 29-66%]; P = .069) and patients who received an allogeneic stem cell transplant (70% [95% CI, 58-85%] vs 66% [95% CI, 44-100%]; P = .56). Subgroup analyses suggested that patients with normal cytogenetics (24-month OS, 65% [95% CI, 56-74%] with IC vs 40% [95% CI, 26-60%] with HMA/VEN; P = .009) and without FLT3 internal tandem duplication mutations might benefit from IC compared with HMA/VEN (24-month OS, 68% [95% CI, 59-79%] vs 43% [95% CI, 29-63%]; P = .008). In multivariable analysis, OS was not statistically different between patients treated with IC and HMA/VEN (hazard ratio for death with HMA/VEN vs IC, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.40-1.27; P = .25).

Real-world outcomes for patients with pleural mesothelioma: A multisite retrospective cohort study.

To evaluate the real-world treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with pleural mesothelioma (PM) in the era of immunotherapy. This retrospective audit included patients with PM diagnosed within three tertiary referral centers in Queensland, Australia from January 2017 to July 2023. Patient and treatment characteristics and outcomes were recorded. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Kaplan-Meier survival method. A total of 90 patients were included: 84% were male, the median age was 75 years (range 70-79) and 85% had baseline Eastern Group Cooperative Group of 0-1. Subtypes included 54% epithelioid, 17% biphasic, 12% sarcomatoid, and 17% unspecified/unknown. First-line treatment was received by 57/90 patients (63%) and 33/90 patients (37%) received the best supportive care (BSC). Chemotherapy was most used (63%) overall, but first-line immunotherapy was more commonly used since ipilimumab/nivolumab was reimbursed by the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in July 2021. After first-line treatment, only 40% received second-line treatment and 60% received BSC. 12-month overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival for all patients were 53% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 43-65) and 25% (95% CI 15-40) respectively. 12-month OS was 72%, 64%, and 29% for immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and BSC, respectively. There was no significant difference in survival between chemotherapy and immunotherapy (hazard ratio 1.28, 95% CI: 0.65-2.5, p=0.5). In our unselected real-world cohort, both chemotherapy and immunotherapy are active against PM, but the prognosis remains guarded. There remains a need for better treatment options, especially in the first-line setting. Enrolment in clinical trials is crucial to improving outcomes in this debilitating disease.

VAMANA: A phase 2 study of low-dose bevacizumab plus CCNU in relapsed/recurrent glioblastoma.

LBA2064 Background: There are limited systemic therapy options for recurrent glioblastomas (rGBM). CCNU and/or Bevacizumab are often used to treat rGBM not amenable to local therapy. The addition of Bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) to CCNU failed to improve overall survival in the EORTC 26101 study. The question is whether the failure was due to the high dose of Bevacizumab used in the study. High doses of Bevacizumab may lead to excessive pruning &amp; destruction of blood vessels, hampering the delivery of CCNU. In vitro &amp; in vivo studies showed that a lower dose of Bevacizumab (1-1.5 mg/kg) has the potential to normalize tumor vasculature leading to improved drug delivery &amp; outcomes. To test this hypothesis, we conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy of low-dose Bevacizumab in combination with CCNU in rGBM. Methods: This was a phase 2 open-label, single-arm trial that included adults with rGBM with an ECOG PS 0-2 and adequate organ &amp; marrow function. The participants received CCNU 110 mg/m2 PO once a day, on day 1 of a 42-day cycle (max. 8 cycles) with Bevacizumab 1.5 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks (max.16 cycles). Appropriate anti-emetic prophylaxis was given. Treatment continued until disease progression, clinical deterioration, or development of intolerable side effects. Response assessment was done with MRI Brain +/- spine at 2 monthly intervals till disease progression. The modified RANO criteria were used for response assessment. Safety assessments were done on day 8 of cycle 1, &amp; days 21 &amp; 42 of each cycle. The primary end-point of this study was overall survival (OS) and secondary end-points were progression-free survival (PFS) &amp; safety. A 6-month OS ≥ 40% was the signal to explore this regimen further and if the 6-month OS &lt;20% it would be considered futile. Descriptive statistics were performed and the Kaplan-Meier method was used for time-to-event analysis. Results: Forty-six patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 42 years (IQR 33-52.75) and 78.3% (36/46) were males. Most patients (76.1%, 35/46) had an ECOG PS of 1. The median follow-up duration was 15.27 months (95% CI 13.47-17.06). The median number of doses of Bevacizumab and CCNU were 4 and 2 respectively. Three (6.5%) patients completed all planned doses of Bevacizumab and CCNU. The objective response rate (ORR) was 15.2 % (7/46). The median OS was 6.133 months (95% CI 5.474-6.793). The 6-month OS was 57.1%. The median PFS was 3.267 months (95% CI 0.850-5.684). The most frequent grade 3 or higher toxicities seen were neutropenia (7/46, 15.2%), thrombocytopenia (5/46,10.8%), elevated ALT levels (3/46, 6.5%), anemia (2/46, 4.3%) and hyponatremia (2/46, 4.3%). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the efficacy of low-dose Bevacizumab in combination with CCNU in rGBM (the median OS exceeded the preplanned cut-off of 40%) with an acceptable toxicity profile and no new safety signals. This combination should be explored further in a phase III randomized study. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2020/07/026696 .

Brain metastases in clinical trial participants with KRAS-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving docetaxel: Pooled data analysis

ObjectivesLimited data are available on central nervous system (CNS) efficacy with standard-of-care therapies for KRAS-mutated (KRASmut) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence and progression of brain metastases in KRASmut advanced NSCLC treated with docetaxel using pooled data from historical clinical trials. Materials and MethodsData from phase 2/3 trials of docetaxel-containing regimens in advanced NSCLC were sourced from the Medidata platform. Analysis was restricted to stage IIIB-IV KRASmut NSCLC with disease progression after ≥ 1 systemic anticancer therapy. Participants with asymptomatic, treated, and stable brain metastases were included. Endpoints included 12-month CNS disease control rate (CNS-DCR) and CNS progression per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; progression-free survival (PFS); and overall survival (OS). Data were pooled and analyses stratified by baseline brain metastases status. ResultsA total of 595 participants were included in the analysis (62 [10%] with baseline brain metastases and 533 [90 %] without). Among participants with brain metastases, 17 (27.4 %) had CNS progression during docetaxel treatment and 12-month CNS-DCR was 75.8 %; 45 (8.4 %) participants without baseline brain metastases developed brain metastases during treatment. In an analysis restricted to patients with metastatic disease, outcomes with and without baseline brain metastases included: median PFS, 3.3 and 4.9 months (p < 0.005); 12-month PFS, 5 % and 16 %; median OS, 6.9 and 10.4 months (p < 0.005); and 12-month OS, 20 % and 44 %, respectively. ConclusionThese findings establish CNS progression rates with docetaxel in previously treated KRASmut advanced NSCLC and facilitate interpretation of data from ongoing randomized clinical trials of novel KRAS-targeted therapeutic strategies vs. docetaxel.

Ipilimumab and nivolumab plus UV1, an anticancer vaccination against telomerase, in advanced melanoma.

LBA9519 Background: The combination of ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO) remains a standard of care for patients with advanced melanoma, especially those with poor prognostic factors, albeit with a significant risk of toxicity. Therapeutic cancer vaccines are ideally positioned to improve outcomes without significantly increasing toxicity. UV1 is a therapeutic cancer vaccine generating T-cell responses against the universal cancer antigen telomerase. In a Phase I trial in melanoma (N = 30), UV1 plus pembrolizumab demonstrated a tolerable safety profile, a complete response rate of 33%, median PFS of 18.9 months, and 2-year OS rate of 73.3%. Recently, results from a randomized Phase II trial indicated a longer overall survival and a higher response rate for previously treated patients with advanced mesothelioma receiving UV1 in combination with IPI-NIVO (1). Methods: In this Phase II, open-label, multicenter study, we randomly assigned treatment-naïve patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma (stage IIIb-IIId or IV) to IPI 3mg/kg + NIVO 1mg/kg for 4 cycles, followed by NIVO 480 mg as maintenance, with or without 8 intradermal injections of 300 µg UV1 (+GM-CSF). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) according to RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, and safety. Results: A total of 156 patients underwent randomization; 78 patients were assigned to the IPI-NIVO-UV1 arm and 78 patients to the IPI-NIVO arm. The median age was 60, 48% had M1C or D disease, 38% had LDH &gt;upper limit of normal, and 42% had a positive BRAF mutation status. With a minimum follow-up of 18 months, the 12-month PFS rate was 57% in both arms (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.59-1.55, p value 0.845). The ORR was similar with IPI-NIVO-UV1 compared to IPI-NIVO, at 60% vs 59%, respectively (Odds ratio 1.12, 95% CI 0.58-2.16, p value 0.867). The 12-month OS rate was 87% and 88%, respectively (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.60-2.20, p value 0.674). The occurrence of grade &gt;3 adverse events was similar in both treatment arms. Conclusion: UV1 did not improve on outcomes of IPI-NIVO, in terms of PFS. Longer follow-up is required for the accurate assessment of OS. No significant toxicity increases were observed with the addition of UV1. Data from a biomarker driven cohort are awaited. 1. Helland et al, Eur J Cancer 2024. Clinical trial information: NCT04382664 .

Survival Impact of Inflammation-based Prognostic Scores in Metastatic or Unresectable Esophageal Cancer Treated With Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy.

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy has been indicated as the first-line treatment for metastatic or unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, pretreatment biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes remain unclear. We investigated the predictive value of inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients treated with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy. The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were calculated before initial treatment in 65 eligible patients with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer receiving pembrolizumab plus CF therapy, and the relationship between these biomarkers and clinical outcomes was analyzed. The objective response rate (ORR) and progression disease (PD) were observed in 51% and 21% of all patients. Patients with PNI<39 have significantly worse treatment responses than those with PNI≥39 (ORR; 28% vs. 60%, PD; 44% vs. 13%, P =0.020). Progression-free survival (PFS) is significantly associated with the PNI and CAR ( P <0.001 and P =0.004, respectively). Overall survival (OS) is associated with PNI, CAR, and PLR ( P <0.001, P =0.008, and P =0.018, respectively). The PNI cutoff value of 39 is identified as an independent factor for PFS (odds ratio=0.27, 95% CI: 0.18-0.81, P =0.012) and OS (odds ratio=0.22, 95% CI: 0.08-0.59, P =0.003). Patients with PNI<39 have significantly worse 6-month PFS and 1-year OS than those with PNI≥39 (27.8% vs. 66.7%, 27.2% vs. 81.1%, respectively). In conclusion, inflammation-based prognostic scores are associated with survival in patients treated with pembrolizumab plus CF therapy. Pretreatment PNI is a promising candidate for predicting treatment response and survival.

Absolute Lymphocyte Count and Outcomes of Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Idecabtagene Vicleucel: The US Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium Real- World Experience

Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) has shown impressive efficacy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). This study aimed to investigate the impact of absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) on the survival outcomes of RRMM patients treated with standard of care (SOC) ide-cel. Data were collected retrospectively from 11 institutions in the U.S. Impact of ALC parameters including pre-apheresis (pre-A), pre-lymphodepletion (pre-LD), absolute and percent difference from pre-A to pre-LD on clinical outcomes after ide-cel were examined using survival analysis. A new ALC profile was created based on univariate analysis that comprises 3 groups: normal (≥1 × 109/L) pre-LD ALC (LDN), low (<1 × 109/L) pre-LD ALC (LDL) + percent reduction <37.5 (%RL), and LDL ALC + percent reduction ≥37.5 (%RH). A total of 214 SOC ide-cel recipients were included in this analysis. The median patient age was 64 years (interquartile range [IQR], 57 to 69 years), median number of prior therapies was 6 (IQR, 5 to 9), and median duration of follow-up was 5.4 months (IQR, 2.1 to 8.3 months). Most patients had both low pre-A ALC (75.3%) and pre-LD ALC (77.2%), and the reduction from pre-A to pre-LD (median, .65 to .55 × 109/L) was statistically significant. Univariate analysis showed that the LDL + %RH group had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to the LDL + %RL and LDN ALC groups (6-month PFS: 40% versus 67.6% and 60.9%; 6-month OS: 69.5% versus 87% and 94.3%). In multivariable analysis, after adjusting for age, performance status, cytogenetic risk, use of bridging therapy, and extramedullary disease, PFS did not maintain its statistical significance; however, OS remained significantly worse for LDL + %RH group compared to the LDN ALC group (hazard ratio [HR], 4.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 17), but the difference between the LDL + %RH versus %RL groups was not statistically significant (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, .8 to 4.0). Our findings indicate that low pre-LD ALC with high %R from pre-A to pre-LD was associated with inferior survival outcomes, particularly OS, in patients who received SOC ide-cel.

Avelumab (A) as neoadjuvant therapy in patients (pts) with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC): Survival data of AURA trial, Oncodistinct 004.

4516 Background: Immunotherapy in the perioperative setting of MIUC appears promising. The AURA trial (NCT03674424) investigated the addition of avelumab to neoadjuvant dose-dense MVAC (ddMVAC) or cisplatin-gemcitabine (CG) respectively, followed by surgery in the cisplatin-eligible cohort. The primary endpoint was previously reported with high pathological complete response (pCR) rates with each cisplatin-based regimen. In the cisplatin-ineligible cohort, pts were randomized to neoadjuvant A alone or in combination with paclitaxel-gemcitabine (PG) followed by surgery. Avelumab monotherapy showed encouraging pCR but the addition of PG did not provide any benefit. Here, we report the survival data from cisplatin-eligible and ineligible cohorts of the AURA trial. Methods: In the cisplatin-eligible cohort, 79 pts were randomly assigned to the ddMVAC-A (n=39) or CG-A (n=40) groups. In the cisplatin-ineligible cohort, 58 pts were randomly assigned to the PG-A (n=29) or A (n=29) groups. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method at 12 months and 36 months for the overall cohort and by subgroups. Results: Median follow-up was 33 months and 45 deaths were reported. In the cisplatin-eligible cohort, 12-month DFS was 92% (95% CI, 83-96%) and 36-month DFS was 72% (95% CI, 57-83%). For ddMVAC-A group: 97% and 77%, respectively. For CG-A group: 86% and 68%. Overall, 12-month OS was 89% (95% CI, 80-95%) and 36-month OS was 73% (95% CI, 61-83%). For ddMVAC-A: 95% and 87%. For CG-A: 84% and 61%. Among the ypT0N0 pts, no events were registered within 12 months of follow-up showing a DFS rate of 100% for both arms. At 36 months no events were reported for pts treated with ddMVAC-A and two for CG-A showing DFS rates of 100% and 78% respectively. In the cisplatin-ineligible cohort, 12-month DFS was 60% (95% CI, 46-72%) and 12-month OS was 71% (95% CI, 57-81%). For PG-A: 52% and 67%. For A: 68% and 75%. Among the ypT0N0 pts, no DFS events occurred within 12 months. Data for 36-month are not yet mature. Overall, the main cause of death was disease progression (73%). Conclusions: The addition of neoadjuvant avelumab to cisplatin-based chemotherapy results in a high DFS and OS at 12 and 36 months respectively, especially in pts with complete response to neoadjuvant treatment. Combination with ddMVAC regimen offers robust activity. Cisplatin-ineligible pts had lower survival outcomes with no benefit of PG addition. Clinical trial information: NCT03674424 . [Table: see text]

Frailty risk assessment and impact on acute myeloid leukemia outcomes (FRAIL-AML): A population-based study from Ontario, Canada.

6506 Background: In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), treatment decisions, specifically intensive versus non-intensive approaches, depend on the clinician’s assessment of patient fitness. Frailty as a measure of fitness is a broader concept than commodities and is associated with worse outcomes in many cancers. Frailty assessment is incorporated to provide the precision to oncology treatment selections in addition to disease-related factors. The impact of frailty on outcomes in AML is not well studied. Methods: This retrospective cohort study from population-based health administrative databases in Ontario, Canada (ICES) included all patients (pts) ≥18 years diagnosed with AML between 2006 and 2021, treated within 90 days after diagnosis. Frailty was measured using McIsaacs’s frailty index (MFI)- a validated tool. Progressively increasing tertiles of MFI were categorized as fit (FT), pre-frail (PFR), or frail (FR). Treatment intensity was classified as intensive (IT) or non-intensive (NIT) based on standard practices. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Association of frailty with OS was measured using Cox regression separately for IT and NIT AML. Results: Out of 5450 pts, with a median age of 65 (IQR 54-74), 55.8% were males and 44.2% were females. 65% (n=3543) received IT, out of which 29.4% and 35.5% pts were FR and PFR respectively. Remaining 35% (n=1907) received NIT, with 41.1% and 32.3% pts being FR and PFR. Median overall survival in months (OS, 95% CI) for the entire group, IT, and NIT were 12.5 (12.0-13.2), 16.7 (15.7-18.2), and 7.6 (7.0-8.2), respectively. OS (table) was notably lower in FR pts compared to fit pts (p&lt;0.0001) in both IT and NIT. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified frailty, advanced age, and previous non-AML malignancy as risk factors associated with worse OS in both IT and NIT groups (table). Conclusions: Higher frailty is independently associated with worse OS in AML pts after adjusting for advanced age. A substantial proportion of AML pts in both IT and NIT groups exhibit a mismatch in treatment intensity assignments based on their frailty status, with about 30 % FR pts receiving IT and over 25 % FT pts receiving NIT. This study sheds light on the need for frailty evaluations using standardized tools to optimize treatment decisions in AML pts. [Table: see text]