Molecular photoswitches such as azobenzenes, which undergo photochemical trans ↔ cis isomerizations, are often mounted for possible applications on a surface and/or surrounded by other switches, for example, in self-assembled monolayers. This may suppress the isomerization cross section due to possible steric reasons, or, as recently speculated, by exciton coupling to neighboring switches, leading to ultrafast electronic quenching (Gahl et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1831). The presence of exciton coupling has been anticipated from a blue shift of the optical absorption band, compared to molecules in solution. From the theory side the need arises to properly analyze and quantify the change of absorption spectra of interacting and adsorbed switches. In particular, suitable methods should be identified, and effects of intermolecule and molecule-surface interactions on spectra should be disentangled. In this paper by means of time-dependent Hartree-Fock (TD-HF), various flavors of time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT), and the correlated wave function based coupled-cluster (CC2) method we investigated the 4-nitroazobenzene molecule as an example: The low-lying singlet excited states in the isolated trans monomer and dimer as well as their composites with a silicon pentamantane nanocluster, which serves also as a crude model for a silicon surface, were determined. As most important results we found that (i) HF, CC2, range-separated density functionals, or global hybrids with large amount of exact exchange are able to describe exciton (Davydov) splitting properly, while hybrids with small amount of exact exchange fail producing spurious charge transfer. (ii) The exciton splitting in a free dimer would lead to a blue shift of the absorption signal; however, this effect is almost nullified or even overcompensated by the shift arising from van der Waals interactions between the two molecules. (iii) Adsorption on the Si "surface" leads to a further, strong red shift for the present system. (iv) At a next-nearest neighbor distance (of ∼3.6 Å), the exciton splitting is ∼0.3 eV, with or without "surface", suggesting a rapid quenching of the molecular π → π* excitation. At larger distances, exciton splitting decreases rapidly.