10-year Hip Research Articles

Risk of Fractures Following Cataract Surgery in Medicare Beneficiaries

Visual impairment is a known risk factor for fractures. Little is known about the association of cataract surgery with fracture risk. To determine the association of cataract surgery with subsequent fracture risk in US Medicare beneficiaries with a diagnosis of cataract. Retrospective study of 1-year fracture incidence in a 5% random sample of Medicare Part B beneficiaries with cataract who received and did not receive cataract surgery from 2002 through 2009. One-year incidence of hip fractures. Analyses were adjusted for age; sex; race/ethnicity; US region of residence; systemic comorbidities, including Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score; ocular comorbidities; cataract severity; and presence of physically limiting conditions. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of hip fractures were calculated using logistic regression modeling. There were 1,113,640 US Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older with a diagnosis of cataract between 2002 and 2009 in the 5% random sample; of these patients, 410,809 (36.9%) received cataract surgery during the study period. There were 13,976 patients (1.3%) who sustained a hip fracture during the study period. The most common fracture-related comorbidity was osteoporosis (n = 134,335; 12.1%). The most common ocular comorbidity was glaucoma (n = 212,382; 19.1%). Compared with 1-year hip fracture incidence in patients with cataract who did not have cataract surgery, adjusted OR of hip fracture within 1 year after cataract surgery was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.81-0.87) with an absolute risk difference of 0.20%. Compared with matched subgroups of patients who did not receive cataract surgery, patient subgroups that experienced lower odds of hip fracture after cataract surgery included patients with severe cataract, patients most likely to receive cataract surgery based on propensity score, patients 75 years and older, and patients with a CCI score of 3 or greater. In a cohort of US Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older with a diagnosis of cataract, patients who had cataract surgery had lower odds of hip fracture within 1 year after surgery compared with patients who had not undergone cataract surgery.

Prevalence of osteoporotic fracture risk factors and antiosteoporotic treatments in the Valencia region, Spain. The baseline characteristics of the ESOSVAL cohort

This study provides information on the prevalence of the most important risk factors for osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture in a large sample of women and men from the Valencia region and also provides the FRAX 10-year major and hip fracture risks for this population, as well as data about the use of diagnostic tests and antiosteoporotic treatments. The purpose of this study was to describe demographic characteristics, osteoporosis risk factors, the 10-year risk of osteoporotic fracture, and the use of densitometry and antiosteoporotic treatments in the Valencia region, Spain. A cross-sectional study using the ESOSVAL cohort baseline data was conducted. We analyze the data from 5,310 women and 5,725 men aged 50 and over who attended to 272 collaborating primary care centers in 2009-2010. We collected the demographic, anthropometric, clinical, and pharmacy data from the electronic medical record. The mean age of participants was 64.3 years old for women and 65.6 years old for men. The most frequent fracture risk factors were sedentary life (22.2 %) and previous fracture (15.8 %) in women and low calcium intake (21.4 %) and current smoker (20.9 %) in men. According to FRAX(®), the 10-year risk of presenting a major fracture was 5.5 % for the women and 2.8 % for the men. The 10-year risk for hip fracture was 1.9 and 1.1 % for the women and the men, respectively; 23.8 % of the women and 5.2 % of the men had a densitometry test, 27.7 % of the women and 3.5 % of the men were taking calcium and/or vitamin D supplements, and 28.2 % of the women (22.0 % in the 50-64 age group) and 2.3 % of the men were taking antiosteoporotic drugs. The prevalence of certain fracture risk factors not included in the FRAX tool (sedentary life, falls, low calcium intake) is high. In young women, their low risks estimated by FRAX contrast with the high figures for densitometry testing and treatment.

762 FRAX® ASSESSMENT OF MEN TREATED WITH ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION THERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER

You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Advanced II1 Apr 2012762 FRAX® ASSESSMENT OF MEN TREATED WITH ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION THERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER Rafal Turo and William Cross Rafal TuroRafal Turo Leeds, United Kingdom More articles by this author and William CrossWilliam Cross Leeds, United Kingdom More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.849AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer is associated with loss of bone mineral density (BMD) and increased risk of fracture. At present, there is limited information on which men are suitable for preventative therapy to maintain bone health. In men treated with ADT for prostate cancer, we have evaluated fracture risk by application of the WHO/FRAX® tool. METHODS Patient and treatment parameters were prospectively collected from a practice cohort of men with prostate cancer treated with ADT. Fracture risk was calculated using the online WHO/FRAX® algorithm. RESULTS A total of 121 men with a median age of 76 years were evaluated. Bone metastases were present in 43.8% of subjects and 7.4% had a history of fracture. By the FRAX® algorithm the 3% hip fracture risk threshold for preventative treatment was exceeded by 66.9% of men (median 10-year hip fracture risk was 4.7%)Figure 1. When subjects were grouped by age the treatment threshold was exceeded by 18.5% of those younger than 70 years, 64.6% of those 70 to 79 years old and by 97.8 % of those 80 years old or older. Fracture risk was recalculated based on a normal dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry result and the median 10-year hip fracture risk was 1.7% and 9.9% of subjects exceeded the 3% threshold for pharmacotherapy Figure 2. CONCLUSIONS In this cohort of men the FRAX® calculated risk of fracture was clinically significant. The results have highlighted the need to address bone health and have guided our service development. © 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 187Issue 4SApril 2012Page: e311-e312 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Rafal Turo Leeds, United Kingdom More articles by this author William Cross Leeds, United Kingdom More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Prevalence and seasonal variation of hypovitaminosis D and its relationship to bone metabolism in healthy Hungarian men over 50 years of age: the HunMen Study

This study reports a high prevalence of hypovitaminosis D and low bone mineral density (BMD) in a healthy Hungarian male cohort over 50years of age. Men with 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels of <75nmol/L had a significantly higher 10-year hip and major osteoporotic fracture probability using the country-specific fracture risk assessment (FRAX) algorithm. The aim of this study is to characterize the prevalence and seasonal variation of hypovitaminosis D and its relationship to bone metabolism in healthy Hungarian men over 50years of age. We determined levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH-D), PTH, osteocalcin (OC), C-terminal telopeptides of type-I collagen (CTX-I), procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (PINP), BMD at L1-L4 (LS) and femur neck (FN), daily dietary calcium intake, and the 10-year probability of hip fracture and a major osteoporotic fracture using the country-specific FRAX algorithm in 206 randomly selected ambulatory men. The mean (range) age of the volunteers was 60 (51-81) years. The prevalence of hypovitaminosis D (25-OH-D, <75nmol/L) was 52.9%. The prevalence of low (T-score < -1.0) BMD at the FN and LS was 45% and 35.4%, respectively. The mean (range) FRAX hip fracture and FRAX major osteoporotic fracture was 0.8% (0-9.4%) and 3.8% (1.7-16%), respectively. On comparing the vitamin D sufficient to the insufficient group, there was a statistically significant difference between the FRAX hip fracture and FRAX major osteoporotic fracture indexes. There was significant seasonal variation in the vitamin D levels; the lowest levels were measured in winter and the highest in summer. A high prevalence of hypovitaminosis D and low BMD were observed in the studied Hungarian male population. This is the first study reporting higher 10-year hip and major osteoporotic fracture probability using the country-specific FRAX algorithm in individuals with hypovitaminosis D.

Does osteoporosis therapy invalidate FRAX for fracture prediction?

Ten-year fracture risk assessment with the fracture risk assessment system (FRAX) is increasingly used to guide treatment decisions. Osteoporosis pharmacotherapy reduces fracture risk, but the effect is greater than can be explained from the increase in bone mineral density (BMD). Whether this invalidates fracture predictions with FRAX is uncertain. A total of 35,764 women (age ≥50 years) and baseline BMD testing (1996–2007) had FRAX probabilities retroactively calculated. A provincial pharmacy database was used to identify osteoporosis medication use. Women were categorized as untreated, current high adherence users [medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥0.80 in the year after BMD testing], current low adherence users (MPR <0.80), and past users. Fractures outcomes to 10 years were established form a population-based health data repository. FRAX and femoral neck BMD alone stratified major osteoporotic and hip fracture risk within untreated and each treated subgroup (all p-values <0.001) with similar area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. In untreated and each treated subgroup, a stepwise gradient in observed 10-year major osteoporotic and hip fracture incidence was found as a function of the predicted probability tertile (all p-values <0.001 for linear trend). Concordance (calibration) plots for major osteoporotic fractures and hip fractures showed good agreement between the predicted and observed 10-year fracture incidence in untreated women and each treated subgroup. Only in the highest risk tertile of women highly adherent to at least 5 years of bisphosphonate use was observed hip fracture risk significantly less than predicted, though major osteoporotic fracture risk was similar to predicted. In summary, this work suggests that the FRAX tool can be used to predict fracture probability in women currently or previously treated for osteoporosis. Although FRAX should not be used to assess the reduction in fracture risk in individuals on treatment, it may still have value for guiding the need for continued treatment or treatment withdrawal

Cost-effectiveness of bone densitometry among Caucasian women and men without a prior fracture according to age and body weight.

We used a microsimulation model to estimate the threshold body weights at which screening bone densitometry is cost-effective. Among women aged 55-65years and men aged 55-75years without a prior fracture, body weight can be used to identify those for whom bone densitometry is cost-effective. Bone densitometry may be more cost-effective for those with lower body weight since the prevalence of osteoporosis is higher for those with low body weight. Our purpose was to estimate weight thresholds below which bone densitometry is cost-effective for women and men without a prior clinical fracture at ages 55, 60, 65, 75, and 80years. We used a microsimulation model to estimate the costs and health benefits of bone densitometry and 5years of fracture prevention therapy for those without prior fracture but with femoral neck osteoporosis (T-score ≤ -2.5) and a 10-year hip fracture risk of ≥3%. Threshold pre-test probabilities of low BMD warranting drug therapy at which bone densitometry is cost-effective were calculated. Corresponding body weight thresholds were estimated using data from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF), the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study, and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for 2005-2006. Assuming a willingness to pay of $75,000 per quality adjusted life year (QALY) and drug cost of $500/year, body weight thresholds below which bone densitometry is cost-effective for those without a prior fracture were 74, 90, and 100kg, respectively, for women aged 55, 65, and 80years; and were 67, 101, and 108kg, respectively, for men aged 55, 75, and 80years. For women aged 55-65years and men aged 55-75years without a prior fracture, body weight can be used to select those for whom bone densitometry is cost-effective.

Guidance for the prevention of bone loss and fractures in postmenopausal women treated with aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer: an ESCEO position paper

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are widely used in women with breast cancer, but they are known to increase bone loss and risk of fractures. Based on available evidence and recommendations, an ESCEO working group proposes specific guidance for the prevention of AIs-induced bone loss and fragility fractures. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are now the standard treatment for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. However, deleterious effects of AIs on bone health have been reported. An ESCEO working group proposes guidance for the prevention of bone loss and fragility fractures in post-menopausal women with breast cancer receiving AIs. A panel of experts addressed the issue of skeletal effects of AIs and effectiveness of antifracture therapies for the prevention of AI-induced bone loss and fractures. Recommendations by national and international organizations, and experts' opinions on this topic were evaluated. All aromatase inhibitors are associated with negative effects on the skeleton, resulting in bone loss and increased risk of fragility fractures. Current guidelines suggest approaches that differ both in terms of drugs proposed for fracture prevention and duration of treatment. The ESCEO working group recommends that all AI-treated women should be evaluated for fracture risk. Besides general recommendations, zoledronic acid 4 mg i.v. every 6 months, denosumab s.c., or possibly oral bisphosphonates should be administered for the entire period of AI treatment to all osteoporotic women (T-score hip/spine <-2.5 or ≥ 1 prevalent fragility fracture), to women aged ≥ 75 irrespective of BMD, and to patients with T-score <-1.5 + ≥ 1 clinical risk factor or T-score <-1.0 + ≥ 2 clinical risk factors. Alternatively, therapy could be considered in patients with a FRAX-determined 10-year hip fracture probability ≥ 3%.

Identifying Individuals at Risk for Fracture in Guatemala

IntroductionThe FRAX calculator combines a set of clinical risk factors with country-specific incidence rates to determine the ten-year absolute risk of major osteoporotic fracture. However, regional or country-specific databases from Central American countries are not available. We compared the use of various FRAX databases and the Pluijm algorithm in determining risk of fracture.MethodsWe collected clinical risk factor data needed for the FRAX calculator and Pluijm algorithm of Hispanic women in Guatemala and calculated the FRAX absolute risk measures of major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture. Subjects were postmenopausal women greater than age 40 with no history of using medication that affect bone. A random sample of 204 women in 34 different regions women in Guatemala City was visited in their homes to complete the surveys. The Pluijm risk score and FRAX risk score using the US Hispanic, Spain, and Mexican databases were calculated.ResultsWe used the US NOF guidelines for treatment which suggest a treatment threshold for patients with a 10-year hip fracture probability ≥3% or a 10-year major osteoporotic fracture risk ≥20%. The number of patients meeting the suggested threshold limits for treatment using the Spain and Mexico calculators were identical. There was 100% conformity in threshold limits for both hip and major osteoporotic fracture risk. The mean conformity for any fracture risk between US Hispanic and the other two databases was 97.5%. Conformity was 99.0% based on major osteoporotic fracture and 97.5% based on risk of hip fracture. The Pluijm evaluation shows conformity of 87.2% and 83.3%, respectively, when compared to the US Hispanic and Spain/Mexico FRAX thresholds for risk of fracture.DiscussionAlthough the different FRAX databases provide variations in the absolute risk of fracture, the overall conformity to treatment thresholds amongst the US Hispanic, Spain, and Mexico databases show the database used would have little effect as to the decision to treat. The Pluijm tool conforms to the FRAX thresholds and can be used as well. It does not matter which country-specific calculator or assessment tool is used, as there are a similar number of patients that would meet the intervention threshold.

An Internet-Based Osteoporotic Fracture Risk Program: Effect on Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors

The 2004 Surgeon General's Bone Health Report calls for innovative interventions to reduce osteoporotic fracture. We developed an Internet-based risk- and stage-tailored intervention to promote self-management of fracture risk. We randomized 121 women to receive 18 personalized Internet-based tutorials with behavior modification strategies for nutrition, exercise, and other behaviors (n=61) or to receive standard information (n=60). Tutorials were tailored for 10-year hip fracture risk, osteoporosis knowledge, attitudes about osteoporosis, nutritional intake, and exercise levels. Participants in both groups completed questionnaires at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Qualitative data included tutorial evaluation forms and focus groups. Main outcomes were perceived impact of the intervention, and changes in osteoporosis knowledge and beliefs, calcium and vitamin D intake, and exercise levels. At 6 months, 80% of intervention and 92% of control group participants completed the study. The intervention group significantly increased general osteoporosis knowledge (p=0.03) and calcium knowledge (p=0.02) compared with the control group. At 6 months, intervention participants were not significantly more likely to meet recommendations for calcium (OR: 1.39; 95% CI: 0.64-3.0; p=0.40), vitamin D (OR: 1.27; CI: 0.61-2.66; p=0.53), or aerobic (OR: 1.49; 95% CI: 0.63-3.48; p=0.36) or resistance exercise (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 0.66-2.79; p=0.40) compared with control group participants. Thematic analyses of two focus groups and 794 tutorial evaluation forms, however, indicated that the intervention improved participant ability to implement and maintain healthy behaviors. Participants suggested program refinements including virtual support groups, applications for portable devices, and tailoring of tutorial length. The risk- and stage-tailored intervention was associated with improved knowledge but was not associated with significant behavioral improvements. Qualitative results suggest the intervention improved behavior implementation and maintenance. A refined intervention with additional tailoring capabilities could be used with Internet-based fracture risk assessment tools to confront the growing societal burden of osteoporotic fractures.

Fracture risk assessment without bone density measurement in routine clinical practice

Fracture probability assessed without bone mineral density (BMD) could potentially be sufficient for clinical decision making in many individuals categorized as low or high fracture risk. For individuals falling in a moderate risk range, there is incremental value in using BMD in the probability calculation as this appropriately reclassifies risk in over one third of the individuals. A new fracture risk assessment tool from the World Health Organization (FRAX) estimates 10-year major osteoporotic and hip fracture probabilities from multiple clinical risk factors with or without hip BMD. The objective of this study is to determine whether fracture probability derived without BMD can be used to identify individuals who would be designated for treatment. A historical cohort of 36,730 women and 2,873 men aged 50 years and older drawn from the Manitoba Bone Density Program database, which contains clinical BMD results for the Province of Manitoba, Canada, was included in the study. When 10-year probability for major osteoporotic fracture estimated without knowledge of BMD was high (≥ 20%), the vast majority (92.8%) qualified for intervention under the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) guidelines, whereas among those at low risk (<10%), the vast majority (80.5%) did not satisfy any NOF intervention criteria. The benefit of including BMD in the risk assessment was greatest among those initially at moderate risk (10-19%) when fracture probability was derived without BMD, but this represented only 29.4% of the cohort (9.3% of those aged < 65 years and 48.7% of those ≥ 65 years). Fracture probability derived without BMD is able to risk stratify women in terms of future fracture risk and could potentially be sufficient for clinical decision making in many of those designated at low or high fracture risk.

Risk communication methods in hip fracture prevention: a randomised trial in primary care

Treatment acceptance by patients is influenced by the way treatment effects are presented. Presentation of benefits using relative risk increases treatment acceptance compared to the use of absolute risk. It is not known whether this effect is modified by prior presentation of a patient's individualised risk estimate or how presentation of treatment harms by relative or absolute risk affects acceptance. To compare acceptance of a hypothetical treatment to prevent hip fracture after presentation of the treatment's benefit in relative or absolute terms in the context of a personal fracture risk estimate, and to reassess acceptance following subsequent presentation of harm in relative or absolute terms. Randomised controlled trial of patients recruited from 10 GPs' lists in Christchurch, New Zealand. Women aged ≥ 50 years were invited to participate. Participants were given a personal 10-year hip fracture risk estimate and randomised to receive information on a hypothetical treatment's benefit and harm in relative or absolute terms. Of the 1140 women invited to participate 393 (34%) took part. Treatment acceptance was greater following presentation of benefit using absolute terms than relative terms after adjustment forage, education, previous osteoporosis diagnosis, and self-reported risk (OR 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10 to 2.73, P = 0.018). Presentation of the treatment's harmful effect in relative terms led to a greater proportion of participants declining treatment than did presentation in absolute terms (OR 4.89, 95% CI = 2.3 to 11.0, P<0.001). Presentation of treatment benefit and harm using absolute risk estimates led to greater treatment acceptance than presentation of the same information in relative terms.

Fracture risk assessed by Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) compared with fracture risk derived from population fracture rates

To evaluate the performance of the Swedish version of Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX)) without bone mass density (BMD) in a Danish population to examine the possibility of applying this version to Danish women. From the Danish National Register of social security numbers, we randomly selected 5000 women living in the region of Southern Denmark aged 40-90 years to receive a mailed questionnaire concerning risk factors for osteoporosis based on FRAX. The predicted 10-year probability of hip fractures was calculated for each woman returning a complete questionnaire using the Swedish version of FRAX. The observed 10-year hip fracture risk was also calculated for each woman using age-specific hip fracture rates from the National Hospital Discharge Register and National survival tables. A total of 4194 (84%) women responded to the questionnaire and 3636 (73%) gave complete information and were included in the analysis. Using FRAX, the predicted 10-year fracture risk was 7.6%, ranging from 0.3 to 25.0% at the age of 41-50 and 81-90, respectively, while the corresponding observed fracture risk was 7.6%, ranging from 0.4 to 24.0%, respectively and not significantly different from the predicted risk (p = 0.92). The Swedish version of FRAX without BMD is applicable to Danish women.

High fracture probability with FRAX® usually indicates densitometric osteoporosis: implications for clinical practice

Most patients designated as high risk of fracture using fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) with femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) (i.e., 10-year major osteoporotic fracture probability exceeding 20% or hip fracture exceeding 3%) have one or more T-scores in the osteoporotic range; conversely, almost no high risk patients have normal T-scores at all bone mineral density measurement sites. We determined the agreement between a FRAX designation of high risk of fracture [defined as 10-year major osteoporotic fracture probability (≥ 20%) or hip fracture probability (≥ 3%)] and the WHO categorizations of bone mineral density according to T-score. Ten-year FRAX probabilities calculated with femoral neck BMD were derived using both Canadian and US white tools for a large clinical cohort of 36,730 women and 2,873 men age 50 years and older from Manitoba, Canada. Individuals were classified according to FRAX fracture probability and BMD T-scores alone. Most individuals designated by FRAX as high risk of major osteoporotic fracture had a T-score in the osteoporotic range at one or more BMD measurement sites (85% with Canadian tool and 83% with US white tool). The majority of individuals deemed at high risk of hip fracture had one or more T-scores in the osteoporotic range (66% with Canadian tool and 64% with US white tool). Conversely, there were extremely few individuals (<1%) who were at high risk of major osteoporotic or hip fracture with normal T-scores at all BMD measurement sites. A FRAX designation of high risk of fracture is usually associated with a densitometric diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Construction of a FRAX® model for the assessment of fracture probability in Canada and implications for treatment

We describe the creation of a FRAX® model for the assessment of fracture probability in Canadian men and women, calibrated from national hip fracture and mortality data. This FRAX tool was used to examine possible thresholds for therapeutic intervention in Canada in two large complementary cohorts of women and men. To evaluate a Canadian World Health Organization (WHO) fracture risk assessment (FRAX®) tool for computing 10-year probabilities of osteoporotic fracture. Fracture probabilities were computed from national hip fracture data (2005) and death hazards (2004) for Canada. Probabilities took account of age, sex, clinical risk factors (CRFs), and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD). Treatment implications were studied in two large cohorts of individuals age 50years and older: the population-based Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (4,778 women and 1,919 men) and the clinically referred Manitoba BMD Cohort (36,730 women and 2,873 men). Fracture probabilities increased with age, decreasing femoral neck T-score, and number of CRFs. Among women, 10.1-11.3% would be designated high risk based upon 10-year major osteoporotic fracture probability exceeding 20%. A much larger proportion would be designated high risk based upon 10-year hip fracture probability exceeding 3% (25.7-28.0%) or osteoporotic BMD (27.1-30.9%), and relatively few from prior hip or clinical spine fracture (1.6-4.2%). One or more criteria for intervention were met by 29.2-34.0% of women excluding hip fracture probability (35.3-41.0% including hip fracture probability). Lower intervention rates were seen among CaMos (Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study) men (6.8-12.9%), but in clinically referred men from the Manitoba BMD Cohort, one or more criteria for high risk were seen for 26.4% excluding hip fracture probability (42.4% including hip fracture probability). The FRAX tool can be used to identify intervention thresholds in Canada. The FRAX model supports a shift from a dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-based intervention strategy, towards a strategy based on fracture probability for a major osteoporotic fracture.

Application of a Fracture Risk Algorithm to Men Treated With Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

Osteoporosis causes morbidity and mortality in men. The National Osteoporosis Foundation recommends fracture risk assessment with the online WHO/FRAX tool. Although androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer increases fracture risk, there is limited information about which men require preventative drug therapy. We applied the WHO/FRAX tool to men treated with androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. Information was collected from a practice cohort of men treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, and included age, height, weight, history of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment, dual energy x-ray absorptiometry results, prior bone targeted therapy and clinical risk factors for fracture. Subjects were evaluated with the WHO/FRAX algorithm (http://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/). A total of 363 men treated with androgen deprivation therapy (median age 72 years) were evaluated. By the FRAX algorithm with clinical information (no dual energy x-ray absorptiometry data) the 3% hip fracture risk threshold for treatment was exceeded by 51.2% of the men (median risk 3.1%). When subjects were grouped by age the treatment threshold was reached by 3.3% of those younger than 70 years, 76.6% of those 70 to 79 years old and by 98.8% of those 80 years old or older. Using FRAX with bone mineral density data in the 93 patients who underwent bone mineral density testing the median 10-year hip fracture risk was 0.9% and the treatment threshold was exceeded by 15% of these subjects. In this cohort of men receiving androgen deprivation therapy the prevalence of risk sufficient to necessitate drug therapy was high and was strongly influenced by age. The WHO/FRAX algorithm identifies a greater proportion of men for treatment than the traditional threshold of T score -2.5 or less.

Can hip fracture prediction in women be estimated beyond bone mineral density measurement alone?

The etiology of hip fractures is multifactorial and includes bone and fall-related factors. Low bone mineral density (BMD) and BMD-related and BMD-independent geometric components of bone strength, evaluated by hip strength analysis (HSA) and finite element analysis analyses on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images, and ultrasound parameters are related to the presence and incidence of hip fracture. In addition, clinical risk factors contribute to the risk of hip fractures, independent of BMD. They are included in the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) case finding algorithm to estimate in the individual patient the 10-year risk of hip fracture, with and without BMD. Fall risks are not included in FRAX, but are included in other case finding tools, such as the Garvan algorithm, to predict the 5- and 10-year hip fracture risk. Hormones, cytokines, growth factors, markers of bone resorption and genetic background have been related to hip fracture risk. Vitamin D deficiency is endemic worldwide and low serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] predict hip fracture risk. In the context of hip fracture prevention calculation of absolute fracture risk using clinical risks, BMD, bone geometry and fall-related risks is feasible, but needs further refinement by integrating bone and fall-related risk factors into a single case finding algorithm for clinical use.

Population-Based Fracture Risk Assessment and Osteoporosis Treatment Disparities by Race and Gender

Undertreatment of osteoporosis has been recognized as a common problem in selected patient subgroups. However, primary prevention has been hampered by limited risk assessment tools that can be applied to large populations. Using clinical risk factors with a new tool from the World Health Organization (FRAX) and recommendations from the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF), we evaluated fracture risk and osteoporosis treatment in a US cohort. African Americans and Caucasians recruited from 2003-7 across the US as part of a longitudinal study. Cross-sectional. The number of persons receiving prescription osteoporosis medications was assessed by race, sex, and fracture risk. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the association between receipt of osteoporosis medications and fracture risk after controlling for potential confounders. Among 24,783 participants, estimated fracture risk was highest for Caucasian women. After multivariable adjustment for fracture-related risk factors, the likelihood of receipt of osteoporosis medications among African Americans was lower than among Caucasians [odds ratio (OR) = 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37, 0.53] and for men compared to women (OR = 0.08, 95% CI 0.06-0.10). Even for the highest risk group, Caucasian women with 10-year hip fracture risk > or = 3% (n = 3,025, 39.7%), only 26% were receiving treatment. A substantial gap exists between 2008 NOF treatment guidelines based on fracture risk and the receipt of prescription osteoporosis medications. This gap was particularly notable for African Americans and men. FRAX is likely to be useful to assess risk at a population level and identify high-risk persons in need of additional evaluation.

Treatment thresholds for osteoporosis in men on androgen deprivation therapy: T-score versus FRAX™

Men treated by androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for localized prostate cancer are at risk for fracture, but it is not known which men require pharmacologic treatment. We found that 33% of men on ADT had osteoporosis of spine, hip, or forearm by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), thus requiring treatment. Using the new fracture prediction algorithm (FRAX) tool with corrected femoral neck T-score identified only 17% requiring treatment, and, if calculated without femoral neck, 54% were identified to need treatment. Men treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate carcinoma live long enough to fracture. A new fracture prediction method, FRAX, is based on femoral neck DXA plus risk factors. Thus, DXA or FRAX could determine which men should receive osteoporosis therapy. Of 115 men undergoing ADT referred for DXA testing, those with bone mineral density (BMD) in spine, hip, or forearm of >or=2.5 standard deviations below a normal male ethnicity-adjusted mean were considered treatment candidates. Using FRAX with and without femoral neck BMD, men were treatment candidates if the 10-year hip fracture risk was >or=3% or the major osteoporotic fracture risk was >or=20%. The men averaged 77 years old; 58% were African-American, and 14.8% were current smokers. Mean femoral neck T-score was -1.4. Using DXA, 38 (33%) men would need treatment. When FRAX was calculated including the femoral neck T-score, only 20 men met criteria for treatment. However, when FRAX was calculated without the T-score, 62 men met criteria for treatment. Overlap among the groups was surprisingly modest. DXA and FRAX identify different ADT men for treatment.

Epidemiology of fracture risk in the Women’s Health Initiative

Osteoporosis is one of the most disabling consequences of aging in women. Strategies that permit earlier identification of women at risk for fracture are needed. The Women's Health Initiative has extended our knowledge of clinical risk factors and biomarkers of fracture risk in postmenopausal women. Based upon 11 clinically available risk factors (age, race/ethnicity, self-reported health, weight, height, physical activity, parental hip fracture, fracture history after age 54, current smoking, corticosteroid use, and history of treated diabetes), an algorithm has been developed to predict 5-year hip fracture risk. Biomarkers including low vitamin D or bioavailable testosterone and/or high cystatin C or sex hormone-binding globulin also predict risk for hip fracture independent of clinical risk factors. To address the growing incidence of fractures in minority women, clinical risk factors for fracture have been identified. These data demonstrate that we can better identify women, irrespective of race or ethnicity, at risk for fracture.

Will absolute fracture risk prediction facilitate treatment of osteoporosis?

Development of valid risk prediction tools for osteoporosis could substantially improve patient care. These tools have the potential to identify individuals at increased fracture risk and specifically direct interventions towards them rather than low-risk individuals. In this Practice Point commentary, I discuss a study by Hans et al. that adds to our current understanding of fracture risk prediction. This large, prospective study aimed to develop a 10-year hip fracture risk prediction tool that combined quantitative ultrasound of the heel bone with clinical risk factors. The authors found that combined use of these parameters was highly predictive of future fracture risk in a cohort of almost 13,000 elderly, white, European women. Significant clinical risk factors included BMI, previous fracture, history of recent fall, current smoking, failed chair test, and diabetes mellitus; age was also found to be a significant risk factor. Before embracing such tools, however, we must acknowledge some important unknowns about their utility.