Μ-opioid Receptor Agonist Research Articles

Anti-Nociceptive and Anti-Aversive Drugs Differentially Modulate Distinct Inputs to the Rat Lateral Parabrachial Nucleus

The lateral parabrachial nucleus (LPBN) plays an important role in the processing and establishment of pain aversion. It receives direct input from the superficial dorsal horn and forms reciprocal connections with the periaqueductal grey matter (PAG), which is critical for adaptive behaviour and the modulation of pain processing. Here, using in situ hybridization and optogenetics combined with in vitro electrophysiology, we characterized the spinal- and PAG-LPBN circuits of rats. We found spinoparabrachial projections to be strictly glutamatergic, while PAG neurons send glutamatergic and GABAergic projections to the LPBN. We next investigated the effects of drugs with anti-aversive and/or anti-nociceptive properties on these synapses: The µ-opioid receptor agonist DAMGO (10 µM) reduced spinal and PAG synaptic inputs onto LPBN neurons, and the excitability of LPBN neurons receiving these inputs. The benzodiazepine receptor agonist diazepam (5 µM) strongly enhanced GABAergic action at inhibitory PAG-LPBN synapses. The cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 (5 µM) led to a reduction in inhibitory and excitatory PAG-LPBN synaptic transmission, without affecting excitatory spinoparabrachial synaptic transmission. Our study reveals that opioid, cannabinoid and benzodiazepine receptor agonists differentially affect distinct LPBN synapses. These findings may support the efforts to develop pinpointed therapies for pain patients. PerspectiveThe LPBN is an important brain region for the control of pain aversion versus recuperation, and as such constitutes a promising target for developing new strategies for pain management. We show that clinically-relevant drugs have complex and pathway-specific effects on LPBN processing of putative nociceptive and aversive inputs.

Opioid-Induced Pronociceptive Signaling in the Gastrointestinal Tract Is Mediated by Delta-Opioid Receptor Signaling.

Opioid tolerance (OT) leads to dose escalation and serious side effects, including opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH). We sought to better understand the mechanisms underlying this event in the gastrointestinal tract. Chronic in vivo administration of morphine by intraperitoneal injection in male C57BL/6 mice evoked tolerance and evidence of OIH in an assay of colonic afferent nerve mechanosensitivity; this was inhibited by the δ-opioid receptor (DOPr) antagonist naltrindole when intraperitoneally injected in previous morphine administration. Patch-clamp studies of DRG neurons following overnight incubation with high concentrations of morphine, the µ-opioid receptors (MOPr) agonist [D-Ala2, N-Me-Phe4, Gly5-ol]-Enkephalin (DAMGO) or the DOPr agonist [D-Ala2, D-Leu5]-Enkephalin evoked hyperexcitability. The pronociceptive actions of these opioids were blocked by the DOPr antagonist SDM25N but not the MOPr antagonist D-Pen-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Orn-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2 The hyperexcitability induced by DAMGO was reversed after a 1 h washout, but reapplication of low concentrations of DAMGO or [D-Ala2, D-Leu5]-Enkephalin restored the hyperexcitability, an effect mediated by protein kinase C. DOPr-dependent DRG neuron hyperexcitability was blocked by the endocytosis inhibitor Pitstop 2, and the weakly internalizing DOPr agonist ARM390 did not cause hyperexcitability. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer studies in HEK cells showed no evidence of switching of G-protein signaling from Gi to a Gs pathway in response to either high concentrations or overnight incubation of opioids. Thus, chronic high-dose opioid exposure leads to opioid tolerance and features of OIH in the colon. This action is mediated by DOPr signaling and is dependent on receptor endocytosis and downstream protein kinase C signaling.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Opioids are effective in the treatment of abdominal pain, but escalating doses can lead to opioid tolerance and potentially opioid-induced hyperalgesia. We found that δ-opioid receptor (DOPr) plays a central role in the development of opioid tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia in colonic afferent nociceptors following prolonged exposure to high concentrations of MOPr or DOPr agonists. Furthermore, the role of DOPr was dependent on OPr internalization and activation of a protein kinase C signaling pathway. Thus, targeting DOPr or key components of the downstream signaling pathway could mitigate adverse side effects by opioids.

A240 OPIOID-INDUCED HYPEREXCITABILITY IN DRG NEURONS IS MEDIATED BY DOR-DEPENDENT ENDOCYTOSIS

Abstract Background Opioids are effective for the treatment of abdominal pain but are also associated with tolerance, and increased dosing leads to severe side effects. We previously showed that prolonged exposure to high doses of opioids evoked paradoxical hyperexcitability of colonic afferent nerves that was mediated by δ-opioid receptor (DOR) signaling. Recent studies suggest that DOR-dependent analgesia is mediated not only by G proteins but also via receptor endocytosis and downstream signaling, but it is unclear what intracellular signaling mechanisms are underlying opioid-induced hyperexcitability. Aims To examine the mechanisms underlying DOR-mediated hyperexcitability of dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons. Methods We assessed the excitability of DRG neurons isolated from C57BL/6 mice by measuring the rheobase (minimal current to elicit an action potential, i.e. lower rheobase=increased excitability) using perforated patch-clamp recordings. Dissociated neurons were exposed to a high concentration (10 µM) of the μ-opioid receptor agonist DAMGO, the DOR agonist DADLE, or the weakly internalizing DOR agonist ARM390 overnight. To examine the role of receptor endocytosis and intracellular receptor activation underlying the excitatory effect by opioids, DRG neurons exposed to DAMGO or DADLE were preincubated with the membrane-permeable opioid receptor antagonist naloxone or the endocytosis inhibitor Pitstop2. To further understand the mechanisms involved in the hyperexcitability evoked by opioid re-exposure, following overnight incubation with high concentrations of DAMGO or DADLE, neurons were washed for 1 hr and treated either with the PKA inhibitor H89 or the PKC inhibitor GFX before re-exposure to DAMGO or DADLE at a low concentration (10 nM). Results Neurons exposed to 10 µM DAMGO or DADLE were hyperexcitable (rheobase decreased 25 % and 26 % compared to controls respectively; p≤0.05, 2-way ANOVA). Naloxone and Pitstop2 blocked the increased excitability of DRG neurons induced by overnight incubations with either DAMGO or DADLE. In contrast to the hyperexcitability induced by DAMGO and DADLE, overnight incubation with 10 µM ARM390 decreased excitability (rheobase increased 31%, p≤0.05, unpaired t-test). The hyperexcitability induced by DAMGO and DADLE was reversed after a 1 hr washout but acute reapplication of a low concentration of DAMGO or DADLE (10nM) now evoked hyperexcitability (rheobase decreased 34 and 35 % respectively, p≤0.05, 2-way ANOVA). This effect was prevented by inhibiting PKC but not PKA. Conclusions Our data suggest that the DOR-dependent hyperexcitability evoked by prolonged exposure to high concentrations of opioids is dependent on receptor endocytosis and downstream PKC signaling. Targeting these pathways could mitigate the hyperexcitability of pain signaling neurons caused by high doses of opioids. Funding Agencies CCC

Contribution of G-Protein α-Subunits to Analgesia, Hyperalgesia, and Hyperalgesic Priming Induced by Subanalgesic and Analgesic Doses of Fentanyl and Morphine.

While opioids produce both analgesia and side effects by action at μ-opioid receptors (MORs), at spinal and supraspinal sites, the potency of different opioids to produce these effects varies. While it has been suggested that these differences might be because of bias for signaling via β-arrestin versus G-protein α-subunits (Gα), recent studies suggest that G-protein-biased MOR agonists still produce clinically important side effects. Since bias also exists in the role of Gα subunits, we evaluated the role of Gαi/o subunits in analgesia, hyperalgesia, and hyperalgesic priming produced by fentanyl and morphine, in male rats. We found that intrathecal treatment with oligodeoxynucleotides antisense (AS-ODN) for Gαi2, Gαi3, and Gαo markedly attenuated hyperalgesia induced by subanalgesic dose (sub-AD) fentanyl, while AS-ODN for Gαi1, as well as Gαi2 and Gαi3, but not Gαo, prevented hyperalgesia induced by sub-AD morphine. AS-ODN for Gαi1 and Gαi2 unexpectedly enhanced analgesia induced by analgesic dose (AD) fentanyl, while Gαi1 AS-ODN markedly reduced AD morphine analgesia. Hyperalgesic priming, assessed by prolongation of prostaglandin E2-induced hyperalgesia, was not produced by systemic sub-AD and AD fentanyl in Gαi3 and Gαo AS-ODN-treated rats, respectively. In contrast, none of the Gαi/o AS-ODNs tested affected priming induced by systemic sub-AD and AD morphine. We conclude that signaling by different Gαi/o subunits is necessary for the analgesia and side effects of two of the most clinically used opioid analgesics. The design of opioid analgesics that demonstrate selectivity for individual Gαi/o may produce a more limited range of side effects and enhanced analgesia.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Biased μ-opioid receptor (MOR) agonists that preferentially signal through G-protein α-subunits over β-arrestins have been developed as an approach to mitigate opioid side effects. However, we recently demonstrated that biased MOR agonists also produce hyperalgesia and priming. We show that oligodeoxynucleotide antisense to different Gαi/o subunits play a role in hyperalgesia and analgesia induced by subanalgesic and analgesic dose (respectively), of fentanyl and morphine, as well as in priming. Our findings have the potential to advance our understanding of the mechanisms involved in adverse effects of opioid analgesics that could assist in the development of novel analgesics, preferentially targeting specific G-protein α-subunits.

Comparison of an Addictive Potential of μ-Opioid Receptor Agonists with G Protein Bias: Behavioral and Molecular Modeling Studies.

Among different approaches to the search for novel—safer and less addictive—opioid analgesics, biased agonism has received the most attention in recent years. Some μ-opioid receptor agonists with G protein bias, including SR compounds, were proposed to induce diminished side effects. However, in many aspects, behavioral effects of those compounds, as well as the mechanisms underlying differences in their action, remain unexplored. Here, we aimed to evaluate the effects of SR-14968 and SR-17018, highly G protein-biased opioid agonists, on antinociception, motor activity and addiction-like behaviors in C57BL/6J mice. The obtained results showed that the compounds induce strong and dose-dependent antinociception. SR-14968 causes high, and SR-17018 much lower, locomotor activity. Both agonists develop reward-associated behavior and physical dependence. The compounds also cause antinociceptive tolerance, however, developing more slowly when compared to morphine. Interestingly, SR compounds, in particular SR-17018, slow down the development of antinociceptive tolerance to morphine and inhibit some symptoms of morphine withdrawal. Therefore, our results indicate that SR agonists possess rewarding and addictive properties, but can positively modulate some symptoms of morphine dependence. Next, we have compared behavioral effects of SR-compounds and PZM21 and searched for a relationship to the substantial differences in molecular interactions that these compounds form with the µ-opioid receptor.

Sufentanil Inhibits the Proliferation and Metastasis of Esophageal Cancer by Inhibiting the NF-κB and Snail Signaling Pathways.

Sufentanil is a μ-opioid receptor agonist, widely used in intraoperative and postoperative analgesia of esophageal cancer. This study investigated the effects of sufentanil on the proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of esophageal carcinoma cells and its molecular mechanisms. Human esophageal carcinoma cells CaES-17 and Eca-109 were cultured in vitro. Different concentrations of sufentanil (1 and 10 μmol/L) were added to the experimental group. MTT was used to detect the proliferative activity of esophageal carcinoma cells. The migration ability of esophageal carcinoma cells was measured by the scratch test. Transwell was used to detect the invasive ability of esophageal carcinoma cells. The EMT marker expression was detected by qPCR. Meanwhile, effects of sufentanil on NF-κB and Snail expression and nucleation were evaluated. Establish a subcutaneous xenograft tumor model of nude mice with esophageal carcinoma cells and evaluate the antitumor effect of sufentanil. Sufentanil can inhibit the proliferation, invasion, and migration of CaES-17 and Eca-109 cells and has a dose-dependent relationship. The molecular mechanism showed that sufentanil could upregulate the expression of E-cadherin and inhibit the expression of vimentin. Sufentanil can inhibit the expression of NF-κB and Snail, as well as the nuclear expression of NF-κB and Snail. Xenograft tumor model results showed that sufentanil could inhibit tumor proliferation and NF-κB and Snail expression in tumor tissues of nude mice. Sufentanil inhibits esophageal cancer epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) by acting on NF-κB and Snail signaling pathways to inhibit proliferation and metastasis of esophageal cancer.

P.0908 Influence of a G protein-biased µ-opioid receptor agonist, PZM21, on behavioural response to stress and anxiogenic conditions

P.0908 Influence of a G protein-biased µ-opioid receptor agonist, PZM21, on behavioural response to stress and anxiogenic conditions

Opioid receptors modulate parallel fiber-Purkinje cell synaptic transmission in mouse cerebellum

Opioid receptors play important roles in, among others, learning and memory, emotional responses, addiction, and pain. In recent years, the cerebellum has received increasing attention for its role in non-motor functions. The Purkinje cell (PC) is the only efferent neuron in the cerebellar cortex, and receives glutamatergic synaptic inputs from the parallel fibers (PF) formed by the axons of granule cells. Studies have shown that opioid receptors are expressed during the development of cerebellar cells. However, the distribution of opioid receptors, their subtypes in cerebellar PF-PC synapses, and their effects on synaptic transmission remain unclear. To examine these questions, we used whole-cell patch clamp recordings and pharmacological methods to determine the effects of activating three different opioid receptor subtypes on synaptic transmission at PF-PC synapses. In the presence of picrotoxin, mouse cerebellar slices were perfused with agonists or blockers of different opioid receptor subtypes, and the changes in excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) were examined. Both agonists of µ-opioid receptors (MOR) and δ-opioid receptors (DOR) significantly reduced the amplitude and area under the curve of PF-PC EPSCs in a concentration-dependent manner, accompanied by an increase in the paired-pulsed ratio (PPR). These effects could be blocked by respective receptor antagonists. In contrast, no significant changes were found after the application of κ-opioid receptor (KOR) agonists. In conclusion, MOR and DOR are present at the axon terminals of PF in the mouse cerebellar cortex, whereas no or negligible amounts of KOR are found. Activation of MOR and DOR regulates PF-PC synaptic transmission via inhibition of glutamate (Glu) release in cerebellar cortex in mice. We also found that endogenous opioid peptides are present in PF-PC synapses of mouse cerebellum, which also can inhibit the release of Glu.

Synthesis, biological, and structural explorations of a series of μ-opioid receptor (MOR) agonists with high G protein signaling bias

Biased agonism refers to the ability of compounds to drive preferred signaling pathways and avoid adverse signaling pathways in a ligand-dependent manner for some G-protein–coupled receptors. It is thought that the separation of therapeutic efficacy (e.g., analgesia) from adverse effects (e.g., respiration depression) can be achieved through the design of biased MOR agonists and one example is the recently approved MOR biased agonist oliceridine (TRV130). However, oliceridine only demonstrates modest beneficial effects as compared to other opioids in terms of therapeutic/adverse effect balance. One possibility attributable to the modest success of oliceridine is its limited bias, and as such developing MOR ligands with a more biased agonism profile could in theory further improve the beneficial effects of the ligands. Here, we rationally designed and synthesized a series of derivatives as potent highly biased MOR agonists (19a-v) through the modification and structure-activity relationship study of TRV130. This novel synthetic molecule, LPM3480392 (19m), demonstrated improved in vitro biased agonism (EC50 = 0.35 nM, Emax = 91.4%) with no measured β-arrestin recruitment (EC50 > 30000 nM, Emax = 1.6%), good brain penetration (B/P ratio = 4.61, 0.25 h post-IV dosing 2.0 mg/kg), a favorable pharmacokinetic profile (distribution volume = 10766 mL/kg, t1/2 = 1.9 h) and produced potent antinociceptive effect with reduced respiratory suppression (sO2(%) = 92.17, 0.32 mg/kg, SC) as compared to TRV130. LPM3480392 has completed preclinical studies and is currently under clinical development (CTR20210370) as an analgesic for the treatment of moderate to severe pain.

Mechanistic insights in chiral recognition of μ-opioid receptor agonist tetrapeptide on crown ether chiral stationary phase

Chiral separation of short peptides is of great interest, due to different pharmacological, pharmacokinetic, and/or toxicological activities often possessed by different stereoisomers of chiral drugs. Crown ether chiral stationary phases have been successfully used for separating enantiomers of various racemic compounds containing primary amino groups. Even though chiral recognition mechanism for crown-ethers CSPs is generally understood, on a molecular level, the exact chiral recognition mechanisms for the resolution are still unclear. Furthermore, short peptide analytes often contain multiple amino moieties capable of binding to the crown ether selector. A research of relationship between peptide chemical structure and chiral chromatographic interactions was performed, by comparing the retention profiles of µ-opioid receptor agonist tetrapeptide Tyr-Arg-Phe-Lys-NH2 and its structural analogues on two commercially available S- and R-(3,3’-diphenyl-1,1′-binaphthyl)-20-crown-6) stationary phases [CROWNPAK CR-I (+) and (-)], in order to clarify, which of the potential interaction sites are responsible for retention and chiral recognition in Tyr-Arg-Phe-Lys-NH2 tetrapeptide.

Opioid Analgesia and Opioid-Induced Adverse Effects: A Review.

Opioids are widely used as therapeutic agents against moderate to severe acute and chronic pain. Still, these classes of analgesic drugs have many potential limitations as they induce analgesic tolerance, addiction and numerous behavioural adverse effects that often result in patient non-compliance. As opium and opioids have been traditionally used as painkillers, the exact mechanisms of their adverse reactions over repeated use are multifactorial and not fully understood. Older adults suffer from cancer and non-cancer chronic pain more than younger adults, due to the physiological changes related to ageing and their reduced metabolic capabilities and thus show an increased number of adverse reactions to opioid drugs. All clinically used opioids are μ-opioid receptor agonists, and the major adverse effects are directly or potentially connected to this receptor. Multifunctional opioid ligands or peripherally restricted opioids may elicit fewer adverse effects, as shown in preclinical studies, but these results need reproducibility from further extensive clinical trials. The current review aims to overview various mechanisms involved in the adverse effects induced by opioids, to provide a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology and, ultimately, to help develop an effective therapeutic strategy to better manage pain.

A Dive Into Oliceridine and Its Novel Mechanism of Action.

The current state of the opioid epidemic has revealed the need of utilizing proper pain management, especially in the postoperative setting where there is overuse of potent analgesics. However, the adequate treatment of pain is necessary to reduce mortality and cost of burden while increasing recovery and improving quality of life. Treatment of pain can be difficult to standardize as the guidelines from the American Pain Society discuss the importance of tailoring treatment options based on a patient’s sensitivities and risk factors. An effective fast-acting analgesic with adequate potency and few adverse events is the key to alleviating acute pain. Oliceridine (Olinvyk®, Trevena Inc., Chesterbrook, USA) is a novel G protein-biased μ-opioid receptor agonist designed to decrease opioid-related adverse events (ORAEs) compared to conventional opioids. This article discusses oliceridine’s novel mechanism of action and current place in therapy. After a literature search on clinicaltrials.gov, three clinical trials were analyzed to understand the safety and efficacy of oliceridine. These trials demonstrated a comparable efficacy to morphine with a decreased risk for serious adverse events. However, further studies need to be conducted to evaluate the true safety impact of oliceridine compared to conventional opioids.

Central Nervous System Distribution of an Opioid Agonist Combination with Synergistic Activity.

Novel combinations of specific opioid agonists like loperamide and oxymorphindole targeting the µ- and δ-opioid receptors, respectively, have shown increased potency with minimized opioid-associated risks. However, whether their interaction is pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic in nature has not been determined. This study quantitatively determined whether these drugs have a pharmacokinetic interaction that alters systemic disposition or central nervous system (CNS) distribution. We performed intravenous and oral in vivo pharmacokinetic assessments of both drugs after discrete dosing and administration in combination to determine whether the combination had any effect on systemic pharmacokinetic parameters or CNS exposure. Drugs were administered at 5 or 10 mg/kg i.v. or 30 mg/kg orally to institute for cancer research (ICR) mice and 5 mg/kg i.v. to Friend leukemia virus strain B mice of the following genotypes: wild-type, breast cancer resistance protein (Bcrp-/- ) (Bcrp knockout), Mdr1a/b-/- [P-glycoprotein (P-gp) knockout], and Bcrp-/- Mdr1a/b-/- (triple knockout). In the combination, clearance of oxymorphindole (OMI) was reduced by approximately half, and the plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) increased. Consequently, brain and spinal cord AUCs for OMI in the combination also increased proportionately. Both loperamide and OMI are P-gp substrates, but administration of the two drugs in combination does not alter efflux transport at the CNS barriers. Because OMI alone shows appreciable brain penetration but little therapeutic efficacy on its own, and because loperamide's CNS distribution is unchanged in the combination, the mechanism of action for the increased potency of the combination is most likely pharmacodynamic and most likely occurs at receptors in the peripheral nervous system. This combination has favorable characteristics for future development. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Opioids have yet to be replaced as the most effective treatments for moderate-to-severe pain and chronic pain, but their side effects are dangerous. Combinations of opioids with peripheral activity, such as loperamide and oxymorphindole, would be valuable in that they are effective at much lower doses and have reduced risks for dangerous side effects because the µ-opioid receptor agonist is largely excluded from the CNS.

Sedation and Anesthesia of Galapagos (Chelonoidis nigra), Aldabra (Aldabrachelys gigantea), and African Spurred Tortoises (Centrochelys sulcata): A Retrospective Review (2009-2019).

Simple SummaryAnesthesia is often required for the medical management of large tortoise species, but little has been published regarding effective anesthetic regimens for these species. The purpose of this study was to review anesthetic regimens that have been used safely and effectively in Galapagos (Chelonoidis nigra), Aldabra (Aldabrachelys gigantea), and African spurred (Centrochelys sulcata) tortoises, with the aim of improving medical management.Tortoises belong to the taxonomic family Testudinidae, which is considered one of the most imperiled families of the order Testudines. Anesthesia is often required for the medical and surgical management of large tortoises. The objectives of this retrospective study were to review drug regimens used to successfully anesthetize Galapagos (Chelonoidis nigra), Aldabra (Aldabrachelys gigantea) and African spurred (Centrochelys sulcata) tortoises, and to compare the times to effect and to extubation in tortoises administered different premedication protocols. Anesthetic records of giant tortoises admitted to the University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine between January 2009 and December 2019 were reviewed. A total of 34 tortoises (six Aldabra, 23 Galapagos, and five African spurred) were included, resulting in 64 anesthetic events. Frequently used premedication protocols included an α2-adrenergic agonist and ketamine combined with either midazolam (group α2−adrenergic agonist, midazolam, ketamine, AMK; n = 34), a μ-opioid receptor agonist (group α2−adrenergic agonist, μ-opioid receptor agonist, ketamine, AOK; n = 13), or a μ−opioid receptor agonist and midazolam (group α2−adrenergic agonist, midazolam, μ-opioid receptor agonist, ketamine, AMOK; n = 10). Inhalant anesthetics (isoflurane, n = 21; sevoflurane, n = 23) were frequently used for maintenance of anesthesia following premedication. Out of the 34 total tortoises, 22 had only one anesthetic event, five had two anesthetic events, three had three anesthetic events, and four had four or more anesthetic events. Few adverse effects were observed and there was no mortality reported during the peri-anesthetic period. Sedation and general anesthesia of giant tortoises can be successfully performed with a combination of an α2-adrenergic agonist and ketamine in combination with midazolam and/or a μ−opioid receptor agonist.

Involvement of the nociceptin opioid peptide receptor in morphine-induced antinociception, tolerance and physical dependence in female mice.

Nociceptin opioid peptide (NOP) receptor modulates pain transmission and is considered a prospective target for pain management. Under acute pain conditions in rodents, however, no definitive conclusions about effects of systemically intervening NOP receptors on nociception, classical opioid-induced antinociception, tolerance and physical dependence have been drawn. Given that opioid analgesia has sex differences, and females experience greater pain and consume more opioids, clarifying these issues in females will help develop novel analgesics. To clarify the role of NOP receptors on the pharmacological profiles of µ-opioid receptor agonists, in this study, a selective agonist (SCH221510) and antagonist (SB612111) of the NOP receptor were subcutaneously administered in female mice in multiple animal models. In hot-plate test, neither SCH221510 (3 and 10mg/kg, sc) nor SB612111 (10mg/kg, sc) produced significant antinociception. SCH221510 (3mg/kg, sc) attenuated but SB612111 (10mg/kg, sc) enhanced morphine-induced antinociception, with rightward and leftward shift of morphine dose-response curves, respectively. SCH221510 (3mg/kg, sc) combined with morphine (10mg/kg, sc) accelerated the development of morphine antinociceptive tolerance. Conversely, SB612111 (10mg/kg, sc) delayed morphine tolerance development. Neither SCH221510 (3mg/kg, sc) nor SB612111 (10mg/kg, sc) statistically significantly altered the development of morphine-induced physical dependence. Therefore, systemic activation of NOP receptors attenuated morphine antinociception to acute thermal stimuli, facilitated morphine-induced antinociceptive tolerance but did not robustly alter physical dependence in female mice. Systemic blockade of NOP receptors produced opposite actions. These findings demonstrate that N/OFQ-NOP receptor system plays diverse roles in modulating pharmacological profiles of µ-opioid receptor agonists.

Activation of nucleus accumbens μ-opioid receptors enhances the response to a glycaemic challenge.

Opioids are known to affect blood glucose levels but their exact role in the physiological control of glucose metabolism remains unclear. Although there are numerous studies investigating the peripheral effects of opioid stimulation, little is known about how central opioids control blood glucose and which brain areas are involved. One brain area possibly involved is the nucleus accumbens because, as well as being a key site for opioid effects on food intake, it has also been implicated in the control of blood glucose levels. Within the nucleus accumbens, μ‐opioid receptors are most abundantly expressed. Therefore, in the present study, we investigated the role of μ‐opioid receptors in the nucleus accumbens in the control of glucose metabolism. We show that infusion of the μ‐opioid receptor agonist [d‐Ala2, N‐MePhe4, Gly‐ol]‐enkephalin (DAMGO) in the nucleus accumbens by itself does not affect blood glucose levels, but it enhances the glycaemic response after both an insulin tolerance test, as well as a glucose tolerance test. These findings indicate that the nucleus accumbens plays a role in the central effects of opioids on glucose metabolism, and highlight the possibility of nucleus accumbens μ‐opioid receptors as a therapeutic target for enhancing the counter‐regulatory response.

Contribution of CYP2D6 Functional Activity to Oxycodone Efficacy in Pain Management: Genetic Polymorphisms, Phenoconversion, and Tissue-Selective Metabolism.

Oxycodone is a widely used opioid for the management of chronic pain. Analgesic effects observed following the administration of oxycodone are mediated mostly by agonistic effects on the μ-opioid receptor. Wide inter-subject variability observed in oxycodone efficacy could be explained by polymorphisms in the gene coding for the μ-opioid receptor (OPRM1). In humans, oxycodone is converted into several metabolites, particularly into oxymorphone, an active metabolite with potent μ-opioid receptor agonist activity. The CYP2D6 enzyme is principally responsible for the conversion of oxycodone to oxymorphone. The CYP2D6 gene is highly polymorphic with encoded protein activities, ranging from non-functioning to high-functioning enzymes. Several pharmacogenetic studies have shown the importance of CYP2D6-mediated conversion of oxycodone to oxymorphone for analgesic efficacy. Pharmacogenetic testing could optimize oxycodone therapy and help achieve adequate pain control, avoiding harmful side effects. However, the most recent Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines fell short of recommending pharmacogenomic testing for oxycodone treatment. In this review, we (1) analyze pharmacogenomic and drug-interaction studies to delineate the association between CYP2D6 activity and oxycodone efficacy, (2) review evidence from CYP3A4 drug-interaction studies to untangle the nature of oxycodone metabolism and its efficacy, (3) report on the current knowledge linking the efficacy of oxycodone to OPRM1 variants, and (4) discuss the potential role of CYP2D6 brain expression on the local formation of oxymorphone. In conclusion, we opine that pharmacogenetic testing, especially for CYP2D6 with considerations of phenoconversion due to concomitant drug administration, should be appraised to improve oxycodone efficacy.

Sucrose drinking mimics effects of nucleus accumbens µ-opioid receptor stimulation on fat intake and brain c-Fos-expression

ABSTRACT Objectives: We have previously shown that the combined consumption of fat and a sucrose solution induces overeating, and there is evidence indicating that sucrose drinking directly stimulates fat intake. One neurochemical pathway by which sucrose may enhance fat intake is through the release of endogenous opioids in the nucleus accumbens (NAC). Methods: To test this hypothesis, we provided rats with a free-choice high-fat diet for two weeks. During the second week, rats had access to an additional bottle of water or a 30% sucrose solution for five minutes per day. After these two weeks, we infused vehicle or the μ-opioid receptor agonist [D-Ala2, N-MePhe4, Gly-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO) into the NAC 30 min after their daily access to the additional bottle of water or the sucrose solution. Results: Sucrose drinking had two effects, (1) it stimulated fat intake in the absence of DAMGO infusion, (2) it diminished sensitivity to DAMGO, as it prevented the rapid increase in fat intake typically seen upon DAMGO infusion in the nucleus accumbens. In a second experiment, we confirmed that these results are not due to the ingested calories of the sucrose solution. Lastly, we investigated which brain areas are involved in the observed effects on fat intake by assessing c-Fos-expression in brain areas previously linked to DAMGO’s effects on food intake. Both intra-NAC DAMGO infusion and sucrose consumption in the absence of DAMGO infusion had no effect on c-Fos-expression in orexin neurons and the central amygdala but increased c-Fos-expression in the NAC as well as the basolateral amygdala. Discussion: In conclusion, we confirm that sucrose drinking stimulates fat intake, likely through the release of endogenous opioids.

Evaluation of Buprenorphine Rotation in Patients Receiving Long-term Opioids for Chronic Pain

Individuals with chronic pain who use long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) are at risk of opioid use disorder and other harmful outcomes. Rotation to buprenorphine may be considered, but the outcomes of such rotation in this population have not been systematically reviewed. To synthesize the evidence on rotation to buprenorphine from full μ-opioid receptor agonists among individuals with chronic pain who were receiving LTOT, including the outcomes of precipitated opioid withdrawal, pain intensity, pain interference, treatment success, adverse events or adverse effects, mental health condition, and health care use. PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycInfo were searched from inception through November 3, 2020, for peer-reviewed original English-language research that reported the prespecified outcomes of rotation from prescribed long-term opioids to buprenorphine among individuals with chronic pain. Two independent reviewers extracted data as well as assessed risk of bias and study quality according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Quality of evidence was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. A total of 22 studies were analyzed, of which 5 (22.7%) were randomized clinical trials, 7 (31.8%) were case-control or cohort studies, and 10 (45.5%) were uncontrolled pre-post studies, which involved 1616 unique participants (675 female [41.8%] and 941 male [58.2%] individuals). Six of the 22 studies (27.3%) were primary or secondary analyses of a large randomized clinical trial. Participants had diverse pain and opioid use histories. Rationale for buprenorphine rotation included inadequate analgesia, intolerable adverse effects, risky opioid regimens (eg, high dose and/or sedative coprescriptions), and aberrant opioid use. Most protocols were adapted from protocols for initiating treatment in patients with opioid use disorder and used buccal or sublingual buprenorphine. Very low-quality evidence suggested that buprenorphine rotation was associated with maintained or improved analgesia, with a low risk of precipitating opioid withdrawal. Steady-dose buprenorphine was better tolerated than tapered-dose buprenorphine. Adverse effects were manageable, and severe adverse events were rare. Only 2 studies evaluated mental health outcomes, but none evaluated health care use. Limitations included a high risk of bias in most studies. In this systematic review, buprenorphine was associated with reduced chronic pain intensity without precipitating opioid withdrawal in individuals with chronic pain who were receiving LTOT. Future studies are necessary to ascertain the ideal starting dose, formulation, and administration frequency of buprenorphine as well as the best approach to buprenorphine rotation.

Amplification by tramadol of PGD2-induced osteoprotegerin synthesis in osteoblasts: Involvement of μ-opioid receptor and 5-HT transporter

Tramadol, a weak μ-opioid receptor (MOR) agonist with inhibitory effects on the reuptake of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) and norepinephrine, is an effective analgesic to chronic pains. Osteoprotegerin produced by osteoblasts is essential for bone remodeling to suppress osteoclastic bone resorption. We previously reported that prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) induces osteoprotegerin synthesis whereby p44/p42 mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase, p38 MAP kinase and stress-activated protein kinase/c-Jun N-terminal kinase (SAPK/JNK) are involved in osteoblast-like MC3T3-E1 cells. Herein, we investigated the mechanism underlying the effect of tramadol on the PGD2-induced osteoprotegerin synthesis in these cells. Tramadol enhanced the PGD2-induced release and mRNA expression of osteoprotegerin. Naloxone, a MOR antagonist, reduced the amplification by tramadol of the PGD2-stimulated osteoprotegerin release. Not the selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor reboxetine but the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors fluvoxamine and sertraline upregulated the PGD2-induced osteoprotegerin release, which was further amplified by morphine. Tramadol enhanced PGD2-stimulated phosphorylation of p38 MAP kinase and SAPK/JNK, but not p44/p42 MAP kinase. Both SB203580 and SP600125 suppressed the tramadol effect to enhance the PGD2-stimulated osteoprotegerin release. Tramadol enhanced the PGE2-induced osteoprotegerin release as well as PGD2. These results suggest that tramadol amplifies the PGD2-induced osteoprotegerin synthesis at the upstream of p38 MAP kinase and SAPK/JNK in the involvement of both MOR and 5-HT transporter in osteoblasts.