Year
Publisher
Journal
1
Institution
Institution Country
Publication Type
Field Of Study
Topics
Open Access
Language
Filter 1
Year
Publisher
Journal
1
Institution
Institution Country
Publication Type
Field Of Study
Topics
Open Access
Language
Filter 1
Export
Sort by: Relevance
Heathens of many names: multiplicity in religious self-descriptors among contemporary Norse-oriented Pagans

ABSTRACT In a digital survey of the reception of Viking-themed and Norse-inspired media products among self-identifying Heathens, 76% of 407 respondents stated that they were comfortable using several terms to describe their religious identity. The bulk of the respondents resided in the United States of America (51%), followed by Nordic countries (22%), the United Kingdom (8%), and Canada (7%)—a geographical distribution that is also, to a large extent, reflected in the interview sample. Twenty-seven follow-up interviews revealed differences in terminological preferences and interpretations. Several respondents considered one term to be the most accurate descriptor, but used another to present themselves in social interactions. This raised the questions of how and why Norse-oriented Pagans select the self-descriptors that they do. Although respondents differ in terms of terminological choices, the motives and rationale that drive their selection are strikingly similar: terminological precision, successful social bonding, and avoidance of social stigma. Norse-oriented Pagans practice religious polyonymy (multiple names for the same thing or person) to ensure success in social interactions and manage social impressions of themselves and their religion’s public image. In a broader perspective, this study addresses how political and ideological context(s) and alignment can motivate choices about how to communicate one’s religious identity and why they vary.

Read full abstract
Open Access Just Published
Pro-immigration Norwegian Church élite: what explains the pro-immigration attitudes and are alleged welfare challenges acknowledged?

ABSTRACT Unlike political and business élites, few studies address attitudes among members of the church élite. Faced with politicians who refer to Christian heritage and values to justify restriction on immigration, we want to understand the attitudes of church leaders. This article draws on data from the Norwegian Leadership Surveys, conducted in 2000 and 2015, to identify attitudes to immigration and to the Norwegian welfare system among the Norwegian Church élite. The church élite respondents were recruited among bishops, deans, and members of the National Church Council in the Lutheran majority church, the Church of Norway. Finding that a pro-immigration position characterizes the Church élite, we explore how these attitudes can be understood by introducing various variables. As immigration allegedly represents challenges to socio-economic integration and to upholding the welfare state, we investigate whether pro-immigration attitudes correlate with attitudes to promoting integration and upholding the welfare state. We find that pro-immigration attitudes are correlated with concern for those not able to provide for themselves, stronger trust in the State than in markets, and no particular concern for the impact on the welfare state. Opposing a nationalist protection discourse, the church leaders express a humanistic or human-centered protection discourse, which we term ‘human-centered cosmopolitanism’.

Read full abstract
Open Access