Year Year arrow
arrow-active-down-0
Publisher Publisher arrow
arrow-active-down-1
Journal
1
Journal arrow
arrow-active-down-2
Institution Institution arrow
arrow-active-down-3
Institution Country Institution Country arrow
arrow-active-down-4
Publication Type Publication Type arrow
arrow-active-down-5
Field Of Study Field Of Study arrow
arrow-active-down-6
Topics Topics arrow
arrow-active-down-7
Open Access Open Access arrow
arrow-active-down-8
Language Language arrow
arrow-active-down-9
Filter Icon Filter 1
Year Year arrow
arrow-active-down-0
Publisher Publisher arrow
arrow-active-down-1
Journal
1
Journal arrow
arrow-active-down-2
Institution Institution arrow
arrow-active-down-3
Institution Country Institution Country arrow
arrow-active-down-4
Publication Type Publication Type arrow
arrow-active-down-5
Field Of Study Field Of Study arrow
arrow-active-down-6
Topics Topics arrow
arrow-active-down-7
Open Access Open Access arrow
arrow-active-down-8
Language Language arrow
arrow-active-down-9
Filter Icon Filter 1
Export
Sort by: Relevance
Friends, family and the circulation of used goods: overlooked sustainability practices

ABSTRACT In the pursuit of sustainable consumption, reducing acquisition and prolonging the life of household items – like clothing, appliances and furniture – has never been more essential. Practices such as purchasing second-hand goods, borrowing, sharing and passing items between people offer environmental advantages and social support and connection too. These informal exchanges of goods remain underexplored in sustainability and consumption research. This study draws on a unique national survey of 2,700 Australian households, shedding light on how everyday sharing of goods flows through informal networks of family and friends. We argue that these personal relationships are pivotal to both understanding and encouraging the circulation of used goods in a developed economy. Our findings reveal gendered, class-based and life-stage differences in sharing practices. We discuss the influence of social capital, which allows more privileged households to circulate goods more actively than their less privileged counterparts – a novel contribution to the literature. Households with children experience faster consumption cycles, driving greater circulation of goods. Generational shifts also play a key role. We contend that informal sharing – with family and friends – holds just as much significance as formal sharing economies in diverting goods from landfills and supporting sustainable consumption. This everyday circulation is vital to the sustainability conversation.

Read full abstract
Open Access Icon Open AccessJust Published Icon Just Published
Relevant
Cite IconCite
Chat PDF IconChat PDF
Save
The epistemic and the political – the play of measuring, managing, and governing ecosystems through woodland key habitats

ABSTRACT This paper explores how contestation unfolds within the interconnected processes of governing, managing, and measuring nature, using Swedish forest policy and Woodland Key Habitats (WKHs) as a case study. It illustrates how contestation rooted in different interests and worldviews manifests as epistemic struggles within the state apparatus. Based on document analysis and expert interviews with policymakers, researchers, and stakeholders, the paper traces the development of WKHs since the 1990s as a method, grounded in an ecosystem approach, for measuring the ecological value of a forest, as well as the subsequent politicization and contestation of the method that has played out over the past decade. Rather than targeting political goals, the contestation is directed at the objectivity, legality, and reasonableness of WKHs. The contestation led to a revision of the classification criteria and eventually the termination of the assessments. This case underscores how the deep entanglement of values and facts is essential both for driving change and for understanding the limited implementation of more progressive ecosystem-oriented policies. Assessing this triadic interrelationship between governing, managing, and measuring nature provides a deeper understanding of how contestation plays out and impacts environmental governance.

Read full abstract
Open Access Icon Open AccessJust Published Icon Just Published
Relevant
Cite IconCite
Chat PDF IconChat PDF
Save
Commoning the gardens by the Bloc. Informal gardening practices in the collective housing districts of a post-socialist city

ABSTRACT This article investigates the persistence of gardening by the bloc, an informal urban gardening practice in the green spaces of collective housing districts of post-socialist Bucharest. Although often reduced in public discourse to a leftover of socialist survival strategies, this research reconsiders it as an everyday social interaction that supports communities amid urban transformations. Following Tsing and De Angelis, the article views gardening by the bloc as a local form of ‘latent commons’, reflecting broader socio-political shifts in a post-socialist city. Based on qualitative research, it documents how residents use, adapt and manage green spaces, along with their relations with institutional actors, revealing how they engage these areas under increasingly neoliberal governance. The study argues that the overlap between a market-oriented regulatory project, inherited socialist structures, and collective spatial practices shaped a distinct way of living together. As an emerging form of urban commons, gardening by the bloc can maintain a shared practice of communal life against an increasingly individualized society, laying the groundwork for bottom-up regeneration of housing estates across diverse social and political contexts. However, through the lens of gardening, the article also reveals the contradictions inherent to latent commons, drawing attention to their internal tensions and ambiguities.

Read full abstract
Open Access Icon Open AccessJust Published Icon Just Published
Relevant
Cite IconCite
Chat PDF IconChat PDF
Save
Race, class, gender, and waste: a spatial analysis of landfill siting and intersectional inequities in South Carolina, USA

ABSTRACT Landfilling is one of the most common waste management strategies and is a significant source of environmental degradation. While research has shown that landfills are more commonly placed in low-income communities and communities of color throughout the United States, less has been done to evaluate landfill siting from an intersectional perspective. To address this gap, this study examined the distribution and disparities related to the placement of landfills throughout South Carolina using an environmental justice and intersectional lens. We used buffer analysis and inferential spatial statistics to assess the relationship between landfill siting and population characteristics. The study found that higher percentages of Black and Hispanic residents were in proximity to a landfill, while households with lower socioeconomic status (SES) were also disproportionately located near landfills. The study also demonstrates evidence of intersectional impacts from landfill siting, particularly with respect to combinations of race, class, and gender. These results provide insight into concerns related to environmental justice and intersectionality related to landfilling in South Carolina, which can assist policymakers in decision-making and community outreach efforts. To conclude, this study provides policy implications and additional considerations related to environmental justice and intersectional concerns related to landfills in South Carolina.

Read full abstract
Just Published Icon Just Published
Relevant
Cite IconCite
Chat PDF IconChat PDF
Save