What is the most suitable solute for studying solute transport in soil?
Answer from top 10 papers
The selection of an appropriate solute for studying transport in soil depends on the specific objectives of the research and the characteristics of the soil being studied. Each paper presents findings using different solutes, such as a conservative tracer in the Loess Plateau (Lu et al., 2022), potassium iodide in macroporous soil (Wang et al., 2013), and multiple tracers including iodine–nitrate and iodine–bromide mixtures for visualizing heterogeneous processes (Ju et al., 2024).
Interestingly, while some studies used inert salts like CaCl2 (Koestel & Larsbo, 2014) and NaCl (Li et al., 2021) to trace solute transport processes, others employed heavy metal compounds and pesticides (Agah et al., 2017) to understand reactive solute transport. The choice of solute can be influenced by factors such as the need to simulate non-reactive or reactive transport, the ability to detect the solute accurately, and the relevance to environmental conditions or pollutants of concern.
In conclusion, there is no single "best" solute for all soil transport studies; the choice should be tailored to the study's goals, the soil's properties, and the transport processes of interest. For non-reactive transport studies, conservative tracers like bromide or iodide are commonly used due to their minimal interaction with soil particles and ease of detection (Ju et al., 2024; Lu et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2013). For studies focusing on reactive transport, selecting solutes that represent the behavior of specific contaminants or nutrients, such as heavy metals or pesticides, may be more appropriate (Agah et al., 2017). Therefore, the best solute for studying transport in soil is context-dependent (`(Agah et al., 2017; Ju et al., 2024; Koestel and Larsbo, 2014; Li et al., 2021; Lu et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2013)`).
Source Papers