What are the disadvantages of diagnostic kits for Bovine Leukemia Virus?

Answer from top 10 papers

Diagnostic kits for diagnosing Bovine Leukemia Virus (BLV) are crucial for managing and controlling the spread of the virus in cattle populations. However, there are inherent disadvantages associated with these diagnostic tools. One limitation is the lack of commercially available vaccines, which means that the identification of BLV-infected cattle relies solely on diagnostic testing, followed by culling of positive animals (Ma et al., 2016). Additionally, while diagnostic kits like ELISA are effective, they require specific reagents and laboratory conditions that may not be readily available in all settings (Bai et al., 2022; Martínez et al., 2014).
Interestingly, despite the high sensitivity and specificity of certain assays, such as the competitive ELISA for the p24 capsid protein, cross-reactivity with other bovine viruses can be a concern, although the novel p24 cELISA was designed to minimize this issue (Ma et al., 2016). Moreover, the reliance on antibody detection does not provide information on the actual viral load or the stage of infection, which could be critical for understanding disease progression and management (Martínez et al., 2014).
In summary, while diagnostic kits are essential for identifying BLV-infected cattle, they come with limitations such as the absence of accompanying vaccines and the need for specialized laboratory capabilities. Additionally, the potential for cross-reactivity and the lack of viral load information pose challenges for the comprehensive management of BLV (Bai et al., 2022; Ma et al., 2016; Martínez et al., 2014).

Source Papers

Development of a novel monoclonal antibody-based competitive ELISA for antibody detection against bovine leukemia virus

Infection with bovine leukemia virus (BLV) leads to enzootic bovine leukosis, the most prevalent neoplastic disease in cattle. Due to the lack of commercially available vaccines, reliable eradication of the disease can be achieved through the testing and elimination of BLV antibody-positive animals. In this study, we developed a novel competitive ELISA (cELISA) to detect antibodies against BLV capsid protein p24. Recombinant p24 protein expressed by Escherichia coli, in combination with the monoclonal antibody 2G11 exhibiting exceptional performance, was used for the establishment of the cELISA. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the sensitivity and specificity of the assay were 98.85 % and 98.13 %, respectively. Furthermore, the established cELISA was specific for detecting BLV-specific antibodies, without cross-reactivity to antisera for six other bovine viruses. Significantly, experimental infection of cattle and sheep with BLV revealed that the cELISA accurately monitors seroconversion. In a performance evaluation, the established cELISA displayed a high agreement with Western blotting and the commercial BLV gp51 cELISA kit in the detection of 242 clinical samples, respectively. In conclusion, the novel p24 cELISA exhibited the potential to be a reliable and efficient diagnostic tool for BLV serological detection with a broad application prospect.

Open Access
Antigenicity of subregions of recombinant bovine leukemia virus (BLV) glycoprotein gp51 for antibody detection

Bovine leukemia virus (BLV) is an enveloped virus, found worldwide that can infect cattle and induce many subclinical symptoms and malignant tumors. BLV infection causes severe economic losses in the cattle industry. The identification of BLV-infected cattle for segregation or elimination would be the most effective way to halt the spread of BLV infection on farms, owing to the lack of effective treatments and vaccines. Therefore, antibody detection against the viral glycoprotein gp51 is an effective method for diagnosing BLV-infected animals. In this study, ten different subregions of gp51 containing a common B cell epitope are vital for developing antigens as epitope-driven vaccine design and immunological assays. Such antigens were produced in Escherichia coli expression system to react with antibodies in the serum from BLV-infected cattle and compete for antigenicity. Recombinant His-gp5156–110 and gp5133–301(full) had the same sensitivity in BLV-positive sera, indicating that antibodies responded to the limited subregion of viral gp51, a common B cell epitope. This finding provides significant information for antigen selection in BLV to use in antibody detection assays. Further studies are needed to evaluate the antigenicity of His-gp5156–110 and gp5133–301(full) as antigens for antibody detection assays using a larger number of bovine serum samples.

Open Access