Abstract
An important problem of practical application of the law is invalid perpetuated judicial practice. It connects call for mediation with art. 184 of the Civil Code, with the effects of limitations of art. 123 § 1 of the Civil Code. Summoning to a conciliation hearing isn’t directly aimed at the fulfillment of the provision, therefore cannot be identified with legal transactions, to be determined content of 123 § 1 of the Civil Code. Practice currently carried out in the case law leads to a prolonged state of legal uncertainty, actual creditor victimization and denying institutions of antiquity.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
