Abstract

PurposeTo study the incidence of acromioclavicular joint injuries in a general population.MethodsAll acute shoulder injuries admitted to an orthopaedic emergency department were registered prospectively, using electronic patient records and a patient-reported questionnaire. The regional area was the city of Oslo with 632,990 inhabitants. Patients with symptoms from the acromioclavicular joint without fracture were registered as a dislocation (type II–VI) if the radiologist described widening of the joint space or coracoclavicular distance on standard anteroposterior radiographs. Patients without such findings were diagnosed as sprains (type I).ResultsAcromioclavicular joint injuries constituted 11% of all shoulder injuries (287 of 2650). The incidence was 45 per 105 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 40–51). 196 (68%) were diagnosed as sprains and 91 (32%) as dislocations. Median age of all acromioclavicular joint injuries was 32 years (interquartile range 24–44), and 82% were men. Thirty percent of all acromioclavicular joint injuries were registered in men in their twenties. Sports injuries accounted for 53%, compared to 27% in other shoulder injuries [OR 3.1 (95% CI 2.4–4.0; p < 0.001)]. The most common sports associated with acromioclavicular joint injuries were football (24%), cycling (16%), martial arts (11%), alpine skiing and snowboarding (both 9%), and ice hockey (6%).ConclusionOur study suggests that in the general population, one in ten shoulder injuries involves the acromioclavicular joint and young men in sports are at highest risk. A prognostic level II cohort study.

Highlights

  • The first classifications of acute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries were introduced by Tossy et al and Allmann [1, 37]

  • The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of ACJ injuries in a general population cohort of all ages, and to describe in which sports activities and age groups, these injuries occur

  • An ACJ injury was registered in 287 patients (11%), corresponding to an incidence of 45 per ­105 person-years in the general population

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The first classifications of acute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries were introduced by Tossy et al and Allmann [1, 37]. They classified the injuries from grade I to III based on radiological examination. Rockwood et al established a more detailed classification that graded injuries from type I to VI [32]. There are no evidence-based guidelines, and there is a lack of evidence-based knowledge concerning these injuries and chronic shoulder pain [2]. Due to the lack of evidence-based guidelines, expert shoulder groups have published guidelines based on clinical experience in an attempt to fill the gap [4]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call