Abstract
Having observed very singular phenomena in the crystalline lenses of fishes and quadrupeds when exposed to polarized light, I was led to examine their anatomical structure, with the view of ascertaining if it had any relation to these optical appearances. Leeuwenhoek and Sattig had previously made some progress in this research, but their methods of observation were ill fitted for so delicate an inquiry, and experience soon convinced me that the structure of the lens could not be thoroughly investigated either by the microscope or the scalpel. Anatomists had long regarded the crystalline lens as composed of concentric laminae, and these laminae of minute fibres; but M. Soemmerring, in his work on the Human Eye, published in 1804, regards this structure as the effect merely of maceration in alcohol, and maintains that it does not exist in the recent or the living eye. This decision, which its author has supported by many plausible but unphilosophical and inefficient arguments, appeared to set aside all the results which had been obtained by preceding inquirers, and rendered it necessary for me to adopt a new mode of investigation, which should not be liable to the same criticism.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.