Abstract

Cells of primary effusion lymphoma (PEL), a B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, are latently infected by Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), with about 80 % of PEL also co-infected with Epstein–Barr virus (EBV). Both viruses can be reactivated into their lytic replication cycle in PEL by chemical inducers. However, simultaneous activation of both lytic cascades leads to mutual lytic cycle co-repression. The plasma cell-differentiation factor X-box binding protein 1 (XBP-1) transactivates the KSHV immediate–early promoter leading to the production of the replication and transcription activator protein (RTA), and reactivation of KSHV from latency. XBP-1 has been reported to act similarly on the EBV immediate–early promoter Zp, leading to the production of the lytic-cycle transactivator protein BZLF1. Here we show that activated B-cell terminal-differentiation transcription factor X-box binding protein 1 (XBP-1s) does not induce EBV BZLF1 and BRLF1 expression in PEL and BL cell lines, despite inducing lytic reactivation of KSHV in PEL. We show that XBP-1s transactivates the KSHV RTA promoter but does not transactivate the EBV BZLF1 promoter in non-B-cells by using a luciferase assay. Co-expression of activated protein kinase D, which can phosphorylate and inactivate class II histone deacetylases (HDACs), does not rescue XBP-1 activity on Zp nor does it induce BZLF1 and BRLF1 expression in PEL. Finally, chemical inducers of KSHV and EBV lytic replication in PEL, including HDAC inhibitors, do not lead to XBP-1 activation. We conclude that XBP-1 specifically reactivates the KSHV lytic cycle in dually infected PELs.

Highlights

  • The human gammaherpesviruses Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) and Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) are associated with B-cell lymphomas and tumours of epithelial and endothelial origin, respectively

  • We show that X-box binding protein 1 (XBP-1) alone induces the KSHV lytic cycle but does not induce either EBV BZLF1 or BRLF1 in primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) cell lines; it does not induce either of the EBV immediately–early proteins in EBV-positive Burkitt’s lymphoma cell lines (BLs)

  • We repeated the experiment with BC3 clone 6 (BC3 cl6) and CRO6 clone 2 (CRO6 cl2); two cell lines that were produced by superinfecting KSHV single-positive PEL cell lines with replication-competent EBV–GFP virus (Xu et al, 2007)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The human gammaherpesviruses Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) and Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) are associated with B-cell lymphomas and tumours of epithelial and endothelial origin, respectively. EBV and KSHV coinfection occurs in approximately 80 % of the nonHodgkin’s B-cell lymphoma, primary effusion lymphoma (PEL); the remainder being infected by KSHV alone. KSHV and EBV dually infected PEL have a subtly different pattern of B-cell gene expression compared with KSHV singly infected PEL (Fan et al, 2005). How dually infected PEL arise is not understood, both KSHV and EBV latently infect PEL and normal B-cells. EBV establishes a latent infection in memory B-cells in vivo

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.