Abstract

Attention priority of reward history, also called value-driven attentional capture (VDAC), is different from that of saliency or contingency. The magnitude of VDAC was found to be correlated with working memory capacity, but how cognitive control interacts with the attentional allocation of reward association is not clear. Here, we examined whether the distraction by learned color-reward association would change under different working memory load conditions. Participants were first trained with color-reward associations by searching a green/red circle with low/high reward. Then, during the test session, participants needed to search a unique shape while a green/red shape was either presented as a distractor or not shown at all. To manipulate the working memory load in the test, a digital memory task was integrated with the visual search task in half of the trials (memory load condition), but not in the other half (no-load condition). Consistent results were found in two experiments that the magnitude of attentional capture caused by low-value distractors was larger under memory load condition than under no-load condition, while there was no enough evidence supporting the influence of memory load on attentional capture by high-value distractors. These results suggested that working memory load, which occupied part of cognitive resources, reduced the priority of target information and might also modulate the strength of reward association holding in working memory. These findings extend the knowledge regarding the influence of working memory load on attentional capture of reward and suggest that reward-induced distraction is dynamic and could be modulated by cognitive control.

Highlights

  • Reward experience is appealing and powerful, which can guide our attention and shape our behavior

  • Attentional capture of high reward showed no significant difference between load and no-load conditions (Fisher’s Least Square Difference (LSD): p = 0.264). These results indicated that, attentional capture driven by low reward history was strengthened in the dual-task condition while attentional capture of high reward was equivalent between single-task and dual-task conditions

  • In Experiment 1, we found greater attentional capture driven by low reward history under working memory load, while no significant change of attentional capture caused by high-reward association was observed between load and no-load conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reward experience is appealing and powerful, which can guide our attention and shape our behavior. It is important to explore the cognitive basis of attentional priority of reward history and reveal the interactions between it and other cognitive processes. The attentional priority of reward-related information was first observed in visual search tasks. Participants need to search the target of certain colors and get rewards trial by trial in a training session. The reaction times (RTs) of subjects get longer when the distractors that used to be associated with reward during training appeared compared to no rewardrelated distractor, which is called value-driven attentional capture (VDAC, Hickey et al, 2010; Anderson et al, 2011b; Awh et al, 2012; Chelazzi et al, 2013)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call