Abstract

According to the Procedural Deficit Hypothesis (PDH), abnormalities of brain structures underlying procedural memory largely explain the language deficits in children with specific language impairment (SLI). These abnormalities are posited to result in core deficits of procedural memory, which in turn explain the grammar problems in the disorder. The abnormalities are also likely to lead to problems with other, non-procedural functions, such as working memory, that rely at least partly on the affected brain structures. In contrast, declarative memory is expected to remain largely intact, and should play an important compensatory role for grammar. These claims were tested by examining measures of working, declarative and procedural memory in 51 children with SLI and 51 matched typically-developing (TD) children (mean age 10). Working memory was assessed with the Working Memory Test Battery for Children, declarative memory with the Children’s Memory Scale, and procedural memory with a visuo-spatial Serial Reaction Time task. As compared to the TD children, the children with SLI were impaired at procedural memory, even when holding working memory constant. In contrast, they were spared at declarative memory for visual information, and at declarative memory in the verbal domain after controlling for working memory and language. Visuo-spatial short-term memory was intact, whereas verbal working memory was impaired, even when language deficits were held constant. Correlation analyses showed neither visuo-spatial nor verbal working memory was associated with either lexical or grammatical abilities in either the SLI or TD children. Declarative memory correlated with lexical abilities in both groups of children. Finally, grammatical abilities were associated with procedural memory in the TD children, but with declarative memory in the children with SLI. These findings replicate and extend previous studies of working, declarative and procedural memory in SLI. Overall, we suggest that the evidence largely supports the predictions of the PDH.

Highlights

  • Children with specific language impairment (SLI) have belowaverage language abilities despite normal intellectual and sensory functioning (American Psychiatric Association, 2000; World Health Organization, 2004)

  • According to the Procedural Deficit Hypothesis (PDH), SLI is associated with abnormalities of brain structures underlying procedural memory, in particular portions of frontal/basal-ganglia circuits (Ullman and Pierpont, 2005)

  • All children were recruited from the northwest of England, and all came from homes where English was spoken as the first language

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Children with specific language impairment (SLI) have belowaverage language abilities despite normal intellectual and sensory functioning (American Psychiatric Association, 2000; World Health Organization, 2004). A number of proposals have suggested that the language problems in SLI are related to memory deficits in the disorder (for recent reviews, see Montgomery et al, 2010; Ullman and Pierpont, 2005). It has been proposed that the language problems in SLI may be largely explained by procedural memory (Ullman, 2004; Ullman and Pierpont, 2005). According to the Procedural Deficit Hypothesis (PDH), SLI is associated with abnormalities of brain structures underlying procedural memory, in particular portions of frontal/basal-ganglia circuits (Ullman and Pierpont, 2005). The present study examined these predictions by testing for (1) group differences between SLI and typically-developing (TD) children in multiple measures of working, declarative, and procedural memory; and (2) associations between these memory measures and both lexical and grammatical abilities within the same set of SLI and TD children

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call