Abstract

The aims of this study were to (a) use a data-based approach to identify positional groups within National Rugby League Women's (NRLW) match-play and (b) quantify the peak locomotor demands of NRLW match-play by positional groups. Microtechnology (Global Navigational Satellite System [GNSS] and integrated inertial sensors; n = 142 files; n = 76 players) and match statistics (n = 238 files; n = 80 players) were collected from all NRLW teams across the 2019 season. Data-based clustering of match statistics was utilized to identify positional clusters through classifying individual playing positions into distinct positional groups. Moving averages (0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 min) of peak running and average acceleration/deceleration demands were calculated via microtechnology data for each player per match. All analysis was undertaken in R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) with positional differences determined via a linear mixed model and effect sizes (ES). Data-based clustering suggested that, when informed by match statistics, individual playing positions can be clustered into one of three positional groups. Based on the clustering of the individual positions, these groups could be broadly defined as backs (fullback, wing, and center), adjustables (halfback, five-eighth, and hooker), and forwards (prop, second-row, and lock). Backs and adjustables demonstrated greater running (backs: ES 0.51–1.00; p < 0.05; adjustables: ES 0.51–0.74, p < 0.05) and average acceleration/deceleration (backs: ES 0.48–0.87; p < 0.05; adjustables: ES 0.60–0.85, p < 0.05) demands than forwards across all durations. Smaller differences (small to trivial) were noted between backs and adjustables across peak running and average acceleration/deceleration demands. Such findings suggest an emerging need to delineate training programs in situations in which individual playing positions train in positional group based settings. Collectively, this work informs the positional groupings that could be applied when examining NRLW data and supports the development of a framework for specifically training female rugby league players for the demands of the NRLW competition.

Highlights

  • There has been an increase in the participation rates, playing opportunities, and professionalization of female rugby league (Cummins et al, 2020b)

  • National Rugby League Women (NRLW) matches are shorter in duration than that of the National Rugby league (NRL) competition with matches being played over halves of 30 min

  • The findings identify that, within this data set, individual playing positions can be clustered into three positional groups and that, when compared with forwards, both backs and adjustables demonstrate increased peak running and average acceleration/deceleration demands

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There has been an increase in the participation rates, playing opportunities, and professionalization of female rugby league (Cummins et al, 2020b). At the elite level, a women’s premiership competition (National Rugby League Women’s [NRLW]; inaugural year: 2018) was recently established by the National Rugby league (NRL). The NRLW is structured via a round robin format, whereby each of the teams (n = 4) play each other once. At the completion of the regular season (round robin), the two highest ranking teams contest the grand final in order to determine the overall premiership winner. The NRLW is governed by similar rules as the men’s NRL competition with matches being played on the standard fullsize field (∼68 m wide x 120 m long [including the in-goal area]). There are, several differences between NRLW and NRL matches. The NRLW competition includes the 40/30 kick advantage and permits more interchanges than the men’s NRL competition (10 vs 8 interchanges per match, respectively)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call