Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the cosmetic appeal of incisions used for open (Pfannenstiel or Vertical midline) versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic lower urinary tract reconstructive surgery in women.
 STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study
 PLACE AND DURATION: Outpatient Urology Clinic of Western General Hospital, Edinburgh Scotland, UK from 1st February 2019 till 28th February 2020. 
 METHODS: All patients were provided illustrations of Pfannenstiel incision (incision at “bikini line”- (A), Vertical midline laparotomy incision (incision from midline symphysis to umbilicus –( B), Robotic-assisted laparoscopic incisions-variation I- (C) and Robotic-assisted laparoscopic incisions-variation II (-D). Patients were asked to rate each incision in order of their preference. Chi square distribution was used to compare mean previous surgeries and no previous surgeries between different preferred incisional groups and ages of the patients.
 RESULTS: One hundred patients with mean age were 53.11±15.05 years with minimum 19 years and maximum 84 years and mean BMI was 28.18±7.05 kg/m2 with minimum 15.6 and maximum 55 kg/m2 calculated. Out of 100 patients (1st preference of incision), 78% preferred incision A, 3% preferred B incision and 16% & 3% patients preferred incision C and D respectively. Similarly (2nd preference of incision) 3% patients preferred incision A, 19% preferred B incision and 56% & 22% patients preferred incision C and D respectively. The mean comparison between first preferred incision with second preferred incision with respect of surgeries (previous surgeries and no previous surgeries) showed significant difference p≤0.05 (chi value=167.692, p=0.000). Relation of preferred incisions with respect to ages of the patients showed no significant difference (Pearson relation value -0.182 and p=0.069).
 CONCLUSION: Overall, open incisions were preferred over robotic incisions. Patient perception of the "visibility" of abdominal incisions and previous experience in term of surgical scars may be the distinguishing issue to explain the difference in the preferences between open versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic incisions in women.
Highlights
The first incision is of Pfannenstiel incision (14 cm incision at “bikini line”, Vertical midline laparotomy incision (14 cm incision from midline symphysis to umbilicus –( incision -B), Robotic-assisted laparoscopic incisions-variation I- and Roboticassisted laparoscopic incisions-variation II
The patient perception of the "visibility" of abdominal incisions may be the distinguishing issue to explain the difference in the preferences between different types of incisions as reported in literature [5,6,8]
Our study shows that the Robotic-assisted laparoscopic incisions-variation II in which multiport laparoscopy with lateral port placement in the mid abdomen and another incision in the umbilical fold is least popular among our patients
Summary
A total of 100 patients were interviewed which provided the rankings for the illustrated incisions. Among 2nd preference, the incision C was the commonest (n=56, 56%) followed by incision D (n=22, 22%) whereas only. The mean comparison between first preferred incision with second preferred incision with respect of surgeries (previous surgeries and no previous surgeries) showed significant difference p≤0.05 (chi value=167.692, p=0.000). Relation of preferred incisions with respect to ages of the patients showed no significant difference (Pearson relation value -0.182 and p=0.069). Among patients with previous surgery 78.08% (n=57) gave 1st preference to incision A and 46.57% (n34) gave 2nd preference to incision. C. the incision A was the commonest choice (77.78%, n=21) followed by incision C (70.37%, n=19) as 2nd choice in patients who have no surgery in past (Table III). Table – III: Frequency of incision preferences with previous surgery or not (N=100)
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have