WITHDRAWN: Comparative Analysis of Asphaltene Deposition Methods : Stability indices, Stability plots, and Equation of state

Abstract

Asphaltene deposition is one of the major problems that hinder hydrocarbon production. It can occur anywhere between the reservoir and the surface. Therefore, it is imperative that there be a procedure for minimizing the deposition of asphaltene in the production flow lines. There are several screening criteria that can be considered to determine the asphaltene deposition. This research will conduct a comprehensive study on different methodologies to determine the stability of asphaltene: the first category is the stability criteria using indices such as: the colloidal instability index (CII), the colloidal stability index (CSI), the stability index (SI), and the asphaltene stability predicting model (ANJIS). These four methods are used to predict the stability of asphaltene using SARA analysis. The fifth one is called modified CII which uses the compositions analysis of reservoir fluids, instead of SARA analysis, to determine the stability of asphaltene. The second method uses SARA Analysis to predict the stability via plots such as: Stankiewics plot (SP), De Boer plot, Sepulveda stability criterion (SCP). The third method is using compositional analysis of reservoir fluids and the equation of state model to predict the asphaltene onset pressure (AOP). In the last method Soave Redlich Kwong (SRK) equation of state model was used to predict asphaltene precipitations.In this work, a dataset of 166 was created which includes reservoir information, depth, compositional analysis, and SARA analysis. These data are used to study the potential of asphaltene deposition at the reservoir level. It was found that the stability criteria using indices and plots shows discrepancy in the results. The only two methods that show all the datasets are stable are the modified CII and the EOS model. As far as predicting asphaltene stability is concerned, the EOS method, based on compositional analysis and the thermodynamic model, appears to be the most reliable and trustworthy method. The other methods presented are observational rather than thermodynamic. Using these criteria is intended as a quick and fast estimate of the stability potential of asphaltene, not for planning or management of asphaltene deposition issues.