Abstract
It was explored that instructions for manual industrial installation are better than instructions on a stationary monitor in a head-worn Virtual Reality Display (AR-HWD). A prototype consisting of virtual instruction screens was designed for two instance assembly tasks. In a comparative analysis, participants carried out the tasks with instructions through an AR-HWD and a stationary screen. The task performance and user experience were measured through questionnaires, interviews, and observation notes. The study showed that the consumers had the enjoyment of exploring the technology and were enthusiastic. The perceived utility in the current situation was different, but the users saw a tremendous opportunity for the future with AR-HWDs. The accuracy of the task with the ARHWD directions was as strong as on the screen. AR-HWDs are a better solution than a stationary screen, but technical limitations are required and new technology employees need to be educated in order to make their application effective.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
