Abstract

VOLUME 288 (2013) PAGES 20817–20829 This article has been withdrawn by the authors upon the request of the Journal. In December 2019, the Journal raised questions about Figs. 2 (B–D), 6A, and 7D. In particular, in Figs. 2B (Ptch1 panel) and 6A, some background features were removed. Figs. 2 (C and D) and 7D were composite images. In Fig. 2D, one of the Ptch1 bands is duplicated. The authors were able to locate most, but not all, of the original data. Inspection of the original data determined that the wrong data were selected in assembling the total STAT3 panel of Fig. 7D. The authors were willing, though, to provide alternative figures from replicated experiments and offered to repeat the experiments. However, the Journal declined both of these offers. The authors stand by the experimental data and conclusions and state that the main results of this paper have been confirmed in the following publications: Coronel et al. (2019) Mol. Neurobiol. 56, 1248–1261; Ovchinnikov et al. (2018) Stem Cell Reports 11, 32–42; and Bailey et al. (2013) Glia 61, 1556–1569. The Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP) Triplicated Gene Impairs Neuronal Precursor Differentiation and Neurite Development through Two Different Domains in the Ts65Dn Mouse Model for Down SyndromeJournal of Biological ChemistryVol. 288Issue 29PreviewIntellectual disability in Down syndrome (DS) appears to be related to severe proliferation impairment during brain development. Recent evidence shows that it is not only cellular proliferation that is heavily compromised in DS, but also cell fate specification and dendritic maturation. The amyloid precursor protein (APP), a gene that is triplicated in DS, plays a key role in normal brain development by influencing neural precursor cell proliferation, cell fate specification, and neuronal maturation. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Highlights

  • This article has been withdrawn by the authors upon the request of the Journal

  • Inspection of the original data determined that the wrong data were selected in assembling the total STAT3 panel of Fig. 7D

  • The Journal declined both of these offers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This article has been withdrawn by the authors upon the request of the Journal. In December 2019, the Journal raised questions about Figs. 2 (B–D), 6A, and 7D. This article has been withdrawn by the authors upon the request of the Journal.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.