Abstract

Equitable payments for ecosystem services are emerging as a viable tool to protect and restore ecosystems. Unlike previous studies using contingent valuation approach in Ethiopia, this study is unique in its scope and target users. It explores the possibility of payment for watershed services as an economic tool in supporting and promoting sustainable land management and financing community-based watershed investments from electric users at a national level. We examine the sensitivity of users’ ability to generate funds for watershed services for sustainable watershed management through the raising of small amounts of money added onto a monthly electrical bill. Sampling frame covered four of the nine regional states of Ethiopia with more than 86% coverage dating back to 2014. A total of 501 urban and rural households and 100 organizations were interviewed over a five-year period from 2014–2019. We used a multistage sampling technique; we first selected cities, towns, and villages based on several data collection methodologies. The findings indicate that about 84% and 90% of households and organizations, respectively, showed their willingness to pay (WTP) additional fees for watershed management that could potentially reduce upland degradation and siltation. Specifically, more than half of the households and organizations and industries were willing to pay the surcharge for watershed management. Likewise, we developed a model estimation of results which verified the WTP amount, respectively. We concluded that funds generated from electric users play a possible role in contributing to the financing of watershed management efforts and could be taken as an important lesson for the watershed management continuum efforts Ethiopia-wide and in other countries.

Highlights

  • Adopting sustainable land management (SLM) practices could guarantee the provision of ecosystem services in a sustainable way [1]

  • One of the identified actions related to the implementation and scaling of SLM is the availability of continued funding [2]; payment to compensate farmers for their SLM investments is an essential constituent for such practice [3]

  • The novelty of this study explores the possibility of payment for watershed services (PWS) as an economic tool in supporting and promoting sustainable watershed management in collaboration with SLM

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Adopting sustainable land management (SLM) practices could guarantee the provision of ecosystem services in a sustainable way [1]. Our world faces an urgent need to adopt successful. One of the identified actions related to the implementation and scaling of SLM is the availability of continued funding [2]; payment to compensate farmers for their SLM investments is an essential constituent for such practice [3]. This would ensure an improved livelihood and alleviate poverty for the farmers alike [4]. A range of instruments, soft approaches and direct regulations often drive conservation and related ecosystem understanding

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.