Wikis and Collaborative Writing Applications in Health Care: A Scoping Review Protocol

Patrick Michel Archambault,Andrea Bilodeau,Marjan J Faber,Irving Gold,Francisco J Grajales Iii,Marcel Heldoorn,Tom H Van De Belt,Alexis F Turgeon,Karine Aubin,Marie-Pierre Gagnon,Julien Poitras,Craig E Kuziemsky,Gunther Eysenbach,Jan A.M Kremer,France Légaré

doi:10.2196/jmir.1993

Abstract

ABSTRACT The rapid rise in the use of collaborative writing applications (eg, wikis, Google Documents, and Google Knol) has created the need for a systematic synthesis of the evidence of their impact as knowledge translation (KT) tools in the health care sector and for an inventory of the factors that affect their use. While researchers have conducted systematic reviews on a range of software-based information and communication technologies as well as other social media (eg, virtual communities of practice, virtual peer-to-peer communities, and electronic support groups), none have reviewed collaborative writing applications in the medical sector. The overarching goal of this project is to explore the depth and breadth of evidence for the use of collaborative writing applications in health care. Thus, the purposes of this scoping review will be to (1) map the literature on collaborative writing applications; (2) compare the applications’ features; (3) describe the evidence of each application’s positive and negative effects as a KT intervention in health care; (4) inventory and describe the barriers and facilitators that affect the applications’ use; and (5) produce an action plan and a research agenda. A six-stage framework for scoping reviews will be used: (1) identifying the research question; (2) identifying relevant studies within the selected databases (using the EPPI-Reviewer software to classify the studies); (3) selecting studies (an iterative process in which two reviewers search the literature, refine the search strategy, and review articles for inclusion); (4) charting the data (using EPPI-Reviewer’s data-charting form); (5) collating, summarizing, and reporting the results (performing a descriptive, numerical, and interpretive synthesis); and (6) consulting knowledge users during three planned meetings. Since this scoping review concerns the use of collaborative writing applications as KT interventions in health care, we will use the Knowledge to Action (KTA) framework to describe and compare the various studies and collaborative writing projects we find. In addition to guiding the use of collaborative writing applications in health care, this scoping review will advance the science of KT by testing tools that could be used to evaluate other social media. We also expect to identify areas that require further systematic reviews and primary research and to produce a highly relevant research agenda that explores and leverages the potential of collaborative writing software. To date, this is the first study to use the KTA framework to study the role collaborative writing applications in KT, and the first to involve three national and international institutional knowledge users as part of the research process.

Highlights

Collaborative Writing Applications and their Potential Impact on Global Knowledge TranslationIn both developed and developing countries, vast numbers of health care decision makers—providers, patients, managers, and policy makers—are failing to use research evidence to inform their decisions [1]
In synergy and partnership with three national and international institutional knowledge users, we propose a scoping review that will map the literature on the use of wikis and other collaborative writing applications in health care in order to synthesize the applications’ positive and negative impacts and inventory the barriers and facilitators that affect how they influence the delivery of health care
A summary table will group those studies that assessed the impacts of the use of a collaborative writing application, showing the phase of the Knowledge to Action (KTA) process that the application influenced and describing the studies’ results

Summary

Introduction

Collaborative Writing Applications and their Potential Impact on Global Knowledge TranslationIn both developed and developing countries, vast numbers of health care decision makers—providers, patients, managers, and policy makers—are failing to use research evidence to inform their decisions [1]. By involving knowledge users in the dissemination of knowledge [5], social media—highly accessible, interactive vehicles of communication—have the potential to increase users’ self-efficacy [5,6,7] and empower users to apply knowledge in practice Acknowledging this potential and recognizing that social media capitalizes on the free and open access to information, scientists, opinion leaders, and patient advocates have called for more research to determine whether social media can equip decision-making constituencies to improve the delivery of health care [8,9], decrease its cost [5,10], and improve access to knowledge within developing countries [8,11,12]. Internet users have turned to wikis [16,17] to produce a Wikipedia entry on the Global Plan to Stop Tuberculosis [8]; to Google Knol [18] to exchange research on influenza at the Public Library of Science [19]; and to Google Docs [14,20] to review the literature on emergency medicine [21,22]

Objectives

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion