Abstract
The following paper addresses the problem of multiple names among women in the bourgeois and peasant environments in the 18th century. The anthroponymic material, which provides the basis for the analysis, dates from the years 1706–1799 and was extracted from 14 record books of 8 parishes (7 Catholic and 1 Uniate) in the mid-western Podlasie region. Despite the fact that the two- and three- name formations are scarce (in the examined onomastic material they account for only 2.7% of the nominations), they appear to be an interesting research object. The study analyzes their origin and frequency. Additionally, the spread of multi-name nominations in the study and their chronology were examined.
Highlights
The paper addresses the problem of multiple names among women in the bourgeois and peasant environments in the 18th century
The anthroponymic material, which provides the basis for the analysis, dates from the years
Despite the fact that the two- and three- name formations are scarce, they appear to be an interesting research object
Summary
Jako pierwsze człony zestawień polionimicznych zostały wykorzystane następujące imiona: Marianna (34), Katarzyna (14), Anna (13), Ewa (9), Franciszka (8), Rozalia (8), Agnieszka (5), Barbara (5), Joanna (5), Krystyna (5), Łucja (5), Marcjanna (5), Tekla (5), Teresa (5), Józefa (4), Julianna (4), Urszula (4), Anastazja (3), Dorota (3), Jadwiga (3), Jozafata (3), Zofia (3), Agata (2), Antonina (2), Apolonia (2), Gertruda (2), Kunegunda (2), Małgorzata (2), Marta (2), Petronela (2), Aniela (1), Antonia (1), Cecylia (1), Elżbieta (1), Eufrozyna (1), Faustyna (1), Hera (1), Klara (1), Konstancja (1), Lucyna (1), Ludwika (1), Magdalena (1), Maria (1), Martyna (1), Róża (1), Scholastyka (1), Stefanida (1), Teodora (1), Weronika (1), Wiktoria (1), Zuzanna (1).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call