Abstract

While various forms of corruption are common in many health systems around the world, defining wrongdoing in terms of legality and the use of public office for private gain obstructs our understanding of its nature and intractability. To address this, I suggest, we must not only break the silence about the extent of wrongdoing in the health sector, but also talk differently about corruption in general, and corruption in healthcare specifically. I propose adopting the notion of institutional corruption (IC) developed by Thompson and Lessig, as divergence from the original purpose of the institution, which may not be illegal but may nevertheless cause harm to people who depend on it by creating perverse dependencies and compelling individuals to act against its core purpose. Such work is much needed to provide in-depth accounts of how external political and legislative pressures enable corruption in healthcare systems. I also argue for bringing together insights from various research domains and levels of analysis to capture why and how corruption becomes systemic, deeply embedded, and intractable.

Highlights

  • What Is Wrong With Corruption? Corruption evokes strong feelings and undesirable associations

  • Corruption is antithetical to the notion of healing,[3] causing harm to those in need of care and diminishing trust in the health system,[4] which thereby deviates from its core purpose of improving lives

  • The theory of institutional corruption (IC)[14] stresses the impact of policy incentives and regulation on organizational culture, and how they may cause organizations to diverge from their original purpose

Read more

Summary

Introduction

What Is Wrong With Corruption? Corruption evokes strong feelings and undesirable associations.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call