Abstract

People heat treated silcrete during the Middle Stone Age (MSA) in southern Africa but the spatial and temporal variability of this practice remains poorly documented. This paucity of data in turn makes it difficult to interrogate the motive factors underlying the application of this technique. In this paper we present data on heat treatment of silcrete through the Howiesons Poort and post-Howiesons Poort of the rock shelter site Mertenhof, located in the Western Cape of South Africa. In contrast to other sites where heat treatment has been documented, distance to rock source at Mertenhof can be reasonably well estimated, and the site is known to contain high proportions of a diversity of fine grained rocks including silcrete, hornfels and chert at various points through the sequence. Our results suggest the prevalence of heat treatment is variable through the sequence but that it is largely unaffected by the relative abundance of silcrete prevalence. Instead there is a strong inverse correlation between frequency of heat treatment in silcrete and prevalence of chert in the assemblage, and a generally positive correlation with the proportion of locally available rock. While it is difficult to separate individual factors we suggest that, at Mertenhof at least, heat treatment may have been used to improve the fracture properties of silcrete at times when other finer grained rocks were less readily available. As such, heat treatment appears to have been a component of the MSA behavioural repertoire that was flexibly deployed in ways sensitive to other elements of technological organisation.

Highlights

  • Heat treatment of stone for knapping was one of the first fire-based transformative technologies used to alter the mechanical properties of natural materials

  • In order to approach some of the relevant controlling factors, in this paper we focus on the relationship between heat treatment of silcrete and other elements of assemblage variability in the southern African Middle Stone Age (MSA)

  • Two of the characteristics setting Mertenhof Rock Shelter (MRS) apart from most other MSA sites that lie in the Cape coastal zone are the relative degree of control available over raw material source locations and the abundance of chert in some of its assemblages

Read more

Summary

Methods

Methods and MaterialsMRS is located in a narrow canyon of the Biedouw River dominated by quartzitic sandstones of the Table Mountain Series, close to the point where the river emerges into the more open artefact showing the difference of roughness. (a-g) and (i-l) all have the same scale. MRS is located in a narrow canyon of the Biedouw River dominated by quartzitic sandstones of the Table Mountain Series, close to the point where the river emerges into the more open artefact showing the difference of roughness. Secondary silcrete cobbles occasionally occur in the Doring River but these are generally coarser-grained than those located in primary contexts and appear to have seen limited use [23]. Chert can be found as pebbles in the cobble beds of the Doring River (at ~20 km from site) but it is rare [23]; more predictable sources of chert occur in the Dwyka and Ecca Series formations of the Karoo System starting 35 km and 45 km east respectively, towards the increasingly arid interior [24]

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call